It’s post-NCAA retrospective time, as we look back at recruit rankings through the lens of now-updated NCAA scoring data. We’ve focused in on the senior class (after four NCAA seasons) and the freshman class (after their first NCAA showings), and now it’s time to share all of our data for the four classes currently making up the NCAA field.
Further reading:
- Revisiting recruiting ranks: High school class of 2021
- Revisiting recruiting ranks: High school class of 2024
We’ll also include this year’s freshmen and seniors to have all the data in one post. You can find further analysis of those classes above.
Notes:
- The data included is only individual scoring at NCAAs. That’s not an exact measure of an athlete’s contribution to a program: many of these swimmers (and others not listed) were relay scorers at NCAAs, scored significant points at conference meets and provided great leadership and culture-building for their programs. This data isn’t a perfect analysis of the best recruits – it’s merely a quick look at the data we can compile.
- Some of these athletes haven’t had as many scoring seasons as others in their class. Some redshirted a season and have more remaining seasons. Some deferred their enrollment as freshmen. Some sat out a year with a transfer. Some turned pro early. Some will turn pro early. Some are hard to pigeonhole into a specific class, international athletes especially. We did our best to group athletes where they best fit. Again, this isn’t a hard-and-fast ranking of value – it’s just the best data we can compile.
- The ranks are from our recruit rankings, typically compiled when these athletes were high school juniors. We don’t include internationals in those rankings, as it’s difficult to figure out if and when internationals will join the NCAA and which class they should be grouped with before they appear in the NCAA. Do bear in mind that our rankings were done well over a year before any of these athletes appeared in NCAA competition, so if you do have a quibble with a specific rank, you may want to check how fast that athlete actually was when the ranking was done before you get too livid. Unranked recruits showing massive improvement curves are some of the best stories in the NCAA year-in and year-out, and one reason we rank recruits is so we can better see which athletes had great rises during their college careers.
- All that said, compiling these ranks is a lot of data entry and a lot of research. If we missed anyone, or misclassified anyone with the wrong class or with the wrong domestic/international tag, please let us know in the comments and we’ll update our data as soon as possible!
SENIORS (HIGH SCHOOL CLASS OF 2021, COLLEGE CLASS OF 2025)
Rank | Name | College Team | Total NCAA Points | 2022 NCAA Points | 2023 NCAA Points | 2024 NCAA Points |
2025 NCAA Points
|
1 | Torri Huske | Stanford | 147 | 43 | 50 | redshirt | 54 |
2 | Gretchen Walsh | Virginia | 231 | 54 | 57 | 60 | 60 |
3 | Grace Sheble | NC State | 15 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
4 | Letitia Sim | Michigan | 29 | 7 | 9 | redshirt | 13 |
5 | Samantha Tadder | Stanford | 5 | no invite | 5 | 0 | no invite |
6 | Paige McKenna | Wisconsin | 62 | 33 | 16 | 9 | 4 |
7 | Mariah Denigan | Indiana | 24 | 0 | 12 | 12 | 0 |
8 | Ellie Waldrep | Auburn | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | no invite |
9 | Josephine Fuller | Tennessee | 110 | 0 | 33 | 44 | 33 |
10 | Rachel Stege | Georgia | 48 | 0 | 25 | 12 | 11 |
11 | Annabel Crush | NC State | 0 | 0 | 0 | relay-only | 0 |
12 | Lindsay Flynn | Michigan | 22 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
13 | Brooke Zettel | Florida / Virginia Tech | 0 | transfer/did not compete | no invite | no invite | no invite |
14 | Ashley Strouse | Northwestern | 0 | no invite | 0 | – | – |
15 | Mia Kragh | Cal | 13 | 0 | 2 | 11 | – |
16 | Mackenzie McConagha | Wisconsin | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
17 | Ella Bathurst | Virginia | 0 | 0 | 0 | no invite | no invite |
18 | Anna Shaw | Stanford | 0 | 0 | no invite | relay-only | no invite |
19 | Caroline Pennington | Virginia / USC | 6 | 6 | – | 0 | – |
20 | Amy Tang | Stanford | 7 | no invite | 0 | 7 | 0 |
HM | Micayla Cronk | Florida | 0 | no invite | 0 | 0 | relay-only |
HM | Summer Smith | Tennessee | 0 | 0 | – | – | – |
HM | Caroline Sheble | NC State | 0 | no invite | no invite | no invite | no invite |
HM | Abby McCulloh | Georgia | 73 | 15 | 5 | 33 | 20 |
HM | Madelyn Christman | Notre Dame | 0 | no invite | no invite | 0 | relay-only |
HM | Lexie Mulvihill | Auburn | 0 | 0 | relay-only | relay-only | 0 |
HM | Mia Abruzzo | Georgia | 0 | 0 | no invite | no invite | no invite |
HM | Malia Rausch | Ohio State/Auburn | 0 | – | – | no invite | no invite |
UNRANKED RECRUITS
Rank | Name | College Team | Total NCAA Points | 2022 NCAA Points | 2023 NCAA Points | 2024 NCAA Points |
2025 NCAA Points
|
Anna Peplowski | Indiana | 119 | 7 | 22 | 45 | 45 | |
Aurora Roghair | Stanford | 79 | 2 | 0 | 37 | 40 | |
BOTR | Olivia Peoples | Florida | 25 | relay-only | 1 | 13 | 11 |
BOTR | Sara Stotler | Tennessee | 24 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
Abby Carlson | Wisconsin | 22 | 0 | 20 | 2 | 0 | |
BOTR | Teresa Ivan | Ohio State | 19 | relay-only | 15 | 4 | 0 |
Greta Pelzek | South Carolina | 18 | no invite | 0 | 7 | 11 | |
Kacey McKenna | Indiana | 17 | 0 | no invite | 13 | 4 | |
Paige MacEachern | UCLA | 13 | 0 | 2 | 11 | no invite | |
Eboni McCarty | Georgia | 12.5 | 0 | 5.5 | 7 | 0 | |
Skyler Smith | UNC | 12 | no invite | 5 | 5 | 2 | |
Ava Deangelis | Ohio State | 7 | no invite | no invite | 0 | 7 | |
BOTR | Kate McCarville | Tennessee | 5 | no invite | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Maddy Huggins | Florida State | 5 | no invite | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
Aris Runnels | Florida | 4 | no invite | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
Nyah Funderburke | Ohio State | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |
Abby Daniel | Akron | 4 | no invite | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Eliot Kennedy | Minnesota | 3 | no invite | no invite | 0 | 3 | |
Early ’22 (#10) | Rye Ulett | Louisville | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Greer Pattison | UNC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
INTERNATIONAL RECRUITS
Name | College Team | Total NCAA Points | 2022 NCAA Points | 2023 NCAA Points | 2024 NCAA Points | 2025 NCAA Points |
Ching Hwee Gan | Indiana | 80 | 7 | 29 | 16 | 28 |
Leah Polonsky | Cal | 54 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 38 |
Brooklyn Douthwright | Tennessee | 53 | 0 | 33 | 9 | 11 |
Celia Pulido | SIU | 31 | 0 | no invite | 16 | 15 |
Dune Coetzee | Georgia | 30 | 8 | 11 | 11 | 0 |
Ellen Walshe | Tennessee | 23 | 23 | – | – | – |
Julia Mrozinski | Tennessee | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Brearna Crawford | Indiana | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
Henrietta Fangli | Houston | 16 | no invite | no invite | 3 | 13 |
Stasya Makarova | Auburn | 11 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 |
Giulia Carvalho | Miami FL | 9.5 | no invite | no invite | 3 | 6.5 |
Edith Jernstedt | FSU | 8 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
Ekaterina Nikonova | Florida | 4 | 0 | 4 | – | – |
Christie Chue | FIU | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | – |
Fernanda Celidonio | Louisville | 3 | no invite | relay-only | 3 | 0 |
DIVING RECRUITS
Name | College Team | Total NCAA Points | 2022 NCAA Points | 2023 NCAA Points | 2024 NCAA Points | 2025 NCAA Points |
Hailey Hernandez | Texas | 104 | 26 | 24 | 33 | 21 |
Sophia McAfee | Purdue | 58 | 11 | 26 | 21 | |
Chiara Pellacani | LSU/Miami FL | 51 | 14 | redshirt | 37 | |
Margo O’Meara | Duke | 32 | 14 | – | 11 | 7 |
Elizabeth Kaye | Virginia | 24 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 6 |
Holly Waxman | Utah | 15 | 2 | 13 | 0 | |
Sophie Verzyl | South Carolina | 15 | no invite | no invite | redshirt | 15 |
Caroline Brady | Notre Dame | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | – |
Holly Prasanto | Rutgers | 6 | no invite | no invite | 6 | 0 |
Brooke Earley | Arizona | 6 | no invite | – | 0 | 6 |
Jenna Sonnenberg | Purdue | 1 | 0 | no invite | 0 | 1 |
JUNIORS (HIGH SCHOOL CLASS OF 2022, COLLEGE CLASS OF 2026)
- Despite sitting out of the 2023-24 season amid her transfer to Virginia, Claire Curzan is the top scorer in this class with 108 points scored in her two NCAA Championship appearances, nearing the maximum of 60 this season with 57. In her first season racing with the Cavaliers, Curzan broke the NCAA Record multiple times in the 200 back, culminating with the NCAA title after winning it as a freshman with Stanford in 2023. She also won the 100 back for the first time and was the runner-up to teammate Gretchen Walsh in the 50 free.
- Joining Curzan above 100 NCAA points in this class is Stanford’s Lucy Bell, who has combined for 89 points the past two seasons after scoring 14 as a freshman. Bell’s career-high 49 points this past season came thanks to her first national title in the 200 breast coupled with a 3rd-place showing in the 400 IM and 6th-place finish in the 200 IM.
- The third-highest scorer in the class is NC State’s Kennedy Noble, though she only scored five as a junior after 42 last season.
- Duke’s Kaelyn Gridley has been a double-digit scorer in all three of her NCAA appearances, posting a career-high 26 points this year with a 4th-place finish in the 200 breast and an 8th-place showing in the 200 breast.
- Among ranked recruits, Stanford’s Kayla Wilson, Indiana’s Kristina Paegle, Louisville’s Ella Welch, USC’s Claire Tuggle and Virginia’s Emma Weber also scored double-digit points this season, with Tuggle and Welch both doing so for the first time. For Welch, it was her first time scoring at NCAAs, earning an ‘A’ final spot in the 100 fly where she placed 7th. Last season, she didn’t even race the 100 fly at NCAAs, instead opting for the 100 breast.
- There were six unranked domestic recruits in this class to score at least 10 points at the 2025 NCAAs, led by BYU’s Mackenzie Miller. Miller, who didn’t qualify for NCAAs in either of her first two seasons. As a junior, Miller had the swim of her life to snag 2nd in the 200 breast, and she added an 8th-place finish in the 100 breast for 29 points. After this breakthrough, she entered the transfer portal.
- The top unranked recruit overall is Louisville’s Julia Dennis, who has steadily progressed through the first three years of her career, scoring five points as a freshman, 14 as a sophomore, and then 27 as a junior this past season. Dennis has evolved into one of the best sprinters in college swimming, placing 3rd in the 50 free and 8th in the 100 free at NCAAs.
- Nebraska’s Gena Jorgenson has been a reliable scorer in back-to-back years, following up an 8th-place finish in the 1650 free as a sophomore with a 6th-place showing this past season for 24 total points.
- Cincinnati’s Joleigh Crye and Washington State’s Emily Lundgren both scored for the first time last year and then hit double-digit points as juniors, with Crye taking 4th in the 100 breast and Lundgren landing a 6th-place finish in the 200 breast (and 16th in the 100 breast).
- Among international recruits, South African Aimee Canny has been the top performer in this class by a wide margin, averaging 21 points through three NCAA Championship appearances. She was 7th in the 200 breast and 9th in the 200 free for UVA this season.
- Spaniard Carmen Weiler Sastre had a breakthrough showing for Virginia Tech after missing the points in her first two seasons, scoring 25 after top-eight finishes in the 100 back (8th) and 200 back (5th).
- Minnesota’s Viviana Del Angel and UCLA’s Eden Cheng are the only two divers in this class who have scored in all three NCAA Championship meets, with Del Angel leading all divers with 55 points after consistent 17, 20 and 18-point showings.
- Indiana’s Skyler Liu pulled within a point of Del Angel’s overall tally after a 36-point showing this season, placing 3rd in the platform event and adding a 15th-place showing on 1-meter.
- Purdue’s Daryn Wright also had a big performance this season, following up her 18 points in 2024 with 26, placing 4th on platform and 8th on 3-meter.
RANK | NAME | COLLEGE TEAM | TOTAL NCAA POINTS | 2023 NCAA POINTS | 2024 NCAA POINTS |
2025 NCAA POINTS
|
1 | Claire Curzan | Stanford/Virginia | 108 | 51 | redshirt | 57 |
2 | Charlotte Hook | Stanford | 17 | 13 | 4 | – |
3 | Lydia Jacoby | Texas | 49 | 26 | 23 | pro |
4 | Kayla Wilson | Stanford | 41 | 15 | 13 | 13 |
5 | Justina Kozan | USC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
6 | Kennedy Noble | NC State | 70 | 23 | 42 | 5 |
7 | Blair Stoneburg | Wisconsin | 0 | 0 | 0 | relay-only |
8 | Carly Novelline | Virginia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9 | Zoe Dixon | Florida | 29 | 6 | 23 | 0 |
10 | Lucy Bell | Stanford | 103 | 14 | 40 | 49 |
11 | Kristina Paegle | Indiana | 32 | 9 | 11 | 12 |
12 | Hayden Miller | Florida/Texas A&M | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0 |
13 | Claire Tuggle | Virginia/USC | 17 | scratch | 6 | 11 |
14 | Emma Weber | Virginia | 30 | 11 | 8 | 11 |
15 | Kaelyn Gridley | Duke | 61 | 20 | 15 | 26 |
16 | Ella Welch | Louisville | 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
17 | Katherine Helms | NC State | 0 | relay-only | no invite | no invite |
18 | Devon Kitchel | Michigan | 0 | 0 | 0 | no invite |
19 | Martina Peroni | Duke | 0 | 0 | 0 | no invite |
20 | Katie Crom | Michigan | 10 | 0 | 10 | – |
HM | Lucy Malys | Ohio State | 0 | no invite | no invite | no invite |
HM | Aubree Brouwer | NC State | 0 | 0 | no invite | relay-only |
HM | Renee Gillilan | Notre Dame | 0 | no invite | no invite | no invite |
HM | Zoe Skirboll | Virginia | 0 | no invite | 0 | 0 |
UNRANKED RECRUITS
NAME | COLLEGE TEAM | TOTAL NCAA POINTS | 2023 NCAA POINTS | 2024 NCAA POINTS |
2025 NCAA POINTS
|
Julia Dennis | Louisville | 46 | 5 | 14 | 27 |
Mackenzie Miller | BYU | 29 | no invite | no invite | 29 |
Gena Jorgenson | Nebraska | 24 | 0 | 11 | 13 |
Brady Kendall | Michigan | 20.5 | relay-only | 11.5 | 9 |
Joleigh Crye | Cincinnati | 19 | 0 | 4 | 15 |
Gigi Johnson | Stanford | 18 | no invite | 15 | 3 |
Emily Lundgren | Washington State | 17 | 0 | 3 | 14 |
Abby Herscu | Cal | 11 | no invite | 0 | 11 |
Rosie Murphy | UCLA | 7 | no invite | 7 | 0 |
Emma Hastings | NC State | 4 | 0 | 4 | no invite |
Amy Riordan | South Carolina | 4 | no invite | 2 | 2 |
Natalie Mannion | Stanford | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Mya Dewitt | Indiana | 3 | no invite | no invite | 3 |
Krista Marlin | Ohio State | 3 | – | 0 | 3 |
Claire Jansen | Pitt | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
INTERNATIONAL RECRUITS
NAME | COLLEGE TEAM | TOTAL NCAA POINTS | 2023 NCAA POINTS | 2024 NCAA POINTS |
2025 NCAA POINTS
|
Aimee Canny | Virginia | 62 | 19 | 22 | 21 |
Carmen Weiler Sastre | Virginia Tech | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 |
Giulia Goerigk | Texas A&M | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
Regan Rathwell | Tennessee | 5 | – | 0 | 5 |
Deniz Ertan | Georgia Tech | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Emily Jones | Alabama | 2 | 0 | redshirt | 2 |
Olivia Herron | SIU | 2 | no invite | no invite | 2 |
Aliz Kalmar | Fresno State | 1 | no invite | no invite | 1 |
DIVING RECRUITS
NAME | COLLEGE TEAM | TOTAL NCAA POINTS | 2023 NCAA POINTS | 2024 NCAA POINTS |
2025 NCAA POINTS
|
Viviana Del Angel | Minnesota | 55 | 17 | 20 | 18 |
Skyler Liu | Indiana | 54 | 18 | 0 | 36 |
Daryn Wright | Purdue | 44 | 0 | 18 | 26 |
Joslyn Oakley | Texas A&M | 31 | 5 | 24 | – |
Eden Cheng | UCLA | 18 | 2 | 9 | 7 |
Kiarra Milligan | Michigan | 13 | 0 | 12 | 1 |
Lena Hentschel | Ohio State | 7 | 7 | 0 | no invite |
Sarah Carruthers | Texas | 6 | 6 | 0 | no invite |
Sephora Ford | Rutgers | 2 | no invite | no invite | 2 |
SOPHOMORES (HIGH SCHOOL CLASS OF 2023, COLLEGE CLASS OF 2027)
- Bella Sims wasn’t as successful at NCAAs as she was in her freshman season, but she still posted 34 points as a sophomore to give her 90 for her career, tops among this class by a wide margin. Sims bounced back from a tough showing in the 500 free prelims to earn a pair of runner-up finishes in the backstroke events, including posting a time of 1:47.11 to rank #2 all-time.
- Sims’ 34 points this season only ranked 4th among sophomore swimmers this season, however, with the #11 recruit in the class, Stanford’s Caroline Bricker, leading the way with 50. Bricker broke through to win the 400 IM and also placed 3rd in the 200 fly and 5th in the 200 IM, playing a key role as the Cardinal earned a surprise runner-up finish.
- Jillian Cox, who redshirted her freshman year at Texas, was an unstoppable force in her first NCAA Championship meet, winning the 500 free and 1650 free in decisive fashion to give her 40 points, which, despite missing the 2024 NCAAs, still ranks her 3rd among ranked recruits in this class for their career.
- Tennessee’s Camille Spink followed up her standout SEC Championship meet with 31 points in her second NCAAs, placing 3rd in the 100 free and 4th in the 50 free after she scored seven as a freshman. It’s worth noting that Spink made the ‘A’ final of the 200 free as a freshman but was disqualified for a false start, so that’s at least 11 points she lost.
- Other ranked recruits scoring double-digit points as sophomores were Texas’ Campbell Stoll and Erin Gemmell, Virginia’s Cavan Gormsen and Tess Howley, and Michigan’s Hannah Bellard, with Gemmell and Bellard hitting 10+ for the first time.
- The #3 ranked recruit in this class, Harvard’s Kiley Wilhelm, redshirted her freshman year and didn’t earn NCAA qualification this past season.
- Among the unranked domestic recruits, Florida’s Catie Choate is the only swimmer who has scored in both NCAA Championship meets, earning seven more this season (10th in the 200 back) to give her 18 total.
- Tennessee’s McKenzie Siroky was listed as a freshman this past season but deferred her enrollment for one season, so she’s a part of this high school class. Siroky scored 23 points in her NCAA debut, placing 3rd in the 100 breast and 10th in the 200 breast.
- Matching Choate’s total was Alabama’s Cadence Vincent, who didn’t score in her first year but had a breakout showing with top-10 finishes in the 50 free (8th) and 100 free (10th) to score 18 points in her sophomore season.
- Three international recruits have proven to be significant point scorers for their respective teams from this class, led by Texas A&M’s Miranda Grana, who scored 40 this season and has now earned 64 through her sophomore year. Grana was 3rd in the 100 back, 4th in the 100 fly and 9th in the 200 back, setting sizeable best times across the board. She was a top-eight finisher in both backstrokes last year, but was only 25th in the 100 fly.
- USC’s Minna Abraham and Michigan’s Stephanie Balduccini battled for the 200 free title, placing a close 2nd and 3rd, respectively, behind Indiana’s Anna Peplowski. The next night, Abraham took 5th and Baluddcini was 6th in the 100 free, giving them 31 and 29 points for the meet, respectively.
- Tennessee’s Emelie Fast scored 21 points last season, but didn’t race past the midseason invitationals this year.
- Among divers, Kansas’ Shiyun Lai and Texas’ Bayleigh Cranford both had monster performances as sophomores, with Liu earning ‘A’ final berths in the two springboard events for 25 points and Cranford placing 6th on platform and 7th on 3-meter for 29 points.
RANK | NAME | TEAM | TOTAL NCAA POINTS | 2024 NCAA POINTS |
2025 NCAA POINTS
|
1 | Bella Sims | Florida | 90 | 56 | 34 |
2 | Campbell Stoll | Texas | 38 | 14 | 24 |
3 | Kiley Wilhelm | Harvard | 0 | redshirt | no invite |
4 | Cavan Gormsen | Virginia | 33 | 14 | 19 |
5 | Tess Howley | Virginia | 30 | 15 | 15 |
6 | Lucy Thomas | Stanford | 5 | 0 | 5 |
7 | Erin Gemmell | Texas | 19 | 7 | 12 |
8 | Camille Spink | Tennessee | 38 | 7 | 31 |
9 | Jillian Cox | Texas | 40 | redshirt | 40 |
10 | Hannah Bellard | Michigan | 20 | 6 | 14 |
11 | Caroline Bricker | Stanford | 72 | 22 | 50 |
12 | Michaela Mattes | Florida | 6 | – | 6 |
13 | Miriam Sheehan | NC State | 0 | 0 | relay-only |
14 | Asia Kozan | UC San Diego | 0 | no invite | no invite |
15 | Berit Berglund | Texas | 9 | 9 | 0 |
16 | Julia Podkoscielny | Florida | 0 | 0 | – |
17 | JoJo Ramey | Florida | 6 | 6 | 0 |
18 | Hailey Tierney | Wisconsin | 0 | 0 | 0 |
19 | Grace Rainey | Florida | 0 | no invite | no invite |
20 | Maddie Waggoner | Wisconsin | 3 | 3 | no invite |
HM | Kathryn Hazle | Cal | 0 | 0 | 0 |
HM | Eleanor Sun | Princeton | 5 | 0 | 5 |
HM | Sophie Brison | Tennessee | 0 | no invite | 0 |
HM | Emma Kern | Texas | 2 | 2 | 0 |
HM | Lainy Kruger | Florida | 3 | 0 | 3 |
HM | Macky Hodges | USC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
UNRANKED RECRUITS
NAME | TEAM | TOTAL NCAA POINTS | 2024 NCAA POINTS |
2025 NCAA POINTS
|
McKenzie Siroky | Tennessee | 23 | defer | 23 |
Catie Choate | Florida | 18 | 11 | 7 |
Cadence Vincent | Alabama | 18 | 0 | 18 |
Angie Coe | Texas | 4 | 4 | 0 |
Helena Jones | Georgia | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Ali Pfaff | Duke | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Lucy Mehraban | Louisville | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Sophia Frei | UNC | 1 | no invite | 1 |
Mary Macaulay | UNC | 1 | no invite | 1 |
Dakota Tucker | Princeton | 1 | 0 | 1 |
INTERNATIONAL RECRUITS
NAME | TEAM | TOTAL NCAA POINTS | 2024 NCAA POINTS |
2025 NCAA POINTS
|
Miranda Grana | Texas A&M | 64 | 24 | 40 |
Minna Abraham | USC | 47 | 16 | 31 |
Stephanie Balduccini | Michigan | 44 | 15 | 29 |
Emelie Fast | Tennessee | 21 | 21 | – |
Zita Szoke | Ohio | 6 | 0 | 6 |
DIVING RECRUITS
NAME | TEAM | TOTAL NCAA POINTS | 2024 NCAA POINTS |
2025 NCAA POINTS
|
Shiyun Lai | Kansas | 31 | 6 | 25 |
Bayleigh Cranford | Texas | 29 | 0 | 29 |
Elna Widerstrom | Minnesota | 13 | 13 | 0 |
Camyla Monroy | Florida | 12 | 12 | 0 |
Emilia Nilsson Garip | Utah | 9 | 9 | – |
Ella Roselli | Indiana | 8 | 0 | 8 |
Lauren Hallaselka | UCLA | 7 | 7 | – |
Lily Witte | Indiana | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Michelle McLeod | Houston | 3 | 0 | 3 |
FRESHMAN (HIGH SCHOOL CLASS OF 2024, COLLEGE CLASS OF 2028
NAME | SWIMMER | TEAM | TOTAL NCAA POINTS |
2025 NCAA POINTS
|
1 | Katie Grimes | Virginia | 34 | 34 |
2 | Erika Pelaez | NC State | 25 | 25 |
3 | Leah Shackley | NC State | 37 | 37 |
4 | Leah Hayes | Virginia | 23 | 23 |
5 | Anna Moesch | Virginia | 29 | 29 |
6 | Jillian Crooks | Tennessee | 0 | 0 |
7 | Levenia Sim | Stanford | 0 | no invite |
8 | Maggie Wanezek | Wisconsin | 4 | 4 |
9 | Piper Enge | Texas | 14 | 14 |
10 | Emily Thompson | Stanford | 7 | 7 |
11 | Bailey Hartman | Virginia | 0 | 0 |
12 | Katie Christopherson | Virginia | 0 | 0 |
13 | Lily Christianson | NC State | 1 | 1 |
14 | Lillie Nesty | Texas | 7 | 7 |
15 | Addison Sauickie | Stanford | 0 | no invite |
16 | Caroline Larsen | Louisville | 2.5 | 2.5 |
17 | Annika Parkhe | Stanford | 0 | 0 |
18 | Emily Brown | Tennessee | 11 | 11 |
19 | Rebecca Diaconescu | Michigan | 0 | 0 |
20 | Camden Doane | Louisville | 0 | no invite |
HM | Kate Hurst | Texas | 7 | 7 |
HM | Teia Salvino | SMU | 0 | no invite |
HM | Campbell Chase | Texas | 7 | 7 |
HM | Katie Belle Sikes | Georgia | 0 | relay-only |
HM | Sofia Plaza | Florida | 0 | 0 |
UNRANKED RECRUITS
NAME | SWIMMER | TEAM | TOTAL NCAA POINTS |
2025 NCAA POINTS
|
BOTR | Mila Nikanorov | Ohio State | 25 | 25 |
BOTR | Charlotte Wilson | Virginia | 6 | 6 |
BOTR | Addison Reese | Florida | 4 | 4 |
BOTR | Amelia Bodenstab | Louisville | 4 | 4 |
INTERNATIONAL RECRUITS
NAME | TEAM | TOTAL NCAA POINTS |
2025 NCAA POINTS
|
Ella Jansen | Tennessee | 18 | 18 |
Mary-Ambre Moluh | Cal | 14.5 | 14.5 |
Julie Brousseau | Florida | 12 | 12 |
Sienna Angove | Ohio State | 11 | 11 |
Lilou Ressencourt | Cal | 10 | 10 |
Anita Bottazzo | Florida | 9 | 9 |
Daria Golovaty | Louisville | 2 | 2 |
Lisa Nystrand | NC State | 2 | 2 |
DIVING RECRUITS
NAME | TEAM | TOTAL NCAA POINTS |
2025 NCAA POINTS
|
Alejandra Estudillo Torres | Texas | 42 | 42 |
Lanie Gutch | UNC | 16 | 16 |
Anna Lemkin | Stanford | 14 | 14 |
Avery Worobel | Purdue | 5 | 5 |
Emily Hallifax | Auburn | 4 | 4 |
Maria Sanchez-Moreno | Arkansas | 4 | 4 |
Kate Miller | USC | 2 | 2 |
BONUS: 5TH YEARS (HIGH SCHOOL CLASS OF 2020, COLLEGE CLASS OF 2024)
We’ve traditionally ignored the 5th-year seniors in these rankings, but we’ve included how the overall class of 2020 point rankings have been impacted by this past season below.
Alex Walsh finished with 275 career points over five seasons, with Phoebe Bacon and Aranza Vazquez Montano also eclipsing 200 points and Emma Sticklen hitting an impressive 182.5.
FINAL RANK | 2020 RANK | NAME | COLLEGE TEAM | TOTAL NCAA POINTS | 2021 NCAA POINTS | 2022 NCAA POINTS | 2023 NCAA POINTS | 2024 NCAA POINTS |
2025 NCAA POINTS
|
1 | 2 | Alex Walsh | Virginia | 275 | 48 | 60 | 53 | 60 | 54 |
2 | 3 | Phoebe Bacon | Wisconsin | 224 | 51 | 33 | 46 | 49 | 45 |
3 | DIVE | Aranza Vazquez Montano | UNC | 200 | 47 | 31 | 47 | 40 | 35 |
5 | 9 | Emma Sticklen | Texas | 182.5 | 18 | 27 | 46.5 | 43 | 48 |
7 | 14 | Gabi Albiero | Louisville | 146 | 5 | 35.5 | 44.5 | 31 | 30 |
4 | 4 | Olivia Bray | Texas | 144 | 30 | 34 | 42 | 36 | 2 |
8 | INTL | Mona McSharry | Tennessee | 144 | 31 | 15 | 33 | 34 | 31 |
6 | 5 | Isabelle Stadden | Cal | 136 | 30 | 27 | 29 | 32 | 18 |
8 | 11 | Emma Weyant | Virginia/Florida | 132 | defer | 32 | 33 | 48 | 19 |
10 | INTL | Anna Elendt | Texas | 107 | 14 | 31 | 33 | 29 | |
12 | 7 | Kaitlyn Dobler | USC | 96 | 23 | 20 | 17 | 29 | 7 |
14 | DIVE | Montserrat Lavenant | LSU | 95 | 9 | 7 | 17 | 34 | 28 |
11 | Early ’21 (#12) | Reilly Tiltmann | Virginia | 90 | 23 | 37 | 18 | 12 | |
13 | DIVE | Tarrin Gilliland | Indiana | 78 | 31 | 47 | – | – | |
23 | 6 | Lillie Nordmann | Stanford | 62 | defer | 17 | 9 | 16 | 20 |
20 | 20 | Maxine Parker | Georgia/Virginia | 61 | 10 | 0 | 23.5 | 12.5 | 15 |
15 | HM | Chloe Stepanek | Texas A&M | 60 | 26 | 1 | 16 | 16 | 1 |
16 | 13 | Abby Harter | Virginia | 55 | 18 | 12 | 12 | 13 | |
16 | DIVE | Anne Fowler | Indiana | 55 | 15 | 5 | 17 | 18 | |
22 | DIVE | Else Praasterink | Louisville/Texas A&M | 55 | 7 | 22 | 15 | 11 | |
18 | 1 | Regan Smith | Stanford | 52.5 | defer | 52.5 | pro | pro | |
24 | INTL | Avery Wiseman | Alabama | 48 | defer | 22 | 4 | 13 | 9 |
19 | HM | Emma Atkinson | Virginia Tech | 47 | 21 | 19 | 7 | relay-only | |
21 | BOTR | Sarah Foley | Duke | 46 | 22 | 20 | 4 | ||
24 | 19 | Katherine Zenick | Ohio State | 39 | 0 | 7 | 24 | 8 | |
26 | 10 | Anna Keating | Virginia | 37.5 | 0 | 14.5 | 12 | 11 | |
32 | NR | Maya Geringer | Ohio State | 37 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 17 |
27 | DIVE | Bridget O’Neil | Texas | 34 | 6 | 28 | |||
28 | BOTR | Megan Van Berkom | Minnesota | 33 | 6 | 13 | 14 | ||
34 | 8 | Abby Arens | NC State | 32 | 0 | 17 | 2 | 13 | |
29 | HM | Paige Hetrick | Louisville | 31 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 8 | |
29 | DIVE | Emma Gullstrand | Miami | 31 | 24 | 7 | – | – | |
31 | BOTR | Lola Mull | Northwestern | 30 | 11 | 19 | 0 | – | |
37 | NR | Caroline Bentz | Virginia Tech | 20.5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 5.5 |
32 | NR | Meghan Lee | Auburn | 20 | no invite | 0 | 5 | 15 | |
NR | Sophie Yendell | Pitt | 20 | no invite | no invite | 0 | 0 | 20 | |
34 | NR | Aly Breslin | Tennessee | 19 | no invite | 0 | 13 | 6 | |
36 | 12 | Tristen Ulett | Louisville | 17 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
37 | INTL | Nicole Maier | Miami (OH) | 15 | no invite | 0 | 9 | 6 | |
47 | NR | Callahan Dunn | Wisconsin | 15 | no invite | no invite | no invite | 3 | 12 |
39 | 17 | Kathryn Ackerman | Michigan | 14 | 12 | 0 | 2 | ||
47 | 16 | Chase Travis | Virginia Tech | 14 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
40 | BOTR | Liberty Williams | Louisville | 13 | 4 | 9 | – | 0 | |
41 | INTL | Emily Gantriis | Cal | 10 | 10 | relay-only | no invite | ||
42 | BOTR | Grace Cooper | Texas | 9 | relay-only | relay-only | 0 | 9 | |
42 | NR | Caroline Famous | USC | 9 | – | no invite | relay-only | 9 | |
42 | DIVE | Samantha Vear | FSU | 9 | 7 | 2 | |||
45 | DIVE | Melissa Mirafuentes | Nevada | 5 | 5 | 0 | |||
45 | DIVE | Ciara McGing | Ohio State | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | |
47 | BOTR | Amanda Ray | Florida | 3 | 3 | 0 | no invite | ||
47 | Olivia Theall | Texas A&M | 3 | no invite | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||
51 | NR | Sophie Housey | Michigan | 2.5 | 2.5 | no invite | – | – | |
51 | INTL | Amalie Mortensen | Arizona | 2.5 | 2.5 | – | no invite | ||
53 | DIVE | Anna Bradescu | Georgia Tech | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
53 | DIVE | Meghan Wenzel | Georgia | 2 | no invite | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
55 | NR | Elle Braun | Wisconsin | 1 | no invite | 0 | no invite | 1 | |
55 | NR | Anna Havens Rice | Kentucky | 1 | 1 | 0 | no invite | no invite | |
55 | INTL | Yara Hierath | NC State | 1 | 1 | 0 | no invite | ||
55 | INTL | Maddy Gatrall | Akron | 1 | no invite | no invite | 1 | 0 |
ARCHIVES: REVISITING RECRUIT RANKS
SPRING 2025 | SPRING 2024 | SPRING 2023 | SPRING 2022 | SPRING 2021 | SPRING 2020 | SPRING 2019 | SPRING 2018 | SPRING 2017 | |
Class of 2024 | |||||||||
Class of 2023 | After Sophomore Year | ||||||||
Class of 2022 | After Junior Year | After Sophomore Year | |||||||
Class of 2021 | After Senior Year | After Junior Year | After Sophomore Year | ||||||
Class of 2020 | After Senior Year | After Junior Year | After Sophomore Year | ||||||
Class of 2019 | After Senior Year | After Junior Year | After Sophomore Year | ||||||
Class of 2018 | After Senior Year | After Junior Year | After Sophomore Year | ||||||
Class of 2017 | After Senior Year | After Junior Year | After Sophomore Year | ||||||
Class of 2016 | After Senior Year | ||||||||
Class of 2015 | |||||||||
Class of 2014 | |||||||||
Class of 2013 |
I acknowledge the problems with different team strengths and a relay being carried by a single swimmer. Still I’ve often wondered why relay points aren’t tracked. Just take the relay score divide by 4 and give those points to each swimmer on the relay. Like with relay medals on the international level keep them in a separate category, but they aren’t valueless. Swimmers should get some kind of credit. They also add an additional swim which can impact individual events. Relays are big in the team standings giving the swimmers some recognition on lists like these feels right.
I’m actually OK with a swimmer who was on two winning relays being credited with as many points as a swimmer who… Read more »
There are a million ways to cut up numbers, and they all show us a different thing.
Taking relay points and dividing by four shows us “who swam on the best relays,” which to me is not particularly valuable information. At that point, you’re just showing us the best sprinters on the best teams, which is certainly a thing, but it’s not really what we’re trying to evaluate in this specific article.
It would help evaluate relay contributions, which is something we account for in our rankings (we move swimmers with more relay potential above, say, 400 IMers), so it would be of some use there, but I think it would be too crude and too big of an impact… Read more »
Yeah I get that, and the different team strengths was actually more about certain teams (like certain countries) likely being the ones to score the most. It’s why tracking it separately was my first thought.
I also agree that it’s mostly a metric of who swam on the fastest relays, but isn’t the fact that you adjust rankings for relay potential also a reason to track relay points as a review metric just like individual points? We all know that sprinters are more valuable point wise and that distance and 200 of strokes just aren’t as likely to get relay contributions. So track them second, see if the predictions that they would be big relay contributors is true or not.… Read more »
Great article – for those who enjoy looking at data. Nicely done – and interesting to see how rankings translated over time. There’s a relatively small number of “surprises” in the data.
The thing that jumps out is just how many top 20 recruits never score at all, especially for those ranked 11-20. Certain swimmers and teams get called out for it, but flopping is really pretty typical. Some of it has to be that the Covid 5th years have meant 20% more top 10 recruits to compete against, but still a lot of zeros.
True. Not scoring shouldn’t be dubbed a flop. It’s just kind of the norm. The 15th ranked swimmer in a class that becomes a regular scorer is the exception.
I think if you look at the top twenty recruits there is probably a lot of overlap in swims, esp. the 50,100, 200 free since they are usually ranked higher due to their ability to add points to relays. Over 4 years that is 80 recruits that are in the top 20 and close to half are in that freestyle distance for relays. Only 16 spots score so it’s only logical that some won’t score. It’s easy to improve year over year and still never score but they were worthy of their rankings.
What happened to Grace Sheble? Not even trying to take a shot at NCS. Injuries? Illness?
NCSU happened.
Came from a high school program that tends to squeeze everything out of them in hs. Very sandpipers style
She seemed to be improving her Soph year….
Then last year’s disaster of a freshman class seemed to wreck havoc on their women’s team chemistry…. And this was a rebuilding year (team unity wise).
It’s out unfair to say state doesn’t develop swimmers. Look at half their men’s team. Look at their female sprinters.
It could simply be that some swimmers want to be students on a fun team and swimming takes a back seat. NCState has always presented themselves as a fun culture. Desorbo and Halloway established that over a decade ago.
As a close friend of a guy on the team, I can confirm they certainly seem to have a fun culture!
Where’s McKenzie Siroky?
Updated with her, thanks. She slipped through the cracks because she deferred her freshman year.
To think, Lucy Bell came in as Diet Charlotte Hook…
Anna Peplowski progression is beyond amazing.
22.8 to 21.8 (50)
50.1 to 47.1 (100)
1:48.0 to 1:40.5 (200)
4:52.8 to 4:33.8 (500)
1:57.8 to 1:51.1 (200 Back)
Also set multiple LCM PBs and qualified to Olympics. When I look to swimcloud recruitment power ranking back in 2021, she was only 5.34!! Is she the first ever swimmer to scored 100+ points in NCAA while the PR is 5.+?
Age 15 gave up cheerleading to swim year round.
Now they, are cheering leading for her! Wow.
Randy
Wuffies pitching alot of shutouts on these charts