SwimSwam’s Top 100 For 2024: Men’s #40-31

After the record-setting year that was 2023, we’re gearing up for another exciting year over here at SwimSwam, and part of that is releasing our fourth annual Top 100 list—check out last year’s rankings here.

Similar to 2023, we’ve taken a statistically driven approach reliant primarily upon world rankings and World Championship medals. We’ve also taken into account things such as potential, Olympic medal opportunities, injuries, and versatility. Long course is weighted more than short course, though performance potential in both formats is factored in.

We’ve also moved Russian and Belarusian swimmers way down this list because of their likely absence from the Olympics or either World Championship meet. While that doesn’t preclude them from swimming fast at domestic meets (including whatever Russia comes up with to replace the Olympics), those swims just won’t mean quite as much without the international spotlight.

We’ll be breaking down the top 100 into multiple installments, so keep an eye out as they’re released.

These lists are, by nature, subjective. If you disagree, leave your thoughts/ranks in the comments.

Braden Keith, Sophie Kaufman, Anya Pelshaw and Mark Wild contributed to this report.

Men’s Rankings:

#40: Arno Kamminga, Netherlands – When Adam Peaty took time off from the sport it looked like Kamminga was set to take over the breaststroke crown. For a variety of reasons, that hasn’t panned out. So, where does that leave the Dutchman? After a career of racing both the 100/200 breaststroke, the 28-year-old seems to have more focused on the 100 breast; he’s been opting out of the 200, and didn’t make the event final at the 2023 World Championships. He’s still at the top of the field in the 100 breast, as evidenced by his three-way tie for silver in Fukuoka with Nic Fink and Nicolo Martinenghi. Those two have caught up to him and Qin Haiyang has blown past everyone which makes it more challenging for Kamminga to get on the podium than perhaps it once was. But he’s shown that he’s still capable, which is what keeps him in the top half of these rankings.

#39: Roman Mityukov, Switzerland – In the semis of the men’s 200 back at the 2023 World Championships, Mityukov set a Swiss Record of 1:55.85, his first time sub-1:56, en route to qualifying for the final in the top spot. He lowered that record to 1:55.34 in the final and earned bronze. With a host of swimmers who have been 1:55-mid, it’s tough to predict how the 200 back is going to shake out in Paris. But Mityukov backed up his summer swims by clocking 1:55.99 in January—a very solid swim for this time of year. Consistently being in the 1:55 range is a positive sign for Mityukov as he aims to defend (or improve) his podium position. His 1:55.34 showing also ranked #3 in the world last year, and at 23, probably has more time to chop off.

#38: Dare Rose, USA – Rose began to drop time in the long course pool in 2022, but in 2023 he fully broke through and arrived as one of the best male butterfliers the U.S. has to offer. He broke 51 seconds for the first time in the 100 fly at U.S. Nationals to make his first senior international team. Then, he continued to drop time at Worlds, swimming 50.46 to earn bronze. Rose’s rise was especially well-timed for the United States when you add in the context of Caeleb Dressel‘s build back to form. When it looked like the American men would be without a serious butterfly contender (50/100) both for individual and relay events, Rose stepped up and performed well. If Dressel is back on form, the path to an Olympic roster spot gets more difficult but for now, Rose looks like the next man up for the U.S. in the 100 fly. Only three swimmers were faster than him last year and Shaine Casas was the only other American sub-51.

#37: Krzysztof Chmielewski, Poland – In 2023, Chmielewski successfully transitioned from winning junior titles to the senior international stage, though he did make the Olympic final in Tokyo at the age of 17. The Polish native followed up his 2022 World Junior title in the 200 fly with a silver at the World Championships in Fukuoka. Chmielewski wasn’t on many people’s radars heading into the meet, but he made the most of Kristof Milak‘s absence, charging on the final 50 meters to move from 4th to 2nd with a personal best of 1:53.62. Since then, Chmielewski started his collegiate career at USC and has been putting up fast times in yards for the Trojans. His underwaters need work, and with competing in the NCAA fine-tuning that skill, he’ll be even better equipped for the impending rematch with fellow rising stars Ilya Kharun and Thomas Heilman, along with Japan’s Tomoru Honda. The four of them were separated by just two-tenths in last year’s Worlds final. It’s also possible we see Chmielewski, who will turn 20 prior to the Games, push for a spot in the Olympic final in the 1500 free, though the event is so stacked he would need to lop off 20 seconds to be in medal contention.

#36: Shaine Casas, USA – There are maybe three swimmers in this entire list who are more difficult to place than Shaine Casas. Over the last quad and despite a World Championship bronze medal in the 200 back in 2022, Casas has built up a reputation of putting up his fastest swims in low-pressure environments, such as the 2022 U.S. Summer Nationals or the ‘B’ final of the U.S. Open, having set some meet records from the latter late last year. After a tough week of misses at the 2023 U.S. Nationals, Casas made his 2nd Worlds team in the 200 IM on the last day of the meet. He was in the silver medal position at the final turn in the Fukuoka final (from Lane 8 no less) but was unable to hold off the charging Brits Duncan Scott and Tom Dean and wound up off the podium in 4th. Casas’ times (wherever they came from) and his versatility keep him ranked highly, but 2024 will be a critical year for Casas to show that he can be at his best when it counts most. He was 4th in the world last year in the 200 IM (1:56.06), 6th in the 100 fly (50.80), and has the pedigree to make the U.S. Olympic team in both backstrokes.

#35: Daiya Seto, Japan – It’s been an up-and-down quad for Seto. After a disappointing home Olympics in 2021, he’s managed to rebound and earn medals at the last two World Championships—bronze in 2022 in the 200 IM and bronze in 2023 in the 400 IM. Those are both encouraging swims for the 29-year-old, as he’s showing that he still has what it takes to compete at the highest level. The veteran will need to fight to earn a spot on either IM podium in Paris, but the 400 IM is probably where he has a better chance. Though he was 4:09.41 in the Fukuoka final, Seto went 4:07.92 at the Japan Open. Getting back under 4:08 was a huge step for him and should be a confidence booster as he heads into the Olympic year. On the SC front, he could become the first person to seven-peat at Worlds. In 2022, he became the first person to six-peat at SC Worlds in the 400 IM.

#34: Matthew Temple, Australia – Temple is a bit of a wildcard heading into Paris. Not that he’s been inconsistent on the major international stage, but occasionally he’s shown flashes that he could challenge for the gold medal in the 100 fly. At the 2021 Australian Olympic Trials, he went 50.45, ranking him #8 all-time, but then fell just short of the Olympic podium in 4th (50.81). He then took 5th at the 2022 World Championships (51.15) and tied for 5th in 2023 (50.92). However, the 24-year-old is coming off blasting a Commonwealth Record of 50.25 in December, ranking him #6 all-time. Whether or not he can find that peak 50-low swim when the pressure is at its highest remains the question.

#33: Nicolo Martinenghi, Italy – After Martinenghi had a breakout year in 2022, he had a quieter 2023. Part of that is a function of Qin Haiyang‘s breaststroke dominance, but Martinenghi was also about a half second off his 2022 times in the 50/100 breaststroke (26.33/58.26), the latter of which won him his first individual world title. In 2023, he was part of a three-way tie for silver with Nic Fink and Arno Kamminga who are his primary competition—along with maybe Adam Peaty—as he looks to return to the Olympic podium. Martinenghi is slated to race in Donha as well, providing him with ample opportunities to shine this year, especially if he gets back to his 2022 form.

#32: Ben Proud, Great Britain – Proud is expected to race in Doha, which will give him a chance to medal in the 50 fly, but we expect that the 50 free is going to take up the majority of the pure sprinter’s focus this season. Proud owns a personal best of 21.11 which would put him right in the mix with Cameron McEvoy, but he hasn’t been that fast since 2018. Proud claimed bronze at the 2023 World Championships in 21.58, .01 shy of tying for silver. The 29-year-old ended the year by winning 50 free gold at SC Euros in a European record of 20.18, just .02 back of Caeleb Dressel‘s world record. Like McEvoy, Proud is certainly one of the older contenders in the field but if he can maintain or better his 2023 form then he’ll be in a good position to earn his first Olympic medal. He’s been on fire the last two years, winning every title major title in the 50 free, and there’s only one left.

#31: Hwang Sunwoo, South Korea – Hwang finished 7th in 200 free in Tokyo, memorably breaking the World Junior Record in the prelims (1:44.62) and leading the final by a wide margin through the 150, putting his raw ability and fearlessness on full display. Since then, he’s established himself as a true gold medal threat each time out. The South Korean star followed up his 2022 World Championship silver with bronze in 2023, then won gold at the Asian Games in a personal best of 1:44.40. The 20-year-old has plenty of opportunities to rack up hardware over this year, starting in Doha and continuing through SC Worlds. In 2022, he scared Paul Biedermann‘s short course 200 free world record in 1:39.72 en route to the world title. He’s been at the core of building South Korea’s rapidly improving 800 freestyle relay and has also been 47.56 in the 100 free. While he’s capable of the 100 free final, the path to the podium is much more difficult for him than in the 200 freestyle where we expect him to be at the front of the pack.

In This Story

63
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

63 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
etsan
2 months ago

Just reported by Hungarian media: Milak has started training secretly for two weeks
https://mandiner.hu/sport/2024/02/a-mandiner-megtudta-ket-hete-vizes-edzeseket-vegez-milak-kristof-olimpia-uszas-kihagyas

etsan
Reply to  etsan
2 months ago

Milak said he wants to ensure that silence remains around him and that he can prepare for the Olympics as calmly as possible, out of the spotlight. His coach will lead his preparation after returning from Doha.
His strength coach said he has done quality work in the gym for 2.5 months and is no longer overweight.

Sub13
Reply to  etsan
2 months ago

So he gave an interview to a media outlet saying he doesn’t want people to know he’s training again?

ooo
Reply to  Sub13
2 months ago

No, the media found out via an anonymous informant that Milak resumed his training under the radar.

phelpsfan
2 months ago

Dare Rose overrated

Jackie O
Reply to  phelpsfan
2 months ago

No.

If he qualifies, he has a chance to medal in 100 fly and a sure fire 4×100 medley medal.

phelpsfan
Reply to  Jackie O
2 months ago

I don’t value prelim relay medals, and there’s no chance he’s swimming finals if Dressel gets back to his best

rhode
2 months ago

Are Dressel and Milak in top 30 or not ranked at all?

oxyswim
Reply to  rhode
2 months ago

Dressel should be ranked, Milak should not

Facts
Reply to  oxyswim
2 months ago

Milak went like 1:52 in the 200 fly last year that’s more than anything Dressel’s done last year

oxyswim
Reply to  Facts
2 months ago

Yeah, but I don’t see a world in which he races seriously this year.

Facts
Reply to  oxyswim
2 months ago

But that is a very subjective measure while at least with his times we objectively know he was in somewhat decent shape last year. It’s also hard to quantify how much training he has done even with the reports, perhaps he’s still training ok but not at the level his coaches expected from him due to high expectations. Plus with how talented Milak is he doesn’t need to be 100 percent to win the 200 fly

Brownish
Reply to  Facts
2 months ago

1:52.58 and 50.80 in 100.

Jackie O
Reply to  oxyswim
2 months ago

Dressel already showed encouraging 50 free and 100 fly times in the last 2 months.

Sub13
Reply to  rhode
2 months ago

They will both be top 30

jeff
Reply to  rhode
2 months ago

they have to be top 30 at this point since it wouldn’t make sense to leave them completely out of the top 100

etsan
Reply to  rhode
2 months ago

McEvoy, Alexy, Chalmers, Grousset, Richards,
Dean, Short, Hafnaoui, Martens, Ceccon,
Armstrong, Xu, Murphy, Finke, Fink,
Kos, Qin, ZSC, Liendo, Marchand
Honda, Scott, Foster, Popovici, Wiffen
Pan, Shun, Wellbrock, Ponti

These were 29, so only one spot left between Dressel and Milak.
Did I get something wrong?

Joel
Reply to  etsan
2 months ago

I’m just really happy there are 4 Aussies in the top 30

Sub13
Reply to  Joel
2 months ago

All 4 should be top 20 I would think as well. ZSC 19, McEvoy 2, Chalmers 11, Short 5

Joshua Liendo-Edwards-Smith
Reply to  etsan
2 months ago

Wow. They really left Milak off altogether.

Owlmando
Reply to  Joshua Liendo-Edwards-Smith
2 months ago

Maybe dressel? Or one of the 29?

Joshua Liendo-Edwards-Smith
Reply to  Owlmando
2 months ago

Not possible. All 29 have a legitimate claim to top 30 and can’t be outside the 100. No way SS is leaving Dressel off the top 100. Must be Milak!

Troyy
Reply to  Joshua Liendo-Edwards-Smith
2 months ago

Or they made a mistake and forgot someone.

Swimfan2024
Reply to  Troyy
2 months ago

They also forgot Chad 6.0

rhode
Reply to  etsan
2 months ago

I don’t think Ponti would be ranked ahead of Temple and Rose, but leaving him out of top 100 is also odd.

Jackie O
Reply to  rhode
2 months ago

Yup. Ponti doesn’t have relay medal chances unlike Temple and Rose. Very odd if he’s ranked ahead of Temple and Rose

Leoyu
Reply to  etsan
2 months ago

I’m not really sure Ponti has any recent performances that would warrant him being in the top 30? It feels odd that he would be ranked higher than Sunwoo, Martinenghi, Rose, Seto, Kamminga, etc. I don’t know how they’d phrase the justification, he has maybe an outside chance of a minor medal in the 1fly? Probably more likely they saved a spot for Milak.

Joshua Liendo-Edwards-Smith
Reply to  Leoyu
2 months ago

He swam the 3rd fastest ever time in both the 50 and 100 fly at Short Course Euros recently. 23.1, 51.0 and 1:55.3 at worlds in the three flies. Doesn’t seem like that should justify top 30, but would also be totally weird to have him outside top 100. Maybe they just forgot he existed.

Leoyu
Reply to  Joshua Liendo-Edwards-Smith
2 months ago

Those were some decent short course times but with no medals at last worlds as well as long course times that weren’t super impressive, it would be kinda unusual to rank him above all those medalists from last year, especially since he only has an outside chance in one event and no relay opportunities. The rest of those 28 all seem like they have very strong claims to a top 30 spot. They’re def not leaving Dressel off. While Milak is in poor form it still’d be pretty bold to take last year’s #1 off the list entirely, given there’s still a chance he could be at the Olympics.

Last edited 2 months ago by Leoyu
ooo
Reply to  Joshua Liendo-Edwards-Smith
2 months ago

He also won the last stop of the world cup in Budapest and could be in an upswing in 2024.His SCM euro swims were really good.

Hank
Reply to  etsan
2 months ago

Maybe a tie ?

Jackie O
Reply to  etsan
2 months ago

Probably Ponti is out of top 100.

It’s impossible to put either Milak or Dressel outside top 100

Smglsn12
2 months ago

I’ve been waiting to see where Casas would end up since I first saw the 91-100 article lol. I honestly think he’s harder to rate than Dressel and Milak given that he has put up some really fast times in the last few months, just at utterly meaningless times. Whenever he dives into a pool you literally have no idea what will happen 😂

bobthebuilderrocks
Reply to  Smglsn12
2 months ago

REALLY curious to see how he does at Worlds.

john26
Reply to  bobthebuilderrocks
2 months ago

watch him go 49.8 and 1:54.5 in the 100fly/200im and then add 1//2s at trials to miss the team in June

Last edited 2 months ago by john26
Pescatarian
Reply to  john26
2 months ago

Wouldn’t be surprised. He posts his nights out of SM.

Pescatarian
2 months ago

I had Casas at ninth because it seems to be his magic number lately.

Jackie O
Reply to  Pescatarian
2 months ago

I understood that reference!

Steve Nolan
2 months ago

So swimmers get a bump for being good in bad events, right? I ask as I read the name ” Roman Mityukov” and had no idea who the hell it was among a bunch of Actual Dudes.

(The 200 back has gotta be the worst men’s event comparatively, no one’s really gotten any better than finals from 10+ years ago.)

gitech
Reply to  Steve Nolan
2 months ago

Mityukov is world medalist 2023 (bronze)

Steve Nolan
Reply to  gitech
2 months ago

Yes. It said so in his blurb, but thank you.

This also made me look it up, but man has that event stagnated and I was so right, you guys. You’d have to go back to 2004 for that time to even make the podium at the Olympics, though it would have been good enough to beat Greenbank in 19 and Casas in 22 for bronze at recent Worlds. (It would then have been off the podium until 2007 at Worlds meets.)

snailSpace
Reply to  Steve Nolan
2 months ago

Men’s 200 free comes to mind. But dude, you only have to be as good as the competition. A medal is a medal is a medal at the Olympics.

Steve Nolan
Reply to  snailSpace
2 months ago

Yeah, but it makes this list weird.

It’s a ranking, so you’re already being judged in relation to all other swimmers. But if swimmers in your event are also bad, your ranking is then higher.

200 free is close tho, but there are at least a bunch of dudes that look like they could make it competitive as hell. (2011 worlds had all medalists under 1:45, which they all did last year, too. The 200 backstrokers aren’t as fast as 2011 yet.)

snailSpace
Reply to  Steve Nolan
2 months ago

The men’s 200 back’s problem is that lately the best of the “talent” hasn’t been targeting it. Targeting the 100 back has medley relay connotations (ironically backstroke has tended to be the weak leg for many relays in the past few years), and this coinciding with the fact that the best backstroke countries (USA and Russia, occasionally Australia) are swimming-wise deep “relay countries” may result in the event stagnating. We’ve had Rylov 2017-2021 who was the dependable 1:53 guy, before that we had Larkin for a few years, and Murphy was Rylov level 2016-2018.
I think that’s changing, not necessarily for medal contention but for winning time at least: I think Hubert Kos has great promise the drag the… Read more »

Steve Nolan
Reply to  snailSpace
2 months ago

“Targeting the 100 back has medley relay connotations (ironically backstroke has tended to be the weak leg for many relays in the past few years), and this coinciding with the fact that the best backstroke countries (USA and Russia, occasionally Australia) are swimming-wise deep “relay countries” may result in the event stagnating.”

Were those countries not “relay countries” at any point in the last 20 years when the event was basically just as fast as it is right now?

Sometimes events just stagnate. Your other example was the 200 free, which is an event that literally has its own relay.

snailSpace
Reply to  Steve Nolan
2 months ago

“Were those countries not “relay countries” at any point in the last 20 years when the event was basically just as fast as it is right now?”
Okay that is true. If less of the talent targets backstroke in general it would still show but that seems not to be the case. I still don’t like “events just stagnate sometimes” because it obviously has an explanation.

Last edited 2 months ago by snailSpace
snailSpace
Reply to  snailSpace
2 months ago

Actually I might have a good explanation after all. I’ve just commented somewhere a few days before about the difference between a 100 and a 200 looking at short-axis vs long-axis strokes. The main point of that stuff was that since long axis strokes are more energy efficient than short axis strokes, the physiological difference between swimming a 100 and a 200 is less well defined. Secondly, by the nature of how long axis strokes work, the supersuits were more effective at maximazing their performance than short axis strokes, especially in the 200s, by reducing drag, increasing lift and thus increasing the energy efficiency of the stroke, making them even more physiologically similar to a 100. This shows in the… Read more »

Last edited 2 months ago by snailSpace
Steve Nolan
Reply to  snailSpace
2 months ago

goddamn is your “enter” key broken

It only takes like 4 dudes to make an event not “stagnant” anymore at the elite level, sometimes it just be like that.

Last edited 2 months ago by Steve Nolan
snailSpace
Reply to  Steve Nolan
2 months ago

Disappointed you aren’t actually trying to argue 🙁 Oh well.

Steve Nolan
Reply to  snailSpace
2 months ago

I’m not going to lie I did not even read that wall of text. (After the “bad” offensive thing I just do not care to engage much anymore.)

That is also the entirety of my argument – it only takes a Civic-full of people to make an event not-stagnant, sometimes it really do just be like that.

(Hell, the 50 free is also similar in a way – Dressel and McEvoy have won by huge margins recently, there’s just a glut of dudes behind ’em around the same level so it doesn’t seem thin.)

snailSpace
Reply to  Steve Nolan
2 months ago

I also take offence with “if swimmers in your event are also bad”. These aren’t bad swimmers per say, just not as good as some that came before them.

Steve Nolan
Reply to  snailSpace
2 months ago

oi you’re offended, eh?? did I offend you??
/gervais voice

Would you prefer I said “less good in relation to previous world-class level swimmers in that event and less good in relation to current world-class level swimmers in other events”?

Or does the word “bad” make it easy enough to understand in context?

snailSpace
Reply to  Steve Nolan
2 months ago

“Would you prefer I said “less good in relation to previous world-class level swimmers in that event and less good in relation to current world-class level swimmers in other events”?”

Yes I would. Thanks!

“Or does the word “bad” make it easy enough to understand in context?”

Easy enough, maybe. Still untrue.

Steve Nolan
Reply to  snailSpace
2 months ago

This might be the most pedantic reply I’ve ever had.

Easy enough, maybe. Still untrue.

Only if you’re taking the most myopic definition of the word ever.

If you ever said someone that knew how to swim was “bad” at it – well, haven’t you considered the billions of people who can’t swim?? In comparison, they are “good”

This is the same thing, we know what population of swimmers we’re talking about. Elite ones. You can be a below-average elite swimmer. Or, if you prefer, bad.

Tryna argue just to argue, g’day.

rhode
Reply to  Steve Nolan
2 months ago

Loyal readers of SwimSwam should know who Mityukov is.

But I agree that a 1:55 200 backstroker shouldn’t be ranked this high, although it might be enough for an individual medal, given how bad the field is. That’s also why I disagree with the ‘It’s 90% about medal chances at Olympics’ criteria. We all know Kolesnikov is a better swimmer than Mityukov.

Khachaturian
Reply to  rhode
2 months ago

it’s a Steve Nolan comment, i don’t think you need to point out that loyal readers of swim swam would know him

Steve Nolan
Reply to  Khachaturian
2 months ago

comment image

Steve Nolan
Reply to  rhode
2 months ago

I basically glaze over in “boring” events so I don’t notice those medalists. (The races can still be pretty entertaining, but just sorta loses some shine when dudes 20 years ago were going just as fast.)

It’s like how I can never remember the Brazilian guy’s name that won in a medal in Tokyo in the 200 free. Not gonna be mad someone don’t know who he is.

Rafael
2 months ago

Dare should be one spot higher and casas should drop a little… while Casas has probably bigger potential.. he is Andrew like when delivering.

Last edited 2 months ago by Rafael
swimswamswum
Reply to  Rafael
2 months ago

Casas I feel is one of the hardest swimmers to rank because he has medal contending times in the 100 fly, 200 back, and 200 IM plus a 100 free which could make the US team. If he’s on at trials and the games he could come home with 5-6 medals, which would shoot him much higher up in the rankings. But he’s just as likely to have a trials where he misses the games entirely, so I feel like this a good placement to balance those things out.

Brit swim fan
2 months ago

Martinenghi will be an interesting one to follow in 2024. After two very consistently quick years in 2021 and 2022, in 2023 he was only able to produce one sub 59 time all year during the final in Japan.

He is also facing some increasingly tough domestic competition from the likes of Poggio, Cerasuolo and now Viberti to be selected for Paris. This let alone the the emergence on the international scene of Qin.

I personally wouldn’t rank him above Arno who whilst not being at his 2021 best of late, has still been a little more consistent in dipping below 59. He is probably also favourite to win gold in Doha given his record of racing quick in… Read more »

Last edited 2 months ago by Brit swim fan
Adrian
Reply to  Brit swim fan
2 months ago

Though Italy’s men’s medley relay is the clear favorite for bronze behind US and China at this point.

Brit swim fan
Reply to  Adrian
2 months ago

Agreed, but Nicolo does face some steep domestic competition to even be on that relay.

About James Sutherland

James Sutherland

James swam five years at Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ontario, specializing in the 200 free, back and IM. He finished up his collegiate swimming career in 2018, graduating with a bachelor's degree in economics. In 2019 he completed his graduate degree in sports journalism. Prior to going to Laurentian, James swam …

Read More »