One Way That Swim Meets Are Better Than Football Games, According to Math

I’ve always had a fascination with the amount of ‘action’ in a sporting event. It’s a curious phenomenon to me that American sports fans (albeit there’s a shift) can say that soccer is boring because there’s not enough going on, but their most popular sport is football – where, according to a 2013 study, a 3 hour, 12 minute game has approximately 11 minutes of action (and about 35 minutes of commercials). That comes out to about 5.7% action – from snap to tackle – in a 3 hour sitting.

So I wanted to see how the swimming World Championships stacked up in terms of the amount of excitement jammed into a period of time.

So I crunched the numbers, and an average finals session at the 2017 World Championships lasted about 6,292 seconds (or, about 1 hour and 44 minutes), and within that session there about 33 minutes worth of action. That comes out to about 23.54% of the finals time being live-action.

That’s a much better ratio than football. In fact, it’s about four-times better than football.

Can swim meets be boring? Yes. Can an individual swimming race be the most exciting play in sports, akin to a last-minute, go-ahead touchdown? Rowdy Gaines and Jason Lezak sure do seem to think so.

This is the problem that swimming needs to solve. There needs to be more fan interaction, more and better intra-race entertainment. There need to be fewer interviews with athletes saying that “this meet” wasn’t that important to them. The incentives need to be bigger – there needs to be more at stake. And, somebody somewhere needs to put the fans first, at least some of the time.

There is a growing chorus in swimming. It’s refrain is that “we want more fans in swimming, we need more paying customers at meets, pro swimmers need to make more money,” with a response of “but we need to make sure that the fans know that they’re always less important than the athletes and coaches.” It’s contradictory, and it’s the biggest economic challenge of our sport.

In the meantime, if you’re curious where the biggest bang-for-your-buck is, try day  and day 8 – the last day has the most total racing time, and better yet: they’re all finals. Days 2 and 7 offer the lowest ratios – which is rather surprising, given that the women’s 800 free falls on day 7, and distance races typically improve the ratios. The relay at the end is slow to start – it comes on a 13-minute gap after the 800 ends, which is more than most of the gaps throughout the meet.

SUMMARY # races Session Length (Seconds) Seconds Spent Swimming %Swimming Time
Day 1 12 5820 1439.13 24.73%
Day 2 12 4920 851.13 17.30%
Day 3 11 6360 1797.94 28.27%
Day 4 13 6660 1631.88 24.50%
Day 5 13 6720 1701.86 25.33%
Day 6 13 6420 1339.27 20.86%
Day 7 12 6480 1112.74 17.17%
Day 8 8 6960 1977.79 28.42%
 Totals 50340 11851.74 23.54%

Methodology notes: this is an inexact science, but is approximately correct. Time stamps on event pages, plus the length of the session-ending event, were used to approximate session length. Action time was determined using the last-place finisher in each race. There was a swim-off at the end of day 2 – that we ignored.

In This Story

Leave a Reply

15 Comments on "One Way That Swim Meets Are Better Than Football Games, According to Math"

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
willy beeman

Less brain damage

Steve Nolan

I was gonna say, you could still do math after participating.

Yeah? Say that to the countless numbers of people who hit their heads on the wall swimming backstroke… Swimming is far and away more dangerous than football and all other sports-combined.

Unimpressive trolling, MLAFORMAT.

ERVINFORTHEWIN

it was a very unimpressive try by that troll – totally agree 😅

I don’t think he was trolling, it was irony.

Maths

Steve Nolan

Get outta here, British nerd.

Football (and by proxy, a football game) sucks. The only thing worse is baseball.
The end.

Golf is even worse

AWSI DOOGER
Golf is the ultimate examination. Every lie is different and the requirements of every shot are different. Just picking the correct club in a challenge along with how to adjust the swing slightly to compensate for the club being slightly too much or slightly too little. Then the varying mental challenges during a four hour round of ups and down. Sometimes you stand over a shot knowing darn well it will fit perfectly into a 5 yard window that you are envisioning, and other times a two-way miss seems all but inevitable. Which way will it go? Naturally the knuckleheads are oblivious to all of the above. They decide golf is nothing more than darts on grass. Looks easy enough.… Read more »

HAHAHHAHA
If golf is so hard then why is Stephen curry so good without practice? Michael phelps owns the world record for the longest televised put in history. So many celebrities are close to as good as pros without any focus on it whatsoever.

Top athletes are fascinated by golf because, for many, it’s easy to pick up a club and be pretty good at the amateur pro or pro level

wpDiscuz

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »