SwimSwam Pulse is a recurring feature tracking and analyzing the results of our periodic A3 Performance Polls. You can cast your vote in our newest poll on the SwimSwam homepage, about halfway down the page on the right side, or you can find the poll embedded at the bottom of this post.
Our most recent poll asked SwimSwam readers which swimmer will gain the most from the depleted field at the 2022 World Championships:
Question: Which swimmer stands to benefit the most from the huge absences at the 2022 World Championships?
- Arno Kamminga – 42.0%
- Siobhan Haughey – 18.9%
- Ryan Murphy – 15.2%
- Hunter Armstrong – 12.0%
- Sarah Sjostrom – 5.4%
- Lilly King – 4.9%
- Zhang Yufei – 1.7%
A variety of circumstances have led to this year’s World Championships missing several of the best swimmers on the planet.
Some, like top Australians Emma McKeon, Ariarne Titmus and Kyle Chalmers, are opting to put all of their focus into the Commonwealth Games, which are just over a month after Worlds. That is also reportedly the case with South Africa’s Tatjana Schoenmaker.
The entire Russian team, including Evgeny Rylov and Kliment Kolesnikov, are ineligible to compete due to FINA’s ban stemming from the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
There are also individual circumstances that result in reigning Olympic and world champions Adam Peaty and Maggie MacNeil both not in the field of their respective events (though MacNeil is expected to still swim relays).
These absences led to the question: who benefits the most?
Leading the poll with just under 42 percent of votes was Dutch breaststroker Arno Kamminga, who has established himself as the clear #2 in the men’s 100 breaststroke behind Peaty and is now in line to win his first World Championship title in Budapest.
Peaty owns a staggering 24 of the 29-fastest swims in the event’s history, while Kamminga owns four of the remaining five (Michael Andrew has the other). Kamminga is also the only swimmer other than Peaty to have cracked the 58-second barrier, and he’s done so twice (also going 58.00 to win silver in the Olympic final).
Kamminga is the clear beneficiary in the 100 breast, but it’s still only one event. The Dutchman is much better in the 200 (Olympic silver medalist) than he is in the 50. Peaty’s absence in the 50 makes for a pretty wide-open field in Budapest, not to mention that Belarusian Ilya Shymanovich, the fifth-fastest performer ever, will also be absent since Belarus was banned alongside Russia as a result of the invasion of Ukraine.
Receiving the second-highest number of votes was Hong Kong’s Siobhan Haughey, who, unlike Kamminga, clearly benefits from some of the major absences in multiple events.
Haughey, like Kamminga, won double silver in Tokyo, taking second to McKeon in the women’s 100 free and earning silver behind Titmus in the 200 free.
Both of those names will be absent at Worlds, opening the door for Haughey to have a clear shot at winning gold in both. The 100 free will also be without bronze medalist Cate Campbell, and the 200 won’t have Katie Ledecky, who was among the pre-race favorites but faded to fifth. Campbell is taking a break this year as she ponders returning for a push for Paris 2024 next year, while Ledecky dropped the 200 free from her World Championship lineup to narrow her focus for the 400, 800 and 1500 free.
As an aside, Ledecky certainly benefits from Titmus’ absence in the women’s 400 free, and Caeleb Dressel now has a much easier path to gold in the 100 free without Chalmers and Kolesnikov. However, they weren’t included in the poll as there’s a good chance they both would’ve won gold no matter who was in the field.
After breaking the world record, Armstrong would likely already be penciled in as the favorite over Kolesnikov in the 50 back, but he’s now the clear #1 in the Russian’s absence. Murphy hasn’t been able to beat Rylov in the 200 back since 2016, so now he’s got a great chance to win the world title in his absence.
In the 100 back, the four of them would be going in with a chance to win if they were all competing, but with Rylov and Kolesnikov out, Murphy and Armstrong benefit equally as they’ll be the favorites to go head-to-head for the gold.
Sjostrom primarily benefits in the women’s 50 free. She was the Olympic silver medalist last summer, and six of the seven other finalists won’t be in Budapest (if China’s leaked roster is correct and Wu Qingfeng won’t be there). Among those seven are McKeon, Campbell, Pernille Blume and the now-retired Ranomi Kromowidjojo.
Sjostrom has said she won’t race the 100 fly at Worlds, but she also benefits from the openings in the 100 free, an event in which she was fifth last year at the Games.
For King, she would slot in as the favorite in the women’s 200 breast if Schoenmaker is indeed out of the championships, though SwimSwam has yet to receive official confirmation from her camp.
King was second in the 200 breast in Tokyo behind Schoenmaker, and we also won’t see either the third (Annie Lazor) or fourth-place finishers (Evgeniia Chikunova) in Budapest.
Kate Douglass, who upset Lazor to earn the second U.S. spot in the event at Trials last month, could very well end up being King’s biggest challenger in the event.
On top of the 200, it’s easy to forget that King fell to third in her pet event, the 100 breast, at the Olympics in 2021. But she’ll be the only one of the top five from Tokyo in Budapest, with Lazor snagging the second U.S. spot from gold medalist Lydia Jacoby, and then Schoenmaker, Chikunova and Russia’s Yuliya Efimova also out of Worlds.
For Zhang, she’s already the clear favorite in the 200 fly as the reigning Olympic champion, but her path to 100 fly gold got a lot easier with MacNeil and McKeon out of the event (plus Sjostrom).
At the Tokyo Games, MacNeil, Zhang, McKeon and American Torri Huske were separated by just 14 one-hundredths of a second in the battle for first, and now that four-horse race has been whittled down to two, unless someone else can step up and join the sub-56 party.
Below, vote in our new A3 Performance Poll, which asks: Which 200 changes the most from short course yards to long course meters:
The A3 Performance Poll is courtesy of A3 Performance, a SwimSwam partner.