EDITORIAL: The Enhanced Games, A Drug Company Throwing A Pool Party And Calling It Sport

by SwimSwam 40

May 30th, 2026 Opinion

SwimSwam welcomes reader submissions about all topics aquatic under our “Shouts from the Stands” series. We don’t necessarily endorse the content of the Shouts from the Stands posts, and the opinions remain those of their authors. If you have thoughts to share, please send them to [email protected].

This “Shouts from the Stands” submission comes from Jaimie Fuller, eo. 

So. The Enhanced Games are done. Las Vegas has been returned to its natural state, a place where money is extracted from optimistic people under flashing lights, and we are left to pick through the wreckage of whatever it is we just watched. A sports event? A drug fair? A very expensive Instagram campaign with lanes? All three, probably, but mostly the last one.

Let us begin with the headline, which the Enhanced Games have been flogging like a medieval town crier who also owns the apothecary. Kristian Gkolomeev, they triumphantly announced, swam the 50m freestyle in 20.81 seconds, faster than the official world record. A million dollars was handed over. Champagne happened. The press release practically wept with joy.

One small detail or possibly a large one depending on your view. Social media has not been kind to the record claim. A number of users circulated video clips purporting to show that when the clock displayed 20.81, Gkolomeev had not yet reached the wall. Others have pushed back, pointing out, not unreasonably, that timing systems and video footage don’t always sync perfectly, a phenomenon that has been noted in Olympic races too. The Enhanced Games have not, at time of writing, offered a detailed technical rebuttal. Watch the clip, make up your own mind. What is beyond dispute is that the record is not recognised by World Aquatics, and never was going to be. But the story ran. The brand trended. The record claim embedded itself into the global news cycle like a particularly tenacious earworm. Whether or not the swim was everything it was billed as, the Enhanced Games had already got what they came for.

This is, you will notice, the entire business model.

The Enhanced Games were not created to advance sport. They were created to sell you peptides. The founders have financial interests in the performance-enhancing compounds they spent months enthusiastically press-releasing at anyone who’d listen. The Games were always, at base, an extended advertisement, an infomercial with a starting pistol, a shop front with a scoreboard, a drugs company that decided the most cost-effective route to market was to rent a Vegas pool and invite some Olympians.

And here’s the thing about cynical genius: it works. This particular operation has been extraordinarily effective. Whatever you think of the ethics, the marketing has been some of the finest snake-oil salesmanship since a gentleman in a waistcoat convinced the American frontier that his bottled tonic cured lumbago, dropsy, and mild disappointment.

The Enhanced Games understood something that traditional sport has spectacularly failed to grasp: that controversy is not the enemy of visibility. It is visibility.

Now, the part where the entire premise collapses in on itself like a particularly dramatic soufflé.

The majority of events at the Enhanced Games, the competition specifically designed to celebrate and normalise performance-enhancing drugs, were reportedly won by athletes who had chosen not to take performance-enhancing drugs. The “non-enhanced” competitors, competing under a rulebook built around the philosophy of definitely take drugs, mostly beat the ones who did.

Let that breathe for a moment.

The Enhanced Games spent two years arguing that PEDs are an untapped frontier of human possibility,  a legitimate scientific toolkit that the stuffy establishment was simply too frightened to embrace. Their own results then suggested, rather awkwardly, that elite athletes are mostly elite because of talent, training, and grinding commitment. Not what’s in the syringe. Someone might want to have a quiet word with their own data.

Now, the athletes. This matters, so pay attention.

The people who competed, many of them underpaid, under-recognised professionals who have given decades of their lives to their sport, are not the villains of this story. We live in a world where an elite swimmer might dedicate fifteen years to their craft and struggle to cover their training costs while the organisations governing their sport negotiate television deals worth hundreds of millions. If the Enhanced Games put serious money in the pockets of people who genuinely deserved it, that is not nothing. We are not in a position to tell athletes how to earn their living, and we should be very careful about the self-righteousness with which some of us reach for that particular stone.

The problem is not the swimmers in the pool. The problem is the people who built the pool, and what they whispered to every impressionable young person watching.

Because here is the lasting damage that no amount of creative video analysis can quantify. The Enhanced Games beamed, at scale, a single message to an audience that included a great many people who are not yet thirty and are still forming their understanding of what sport means, what achievement means, what the body is for. That message was: chemistry is the edge that separates the good from the great. Science can get you over the line. The establishment doesn’t want you to know this, but we’re telling you anyway, and also here is our website.

This is not a philosophy. It is a sales pitch. And it is a deeply corrosive one, arriving at precisely the moment when youth sport is already fighting a losing battle against shortcuts, quick fixes, and the relentless algorithm-driven promise that there is always a faster route to the top.

The Enhanced Games leadership had a genuine opportunity to do something interesting with the real problems in elite sport – financial exploitation, governing body dysfunction, the grotesque economics of amateurism. Instead they built a drug shop with a stadium attached and declared it progress.

Sport, at its best, is the most straightforward lie we tell ourselves: that effort is rewarded, that the best person wins, that the race is fair. It is not always true. But the aspiration matters enormously. The Enhanced Games took that aspiration, valued it at approximately nothing, and flogged the naming rights.

Remarkable, in its way. Absolutely, comprehensively wrong.

If you’re interested in reading more of Jaimie’s thoughts on sport, technology, integrity, and progress, click HERE.

40
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

40 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
College Sports Union Member
18 days ago

One of the points made in this article is that the “experiment” was a failure because clean athletes won in the majority of the events. I wasn’t able to verify which athletes/events these were, but I think where this claim stems from is Hunter Armstrong winning the 50 back. I’ll just say that Armstrong was probably the highest calibre athlete there, so comparing him to others on PEDs isn’t exactly apples to apples, but also that if their timers weren’t being messed with, Gkolomeev’s “record” gives more evidence to the notion that PEDs help than what Armstrong’s victory does for the contrary.

The main objection I have to this OP/ED though is that it suggests that our nation’s youth are… Read more »

Admin
Reply to  College Sports Union Member
17 days ago

Both track events were won by unenhanced athletes.

Unenhanced athletes did not win the majority of events – but they did win the majority of events in which unenhanced athletes were entered, if that makes sense.

I think the protocol is probably just wrong for performance. It’s optimizing for things that appeal to a retail customer, but isn’t actually the right mix for peak performance. As a 38 year old man with a career and a family, would I rather have the opportunity to train for 6 hour days and swim 47 in the 100 free, or would I be less sore the day after a hard workout and look more visibly fit? Definitely the latter.

Tracy Kosinski
18 days ago

No matter the case, it’s on next year with many more track athletes joining to attain a 10 million dollar payday. Imagine how many we see fall from grace over the next year for that amount.

I find it embarrassing they announced he broke the WR. I’m sure Gkolomeev went to bed deeply ashamed. He cheated and no one will ever see him as an official WR holder. Pretty sure that was his last thought before drifting off to sleep. He has to live with this and the money will not take away his guilt.

Petey
Reply to  Tracy Kosinski
18 days ago

@Tracy Kosinski It’s a fact that he’s the enhanced WR holder. Perhaps one day there will be separate natural and enhanced records without any stigma, which I would personally love to see.

Last edited 18 days ago by Petey
That dude
19 days ago

At the end of the day I’ll put it straight – my belief is there’s nothing wrong about making money for yourself and for your family. If you got the chance to cash in big that puts you n your family in a good position, that’s amazing. A lot of people seem to have a problem with that.

EG and traditional sporting events are separate things. The records are seperate. The rules are separate. Also there needs to be great cash flow to be able to pay athletes and organisers of the event good. Selling things is a great way to do that. In my eyes EG is a lever that will start to force world aquatics/olympics to start… Read more »

Admin
Reply to  That dude
18 days ago

I disagree with painting them as completely separate things, because the Enhanced Games’ marketing is fully centered around the non-Enhanced world. The athletes’ achievements, their followings, the “World Records” they talk about. They don’t discuss “EG World Records,” they discuss “World Aquatics World Records.”

Zaq
19 days ago

It’s still swimming. 3 out of 4 years nobody cares about swimming.

Mr 25m.
Reply to  Zaq
19 days ago

That’s weird. I’m somebody and I care every day.

Am I the only one?

Susan
19 days ago

Well written, yet I disagree with the athletes not being held responsible..they are totally responsible for selling out swimming for money.Trying to justify it by using the ” years of hard work” is BS..they knew going in that swimming was not about money. As far as visibility, Swimswam did a great job of advertising! Oh yeah, and announcing money. Someone like CM, an EX swimmer, whose income may not have been enough to match a certain lifestyle that seemed extravagant by most standards, ended up taking the juice..it was the EASY decision..and I think many more may follow suit. I hope not..quoting Titmus..” It makes my blood boil” what a slap in the face to the Great clean athletes. And… Read more »

Last edited 19 days ago by Susan
67meetmobile
19 days ago

Enhanced games was so tuff best swimming event ever

HomologicalAlgebra
Reply to  67meetmobile
19 days ago

Wtf even is life

Swim Fan
19 days ago

I have never looked at the dopers competing in this thing as villains. Misguided, easily beguiled by the bells and whistles, weak-willed – sure. But not villains… The author is too quick to dismiss that the entertainers doing this thing have any significant roll to play in this thing. Minor role maybe, but not nothing…

swimapologist
Reply to  Swim Fan
19 days ago

I think different athletes have taken different roles. A swimmer like Ben Proud just kind of swam, analyzed, and that was about it. A swimmer like Cody Miller has taken a bit more of an active role in it where I think it’s fair to see him as a bit of a villain (though he’s at best like uncredited henchman #2 in the credits).

newbie
Reply to  swimapologist
19 days ago

Agreed — I don’t know if Cody explicitly encouraged normal people to get on the “protocol”, but he certainly passively did, and I don’t feel good about that. But like you said, he isn’t even close to the top of the list of people we should be mad at. (Also, anyone who calls Gkolomeev a WR holder is a villain in my eyes but I acknowledge that that’s probably a personal problem on my end)

swifter
19 days ago

The denounced games will disappear into the washed-up bought up athlete retirement programs they came from.

YGBSM
Reply to  swifter
19 days ago

good moniker – The Denounced Games