Gretchen Walsh’s 54.33 world record in the women’s 100 butterfly, set last Saturday at the Fort Lauderdale Open, was truly astonishing.
The level of dominance she has displayed in the event over the past few years has been remarkable. After all, she now owns the 13 fastest performances in history in the event — a distinction usually reserved for the greatest swimmers the sport has ever seen.
But beyond that, what may stand out even more is the gap she has created between herself and the rest of the field.
Sarah Sjostrom’s 55.48 world record, which stood from 2016 to 2024, now feels like a distant memory. So distant that Sjostrom — still the second-fastest performer in history with that swim — now sits 1.15 seconds behind Walsh’s world record. That is an enormous margin in a 100-meter race.
Walsh’s previous world record of 54.60 was already overwhelmingly dominant. In terms of the percentage gap to the second-fastest performer in history, it represented a 1.59% advantage — already the largest among all current world records. Now, that margin has grown to an incredible 2.07%.
That puts Walsh comfortably ahead of the second-largest gap among active world records in long course meters: Adam Peaty’s 56.88 in the men’s 100 breaststroke at 1.40%. On the women’s side, the closest comparison is Katie Ledecky in the women’s 1500 freestyle, where her record stands 1.21% ahead of the second-fastest performer ever.
View this post on Instagram
But what does that mean historically? Have there been other world records that were equally — or even more — dominant?
Being more than 2% faster than the second-fastest swimmer in history is an extraordinarily rare achievement. Very few swimmers have ever reached that level.
One of them is Peaty himself. When he set his still-standing 56.88 world record in the men’s 100 breaststroke at the 2019 World Aquatics Championships, the second-fastest performer in history had been 58.29. In other words, Peaty was an astonishing 2.42% faster.
Another example is Sjostrom. Her still-standing 24.43 world record in the women’s 50 butterfly, set in 2014, made her 2.55% faster than the previous record holder, fellow Swede Therese Alshammar.
To look for similarly dominant performances, my database research extended back to the late 1970s.
And since then, no world record in swimming has been more impressive than the legendary 2:05.96 that Mary T. Meagher posted in the women’s 200 butterfly at the historic 1981 U.S. National Championships.
Top LCM World Records Ranked by Percentage Gap to the 2nd-Fastest Performer (Since the Late 1970s) – One Entry per Swimmer per Event
| Event | Gender | Year | Swimmer | WR | 2nd all-time performer | % dif. |
| 200 butterfly | Women | 1981 | Mary T. Meagher (USA) | 2:05.96 | 2:09.87 | 3.01% |
| 100 butterfly | Women | 1981 | Mary T. Meagher (USA) | 57.93 | 59.46 | 2.57% |
| 50 butterfly | Women | 2014 | Sarah Sjostrom (SWE) | 24.43 | 25.07 | 2.55% |
| 50 butterfly | Women | 2000 | Inge de Bruijn (NED) | 25.64 | 26.29 | 2.47% |
| 100 breaststroke | Men | 2019 | Adam Peaty (GBR) | 56.88 | 58.29 | 2.42% |
| 50 breaststroke | Men | 2017 | Adam Peaty (GBR) | 25.95 | 26.54 | 2.22% |
| 200 butterfly | Men | 2007 | Michael Phelps (USA) | 1:52.09 | 1:54.56 | 2.16% |
| 100 butterfly | Women | 2000 | Inge de Bruijn (NED) | 56.64 | 57.88 | 2.14% |
| 100 butterfly | Women | 2026 | Gretchen Walsh (USA) | 54.33 | 55.48 | 2.07% |
| 1500 freestyle | Women | 2018 | Katie Ledecky (USA) | 15:20.48 | 15:38.88 | 1.96% |
| 100 freestyle | Men | 1988 | Matt Biondi (USA) | 48.42 | 49.35 | 1.88% |
| 800 freestyle | Women | 2016 | Katie Ledecky (USA) | 8:04.79 | 8:14.10 | 1.88% |
| 200 IM | Men | 2003 | Michael Phelps (USA) | 1:55.94 | 1:58.16 | 1.88% |
| 1500 freestyle | Women | 1979 | Tracey Wickham (AUS) | 16:06.63 | 16:24.60 | 1.83% |
| 200 freestyle | Women | 2009 | Federica Pellegrini (ITA) | 1:52.98 | 1:54.96 | 1.72% |
| 100 breaststroke | Women | 1999 | Penny Heyns (RSA) | 1:06.52 | 1:07.66 | 1.68% |
| 100 breaststroke | Women | 2006 | Leisel Jones (AUS) | 1:05.09 | 1:06.20 | 1.68% |
| 50 freestyle | Men | 2008 | Eamon Sullivan (AUS) | 21.28 | 21.64 | 1.66% |
| 400 IM | Women | 1980 | Petra Schneider (GDR) | 4:36.29 | 4:40.83 | 1.62% |
| 800 freestyle | Men | 1986 | Vladimir Salnikov (URS) | 7:50.64 | 7:58.24 | 1.59% |
| 200 backstroke | Women | 1991 | Krisztina Egerszegi (HUN) | 2:06.62 | 2:08.60 | 1.54% |
| 100 butterfly | Men | 2005 | Ian Crocker (USA) | 50.40 | 51.10 | 1.37% |
| 400 IM | Men | 2007 | Michael Phelps (USA) | 4:06.22 | 4:09.63 | 1.37% |
| 50 freestyle | Men | 2009 | Frederick Bousquet (FRA) | 20.94 | 21.23 | 1.37% |
| 200 breaststroke | Women | 2006 | Leisel Jones (AUS) | 2:20.54 | 2:22.44 | 1.33% |
Meagher had already been lowering the world record in the event since 1979, first with 2:07.01 and later with 2:06.37 — both more than 2% faster than the previous world record of 2:09.87 held by East German swimmer Andrea Pollack. By 1981, Pollack still ranked as the second-fastest performer ever, and Meagher’s 2:05.96 represented a staggering 3.01% advantage — something truly extraordinary. Not surprisingly, the performance was widely considered “Beamonesque” and the record lasted nearly 20 years.
Right behind Meagher’s 200 butterfly performance comes Meagher herself again, this time in the 100 butterfly. Her 57.93, also set at the 1981 U.S. Nationals, represented a 2.57% advantage over Pollack’s 59.46.
From the 2000s onward, the leaders in this category are Sjostrom in the 50 butterfly, followed by Inge de Bruijn — also in the 50 butterfly — and Peaty. Michael Phelps also appears on the list with his 1:52.09 world record in the 200 butterfly at the 2007 World Aquatics Championships. And then comes Gretchen Walsh’s 54.33.
All of this reinforces the magnitude of Walsh’s world record — a performance that, statistically speaking, belongs among the most impressive in the history of swimming.
Curiously, none of the records with gaps above 2% come from the 1990s. Truly extreme world records became more frequent in the 21st century. And interestingly, none were set during the supersuit era of 2008 and 2009.

Should have logged the pct change duh
How about David Wilkie’s 200 BR in 1976? Do you have data available for world records in that era? Would taking the previous world record be a suitable standard for “next best time”?
In terms of ‘in swimming history’ I think the WRs should be compared to the next best performer at the time they were set like your table at the end.
It’s definitely the hardest to see anyone else beating right now though.
Mary T butterfly times are transcedent . She was so far ahead of anyone in the ‘80s. Her 2:05 200 fly would still medal at the Olympics 40 years later
This is a really impressive World Record. The fact that no one is within a second of her is kinda nuts, with how many great women sprinters there are now. I was shocked while watching the live stream at how far under her old record she went.
Siskos went 1:54.12
Not until Huske, Perkins or Roos go sub 55 lol
None of which are happening
No hate, but like be realistic
They need to to go close to 55 flat first and that’s like a routine for Walsh on a random meet
Huske is probably maxed out (she’s been stuck at 55-mid for 5 years), but Van Otter D!ck is barely 21 and can still improve.
Aside from the percentage gap thing, 54.3 would comfortably place her in the female 4×100 free relay of most nations. That’s how good that time is.