Women’s Recruit Ranks: Individual Scoring For All Classes Through 2025 NCAAs

It’s post-NCAA retrospective time, as we look back at recruit rankings through the lens of now-updated NCAA scoring data. We’ve focused in on the senior class (after four NCAA seasons) and the freshman class (after their first NCAA showings), and now it’s time to share all of our data for the four classes currently making up the NCAA field.

Further reading:

We’ll also include this year’s freshmen and seniors to have all the data in one post. You can find further analysis of those classes above.

Notes:

  • The data included is only individual scoring at NCAAs. That’s not an exact measure of an athlete’s contribution to a program: many of these swimmers (and others not listed) were relay scorers at NCAAs, scored significant points at conference meets and provided great leadership and culture-building for their programs. This data isn’t a perfect analysis of the best recruits – it’s merely a quick look at the data we can compile.
  • Some of these athletes haven’t had as many scoring seasons as others in their class. Some redshirted a season and have more remaining seasons. Some deferred their enrollment as freshmen. Some sat out a year with a transfer. Some turned pro early. Some will turn pro early. Some are hard to pigeonhole into a specific class, international athletes especially. We did our best to group athletes where they best fit. Again, this isn’t a hard-and-fast ranking of value – it’s just the best data we can compile.
  • The ranks are from our recruit rankings, typically compiled when these athletes were high school juniors. We don’t include internationals in those rankings, as it’s difficult to figure out if and when internationals will join the NCAA and which class they should be grouped with before they appear in the NCAA. Do bear in mind that our rankings were done well over a year before any of these athletes appeared in NCAA competition, so if you do have a quibble with a specific rank, you may want to check how fast that athlete actually was when the ranking was done before you get too livid. Unranked recruits showing massive improvement curves are some of the best stories in the NCAA year-in and year-out, and one reason we rank recruits is so we can better see which athletes had great rises during their college careers.
  • All that said, compiling these ranks is a lot of data entry and a lot of research. If we missed anyone, or misclassified anyone with the wrong class or with the wrong domestic/international tag, please let us know in the comments and we’ll update our data as soon as possible!

SENIORS (HIGH SCHOOL CLASS OF 2021, COLLEGE CLASS OF 2025)

RANKED RECRUITS

Rank Name College Team Total NCAA Points 2022 NCAA Points 2023 NCAA Points 2024 NCAA Points
2025 NCAA Points
1 Torri Huske Stanford 147 43 50 redshirt 54
2 Gretchen Walsh Virginia 231 54 57 60 60
3 Grace Sheble NC State 15 1 14 0 0
4 Letitia Sim Michigan 29 7 9 redshirt 13
5 Samantha Tadder Stanford 5 no invite 5 0 no invite
6 Paige McKenna Wisconsin 62 33 16 9 4
7 Mariah Denigan Indiana 24 0 12 12 0
8 Ellie Waldrep Auburn 0 0 0 0 no invite
9 Josephine Fuller Tennessee 110 0 33 44 33
10 Rachel Stege Georgia 48 0 25 12 11
11 Annabel Crush NC State 0 0 0 relay-only 0
12 Lindsay Flynn Michigan 22 6 0 0 16
13 Brooke Zettel Florida / Virginia Tech 0 transfer/did not compete no invite no invite no invite
14 Ashley Strouse Northwestern 0 no invite 0
15 Mia Kragh Cal 13 0 2 11
16 Mackenzie McConagha Wisconsin 2 2 0 0 0
17 Ella Bathurst Virginia 0 0 0 no invite no invite
18 Anna Shaw Stanford 0 0 no invite relay-only no invite
19 Caroline Pennington Virginia / USC 6 6 0
20 Amy Tang Stanford 7 no invite 0 7 0
HM Micayla Cronk Florida 0 no invite 0 0 relay-only
HM Summer Smith Tennessee 0 0
HM Caroline Sheble NC State 0 no invite no invite no invite no invite
HM Abby McCulloh Georgia 73 15 5 33 20
HM Madelyn Christman Notre Dame 0 no invite no invite 0 relay-only
HM Lexie Mulvihill Auburn 0 0 relay-only relay-only 0
HM Mia Abruzzo Georgia 0 0 no invite no invite no invite
HM Malia Rausch Ohio State/Auburn 0 no invite no invite

UNRANKED RECRUITS

Rank Name College Team Total NCAA Points 2022 NCAA Points 2023 NCAA Points 2024 NCAA Points
2025 NCAA Points
Anna Peplowski Indiana 119 7 22 45 45
Aurora Roghair Stanford 79 2 0 37 40
BOTR Olivia Peoples Florida 25 relay-only 1 13 11
BOTR Sara Stotler Tennessee 24 0 7 2 15
Abby Carlson Wisconsin 22 0 20 2 0
BOTR Teresa Ivan Ohio State 19 relay-only 15 4 0
Greta Pelzek South Carolina 18 no invite 0 7 11
Kacey McKenna Indiana 17 0 no invite 13 4
Paige MacEachern UCLA 13 0 2 11 no invite
Eboni McCarty Georgia 12.5 0 5.5 7 0
Skyler Smith UNC 12 no invite 5 5 2
Ava Deangelis Ohio State 7 no invite no invite 0 7
BOTR Kate McCarville Tennessee 5 no invite 5 0 0
Maddy Huggins Florida State 5 no invite 0 2 3
Aris Runnels Florida 4 no invite 4 0 0
Nyah Funderburke Ohio State 4 0 0 4 0
Abby Daniel Akron 4 no invite 0 2 2
Eliot Kennedy Minnesota 3 no invite no invite 0 3
Early ’22 (#10) Rye Ulett Louisville 1 1 0 0 0
Greer Pattison UNC 1 0 0 1 0

INTERNATIONAL RECRUITS

Name College Team Total NCAA Points 2022 NCAA Points 2023 NCAA Points 2024 NCAA Points 2025 NCAA Points
Ching Hwee Gan Indiana 80 7 29 16 28
Leah Polonsky Cal 54 9 4 3 38
Brooklyn Douthwright Tennessee 53 0 33 9 11
Celia Pulido SIU 31 0 no invite 16 15
Dune Coetzee Georgia 30 8 11 11 0
Ellen Walshe Tennessee 23 23
Julia Mrozinski Tennessee 18 9 9 0 0
Brearna Crawford Indiana 16 0 0 0 16
Henrietta Fangli Houston 16 no invite no invite 3 13
Stasya Makarova Auburn 11 0 0 11 0
Giulia Carvalho Miami FL 9.5 no invite no invite 3 6.5
Edith Jernstedt FSU 8 0 4 0 4
Ekaterina Nikonova Florida 4 0 4
Christie Chue FIU 4 3 1 0
Fernanda Celidonio Louisville 3 no invite relay-only 3 0

DIVING RECRUITS

Name College Team Total NCAA Points 2022 NCAA Points 2023 NCAA Points 2024 NCAA Points 2025 NCAA Points
Hailey Hernandez Texas 104 26 24 33 21
Sophia McAfee Purdue 58 11 26 21
Chiara Pellacani LSU/Miami FL 51 14 redshirt 37
Margo O’Meara Duke 32 14 11 7
Elizabeth Kaye Virginia 24 0 0 18 6
Holly Waxman Utah 15 2 13 0
Sophie Verzyl South Carolina 15 no invite no invite redshirt 15
Caroline Brady Notre Dame 6 0 0 6
Holly Prasanto Rutgers 6 no invite no invite 6 0
Brooke Earley Arizona 6 no invite 0 6
Jenna Sonnenberg Purdue 1 0 no invite 0 1

JUNIORS (HIGH SCHOOL CLASS OF 2022, COLLEGE CLASS OF 2026)

  • Despite sitting out of the 2023-24 season amid her transfer to Virginia, Claire Curzan is the top scorer in this class with 108 points scored in her two NCAA Championship appearances, nearing the maximum of 60 this season with 57. In her first season racing with the Cavaliers, Curzan broke the NCAA Record multiple times in the 200 back, culminating with the NCAA title after winning it as a freshman with Stanford in 2023. She also won the 100 back for the first time and was the runner-up to teammate Gretchen Walsh in the 50 free.
  • Joining Curzan above 100 NCAA points in this class is Stanford’s Lucy Bell, who has combined for 89 points the past two seasons after scoring 14 as a freshman. Bell’s career-high 49 points this past season came thanks to her first national title in the 200 breast coupled with a 3rd-place showing in the 400 IM and 6th-place finish in the 200 IM.
  • The third-highest scorer in the class is NC State’s Kennedy Noble, though she only scored five as a junior after 42 last season.
  • Duke’s Kaelyn Gridley has been a double-digit scorer in all three of her NCAA appearances, posting a career-high 26 points this year with a 4th-place finish in the 200 breast and an 8th-place showing in the 200 breast.
  • Among ranked recruits, Stanford’s Kayla Wilson, Indiana’s Kristina Paegle, Louisville’s Ella Welch, USC’s Claire Tuggle and Virginia’s Emma Weber also scored double-digit points this season, with Tuggle and Welch both doing so for the first time. For Welch, it was her first time scoring at NCAAs, earning an ‘A’ final spot in the 100 fly where she placed 7th. Last season, she didn’t even race the 100 fly at NCAAs, instead opting for the 100 breast.
  • There were six unranked domestic recruits in this class to score at least 10 points at the 2025 NCAAs, led by BYU’s Mackenzie Miller. Miller, who didn’t qualify for NCAAs in either of her first two seasons. As a junior, Miller had the swim of her life to snag 2nd in the 200 breast, and she added an 8th-place finish in the 100 breast for 29 points. After this breakthrough, she entered the transfer portal.
  • The top unranked recruit overall is Louisville’s Julia Dennis, who has steadily progressed through the first three years of her career, scoring five points as a freshman, 14 as a sophomore, and then 27 as a junior this past season. Dennis has evolved into one of the best sprinters in college swimming, placing 3rd in the 50 free and 8th in the 100 free at NCAAs.
  • Nebraska’s Gena Jorgenson has been a reliable scorer in back-to-back years, following up an 8th-place finish in the 1650 free as a sophomore with a 6th-place showing this past season for 24 total points.
  • Cincinnati’s Joleigh Crye and Washington State’s Emily Lundgren both scored for the first time last year and then hit double-digit points as juniors, with Crye taking 4th in the 100 breast and Lundgren landing a 6th-place finish in the 200 breast (and 16th in the 100 breast).
  • Among international recruits, South African Aimee Canny has been the top performer in this class by a wide margin, averaging 21 points through three NCAA Championship appearances. She was 7th in the 200 breast and 9th in the 200 free for UVA this season.
  • Spaniard Carmen Weiler Sastre had a breakthrough showing for Virginia Tech after missing the points in her first two seasons, scoring 25 after top-eight finishes in the 100 back (8th) and 200 back (5th).
  • Minnesota’s Viviana Del Angel and UCLA’s Eden Cheng are the only two divers in this class who have scored in all three NCAA Championship meets, with Del Angel leading all divers with 55 points after consistent 17, 20 and 18-point showings.
  • Indiana’s Skyler Liu pulled within a point of Del Angel’s overall tally after a 36-point showing this season, placing 3rd in the platform event and adding a 15th-place showing on 1-meter.
  • Purdue’s Daryn Wright also had a big performance this season, following up her 18 points in 2024 with 26, placing 4th on platform and 8th on 3-meter.

RANKED RECRUITS

RANK NAME COLLEGE TEAM TOTAL NCAA POINTS 2023 NCAA POINTS 2024 NCAA POINTS
2025 NCAA POINTS
1 Claire Curzan Stanford/Virginia 108 51 redshirt 57
2 Charlotte Hook Stanford 17 13 4
3 Lydia Jacoby Texas 49 26 23 pro
4 Kayla Wilson Stanford 41 15 13 13
5 Justina Kozan USC 1 0 0 1
6 Kennedy Noble NC State 70 23 42 5
7 Blair Stoneburg Wisconsin 0 0 0 relay-only
8 Carly Novelline Virginia 0 0 0 0
9 Zoe Dixon Florida 29 6 23 0
10 Lucy Bell Stanford 103 14 40 49
11 Kristina Paegle Indiana 32 9 11 12
12 Hayden Miller Florida/Texas A&M 14 0 14 0
13 Claire Tuggle Virginia/USC 17 scratch 6 11
14 Emma Weber Virginia 30 11 8 11
15 Kaelyn Gridley Duke 61 20 15 26
16 Ella Welch Louisville 12 0 0 12
17 Katherine Helms NC State 0 relay-only no invite no invite
18 Devon Kitchel Michigan 0 0 0 no invite
19 Martina Peroni Duke 0 0 0 no invite
20 Katie Crom Michigan 10 0 10
HM Lucy Malys Ohio State 0 no invite no invite no invite
HM Aubree Brouwer NC State 0 0 no invite relay-only
HM Renee Gillilan Notre Dame 0 no invite no invite no invite
HM Zoe Skirboll Virginia 0 no invite 0 0

UNRANKED RECRUITS

NAME COLLEGE TEAM TOTAL NCAA POINTS 2023 NCAA POINTS 2024 NCAA POINTS
2025 NCAA POINTS
Julia Dennis Louisville 46 5 14 27
Mackenzie Miller BYU 29 no invite no invite 29
Gena Jorgenson Nebraska 24 0 11 13
Brady Kendall Michigan 20.5 relay-only 11.5 9
Joleigh Crye Cincinnati 19 0 4 15
Gigi Johnson Stanford 18 no invite 15 3
Emily Lundgren Washington State 17 0 3 14
Abby Herscu Cal 11 no invite 0 11
Rosie Murphy UCLA 7 no invite 7 0
Emma Hastings NC State 4 0 4 no invite
Amy Riordan South Carolina 4 no invite 2 2
Natalie Mannion Stanford 3 1 0 2
Mya Dewitt Indiana 3 no invite no invite 3
Krista Marlin Ohio State 3 0 3
Claire Jansen Pitt 1 0 0 1

INTERNATIONAL RECRUITS

NAME COLLEGE TEAM TOTAL NCAA POINTS 2023 NCAA POINTS 2024 NCAA POINTS
2025 NCAA POINTS
Aimee Canny Virginia 62 19 22 21
Carmen Weiler Sastre Virginia Tech 25 0 0 25
Giulia Goerigk Texas A&M 5 0 5 0
Regan Rathwell Tennessee 5 0 5
Deniz Ertan Georgia Tech 2 2 0 0
Emily Jones Alabama 2 0 redshirt 2
Olivia Herron SIU 2 no invite no invite 2
Aliz Kalmar Fresno State 1 no invite no invite 1

DIVING RECRUITS

NAME COLLEGE TEAM TOTAL NCAA POINTS 2023 NCAA POINTS 2024 NCAA POINTS
2025 NCAA POINTS
Viviana Del Angel Minnesota 55 17 20 18
Skyler Liu Indiana 54 18 0 36
Daryn Wright Purdue 44 0 18 26
Joslyn Oakley Texas A&M 31 5 24
Eden Cheng UCLA 18 2 9 7
Kiarra Milligan Michigan 13 0 12 1
Lena Hentschel Ohio State 7 7 0 no invite
Sarah Carruthers Texas 6 6 0 no invite
Sephora Ford Rutgers 2 no invite no invite 2

SOPHOMORES (HIGH SCHOOL CLASS OF 2023, COLLEGE CLASS OF 2027)

  • Bella Sims wasn’t as successful at NCAAs as she was in her freshman season, but she still posted 34 points as a sophomore to give her 90 for her career, tops among this class by a wide margin. Sims bounced back from a tough showing in the 500 free prelims to earn a pair of runner-up finishes in the backstroke events, including posting a time of 1:47.11 to rank #2 all-time.
  • Sims’ 34 points this season only ranked 4th among sophomore swimmers this season, however, with the #11 recruit in the class, Stanford’s Caroline Bricker, leading the way with 50. Bricker broke through to win the 400 IM and also placed 3rd in the 200 fly and 5th in the 200 IM, playing a key role as the Cardinal earned a surprise runner-up finish.
  • Jillian Cox, who redshirted her freshman year at Texas, was an unstoppable force in her first NCAA Championship meet, winning the 500 free and 1650 free in decisive fashion to give her 40 points, which, despite missing the 2024 NCAAs, still ranks her 3rd among ranked recruits in this class for their career.
  • Tennessee’s Camille Spink followed up her standout SEC Championship meet with 31 points in her second NCAAs, placing 3rd in the 100 free and 4th in the 50 free after she scored seven as a freshman. It’s worth noting that Spink made the ‘A’ final of the 200 free as a freshman but was disqualified for a false start, so that’s at least 11 points she lost.
  • Other ranked recruits scoring double-digit points as sophomores were Texas’ Campbell Stoll and Erin Gemmell, Virginia’s Cavan Gormsen and Tess Howley, and Michigan’s Hannah Bellard, with Gemmell and Bellard hitting 10+ for the first time.
  • The #3 ranked recruit in this class, Harvard’s Kiley Wilhelm, redshirted her freshman year and didn’t earn NCAA qualification this past season.
  • Among the unranked domestic recruits, Florida’s Catie Choate is the only swimmer who has scored in both NCAA Championship meets, earning seven more this season (10th in the 200 back) to give her 18 total.
  • Tennessee’s McKenzie Siroky was listed as a freshman this past season but deferred her enrollment for one season, so she’s a part of this high school class. Siroky scored 23 points in her NCAA debut, placing 3rd in the 100 breast and 10th in the 200 breast.
  • Matching Choate’s total was Alabama’s Cadence Vincent, who didn’t score in her first year but had a breakout showing with top-10 finishes in the 50 free (8th) and 100 free (10th) to score 18 points in her sophomore season.
  • Three international recruits have proven to be significant point scorers for their respective teams from this class, led by Texas A&M’s Miranda Grana, who scored 40 this season and has now earned 64 through her sophomore year. Grana was 3rd in the 100 back, 4th in the 100 fly and 9th in the 200 back, setting sizeable best times across the board. She was a top-eight finisher in both backstrokes last year, but was only 25th in the 100 fly.
  • USC’s Minna Abraham and Michigan’s Stephanie Balduccini battled for the 200 free title, placing a close 2nd and 3rd, respectively, behind Indiana’s Anna Peplowski. The next night, Abraham took 5th and Baluddcini was 6th in the 100 free, giving them 31 and 29 points for the meet, respectively.
  • Tennessee’s Emelie Fast scored 21 points last season, but didn’t race past the midseason invitationals this year.
  • Among divers, Kansas’ Shiyun Lai and Texas’ Bayleigh Cranford both had monster performances as sophomores, with Liu earning ‘A’ final berths in the two springboard events for 25 points and Cranford placing 6th on platform and 7th on 3-meter for 29 points.

RANKED RECRUITS

RANK NAME TEAM TOTAL NCAA POINTS 2024 NCAA POINTS
2025 NCAA POINTS
1 Bella Sims Florida 90 56 34
2 Campbell Stoll Texas 38 14 24
3 Kiley Wilhelm Harvard 0 redshirt no invite
4 Cavan Gormsen Virginia 33 14 19
5 Tess Howley Virginia 30 15 15
6 Lucy Thomas Stanford 5 0 5
7 Erin Gemmell Texas 19 7 12
8 Camille Spink Tennessee 38 7 31
9 Jillian Cox Texas 40 redshirt 40
10 Hannah Bellard Michigan 20 6 14
11 Caroline Bricker Stanford 72 22 50
12 Michaela Mattes Florida 6 6
13 Miriam Sheehan NC State 0 0 relay-only
14 Asia Kozan UC San Diego 0 no invite no invite
15 Berit Berglund Texas 9 9 0
16 Julia Podkoscielny Florida 0 0
17 JoJo Ramey Florida 6 6 0
18 Hailey Tierney Wisconsin 0 0 0
19 Grace Rainey Florida 0 no invite no invite
20 Maddie Waggoner Wisconsin 3 3 no invite
HM Kathryn Hazle Cal 0 0 0
HM Eleanor Sun Princeton 5 0 5
HM Sophie Brison Tennessee 0 no invite 0
HM Emma Kern Texas 2 2 0
HM Lainy Kruger Florida 3 0 3
HM Macky Hodges USC 0 0 0

UNRANKED RECRUITS

NAME TEAM TOTAL NCAA POINTS 2024 NCAA POINTS
2025 NCAA POINTS
McKenzie Siroky Tennessee 23 defer 23
Catie Choate Florida 18 11 7
Cadence Vincent Alabama 18 0 18
Angie Coe Texas 4 4 0
Helena Jones Georgia 3 0 3
Ali Pfaff Duke 1 1 0
Lucy Mehraban Louisville 1 0 1
Sophia Frei UNC 1 no invite 1
Mary Macaulay UNC 1 no invite 1
Dakota Tucker Princeton 1 0 1

INTERNATIONAL RECRUITS

NAME TEAM TOTAL NCAA POINTS 2024 NCAA POINTS
2025 NCAA POINTS
Miranda Grana Texas A&M 64 24 40
Minna Abraham USC 47 16 31
Stephanie Balduccini Michigan 44 15 29
Emelie Fast Tennessee 21 21
Zita Szoke Ohio 6 0 6

DIVING RECRUITS

NAME TEAM TOTAL NCAA POINTS 2024 NCAA POINTS
2025 NCAA POINTS
Shiyun Lai Kansas 31 6 25
Bayleigh Cranford Texas 29 0 29
Elna Widerstrom Minnesota 13 13 0
Camyla Monroy Florida 12 12 0
Emilia Nilsson Garip Utah 9 9
Ella Roselli Indiana 8 0 8
Lauren Hallaselka UCLA 7 7
Lily Witte Indiana 3 0 3
Michelle McLeod Houston 3 0 3

FRESHMAN (HIGH SCHOOL CLASS OF 2024, COLLEGE CLASS OF 2028

RANKED RECRUITS

NAME SWIMMER TEAM TOTAL NCAA POINTS
2025 NCAA POINTS
1 Katie Grimes Virginia 34 34
2 Erika Pelaez NC State 25 25
3 Leah Shackley NC State 37 37
4 Leah Hayes Virginia 23 23
5 Anna Moesch Virginia 29 29
6 Jillian Crooks Tennessee 0 0
7 Levenia Sim Stanford 0 no invite
8 Maggie Wanezek Wisconsin 4 4
9 Piper Enge Texas 14 14
10 Emily Thompson Stanford 7 7
11 Bailey Hartman Virginia 0 0
12 Katie Christopherson Virginia 0 0
13 Lily Christianson NC State 1 1
14 Lillie Nesty Texas 7 7
15 Addison Sauickie Stanford 0 no invite
16 Caroline Larsen Louisville 2.5 2.5
17 Annika Parkhe Stanford 0 0
18 Emily Brown Tennessee 11 11
19 Rebecca Diaconescu Michigan 0 0
20 Camden Doane Louisville 0 no invite
HM Kate Hurst Texas 7 7
HM Teia Salvino SMU 0 no invite
HM Campbell Chase Texas 7 7
HM Katie Belle Sikes Georgia 0 relay-only
HM Sofia Plaza Florida 0 0

UNRANKED RECRUITS

NAME SWIMMER TEAM TOTAL NCAA POINTS
2025 NCAA POINTS
BOTR Mila Nikanorov Ohio State 25 25
BOTR Charlotte Wilson Virginia 6 6
BOTR Addison Reese Florida 4 4
BOTR Amelia Bodenstab Louisville 4 4

INTERNATIONAL RECRUITS

NAME TEAM TOTAL NCAA POINTS
2025 NCAA POINTS
Ella Jansen Tennessee 18 18
Mary-Ambre Moluh Cal 14.5 14.5
Julie Brousseau Florida 12 12
Sienna Angove Ohio State 11 11
Lilou Ressencourt Cal 10 10
Anita Bottazzo Florida 9 9
Daria Golovaty Louisville 2 2
Lisa Nystrand NC State 2 2

DIVING RECRUITS

NAME TEAM TOTAL NCAA POINTS
2025 NCAA POINTS
Alejandra Estudillo Torres Texas 42 42
Lanie Gutch UNC 16 16
Anna Lemkin Stanford 14 14
Avery Worobel Purdue 5 5
Emily Hallifax Auburn 4 4
Maria Sanchez-Moreno Arkansas 4 4
Kate Miller USC 2 2

BONUS: 5TH YEARS (HIGH SCHOOL CLASS OF 2020, COLLEGE CLASS OF 2024)

We’ve traditionally ignored the 5th-year seniors in these rankings, but we’ve included how the overall class of 2020 point rankings have been impacted by this past season below.

Alex Walsh finished with 275 career points over five seasons, with Phoebe Bacon and Aranza Vazquez Montano also eclipsing 200 points and Emma Sticklen hitting an impressive 182.5.

FINAL RANK 2020 RANK NAME COLLEGE TEAM TOTAL NCAA POINTS 2021 NCAA POINTS 2022 NCAA POINTS 2023 NCAA POINTS 2024 NCAA POINTS
2025 NCAA POINTS
1 2 Alex Walsh Virginia 275 48 60 53 60 54
2 3 Phoebe Bacon Wisconsin 224 51 33 46 49 45
3 DIVE Aranza Vazquez Montano UNC 200 47 31 47 40 35
5 9 Emma Sticklen Texas 182.5 18 27 46.5 43 48
7 14 Gabi Albiero Louisville 146 5 35.5 44.5 31 30
4 4 Olivia Bray Texas 144 30 34 42 36 2
8 INTL Mona McSharry Tennessee 144 31 15 33 34 31
6 5 Isabelle Stadden Cal 136 30 27 29 32 18
8 11 Emma Weyant Virginia/Florida 132 defer 32 33 48 19
10 INTL Anna Elendt Texas 107 14 31 33 29
12 7 Kaitlyn Dobler USC 96 23 20 17 29 7
14 DIVE Montserrat Lavenant LSU 95 9 7 17 34 28
11 Early ’21 (#12) Reilly Tiltmann Virginia 90 23 37 18 12
13 DIVE Tarrin Gilliland Indiana 78 31 47
23 6 Lillie Nordmann Stanford 62 defer 17 9 16 20
20 20 Maxine Parker Georgia/Virginia 61 10 0 23.5 12.5 15
15 HM Chloe Stepanek Texas A&M 60 26 1 16 16 1
16 13 Abby Harter Virginia 55 18 12 12 13
16 DIVE Anne Fowler Indiana 55 15 5 17 18
22 DIVE Else Praasterink Louisville/Texas A&M 55 7 22 15 11
18 1 Regan Smith Stanford 52.5 defer 52.5 pro pro
24 INTL Avery Wiseman Alabama 48 defer 22 4 13 9
19 HM Emma Atkinson Virginia Tech 47 21 19 7 relay-only
21 BOTR Sarah Foley Duke 46 22 20 4
24 19 Katherine Zenick Ohio State 39 0 7 24 8
26 10 Anna Keating Virginia 37.5 0 14.5 12 11
32 NR Maya Geringer Ohio State 37 3 9 3 5 17
27 DIVE Bridget O’Neil Texas 34 6 28
28 BOTR Megan Van Berkom Minnesota 33 6 13 14
34 8 Abby Arens NC State 32 0 17 2 13
29 HM Paige Hetrick Louisville 31 0 5 18 8
29 DIVE Emma Gullstrand Miami 31 24 7
31 BOTR Lola Mull Northwestern 30 11 19 0
37 NR Caroline Bentz Virginia Tech 20.5 0 0 3 12 5.5
32 NR Meghan Lee Auburn 20 no invite 0 5 15
NR Sophie Yendell Pitt 20 no invite no invite 0 0 20
34 NR Aly Breslin Tennessee 19 no invite 0 13 6
36 12 Tristen Ulett Louisville 17 0 10 6 0 1
37 INTL Nicole Maier Miami (OH) 15 no invite 0 9 6
47 NR Callahan Dunn Wisconsin 15 no invite no invite no invite 3 12
39 17 Kathryn Ackerman Michigan 14 12 0 2
47 16 Chase Travis Virginia Tech 14 0 3 0 0 11
40 BOTR Liberty Williams Louisville 13 4 9 0
41 INTL Emily Gantriis Cal 10 10 relay-only no invite
42 BOTR Grace Cooper Texas 9 relay-only relay-only 0 9
42 NR Caroline Famous USC 9 no invite relay-only 9
42 DIVE Samantha Vear FSU 9 7 2
45 DIVE Melissa Mirafuentes Nevada 5 5 0
45 DIVE Ciara McGing Ohio State 5 0 0 0 5
47 BOTR Amanda Ray Florida 3 3 0 no invite
47 Olivia Theall Texas A&M 3 no invite 0 0 3
51 NR Sophie Housey Michigan 2.5 2.5 no invite
51 INTL Amalie Mortensen Arizona 2.5 2.5 no invite
53 DIVE Anna Bradescu Georgia Tech 2 2 0 0
53 DIVE Meghan Wenzel Georgia 2 no invite 0 0 2
55 NR Elle Braun Wisconsin 1 no invite 0 no invite 1
55 NR Anna Havens Rice Kentucky 1 1 0 no invite no invite
55 INTL Yara Hierath NC State 1 1 0 no invite
55 INTL Maddy Gatrall Akron 1 no invite no invite 1 0

ARCHIVES: REVISITING RECRUIT RANKS

SPRING 2025 SPRING 2024 SPRING 2023 SPRING 2022 SPRING 2021 SPRING 2020 SPRING 2019 SPRING 2018 SPRING 2017
Class of 2024
Class of 2023 After Sophomore Year
Class of 2022 After Junior Year After Sophomore Year
Class of 2021 After Senior Year After Junior Year After Sophomore Year
Class of 2020 After Senior Year After Junior Year After Sophomore Year
Class of 2019 After Senior Year After Junior Year After Sophomore Year
Class of 2018 After Senior Year After Junior Year After Sophomore Year
Class of 2017 After Senior Year After Junior Year After Sophomore Year
Class of 2016 After Senior Year
Class of 2015
Class of 2014
Class of 2013

In This Story

23
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

23 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kevin
3 days ago

I acknowledge the problems with different team strengths and a relay being carried by a single swimmer. Still I’ve often wondered why relay points aren’t tracked. Just take the relay score divide by 4 and give those points to each swimmer on the relay. Like with relay medals on the international level keep them in a separate category, but they aren’t valueless. Swimmers should get some kind of credit. They also add an additional swim which can impact individual events. Relays are big in the team standings giving the swimmers some recognition on lists like these feels right.

I’m actually OK with a swimmer who was on two winning relays being credited with as many points as a swimmer who… Read more »

Admin
Reply to  Kevin
3 days ago

There are a million ways to cut up numbers, and they all show us a different thing.

Taking relay points and dividing by four shows us “who swam on the best relays,” which to me is not particularly valuable information. At that point, you’re just showing us the best sprinters on the best teams, which is certainly a thing, but it’s not really what we’re trying to evaluate in this specific article.

It would help evaluate relay contributions, which is something we account for in our rankings (we move swimmers with more relay potential above, say, 400 IMers), so it would be of some use there, but I think it would be too crude and too big of an impact… Read more »

Last edited 3 days ago by Braden Keith
Kevin
Reply to  Braden Keith
3 days ago

Yeah I get that, and the different team strengths was actually more about certain teams (like certain countries) likely being the ones to score the most. It’s why tracking it separately was my first thought.

I also agree that it’s mostly a metric of who swam on the fastest relays, but isn’t the fact that you adjust rankings for relay potential also a reason to track relay points as a review metric just like individual points? We all know that sprinters are more valuable point wise and that distance and 200 of strokes just aren’t as likely to get relay contributions. So track them second, see if the predictions that they would be big relay contributors is true or not.… Read more »

joebagadonuts
3 days ago

Great article – for those who enjoy looking at data. Nicely done – and interesting to see how rankings translated over time. There’s a relatively small number of “surprises” in the data.

Expat Swimmer
3 days ago

The thing that jumps out is just how many top 20 recruits never score at all, especially for those ranked 11-20. Certain swimmers and teams get called out for it, but flopping is really pretty typical. Some of it has to be that the Covid 5th years have meant 20% more top 10 recruits to compete against, but still a lot of zeros.

Swimgeek
Reply to  Expat Swimmer
3 days ago

True. Not scoring shouldn’t be dubbed a flop. It’s just kind of the norm. The 15th ranked swimmer in a class that becomes a regular scorer is the exception.

Retired Swimdad
Reply to  Expat Swimmer
2 days ago

I think if you look at the top twenty recruits there is probably a lot of overlap in swims, esp. the 50,100, 200 free since they are usually ranked higher due to their ability to add points to relays. Over 4 years that is 80 recruits that are in the top 20 and close to half are in that freestyle distance for relays. Only 16 spots score so it’s only logical that some won’t score. It’s easy to improve year over year and still never score but they were worthy of their rankings.

I miss the ISL (go dawgs)
3 days ago

What happened to Grace Sheble? Not even trying to take a shot at NCS. Injuries? Illness?

Bad Man
Reply to  I miss the ISL (go dawgs)
3 days ago

NCSU happened.

Swammer123
Reply to  I miss the ISL (go dawgs)
3 days ago

Came from a high school program that tends to squeeze everything out of them in hs. Very sandpipers style

NSSO
Reply to  I miss the ISL (go dawgs)
3 days ago

She seemed to be improving her Soph year….

Then last year’s disaster of a freshman class seemed to wreck havoc on their women’s team chemistry…. And this was a rebuilding year (team unity wise).

It’s out unfair to say state doesn’t develop swimmers. Look at half their men’s team. Look at their female sprinters.

It could simply be that some swimmers want to be students on a fun team and swimming takes a back seat. NCState has always presented themselves as a fun culture. Desorbo and Halloway established that over a decade ago.

I miss the ISL (Go dawgs)
Reply to  NSSO
3 days ago

As a close friend of a guy on the team, I can confirm they certainly seem to have a fun culture!

VFL
3 days ago

Where’s McKenzie Siroky?

Captain Bubbles
3 days ago

To think, Lucy Bell came in as Diet Charlotte Hook…

15m steps ahead
3 days ago

Anna Peplowski progression is beyond amazing.

22.8 to 21.8 (50)
50.1 to 47.1 (100)
1:48.0 to 1:40.5 (200)
4:52.8 to 4:33.8 (500)
1:57.8 to 1:51.1 (200 Back)
Also set multiple LCM PBs and qualified to Olympics. When I look to swimcloud recruitment power ranking back in 2021, she was only 5.34!! Is she the first ever swimmer to scored 100+ points in NCAA while the PR is 5.+?

Chas
Reply to  15m steps ahead
3 days ago

Age 15 gave up cheerleading to swim year round.

Randy
Reply to  Chas
3 days ago

Now they, are cheering leading for her! Wow.

Randy

Hmm
3 days ago

Wuffies pitching alot of shutouts on these charts

About James Sutherland

James Sutherland

James swam five years at Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ontario, specializing in the 200 free, back and IM. He finished up his collegiate swimming career in 2018, graduating with a bachelor's degree in economics. In 2019 he completed his graduate degree in sports journalism. Prior to going to Laurentian, James swam …

Read More »