Katie Ledecky on Going First Best Time in 800 Free Since 2016: “I can’t stop smiling”

2025 Pro Swim Series – Fort Lauderdale

Katie Ledecky broke her own 9-year-old world record in the 800 free tonight in Ft Lauderdale, clocking a time of 8:04.12. Her previous world record and lifetime best, 8:04.79, came from the 2016 Rio Olympic final. After going her first lifetime in nearly a decade in the event, Ledecky was all smiles in the mixed zone.

In This Story

31
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

31 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Yikes
19 days ago

It’s impossible not to root for her

Rumbuns
19 days ago

Jon Urbanchek is also certainly smiling down on that swim. Monumental achievement.

Walsh-Madden-Grimes-Weinstein
20 days ago

I’m smiling, as well.

KSW
20 days ago

Ledecky is in her 2015 phelps era rn

PFA
Reply to  KSW
20 days ago

But better

Walsh-Madden-Grimes-Weinstein
Reply to  KSW
20 days ago

Close but not in the shorter distances:

2016 Arena Pro Swim Series – Austin, TX
W 100 FR – 53.75
W 200 FR – 1:54.43

The Kaz
20 days ago

I’m beginning to think that this pool is not 50m in length, these time are downright suspicious!

Oldmanswimmer
Reply to  The Kaz
20 days ago

They use a laser to measure pool length so that is unlikely, but it is crazy fast. This pool always has been though.

Walsh-Madden-Grimes-Weinstein
Reply to  The Kaz
20 days ago

To think how slow the pool was in Paris, France and how fast the pool was in Budapest, Hungary.

maheny
Reply to  The Kaz
20 days ago

that suspicion would only make sense if times would be significantly faster ACROSS THE BOARD from all swimmers. thats not the case.

Cate
Reply to  The Kaz
19 days ago

*sigh* yes, sweetie, the pool is the correct length. Move on to your bpnext conspiracy theory. 🙄

PFA
20 days ago

The Queen of swimming. Not saying she would do this but I do wonder if she’s going to think about if sub 8 is possible in the future? If not her even maybe someone else.

96Swim
Reply to  PFA
20 days ago

I think we’ll see sub 8 within the next 20 years. Katie is such an outlier that it may take awhile for someone that can break her records to come along but Titmus and McIntosh did it in the 400. Eventually someone will. In 40 years it’ll probably take sub 8 to make an Olympic final.

IRO
Reply to  96Swim
20 days ago

It was a long time between Janet Evans’ 8:16 and Adlington’s 8:14, but not so long until Ledecky took ten seconds off that. You just never know when some freak of nature will crop up.

PFA
Reply to  IRO
20 days ago

That reminds me how far ahead was Janet Evans ahead of number two all time when she went 8:16.22?

Pags
Reply to  PFA
20 days ago

A bit over 3 seconds? Anke Mohring held the record at 8:19.53 from Aug 1987 until Janet took it back in March 1988 with an 8:17.12. I don’t think anyone else went any faster than Mohring’s previous record between then and August 1989 when Janet lowered the recored to 8:16.22.

Kevin
Reply to  Pags
20 days ago

I’m not sure anyone else went under 8:20 other than Janet until 2000. There is also the whole how do you feel about any East German swimmer from the 1980’s with Anke Mohring’s only sub 8:20 and short term WR. The wikipedia page looks to have the WR progression correct. Tracey Wickham’s 8:24.62 from Aug of 1972 until Evan’s 8:22.44 in July of 1987. Then the progress Pags mentions. Swimming doesn’t have stuff like this https://www.alltime-athletics.com/w_800ok.htm that would make these questions a lot easier.

Pags
Reply to  Kevin
20 days ago

Yeah, the East German performances of that era are suspect for sure. Australian Julie McDonald went 8:22.93 at Seoul, which I believe was still the fastest non-East-German time standing when Janet went 8:16 a year later. It is hard to find comprehensive data.

FWIW, Janet’s 8:16 still has her ranked as 12th all time. I don’t think there are any other performances from the 1980’s or 1990’s in any event, men or women, that keep the swimmer ranked in the top 25 all time. And only a handful from the pre-super-suit 2000’s (i.e. 2000-2007). The overwhelming majority of Top 25 performers have done it in the last 16 years.

JimSwim22
Reply to  Pags
20 days ago

Mary T 2Fl from 81 is ranked where?

Beachmouse
Reply to  JimSwim22
20 days ago

Not sure where it ranks absolutely but Madame Butterfly’s 200fly time would have been 4th at the Paris Olympics 40+ years later. And that’s with popping up right after the turns and an old Lycra suit.

Pags
Reply to  JimSwim22
18 days ago

Just outside the top 25. Mary T’s record was 2:05.96. Cammile Adams is currently ranked the 25th best performer ever @ 2:09.90.

Mr Piano
Reply to  96Swim
20 days ago

I wouldn’t be surprised if nobody breaks 8:04 within the next 20 years, people were taking about Katie breaking 8:00 back in 2016 but it took her 9 years just to get back to that 8:04.

Others may have passed her in the 400 but the 800 and 1500 have always been Ledecky’s better events and speciality.

Pags
Reply to  Mr Piano
20 days ago

Only two swimmers have significantly advanced the pace since Adlingtions 8:14.10 mark set in 2008; Ledecky and McIntosh. If Summer set a singular goal of beating Ledecky’s 800 WR, I believe she could do it. I don’t see that happening, though, as she has much broader goals and the talent to achieve them.

Walsh-Madden-Grimes-Weinstein
Reply to  Pags
20 days ago

Nope!

I foresee Summer McIntosh swimming the W 200 BK in lieu of the W 800 FR.

Mr Piano
Reply to  96Swim
20 days ago

Also, it will absolutely not take sub 8 to make it to an A final in 40 years unless they bring back super suits and give them fins.

Mary T’s 200 fly time from 1981 would have qualified for 3rd in the 2024 semis, and swimming is way more optimized now. 8:04 might still be a winning time in 40 years

M d e
Reply to  PFA
20 days ago

I want to say no. She’s still so far away and getting old (for an elite swimmer).

But on the other hand a few hours ago I would have said she was never going 8:04 again.

Facts
20 days ago

Thought she’d foresure retire after LA 2028. Beginning to think she’ll swim through 2032 and still be a winner

Geez
Reply to  Facts
20 days ago

In an interview she said she doesn’t see herself going to 2032, I wonder if she’ll change her mind

Togger
Reply to  Geez
20 days ago

Imagine even she doesn’t know, life can change a lot in seven years. Obvious one for a female athlete is whether they want to have kids, but there are so many factors that could influence things.

Geez
Reply to  Togger
20 days ago

She did say she wants to have kids multiple times.

Last edited 20 days ago by Geez
Swimfan27
Reply to  Facts
20 days ago

She is certainly an anomaly when it comes to women’s swimming. You just don’t really see women getting faster or being as consistent as she has been, especially in distance races.

About Coleman Hodges

Coleman Hodges

Coleman started his journey in the water at age 1, and although he actually has no memory of that, something must have stuck. A Missouri native, he joined the Columbia Swim Club at age 9, where he is still remembered for his stylish dragon swim trunks. After giving up on …

Read More »