There Were 10 World Records Set in Fukuoka. Where Does That Rank All-Time?

The 10 World Records set at the 2023 World Aquatics Championships last week in Fukuoka, Japan felt like a huge haul. It seemed like a historically-big number that would stand the test against other major meets (aside from, of course, the infamous 2009 World Championships, where new suit technology led to World Records broken in almost every event).

But as it turns out, it wasn’t a historic high – not even close.

According to the World Record database maintained by SwimSwam statistician Daniel Takata Gomes, there have been 25 long course swim meets in history where more FINA/World Aquatics World Records have been broken. That includes the 2015 (11) and 2017 (11) World Championships, plus an equal number at the 2019 World Championships.

2023 World Championships – World Records set:

Date Round Event Time Name Nation
July 23 Final Women’s 400 metre freestyle 3:55.38 Ariarne Titmus  Australia
July 23 Final Men’s 400 metre individual medley 4:02.50 Léon Marchand  France
July 23 Final Women’s 4 × 100 metre freestyle relay 3:27.96 Mollie O’Callaghan (52.08)
Shayna Jack (51.69)
Meg Harris (52.29)
Emma McKeon (51.90)
 Australia
July 26 Final Women’s 200 metre freestyle 1:52.85 Mollie O’Callaghan  Australia
July 27 Final Women’s 4 × 200 metre freestyle relay 7:37.50 Mollie O’Callaghan (1:53.66)
Shayna Jack (1:55.63)
Brianna Throssell (1:55.80)
Ariarne Titmus (1:52.42)
 Australia
July 28 Final Men’s 200 metre breaststroke 2:05.48 Qin Haiyang  China
July 29 Semifinal 2 Women’s 50 metre freestyle 23.61 Sarah Sjöström  Sweden
July 29 Semifinal 2 Women’s 50 metre breaststroke =29.30 Rūta Meilutytė  Lithuania
July 29 Final Mixed 4 × 100 metre freestyle relay 3:18.83 Jack Cartwright (48.14)
Kyle Chalmers (47.25)
Shayna Jack (51.73)
Mollie O’Callaghan (51.71)
 Australia
July 30 Final Women’s 50 metre breaststroke 29.16 Rūta Meilutytė  Lithuania

With $30,000 awarded to each World Record, that meant and additional $300,000 in prize money awarded to swimmers at the meet.

Still, the mark is a huge increase from the just three that were set at the 2022 championships – which with so many other major international meets happening and so many conspicuous absences, was a bit of a wonky affair.

Rank Meet WRs
1 World Championships Roma, Lazio 2009 43
2 Olympic Games Montréal, Québec 1976 29
3 Olympic Games München, Bavaria 1972 28
4 Olympic Games Beijing 2008 25
5 World Championships Beograd (Belgrade) 1973 18
6 European Championships Wien (Vienna) 1974 17
6 USA Olympic Trials Long Beach, California 1968 17
8 GDR Olympic Trials Berlin 1976 16
8 Olympic Games Seoul 1988 16
10 Olympic Games Sydney, New South Wales 2000 15
10 World Championships Melbourne, Victoria 2007 15
12 Olympic Games Tokyo 1964 14
12 USA Olympic Trials Chicago, Illinois 1972 14
12 World Championships Barcelona 2003 14
15 AAU Championships Los Angeles, California 1970 13
15 Men’s NAAA Championships Los Angeles, California 1961 13
15 World Championships Berlin 1978 13
18 Olympic Games Los Angeles, California 1984 12
18 Pan American Games Winnipeg, Manitoba 1967 12
18 Pan Pacific Championships Sydney, New South Wales 1999 12
21 Olympic Games Moskva (Moscow) 1980 11
21 USA Spring Nationals Austin, Texas 1980 11
21 USA Summer Nationals Los Altos, California 1964 11
21 World Championships Budapest 2017 11
21 World Championships Kazan 2015 11
26 AAU Championships Lincoln, Nebraska 1966 10
26 Olympic Games Barcelona 1992 10
26 USA v GDR Dual Meet Concord, California 1974 10
26 World Championships Roma, Lazio 1994 10
26 World Championships Gwangju 2019 10
26 World Championships Fukuoka 2023 10

 

In This Story

123
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

123 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
rudi schmidt
1 year ago

cate campbell—nbc is not the usa… americans love u aussies…enjoy your hard earned success… but it won’t last…ha

David
1 year ago

Go back to the 1960 Australian Olympic trials/ National Championships in Feb/ March and think you may need to add another entry fairly high up in your rankings.
It is worth checking it was certainly a sensational meet at the time.

Big T
1 year ago

Is Molly’s 4 WR at a meet a record?

Sub13
Reply to  Big T
1 year ago

No. Thorpey broke 4 last time in Fukuoka but I’m pretty sure there have been more than that as well.

David S
Reply to  Big T
1 year ago

Phelps Melbourne ‘07
5

CanuckSwimFan
1 year ago

My stats nerd observations …. Be interesting also to compare number of world records to number of events. E.g world champs, at least over the last 20 years or so, have the 50’s for all the events, the mixed relays were a fairly recent editions. The women’s 4×2 relays were a relatively new edition. Whereas none of the 50 except 5 fr are included at the Olympics & even 50 fr was only started to be included in the 1980’s i think. Also perhaps consider number of rounds or chances to set WR..( were there semis etc.). The more rounds the more opportunities to set WR. ..

also 2009 was the year of the super suit-so maybe that needs… Read more »

David S
1 year ago

I’m biased.
So Titmus WR was best

Facts
1 year ago

Top 3 male swimmers in the world: 1. Leon Marchand, 2. Qin Haiyang, 3. Ahmed Hafnoui, HM: Kliment Kolesnikov. Top 3 female swimmers in the world: 1. Kaylee Mckeown, 2. Summer McIntosh, 3. Mollie O’Callaghan, HM: Ariarne Titmus

swimmer
Reply to  Facts
1 year ago

Katie ledecky? Even if she’s not re breaking her records she is more dominant than any of the female swimmers on this list

Swammer
Reply to  swimmer
1 year ago

And Sarah Sjostrom as well…

Lap Counter
1 year ago

No Americans set any WR! Is that first in this list?

David S
Reply to  Lap Counter
1 year ago

They’re not a swimming superpower anymore.

Lisa
Reply to  David S
1 year ago

I don’t know if you can judged that based on one meet.

Last edited 1 year ago by Lisa
David S
Reply to  Lisa
1 year ago

Not just any meet.
Pre-Olympic World Championship

Wanna Sprite?
Reply to  David S
1 year ago

This is a dumb comment. We’re usually slower during pre Olympic world championship, we’ll be fine

Lap Counter
Reply to  Wanna Sprite?
1 year ago

But “critics” said usa was slow at those Worlds because they picked the team a year earlier. So this year USA Swimming picked it a month out and …….
Now what?

Lisa
Reply to  Lap Counter
1 year ago

And a lot of them this year is rookie and first timers on international meet and one of them almost won mens 100 free

BSdetector
1 year ago

Yet nobody finds it odd that WRs are constantly going down with no significant change to any element of swimming since 2009? Cyclists at least have gear and aerodynamics as an excuse for outrageous results.

carlo
Reply to  BSdetector
1 year ago

I have often wondered the same myself. Track and field world records are very rare and seem incredibly hard to break, with some still standing from the 1980s.

Track and field world records truly feel like a once-in-a lifetime event, some of us may be dead before some track and field world records are broken. Swimming world records don’t feel the same in terms of magnitude, but that doesn’t make swimming world records not impressive.

Maybe it’s easier to break world records by moving through water than by moving through air?

Last edited 1 year ago by carlo
Noah
Reply to  carlo
1 year ago

Feel like swimming has a lot more room for new techniques vs track

Boknows34
Reply to  Noah
1 year ago

Yep, as humans I think we’re much closer to our maximum limit as runners than swimmers. Track improvements recently have in some ways due to better technology with shoes and track.

Ragnar
Reply to  carlo
1 year ago

The volume and depth of competition is immensely higher in track and field. It goes back thousands of years, and butterfly has only been a stroke since the 50s!

Within 100 years, swimming records will probably reach their general peak

Ryan Crouser is someone that is breaking records yearly, but it’s because he’s more efficient and simply larger than previous record holders in the shot put. One day the 6’8 version of him will arrive and smoke 24m or even 25m.

And the show goes on!

The absolute limit of swimming events is probably near, like the 100 free, the most famous of events,
will never drop under 45 seconds.

Last edited 1 year ago by Ragnar
Abcdefg
Reply to  Ragnar
1 year ago

I agree that there is still some room to improve swimming times with technique, but within a few decades we’ll hit the threshold of what’s humanly possible. Like what was mentioned with track, breaking WRs will become very rare and it’ll take a truly exceptional person physically, mentally, etc. to do it. We’re past the era where someone like Michael Phelps can come in, swim dozens of races spanning multiple events in a single championships, and shatter WRs left and right. The era of the specialist is well underway. Swimming fewer events, better, is going to be the path forward to breaking WRs. Swimming has gotten incredibly competitive, as evidenced by these past world championships!

swimfast
Reply to  BSdetector
1 year ago

Swimming is simply becoming more popular. The sport is also just no doubt in a honeymoon period as a whole.

Last edited 1 year ago by swimfast
CanuckSwimFan
Reply to  BSdetector
1 year ago

2009 were the super suits so was a total anomaly, 1976 had the east german women drug issue .. so could be argued top 2 years were a result of ‘technology’ that was later deemed problematic. The problem with 2009 is that it meant records were ‘accepted’ but then the suits were banned. But some how the wr were kept. 🤷🏻‍♂️ (A head scratcher at least f0r me.) inflating the number of records set in 2009 & then negatively impacting the number of records that were set in the years afterwards.

BSdetector
Reply to  CanuckSwimFan
1 year ago

2009 and 1976 were anomalies with a known cause. My point, unlike some people here argue, is that swimming is very mature as a sport and didn’t have much room to grow over the past 20, or even 30 years. There have been no significant changes in technique across all strokes, training or what little there is of technology (suits, goggles, pools…) that can easily explain the constant and quite significant progression not just in WRs, but also records in junior categories. Not buying it. We’re at a point where 1, maybe 2, WR per year would be normal, expected with emergence of some exceptional athlete per generation. And here we’re discussing 10 as nothing to be concerned about.

In… Read more »

okthen
Reply to  Braden Keith
1 year ago

Maybe true from a US centric view but certainly not universal with regard to talent field and training even looking at my own experience over 30 years ago.

Normal, and explained by your arguments, is when a 14 y.o. breaks a 1500 record from back in early 70s. Highly suspect is when you have WR falling nearly every year in 100 whatever approaching half a second under the previous.

It’s probably more a case of not wanting to look at the obvious and stopping the party (money flow) while everyone is finally enjoying some recognition. Textbook cycling scenario.

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder/co-owner of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »