2024 SC WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS
- December 10-15, 2024
- Duna Arena, Budapest, Hungary
- SCM (25m)
- Meet Central
- Roster Index
- SwimSwam Preview Index
- Pick’em
- Psych Sheets
- Live Results
- Prelims Live Recap: Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | Day 6
- Finals Live Recap: Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | Day 6
- Complete final results (PDF)
The United States won another FINA/World Aquatics Trophy, which is at least their 11th-straight such title at the World Short Course Swimming Championships dating back to 2004 – the earliest Trophy results SwimSwam has been able to locate.
Carried by the women’s team and their 579 points, more than 250 ahead of the next-best women’s group from Australia, the U.S. scored 1,005 points.
The U.S. had a 306-point margin overall ahead of the next-best group of athletes, which was the Neutral Athletes B team. That group is neutral athletes holding Russian passports. Australia was third, another 100 points behind the Neutral Athletes.
The Neutral Athletes B men actually outscored the Americans by 7 points; while the U.S. men had some highlights, like the World Records in the 200 free from Luke Hobson and the dominant World Record in the 800 free relay, the back-end of the roster struggled depth-wise, leading to the Russian athletes outscoring them.
The U.S. margin was the biggest since 2018.
Team USA captains Lilly King, Regan Smith, Carson Foster, and Kieran Smith accepted the award on behalf of the American team.
The FINA Points Trophy, as compared to the medals table that the U.S. also won, is considered a better measure of a country’s depth at a meet. For example, Canada, lifted by performances from stars Summer McIntosh and Ilya Kharun, won the second-most medals. Those two were responsible (as solos or on relays) for 10 of the country’s 15 medals, though, and their smallish roster of 18 athletes, though, only placed 5th in the team trophy.
Historical Margins of Victory for the U.S., World Short Course Swimming Championships
- 2004 – 167 point margin
- 2006 – 168 point margin
- 2008 – 44 point margin
- 2010 – 268 point margin
- 2012 – 406 point margin
- 2014 – 267 point margin
- 2016 – 279 point margin
- 2018 – 310 point margin
- 2021 – 222 point margin*
- 2022 – 234.5 point margin*
- 2024 – 306 point margin
*FINA didn’t release the Trophy standings in 2021 and 2022, so Barry Revzin calculated them. This comes with the caveat that the official Trophy scoring sometimes doesn’t align with our math, and we can’t figure out why.
Trophy Scoring
Teams are awarded points for the finishing placement of each individual and relay.
- Individual Event Places 1 – 16: 18, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 point
- Relay Places 1 – 8: 36, 32, 30, 28, 26, 24, 22, 20 points.
Full 2024 Trophy Standings
Rank | NAT | NAT Code | Men | Women | Mixed | Total |
1 | United States of America | USA | 364 | 579 | 62 | 1005 |
2 | Neutral Athletes B | NAB | 371 | 228 | 100 | 699 |
3 | Australia | AUS | 221 | 322 | 56 | 599 |
4 | Italy | ITA | 296 | 198 | 84 | 578 |
5 | Canada | CAN | 128 | 254 | 94 | 476 |
6 | France | FRA | 139 | 126 | 0 | 265 |
7 | Hungary | HUN | 133 | 126 | 0 | 259 |
8 | Japan | JPN | 145 | 88 | 22 | 255 |
9 | People’s Republic of China | CHN | 85 | 145 | 0 | 230 |
10 | Poland | POL | 147 | 52 | 30 | 229 |
11 | Netherlands | NED | 63 | 95 | 66 | 224 |
12 | Great Britain | GBR | 23 | 137 | 26 | 186 |
13 | Sweden | SWE | 36 | 122 | 24 | 182 |
14 | Spain | ESP | 100 | 54 | 24 | 178 |
15 | Germany | GER | 70 | 97 | 0 | 167 |
16 | Brazil | BRA | 109 | 44 | 0 | 153 |
17 | Neutral Athletes A | NAA | 50 | 75 | 0 | 125 |
18 | Ireland | IRL | 47 | 59 | 0 | 106 |
19 | South Africa | RSA | 52 | 51 | 0 | 103 |
20 | Lithuania | LTU | 38 | 38 | 0 | 76 |
21 | Hong Kong, China | HKG | 9 | 36 | 22 | 67 |
22 | Czechia | CZE | 33 | 31 | 0 | 64 |
22 | Switzerland | SUI | 64 | 0 | 0 | 64 |
24 | Türkiye | TUR | 61 | 0 | 0 | 61 |
25 | Estonia | EST | 26 | 28 | 0 | 54 |
26 | Austria | AUT | 47 | 6 | 0 | 53 |
27 | Finland | FIN | 14 | 33 | 0 | 47 |
28 | Tunisia | TUN | 44 | 0 | 0 | 44 |
29 | Croatia | CRO | 41 | 1 | 0 | 42 |
30 | Slovakia | SVK | 0 | 15 | 24 | 39 |
31 | Cayman Islands | CAY | 33 | 0 | 0 | 33 |
31 | Denmark | DEN | 0 | 33 | 0 | 33 |
31 | Greece | GRE | 23 | 10 | 0 | 33 |
48 | Bahamas | BAH | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
49 | Ukraine | UKR | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
50 | Lebanon | LBN | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Is there a pdf document link from World Aqustics that addresses the points system?
4th paragraph should say Neutral Athletes B men
I love that nobody can explain how the points actually work so that everyone comes up with the same results. So normal in World Aquatics
Yeah. And it’s so bad that it’s basically not worth asking. From Barry:
okay here’s what I have for Romania, and I think this is right:
COMAN Darius-Stefan: tied for 14th in the M 200 Breast (2.50)
BADEA Robert-Andrei: 11th in the M 400 IM (6)
PROCA Andrei-Theodor: 12th in the M 1500 Free (5)
POPESCU Denis-Laurean: tied for 14th in the M 100 back (2.50)
PRISECARIU Aissia Claudia: 15th in the F 200 back (2)
so my men add up to 16 but apparently should add up to 12.
I hand-checked his math a dozen times and cannot explain the four point discrepancy. Maybe one of you can.
If somebody can come up with a way such that the above results for the four men get you to 12 points (instead of 16), I’d love to see it. Or if I have the results wrong, would be good to know too.
For the heck of it, I did a spot check for Lithuania and it adds up.
Men
100 FR, 200 FR, 400 FR, 50 BK
10 + 14 + 8 + 6 = 38
Women
50 BR, 100 BR, 100 BR, 200 BR
18 + 10 + 4 + 6 = 38
The points system should be simplified:
1 – 8: Individual Events
1 – 8: Relays
For the heck of it, I conducted a spot check for the Chinese men and the results add up.
CHN (men)
200 BK, 50 BR, 100 BR, 200 BR, 200 BR, 200 FL, 200 IM, 400 IM, 4 x 200 FR-R
12 + 18 + 18 + 8 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 1 + 22 = 85
As far as I can remember, USA Swimming did not even bother to replace Hunter Armstrong and Torri Huske on the roster.
Did aussie women or us women have a better team at paris
Did the Aussie women or USA women have a better team at the 2024 Junior Pan Pacs?
Did the Aussie women or USA women have a better team at the 2024 World Aquatics Swimming World Cup?
so this article is actually about the short course world championships that happened this week. if you scroll down far enough on swimswam i’m sure you’ll find the ones about paris
Unfortunately I do have at least half a brain cell to figure this is about this weeks meet. Was just curious to be honest. Wonder how the women’s team here ranks to other high level team performances from the past.
If only there was a service, a place that had all the information in the world on it. Every bit of it. You could look up such a thing. If only…
The trolls from down under are so jealous.
Yeah I suppose looking back at the results for yourself has a three-brain-cell minimum
Sounds like sour grapes to me.
Stop I’m blushing. Will see if brain cell number 2 is working today
It doesn’t seem that McIntosh and Kharun are responsible for 10 out of 11 medals since MSH got two individual medals.
Ingrid Wilm and Kylie Masse also won individual medals