Every summer, we rank down the top recruiting classes snagged by each team. But what do those rankings look like four years later, when each swimmer has had an opportunity to complete a full NCAA career of competing and scoring?
We’ve already looked back at our top 20 individual athletes in the high school graduating class of 2017, ranked when they were high school juniors in the summer of 2016. Now it’s time to look back at our team-by-team recruiting class rankings to see which teams got most from their recruiting hauls.
Back in July of 2017, we ranked out the top 12 recruiting classes nationwide. You can look back on our ranks here:
We’ve republished each of the 12 classes below, verbatim from how they were listed in our 2017 post. Then we tracked down some stats on each class, plus a short analysis of each class along with any extra swimmers who wound up being part of the class.
Bear in mind that international swimmers throw a wrinkle into this sort of analysis, given the difficulty in projecting ahead of time when an international recruit will join an NCAA program and officially start their eligibility.
Note: The ‘number of NCAA Scorers’ section refers only to individual scorers, and only among athletes included in our original recruiting class rankings. Late additions to the classes are noted when we can find them.
*Special 2020 note: with the 2020 NCAA Championships canceled, any 2020 references below refer to psych sheet scoring, including the team finish, marked with an asterisk.
#12: VIRGINIA CAVALIERS
Top-tier additions: #18 Paige Madden, Kyla Valls, Erin Earley, Abby Richter, Emma Seiberlich
Others: Anna Pang, Marcie Maguire, Caroline Gmelich, Jocelyn Porter (diver)
- NCAA finishes over 3* years: 9th, 6th, *1st*, 1st
- Number of NCAA scorers in class: 5 (Madden, Valls, Richter, Seiberlich, Gmelich)
This was an outstanding class for Virginia, helping power that program’s rise to an NCAA title in their senior seasons. This crew was recruited by Virginia’s old coaching staff, with our recruit rankings coming out just a month before UVA hired Todd Desorbo away from NC State. But they swam all four seasons under Desorbo & co. Madden lived up to billing and more as the #18 recruit, scoring the second-most points of any recruit in this class and leading the class with 3 individual NCAA titles.
Four unranked recruits scored points. Seiberlich and Richter scored as sophomores, but both actually dropped off the roster in their senior seasons. Meanwhile Gmelich and Valls both scored for the first time as seniors. Valls also won an NCAA title as part of a relay.
#11: ALABAMA CRIMSON TIDE
Top-tier additions: Leonie Kullmann, Flora Molnar
Others: Amy Stevens (diver), Bean Faunce, Julia Kukla, Kaila Wong, Kathryn Nicholson, Leonie Kullmann, Lydia Jackson, Mallory Underwood, Maria Reed, Nicole Smith, Sezin Eligul, Sydney Dawson, Tori van Buskirk
- NCAA finishes over 3* years: 30th, 34th, *12th*, 5th
- Number of NCAA scorers in class: 0
No individual scorers out of this bunch, but that’s also not the full picture. Molnar was seeded to score in the canceled 2020 meet. She also helped Alabama win its first-ever NCAA relay title this year, splitting 47.9 on the 400 free relay and also scoring as part of the 200 free relay in 6th. Kaila Wong swam the breaststroke leg of the scoring 200 medley relay.
#10: NC STATE WOLFPACK
Top-tier additions: Julia Poole, Tamila Holub, Olivia Calegan, Jacquee Clabeaux, Summer Finke (transfer), Lexie Lupton (transfer)
Others: Maddie Morello, Miranda Donley, Olivia Fisher, Kate Moore, Danika Huizinga, Anna Shumate
- NCAA finishes over 3* years: 18th, 7th, *4th*, 2nd
- Number of NCAA scorers in class: 4 (Moore, Poole, Holub, Calegan)
This group saw a massive rise in NC State’s team finish. Interestingly, the biggest individual scorer, Kate Moore, wasn’t even one of their most-touted recruits in this class. Moore and Julia Poole each scored as sophomores and seniors, with projected psych sheet points as juniors in 2020. Holub scored as a freshman but dropped off the roster after her sophomore year.
#9: GEORGIA BULLDOGS
Top-tier additions: #1 Courtney Harnish, Sammie Burchill, Olivia Anderson, Danielle Dellatorre
Others: Donna Blaum, Emmaline Peterson, Kayla Tennant, Maddie Wallis
- NCAA finishes over 3* years: 11th, 18th, *6th*, 8th
- Number of NCAA scorers in class: 3 (Harnish, Anderson, Dellatorre)
Harnish lived up to her #1 billing, scoring individually in all three meets, and she was seeded to score her highest total (38) in the canceled 2020 meet. Anderson and Dellatorre scored as seniors.
#8: TEXAS LONGHORNS
Top-tier additions: #11 Victoria Edwards (TX – fly/back), Evie Pfeifer (MO – free), Ella Tierney (IL – free), Kennedy Lohman (Arizona transfer – breast)
The rest: Ashley Pollok, Emily Reese, Grace Ritch, Peyton Quattlebaum, Logan Shiller
- NCAA finishes over 3* years: 6th, 5th, *19th*, 3rd
- Number of NCAA scorers in class: 1 (Pfeifer)
Ranked recruit Edwards didn’t scored, but Pfeifer more than made up for that by scoring 87.5 individually, the #3 overall scorer in the class. Key transfer Lohman didn’t score individually, but did fill a much-needed breaststroke vacancy on the medley relays and was an All-American with several top 8 relay finishes.
#7: FLORIDA GATORS
Top-tier additions: Liliana Szilagyi (Hungary – fly), #17 Taylor Ault (CA – distance free), Bettina Boszormenyi (Hungary – free), Rachel Ramey (TX – breast)
The rest: Nikki Miller, Gabrielle Hillis, Jillian Hatch (Pacific transfer), Emma Whitner (diving)
- NCAA finishes over 3* years: 35th, 24th, *13th*, 17th
- Number of NCAA scorers in class: 1 (diver Ashley McCool)
Szilagyi was the big driver of this rank, but she never wound up competing for the Gators. Diver Ashley McCool finished off her career by scoring at NCAAs and was an SEC champion on 1-meter.
#6: TENNESSEE VOLUNTEERS
Top-tier additions: #5 Nikol Popov (CA – breast/IM), Tjasa Pintar (Slovenia – free/breast/IM), Alexis Yager (IL – IM/breast), Stanzi Moseley (USC transfer – free)
The rest: Emily Sykes, Megan Sichterman, Bailey Grinter, Amanda Nunan
- NCAA finishes over 3* years: 7th, 8th, *2nd*, 10th
- Number of NCAA scorers in class: 5 (Popov, Pintar, Yager, Nunan, Moseley)
This class finishes with mostly low-level individual scoring, but probably would have seen its total points at least double if the 2020 meet had happened. Popov scored as a sophomore and won an NCAA relay title that year with a strong 50 breast split on the 200 medley. Moseley was a key transfer who scored in 2018 and was a key relay piece for Tennessee throughout a big rise in the NCAA finish order as a team.
#5: CALIFORNIA GOLDEN BEARS
Top-tier additions: Robin Neumann (Netherlands – free), Sarah Darcel (Canada – IM/breast), Sophie Krivokapic-Zhou (CA – back), Ali Harrison (CA – breast)
The rest: Alexandra Skorus-Neely, Dannie Dilsaver, Natalie Tuck, Elizabeth Bailey, Briana Thai (diving), Jackie IM (diving), Kathleen Navas (diving)
- NCAA finishes over 3* years: 2nd, 2nd, *3rd*, 4th
- Number of NCAA scorers in class: 2 (Neumann, Darcel)
This was a small and more internationally-based class, but both Neumann and Darcel came through well. Neumann was a top 10 overall scorer in the class and the #1 international prospect in scoring. Darcel scored a dozen points as a freshmen, but scratched out of the meet as a sophomore.
#4: USC TROJANS
Top-tier additions: #3 Margaret Aroesty (NY – breast/IM), #13 Marta Ciesla (FL – sprint free), #14 Caitlin Tycz (ME – fly), Isabella Rongione
The rest: N/A
- NCAA finishes over 3* years: 12th, 10th, *8th*, 22nd
- Number of NCAA scorers in class: 1 (Aroesty)
This crew always looked on the cusp of a breakout that never quite materialized. Aroesty did score 9 points as a freshman, which is difficult to do. But after that, this group’s scoring dried up. They also went through a coaching change late in their careers when Dave Salo retired and Jeremy Kipp jumped from Northwestern.
#3: TEXAS A&M AGGIES
Top-tier additions: #9 Taylor Pike (AR – fly), #16 Anna Belousova (MD/Russia – breast), #19 Joy Field (TX – distance), Haley Yelle (TX – distance)
The rest: Kara Eisenmann, Audrey McMurry, Camryn Toney, Jing Wen Quah, McKenna Debever (Auburn transfer), Charlye Campbell (diver), Haley Walding (diver), Kaja Skrzek (diver)
- NCAA finishes over 3* years: 3rd, 13th, *25th*, 14th
- Number of NCAA scorers in class: 6 (Belousova, Pike, Campbell, Toney, Quah, Yelle)
What a great class this turned out to be. Belousova only swam in two NCAA meets, but scored 45 total points. Pike and Campbell each scored 20+ individually. The NCAA finishes really fluctuated over this group’s four years, but it wasn’t for lack of scoring from this class.
#2: MICHIGAN WOLVERINES
Top-tier additions: #2 Sierra Schmidt (PA – distance), #15 Alexis Margett (CA – fly), Miranda Tucker (IU transfer), Taylor Garcia (Arizona transfer), Daria Pyshnenko (IL – sprinter), Kate Krolikowski (CA – free/IM)
The rest: Alex Hughes, Claire Maiocco, Emma Cleason, Margaret Rogers (diver), Nikki Canale (diver), Christy Cutshaw (diver)
- NCAA finishes over 3* years: 4th, 3rd, *5th*, 6th
- Number of NCAA scorers in class: 3 (Schmidt, Cutshaw, Tucker)
Schmidt was an outstanding scorer, the #6 overall individual scorer in the class. Cutshaw scored as a freshman in diving. Pyshnenko never actually scored individually, but was a really key relay piece and was seeded to score 8.5 in the canceled 2020 meet.
#1: STANFORD CARDINAL
Top-tier additions: #4 Brooke Forde (KY – IM/everything), #6 Lauren Pitzer (TX – free), #8 Hannah Kukurugya (IN – fly), #10 Grace Zhao (CA – breast), #12 Ashley Volpenhein (OH – sprint free)
The rest: Lauren Green, Katie Glavinovich
- NCAA finishes over 3* years: 1st, 1st, *7th*, 9th
- Number of NCAA scorers in class: 3 (Forde, Pitzer, Zhao)
Our recruit rankings always inspire plenty of discussion about how much elite recruiting really matters compared to talent development. While we all remember the out-of-nowhere breakout types, this Stanford class shows just how much recruiting elite prospects still consistently outscored the diamond-in-the-rough type recruiting.
For a class with five of our top 20 recruits, this group was fairly hit-or-miss. Yet that incoming talent baseline was just so high that Stanford still had the #1 scoring group out of any of these classes. Forde was a smash hit, scoring 104 individual points and leading all individual scorers in the class. She also led the way with 3 individual NCAA titles and 2 relay wins.
Pitzer scored as a freshman and sophomore, but didn’t make the meet as a senior. Same goes for Zhao. The other two ranked recruits never scored individually.
If nothing else, this class is a reminder of why we put stock in recruiting class rankings. While not every top-20 recruit pans out, the odds of finding a smash scorer like Forde are way, way higher in top-20-type recruits than in the developmental types. Recruiting and athlete development are both factors in final NCAA scoring… but elite recruiting continues to be the most reliable factor in predicting NCAA scoring.
RE-RANKING THE CLASSES
Certainly, individual points don’t encapsulate everything a recruiting class brings to a program over four years. But they are the easiest way to rank the classes against each other four years later. Here’s a look at all the classes represented, ranked by individual points from all swimmers in this graduating class:
Rank | Team | Points Over 4 Years |
1 | Stanford | 134 |
2 | Texas A&M | 133.5 |
3 | Virginia | 124 |
4 | Arkansas | 88 |
5 | Texas | 87.5 |
6 | Arizona | 76.5 |
7 | Michigan | 64 |
8 | Cal | 63 |
9 | NC State | 60 |
10 | Georgia | 54 |
11 | Ohio State | 46.5 |
12 | Northwestern | 44 |
13 | Purdue | 39 |
14 | Minnesota | 37 |
15 | Kentucky | 35 |
16 | Nebraska | 33 |
17 | Arizona State | 23 |
17 | Missouri | 23 |
19 | Georgia Tech | 22 |
20 | Indiana | 19 |
20 | Miami | 19 |
22 | Virginia Tech | 16 |
23 | San Diego State | 15 |
24 | Louisville | 12 |
24 | Tennessee | 12 |
26 | Florida | 11 |
27 | Houston | 9 |
27 | USC | 9 |
29 | FGCU | 6 |
30 | Auburn | 3 |
31 | Notre Dame | 1 |
And our new top 12, purely in terms of individual NCAA points:
The far left column tracks each swimmer’s final rank within the class. The next column tracks their individual ranking in our top 20 recruits post. HM means “honorable mention.” UNR means “unranked” and INTL means “international”, as we don’t rank international swimmers in our top 20 post. “DIVE” refers to divers, also not ranked in our top 20 lists.
In the case of transfers, we’ve only awarded points to the school that the athlete earned while at that school – so a swimmer who transferred after two years will have their first two year’s worth of point totals count for their original school and their next two years for their second school.
#1 Stanford (-)
Final Rank | 2017 Rank | Name | College Team | Total NCAA Points | 2018 NCAA Points | 2019 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Points | 2021 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Psych Sheet Points |
1 | 4 | Brooke Forde | Stanford | 104 | 21 | 43 | — | 40 | 42 |
17 | 6 | Lauren Pitzer | Stanford | 23 | 1 | 22 | — | no invite | 5 |
41 | 10 | Grace Zhao | Stanford | 7 | 5 | 2 | — | no invite | no invite |
#2 Texas A&M (+1)
Final Rank | 2017 Rank | Name | College Team | Total NCAA Points | 2018 NCAA Points | 2019 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Points | 2021 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Psych Sheet Points |
8 | 16 | Anna Belousova | Texas A&M | 45 | 27 | 18 | — | — | |
15 | 9 | Taylor Pike | Texas A&M | 25.5 | 5 | 6 | — | 14.5 | 1 |
16 | DIVE | Charlye Campbell | Texas A&M | 24 | — | 24 | |||
21 | UNR | Camryn Toney | Texas A&M | 19 | — | 19 | |||
24 | INTL | Jing Quah | Texas A&M | 17 | 11 | — | 6 | 9 | |
51 | UNR | Haley Yelle | Texas A&M | 3 | 3 | — |
#3 Virginia (+9)
Final Rank | 2017 Rank | Name | College Team | Total NCAA Points | 2018 NCAA Points | 2019 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Points | 2021 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Psych Sheet Points |
2 | 18 | Paige Madden | Virginia | 98 | 0 | 38 | — | 60 | 44 |
34 | UNR | Caroline Gmelich | Virginia | 11 | — | 11 | 3 | ||
44 | UNR | Emma Seiberlich | Virginia | 6 | 6 | — | |||
47 | UNR | Abby Richter | Virginia | 5 | 5 | — | 14 | ||
50 | UNR | Kyla Valls | Virginia | 4 | — | 4 |
#4 Arkansas (+)
Final Rank | 2017 Rank | Name | College Team | Total NCAA Points | 2018 NCAA Points | 2019 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Points | 2021 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Psych Sheet Points |
4 | DIVE | Brooke Schultz | Arkansas | 82 | 29 | 32 | — | 21 | |
47 | UNR | Peyton Palsha | Arkansas | 5 | — | 5 | |||
62 | DIVE | Maha Amer | Arkansas | 1 | 1 | — |
#5 Texas (+3)
Final Rank | 2017 Rank | Name | College Team | Total NCAA Points | 2018 NCAA Points | 2019 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Points | 2021 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Psych Sheet Points |
3 | UNR | Evie Pfeifer | Texas | 87.5 | 23.5 | 16 | — | 48 | 1 |
#6 Arizona (+)
Final Rank | 2017 Rank | Name | College Team | Total NCAA Points | 2018 NCAA Points | 2019 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Points | 2021 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Psych Sheet Points |
5 | DIVE | Delaney Schnell | Arizona | 76.5 | 13 | 31.5 | — | 32 |
#7 Michigan (-5)
Final Rank | 2017 Rank | Name | College Team | Total NCAA Points | 2018 NCAA Points | 2019 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Points | 2021 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Psych Sheet Points |
6 | 2 | Sierra Schmidt | Michigan | 57 | 9 | 17 | — | 31 | 21 |
41 | DIVE | Christy Cutshaw | Michigan | 7 | 7 | — | |||
64 | UNR | Daria Pyshnenko | Michigan | 0 | — | 8.5 |
#8 Cal (-3)
Final Rank | 2017 Rank | Name | College Team | Total NCAA Points | 2018 NCAA Points | 2019 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Points | 2021 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Psych Sheet Points |
7 | INTL | Robin Neumann | Cal | 51 | 16 | 14 | — | 21 | 4 |
32 | INTL | Sarah Darcel | Cal | 12 | 12 | — | — |
#9 NC State (+1)
Final Rank | 2017 Rank | Name | College Team | Total NCAA Points | 2018 NCAA Points | 2019 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Points | 2021 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Psych Sheet Points |
13 | UNR | Kate Moore | NC State | 29 | 2 | — | 27 | 15 | |
25 | UNR | Julia Poole | NC State | 16 | 3 | — | 13 | 5 | |
34 | INTL | Tamila Holub | NC State | 11 | 11 | 0 | — | ||
50 | UNR | Olivia Calegan | NC State | 4 | — | 4 | 7 |
#10 Georgia (-1)
Final Rank | 2017 Rank | Name | College Team | Total NCAA Points | 2018 NCAA Points | 2019 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Points | 2021 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Psych Sheet Points |
9 | 1 | Courtney Harnish | Georgia | 44 | 7 | 15 | — | 22 | 38 |
41 | INTL | Olivia Anderson | Georgia | 7 | — | 7 | 2 | ||
53 | UNR | Danielle Dellatorre | Georgia | 3 | — | 3 | 23 |
#11 Ohio State (+)
Final Rank | 2017 Rank | Name | College Team | Total NCAA Points | 2018 NCAA Points | 2019 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Points | 2021 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Psych Sheet Points |
14 | UNR | Kristen Romano | Ohio State | 27 | 7 | 0 | — | 20 | |
25 | UNR | Katie Trace | Ohio State | 16 | 3 | — | 13 | ||
56 | DIVE | Genevieve Angerame | Ohio State | 2 | 2 | — | |||
58 | UNR | Taylor Petrak | Ohio State | 1.5 | — | 1.5 | |||
61 | INTL | Freya Rayner | Ohio State | 0 | 11 |
#12 Northwestern (+)
Final Rank | 2017 Rank | Name | College Team | Total NCAA Points | 2018 NCAA Points | 2019 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Points | 2021 NCAA Points | 2020 NCAA Psych Sheet Points |
23 | UNR | Maddie Smith | Northwestern | 18 | — | 18 | |||
28 | INTL | Calypso Sheridan | Northwestern | 15 | 15 | — | 44 | ||
34 | UNR | Sophie Angus | Northwestern | 11 | — | 11 | 6 |
What happened to Sarah Darcel?
I probably should have noted that if Anna Belousova had competed at the 2021 NCAAs, she would no doubt have been Texas A&M’s highest point contributor and also their 5th senior on the “Who from 2017 tallied points?” roster. I’m not sure if any other schools had key athletes missing in March, but Belousova’s absence hurt A@M big time.
I thought this was an interesting research piece. Every swimmer/diver and every team has their own story, but it’s fascinating to see who’s still around making a difference four years or so after completing their high school career and heading off to college.
Only one school had four seniors score individually at the 2021 NCAA Championships and that school was Texas A&M. They seem to do a great job with whoever they have. Hats off to the Aggie coaching staff.
Four schools had three seniors score individually this past March – Virginia, NC State, Georgia, and Ohio State.
Good to see seniors still competing and scoring individually, as well as helping relays put valuable points on the board and/or contributing to their team in other ways (leadership, spirit, morale, etc).