Seven Russian Athletes Banned Could Have Profound Effect On Medal Haul

On Monday FINA issued a statement announcing that seven swimmers from the Russian Olympic team have been withdrawn, with more to possibly follow. Four athletes were withdrawn by the Russian Olympic Committee, and three more have been named in the WADA-sanctioned McLaren report, named ineligible by FINA. For more information and the full release by FINA, click here.

Among the seven athletes removed from the team, six of them had a legitimate chance at one medal or more. The athletes removed are as follows:

Athletes withdrawn by the ROC:

–    Mikhail Dovgalyuk
–    Yulia Efimova
–    Natalia Lovtcova
–    Anastasia Krapivina (Marathon Swimming)

Athletes appearing in the WADA IP Report:

–    Nikita Lobintsev
–    Vladimir Morozov
–    Daria Ustinova

Here’s a closer look at each swimmer removed, their past international success and what their chances were heading into Rio.

Dovgalyuk swam a best time of 1:47.83 in the 200 free at the Russian Olympic Trials to place fourth, qualifying for the team as a relay-only swimmer. Though only him and 3rd place finisher Danila Izotov were named as relay-only swimmers in this relay, 5th and 6th place finishers at Trials Vyacheslav Andrusenko (400 free) and Alexander Sukhorukov (400 free relay) also qualified to swim in Rio, so there’s a chance Dovgalyuk would have only swum the prelim relay had he been out-swum in the prelims.

The Russians won silver in the 800 free relay at the 2008 Olympics in Beijing and again at the 2009 World Championships in Rome, but faltered at the last Olympics finishing 10th in London. They have had improved results since, placing 2nd and 4th respectively at the last two World Championships. Dovgalyuk was part of the team that finished 4th in Kazan. Trials runner-up Nikita Lobintsev, who was set to also swim the individual race in Rio, has also been removed from the Olympic team. How this effects the 800 free relay moving forward remains to be seen.

The most talked about Russian swimmer lately, Efimova’s ban is music to the ears of many swimming fans who are calling for clean sport. Until recently it appeared Efimova would be allowed in Rio after being cleared by FINA, but the IOC has taken action. She will reportedly appeal this decision to the CAS. Efimova was unable to swim at the Russian Olympic Trials due to her doping ban, but was a legitimate medal threat in both breaststroke events in Rio.

Efimova was the world champion last year in Kazan in the 100, and did the same thing two years prior in Barcelona in the 200. This year she sits 2nd in the world in both the 100 and 200 breast, done at the Arena Pro Swim in Orlando in March. Her times of 1:05.70 and 2:21.41 sat behind only American Lilly King (1:05.20) and Japan’s Rie Kaneto (2:19.65) for top spot in the world. She was also the 2012 Olympic bronze medalist in the 200. Efimova’s removal from the team leaves Daria Chikunova (100 br) and Sofia Andreeva (200 br) as Russia’s female breaststrokers at the Games.

Lovtcova was set to swim the 50 free and 100 fly in Rio, as well as swim on the 400 free relay. Lovtcova was seeded 25th in the 50 free with her entry of 25.00 done last year, but she was faster at this years Trials in 24.97. Her best time is 24.93, leaving her outside of the medal conversation, but she would’ve had a shot at the semi-finals. She was also seeded 25th in the 100 fly with a 58.42. At Trials Lovtcova finished 1st in the 50 free, 2nd in the 100 fly and 3rd in the 100 free.

Lovtcova was an Olympian four years ago in the 400 free relay, and most recently swam four individual events at the 2015 World Championships including a 13th place finish in the 100 freestyle. The Russian 400 free relay could go on without any additional changes being made if they so chose, as 4th place finisher at Trials Rozaliya Nasretdinova qualified for the team in the 50 free, so they have added Daria Mullakaeva as an alternate, giving them four along with the Trials top-2 of Veronika Popova and Viktoriya Andreeva (Andreeva won’t swim the 100 individually in Rio, but she will swim the 200 IM).

Anastasia Krapivina, an open water swimmer who was suspended back in 2013, automatically qualified for Rio with her 5th place finish at the 2015 World Championships in the 10 KM. Just two seconds outside of a medal, Krapivina figured to be in the hunt for a medal this year in Rio. She also placed 8th in the 5 KM race, and recently came away with the win at the Russian Open Water Championships.

Nikita Lobintsev broke out at the 2008 Olympics, qualifying for the final of the 400 free in a national record (that still stands) and won silver on the 800 free relay. Since then he has been a consistent performer for Russia, winning four World Championship medals on the free relays and added another Olympic medal in 2012 with a bronze in the 400 free relay. Lobintsev placed second at the Olympic Trials in the 200 free, earning an individual event at the Olympics to go along with the relay. He also placed 6th in the 100 free, so he could’ve potentially been used as a prelim swimmer in the 400 free relay.

A finalist four years ago in London in the 100 free, Lobintsev was a long shot to match that this year in the 200, but he and the Russians were real medal threats in the 800 free relay. He and Dovgalyuk take away half of the top-4 in this event at Russian Olympic Trials.

Probably the biggest surprise on this list is Morozov, who has no positive doping tests on record but was on the McLaren report banning him from the Games. Morozov had a legitimate chance at a medal in both the 50 and 100 freestyles as well as the 400 free relay. Beginning with an Olympic bronze in 2012 on the 400 free relay, Morozov hit his stride in 2013, earning a silver medal in the 50 free at the World Championships along with a bronze in the 400 free relay.

Morozov split a 46.95 last year on the 400 free relay at the World Championships, but was disqualified in the individual race leaving him with no individual medals. Morozov was seeded 6th in the 50 free for Rio and was our original pick for bronze, but that won’t happen and the picks have been updated. He was also seeded 9th in the 100 free, and is the key for the Russians in the 400 free relay. They have medalled at 4 of the last 5 major championship meets (Olympics & World Championships), but with Morozov out they’ll be in tough to reach the podium again.

Daria Ustinova placed fourth at the World Championships last year in the 200 back, and has been even faster this year as she was a medal threat. She sits 5th in the world with her time of 2:06.92, and is also 15th in the 100 back in 59.78. She won both events at the Russian Olympic Trials. Her absence now leaves Anastasia Fesikova as the only female Russian backstroker on the team.


In This Story

Leave a Reply

15 Comment threads
37 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
36 Comment authors
newest oldest most voted

Double standard, unfortunately: Why exclude russian swimmers with a doping background when Justin Gatlin is enterede for the US?


Justin Gatlin served his ban.


So did sun yang and park and efimova


It’s not a double standard because in the US there isn’t state sponsored systematic doping like in Russia so there is no need for the harsher rules in the Us that been placed on the ROC


“…in the US there isn’t state sponsored systematic doping…” That is certainly true, however, we have large corporations. Do you think Nike, Speedo, Under Armor, etc. would be able to sell products with athletes coming in at 8th place in an Olympic final? Here, it is done through agents (Octogon, IMG, DLE Agency, so on…) who make the big bucks with top athletes after signing deals with corporations who need the “best” advertising they can get. I mean who would not buy a pair of sneakers, a pair of swimming goggles, or other equipment which are being used by the No.1 athletes in the world? I am a fan of swimming and I also have done it for a long… Read more »


The history of sport suggests it’s foolish to take a big holier-than-thou attitude when talking about other countries… yours could be next. It’s good to keep an open mind. I won’t say that so-and-so could *never* be a doper… that’s why we test. That said, there’s a difference between keeping an open mind, and complete speculation. With Russia (and China in 90s, GDR in 70s) there is clear public evidence of state-sponsored doping. In the U.S., there isn’t. It’s lazy to *assume* that there is. Also, a few things make the U.S. less susceptible to massive, secretive doping. In no particular order; #1 Talent and competitors are spread among many sites, many coaches, etc. The sport does not have a… Read more »


Which olympics were you in during your time at the “Olympic level”?


I call bs


Remember BALCO?
How many others could it be out there (not specifying any sport but the methods)?


How do you know that there isn’t?:)

Brad Flood

We don’t know there isn’t, however, we DO have an independently run, in depth investigation that has exposed indisputable evidence of a multiple-years long, state sponsored doping system that not only supplied doping substances to athletes, covered up/made disappear positive tests, went so far as to manipulate the testing facilities at the Sochi 2014 Olympics for the express purpose of exchanging Russian athletes urine samples, that were known to indicate positive doping, with previously taken “clean” samples.

THIS is the reason for the action by the IOC. This is no witch-hunt on the Russians, this is based on FACTS that have been proven and evidenced by an independent investigation.

Understand the discussion, prior to making accusations and providing defenses.


Maybe you should understand my comment, slow boy. Did I mention something about Russia or the actions taken!? LOL, we didn’t know Russia had any kind of state sponsored doping for their athletes until a while ago, and all of this is because the US is always.. you know, doing the stuff they like to do;) which I don’t think is bad in this case. But I think you should know that the use of PED’s is EXTREMELY normal at the top level, trust me, been there done that, and I don’t think that excluding the US athletes is a good idea!

Brad Flood

My understanding of your comment is precisely why I posted mine BIGDUDE. The knowledge that PED use is “extremely normal at the top level” (firsthand apparently…Mr. “been there done that”), VOID of direct, quantifiable & public proof that it is sponsored and/or supported by an IOC member’s government, may permit you to think that excluding the US athletes is not a good idea, however, when there is an investigation, run by an independent, NON-AMERICAN, expert, exposing a state run and sponsored doping system, that included directly manipulating the doping controls at an Olympic Games hosted by that country, one does not have to “think” about why that country’s athletes, and ONLY that country’s athletes, should be banned.from this Olympics. FYI,… Read more »


Here is USA “doctor sponsored” doping activity. At least the appearance is a little shady.

Brad Flood

“USA “doctor sponsored”.. ” is hardly the same as the Russian Government sponsoring, financing and supporting an all sport inclusive system to provide doping substances to it’s athletes and assisting in the manipulation of testing procedures to cover up doping offenses.

A “little shady” is a far cry from a Hurricane Cloud covering with widespread destructive results!

Reaching for straws!


Its just done differently here. A doped athlete is a doped athlete. We use a free market system with capitalism paying the way. This doctor probably bills the insurance co 1000s of dollars for the treatments and then we have sports apparel companies rewarding the top track and field athlete with big contracts so yes it is sponsored here also. Its just not institutionalized with the government or USOC but its still sponsored by capitalism and the almighty $. Do you go on the body building forums? We allow all the info out in the open for everyone to see but we don’t sponsor it? Whats the difference? I gave you the link to the difference, its USADA and they… Read more »


Where is the evidence for this?


Boy, I hate to say this, but the U.S. Postal Service unwittingly (I suppose — why argue with a good thing?) supported state-sponsored doping of Lance Armstrong et al.


How do you know?

tea rex

Can we please get an update on why Morozov was named in the McLaren report???
I was not aware of that.

tea rex – we’ve been asking all day, nothing but dead ends.

Scott Morgan

Morozov missed tests, apparently, and had samples tampered with/tested in inappropriate conditions, as per McLaren report.

swim dawg

do we still have NO reason why Vlad Morozov is in the McLaren report?? Can they really just mention his name and not give ANY reason

About James Sutherland

James Sutherland

James swam five years at Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ontario, specializing in the 200 free, back and IM. He finished up his collegiate swimming career in 2018, graduating with a bachelor's degree in economics. In 2019 he completed his graduate degree in sports journalism. Prior to going to Laurentian, James swam …

Read More »