Top 20 Swimming Recruits In The Boys’ High School Class of 2015

Professional sports leagues in the United States have draft day. It’s the day when all fortunes could change, it’s the day when fans and commentators can micro-sect every move, decision, and wrinkle.

In college swimming, there’s two such days: July 1st, where Division I coaches are first given free reign to contact high school seniors; and national signing day.

In honor of that day, today, we post below our top 20 rankings for the high school class of 2014, boys edition.

Our goal in these rankings is to try and reflect what college coaches look for in recruits, based on many years of conversations. Every coach has different preferences and different details they look at. For example, Georgia, who will be graduating Nic Fink after next season, will probably have breaststrokers a little higher on their lists than will Alabama: a team stacked with very good, very young swimmers in that group.

This list focuses on American-based athletes, simply because there is so much uncertainty about international recruits, when they’ll come to the USA, if they have a desire to come to the USA, and once they’ve committed, if they’ll even wind up in the USA.

This class as a whole is sort of an odd one. There’s not nearly the same name recognition outside of the top 5 as we saw last year. Just looking at the number of sub-55 second breaststrokers, it’s almost unbelievable. The number of 1:37 200 freestylers almost makes such a time unimpressive.

But in general, here’s the things that will get a recruit ranked a touch higher:

  • Sprints over distance – Every team needs sprinters, and lots of them. Of course, a special distance swimmer can easily rank ahead of a very good 100 freestyler, but every honest coach in the country knows that the best sprinter in the NCAA is more valuable than the best miler in the country.
  • Improvements – Actual times are a big trump card, but any big improvements in quality can make a difference as well. For example, a swimmer who only took up year-round swimming as a junior in high school going the same time as a swimmer whose been swimming year-round since they were 8 will probably get the edge in our rankings. Think Breeja Larson.
  • Short Course over Long Course – we recognize that some programs, many programs, put their focus with their high school aged swimmers on long course, especially depending on when the high school championships may fall. That said, college swimming is short course, so a swimmer who is great in short course but struggles in long course will have the advantage.
  • Conference scoring ability – yes, freshmen who score at NCAA’s, especially on the men’s side, are incredibly valuable. But college coaches know that their Athletics Directors also want to see success at conference meets, so we’ve factored that in as well.

The womens’ rankings will be coming soon as well.

Disclosure: there’s a lot of high school seniors in the country, and no really good, complete, 100% accurate listing of them all. If you don’t see your favorite swimmer on the list, feel free to point them out in the comments. There’s a chance that we disagree with your assessment of their spot in the top 20, and so long as it’s done civilly, there’s no problem with differences of opinions. There’s also a chance that we’ve simply missed a no-brainer (we’ve taken every precaution to avoid that), and if that happens, we want to make sure we correct it.

Top 10 Swimmers From The Class of 2015

1. Andrew Seliskar – Nation’s Capital Swim Club – McLean, VA  **Verbally committed to Cal**
Best times in yards: 20.06 50 free, 44.48 100 free, 46.89 100 back, 53.24 100 breast, 46.50 100 fly, 1:35.17 200 free, 1:42.17 200 back, 1:52.21 200 breast, 1:42.55 200 fly, 200 IM 1:43.22, 3:41.19 400 IM, 4:18.97 500 free. 

The hardest part about narrowing down the top recruits from the class of 2015 was trying to figure out what Andrew Seliskar’s 5 best times in yards are. How do you narrow his ability down to five events with as wide of a span as he has? You don’t. He has the ability to be a key player for any team that signs him at the NCAA level.

Andrew Seliskar won the 400 IM at the 2013 Winter Nationals in Knoxville, Tennessee. He is primarily a IMer, but he has an incredible range outside of that. His butterfly is the fastest from his class, his backstroke is within the top 3, and his breaststroke is ranked second in the country, and his freestyle is sub 45. This kid is an animal, and he will be a name to watch for many years to come. He is currently a member of the US Junior national team for the 100 breaststroke, 200 butterfly, and 400 IM.

He has an older brother, Stephen, that currently swims for Purdue University. Stephen was an NCAA qualifier as a member of Purdue’s medley relays in 2013.

2. Townley Haas – Nova Of Virginia Aquatics – Richmond, VA
5 best times in yards: 43.82 100 free, 1:35.19 200 free, 4:17.45 500 free, 8:53.31 1000 free, 14:59.94 1650 free. 

Townley Haas received a good amount of press this year for breaking Michael Phelps’ 15-16 500 freestyle record of 4:18.12 from 2002. He is going to be a weapon for which ever team he ends up signing with. His freestyle spans from a 43.9 100 freestyle all the way to a sub 15 minute 1650 freestyle. Townley has the ability to be a scorer in the distance events as well as a strong leg of a sprint relay, especially at the conference level. It is rare to see swimmers with this kind of range.

He is a member of the junior national team in the 200 and 400 meter freestyles.

3. Michael Thomas – Upper Dublin Aquatic Club – Horsham, PA  **Verbally committed to Cal**
5 best events in yards: 46.65 100 back, 1:43.82 200 back, 1:46.18 200 IM, 1:45.83 200 fly, 20.63 50 free.

 We spent a while trying to decide where Michael Thomas fits into our ranking for his class. There are a lot of fast backstrokers and IMer’s, and Michael Thomas is included in that mix. We decided to make him number three on our list because of his value as a sprinter. He has the fastest time in the country in the 100 backstroke, and has several other strong events to compliment that event. His 20.63 also fares well for his sprint freestyle ability.

When Ryan Muphy set the 15-16 NAG record in the 100 backstroke, I personally did not expect it to be broken for at least a few more years. Micahel Thomas was able to break it with a 46.65. If he can continue to follow along the same path as Ryan Murphy, his future will look very promising.

4. Carsten Vissering – Nation’s Capital Swim Club – Bethesda, MD **Verbally committed to USC**
5 best events in yards: 52.83 100 breast, 1:55.44 200 breast, 1:48.10 200 IM, 3:57.22 400 IM, 21.07 50 free. 

Carsten Vissering announced that he will swim for USC, which will be a huge to relief for Trojan fans a year after largely striking-out in men’s recruiting. Vissering is the National Age Group Record holder in both the 100 yard breaststroke (52.83) and the 100 meter breaststroke (1:01.94) for the 15-16 age group. That 100 breaststroke time already makes him faster than anybody who was on USC’s roster last year, and would have been the third-best in the Pac-12 in 2014.

In other events, he’s also been 1:55.44 in the 200 breaststroke, and 1:48.1 in the 200 yard IM.

USC does have some good breaststrokers returning next season in Morten Klarskov, Sergio Lujan-Rivera, and Andrew Malone, but the latter two of those will be graduated by the time Vissering arrives on campus.

Vissering is a member of the USA Swimming Junior National Team in both the 100 and the 200 breaststroke and earned a bronze medal on the mixed medley relay at the 2013 FINA Junior World Championships.

5. Aidan Burns – Santa Clara Swim Club – Saratoga, CA  **Verbally committed to Georgia**
5 best events in yards: 1:37.15 200 free, 4:17.97 500 free, 8:51.80 1000 free, 14:57.07 1650 free, 3:48.60 400 IM.

Aidan Burns is our 5th ranked recruit from the class of 2015. Burns is primarily a distance swimmer, but his backstrokes and IM’s are very competitive as well, with a 1:44.37 200 backstroke and a 1:45.36 200 IM. He will be a major player for any team that signs him. One of the only things bumping Burns down to 5th on our rankings this year is his sprinting. A lot of schools will be looking for swimmers who can score points at the conference and NCAA level; individually as well as on relays. He could be a fantastic addition to an 800 freestyle relay, but dipping down to those shorter relays isn’t likely.

His 800 freestyle is already within 8 seconds of Michael McBroom’s 1000 freestyle NCAA record, and he still has a full high school season before he gets to start swimming in the NCAA. He is currently a member of the USA Swimming junior national team because of his 400 meter freestyle.

6. Patrick Mulcare – Tualatin Hill Swim Club – Tigard, OR  **Verbally committed to USC**
5 best times in yards: 47.69 100 back, 1:36.64 200 free, 1:42.99 200 back, 1:46.51 200 IM, 3:48.48 400 IM

Patrick Mulcare is another great backstroker from the class of 2015. There are a lot of great backstrokers and IMer’s this year, and Mulcare is no exception to that. Mulcare had breakout swims at the Federal Way Sectional in March of 2014, where he broke Tyler Messerschmidt’s meet record. He could be a huge contributor to the medley relays as well as the freestyle relays, with a 1:36 200 freestyle.

He will be a member of the 2014 US youth Olympic Team.

7. Cole Cogswell – Canyons Aquatic Club – Santa Clarita, CA
4 best events in yards: 20.20 50 free, 43.97 100 free, 1:36.81 200 free, 50.46 100 back, 

Cole Cogswell is primarily a sprint freestyler, which is why he is ranked 7th in our class of 2015 ranking. With best times of 20.2, 43.9, and 1:36.8, he will be a huge asset as a sprint freestyler and relay swimmer. We have to keep in mind that these times are from his junior year of high school. Most sprinters gain a significant amount of body mass in college, which allows them to drop time and develop into 18 seconds sprinters.

8. Thomas Brewer – Current Swimming – Bend, OR  **Verbally committed to Auburn**
5 best events in yards: 44.86 100 free, 54.32 100 breast, 1:37.91 200 free, 1:58.23 200 breast, 1:47.12 200 IM. 

Normally a 54.32 100 breaststroker would stand out among his peers, but this class’ breaststroke talent is unreal. Brewer is ranked 8th in the class of 2015. His times are incredible, but he loses a little bit of stock due to where he falls within the class. Regardless, Brewer will be a great swimmer to pick up. He has a strong freestyle (44.86 100 freestyle, 1:37.91 200 freestyle) as well as a great 200 breaststroke and 200 IM. His times will allow him to score individually as well as be a major contributor on relays.

9. Ryan Harty – Greenwood Memorial Swim Club – Gardner, MA  **Verbally committed to Texas**
5 best events in yards: 47.77 100 back, 1:42.02 200 back, 1:48.33 200 IM, 3:50.13 400 IM, 45.17 100 free. 

Ryan Harty is ninth on our list of top recruits from the class of 2015. He is another really strong backstroker, and just like Thomas Brewer, loses a little stock due to where he falls within his class, despite his fast times. He has the fourth fastest 100 backstroke in his class. His best 200 back would have earned him a spot at the NCAA Championships. His IM’s are not as strong as his backstrokes, but they are still going to score well at the conference level and are not far away from being competitive at the NCAA championship level.

10. Alex Valente – Santa Barbara Swim Club – Santa Barbara, CA  **Verbally committed to USC**
4 best events in yards: 46.69 100 fly, 1:44.10 200 fly, 49.99 100 back, 1:50.63 200 back. 

The final swimmer in the top 10 from the class of 2015 is Alex Valente, the 15-16 NAG record holder in the 100 butterfly. He broke Mike Cavic’s previous record with a 46.99. Since breaking the 15-16 NAG record, he has lowered his 100 butterfly time to 46.69. His 200 butterfly is also a strength of his. He has been 1:44.10 in that event. His third collegiate event will be either the 100 or 200 backstroke. Although they aren’g as strong as his butterfly times, they can be developed into a strong third event.

Honorable Mention (11-20):

11. Ryan Dudzinski – Upper Saint Clair Swim Club – Upper St. Clair, PA  **Verbally committed to Stanford**
Best events in yards: 46.88 100 back, 47.44 100 fly, 21.15 50 free, 45.12 100 free. 
12. Tabahn Afrik – Michigan Lakeshore Aquatics – Holland, MI  **Verbally committed to Notre Dame**
Best events in yards: 20.55 50 free, 43.90 100 free, 1:37.80 200 free.
13. Ross Palazzo – Hudson Explorers Aquatic Team – Hudson, OH  **Verbally committed to Florida**
Best events in yards: 54.53 100 breast, 1:57.74 200 breast, 1:47.93 200 IM, 1:38.50 200 free, 3:51.13 400 IM.
14. Cody Bekemeyer – SwimAtlanta – Suwanee, GA  **Verbally committed to South Carolina**
Best events in yards: 4:21.96 100 free, 9:10.01 1000 free, 15:10.71 1650 free, 3:51.30 400 IM, 1:48.65 200 back.
15. Bowen Anderson – Michiana Stars – Granger, IN  **Verbally committed to Kentucky**
Best events in yards: 4:25.01 500 free, 1:46.39 200 fly, 48.79 100 fly, 1:38.55 200 free, 46.38 100 free.
16. Brennan Balogh – Lincoln Select Swimming – Lincoln, NE  **Verbally committed to Florida**
Best events in yards: 48.66 100 back, 1:44.08 200 back, 49.47 100 fly, 1:48.18 200 fly, 1:48.17 200 IM.
17. Brad Zdroik – Somerset Valley YMCA – Hillborough, NJ  **Verbally committed to Stanford**
Best events in yards: 20.32 50 free, 44.74 100 free, 48.88 100 back, 1:38.50 200 free. 
18. Nick Norman – Mission Viejo Nadadores – San Juan Capistrano, CA  **Verbally committed to Cal**
Best events in yards: 4:23.01 500 free, 8:57.68 1000 free, 14:58.76 1650 free, 1:40.00 200 free.
19. Jake Miller – Redbird Swim Club – El Paso, IL  **Verbally committed to Louisville**
Best events in yards: 4:25.38 500 free, 1:47.47 200 IM, 3:50.36 400 IM, 45.03 100 free. 
20. Tate Jackson – Nitro Swimming – Austin, TX **Verbally committed to Notre Dame**
Best events in yards: 20.09 50 free, 44.48 100 free, 49.35 100 fly. 



In This Story

Leave a Reply

Notify of
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
7 years ago

Wow! How disheartening for distance swimmers!! Such doom and gloom if you don’t have sprint chops…that’s just sad to dismiss long distance talent.

Reply to  shawn
7 years ago

I have to agree with Shawn. Always been told by our club coaches and aquatic director that swimmers who rock the distance events are highly desirable at the NCAA level, whereas sprinters are a dime a dozen.

Reply to  Kaytee
7 years ago

Most people would disagree with your coach. Sprinters are more valuable at the collegiate level because they can swim relays. It is true that sprinters are more common at the collegiate level, but they are also more likely to get scholarships from the big schools. That said, you do seem to see some of the second tier schools with great distance swimmers, perhaps because the big schools pass on them. As a sprinter or distance swimmer, if you put in the work, you will have opportunities to swim in college.

bobo gigi
Reply to  shawn
7 years ago

I’ve understood that sprint is important but I remark that none of the first 6 guys of that list is a pure sprinter. 🙂

I’ve just read the 2015 list of College Swimming to see if there are little differences with your rankings and it looks like they have again smoked illegal substances.
They put Vissering in 12th position and Valente in 34th position! :mrgreen:
But it’s still worst on the girls’ side with Katie Ledecky only in 5th and especially Abbey Weitzeil in 41st! 😆

Reply to  bobo gigi
7 years ago

Yeah, on the boys’ side, there’s relatively few of those sprint guys as compared to what we saw in the prior class. Tons of versatility though.

Reply to  bobo gigi
7 years ago

BoBo Im pretty sure their rankings are completed with an algorithm. Its obviously, not finely tuned.

Reply to  bobo gigi
7 years ago

Bobo, a lot of the College Swimming rankings depend on people inputting their own times. Some people eat up things like this; others just don’t care. I’m guessing Katie Ledecky has more important things on her plate than worrying about where she ranks in the college recruiting process.

Reply to  shawn
7 years ago

it comes down to simple math. good distance swimmers can impact 3 events and (at best) maybe 1 relay. good sprinters can impact 7 events (assuming 4 relays). or put another way, a distance swimmer can score up to 70 points at ncaa (3 x 20 +1*40/4) while a sprinter can account for 100 (3×20 + 4*40/4). i’m sure swimswam took this into consideration when coming up with their rankings.

college coaches know this. apparently your swim coach does not.

(also, i would contend that elite sprinters are not a dime a dozen.)

Reply to  theroboticrichardsimmons
7 years ago

I think it’s a good point on the point scoring. That said, if a distance swimmer stretches into the 200, they can become very valuable (i.e. Connor Jaeger, Big Ten MVP)

Reply to  Flyin'
7 years ago

Connor Jaeger was the Big Ten Swimmer of the Year. However, he has never been Michigan’s “MVP”. That honor has gone to the Ortiz brothers each of the last two years, and Bruno will carry it again in 2015 for the reasons discussed above.

7 years ago

Sprinters can mostly likely swim 4 relays where distance swimmers have 1 really. It’s not sad it’s reality.

7 years ago


Doesn’t it come down to points at the big meets? You have to be versatile enough to swim at least the 4×200 (like Connor Jaeger) and not just 1 (1650) or maybe 2 (500) distance events.

Reply to  gator
7 years ago

The bottom line is how much potential is left, and how many points will the swimmer likely score.

A swimmer like Michael McBroom who can win the mile and make the A final in the 500 will bring in more points than a sprinter on a couple of sprint relays that only make the B finals.

Distance swimmers, like divers, can win or lose championships for you.

7 years ago

Interesting that the HS is not also listed. A reality that some parents do not understand. As for distance swimmers it is true but some colleges should offer a real distance program you may not win but could score well as so few schools have the big points at the NCAA’s and one or two top swimmers could give you great recognition.

Reply to  CoachGB
7 years ago

COACHGB, please elaborate on “a reality that some parents do not understand”. Do you mean that whether / where you swim High School is not important to college coaches, vs. swimming only USA-S?

Reply to  love2swim
7 years ago

“Well, he goes a 21.8 in the 50 free which would put him 6th on our depth chart, but it says in his profile he was the captain of a state championship winning HS team four years in a row! Better get on the horn with this kid,” said no college coach ever.

7 years ago

A few of your top ten are without dispute. As for the rest, particularly your honorable mention, I think I will wait and see what kids produce at the end of this summer season.

Would be interesting to see your top 20 from July 2010 and compare to what they actually did during their NCAA careers.

You fail to mention the value of versatility to a program. A kid that can be developed along multiple paths is more valuable to the overall program flexibility.

And don’t you think the colleges like to handicap recruits on their physicaly maturity – those with less have more upside – as well as educational accomplishments – dependability that the swimmer will not drown… Read more »

Reply to  SwimFan
7 years ago

Interesting you should mention looking at prospects further down the road. We actually went back this spring to look at the high school class of 2012 and how they performed as freshmen (SwimSwam was started in the spring of 2012, so this was our first opportunity to look back at how our ranked swimmers competed in a college setting).

The men’s story is here and the women’s story here, if you’re interested in reading them.

Predicting the future is never an exact science. Interestingly enough, our top 10 men from 2012 were pretty hit-and-miss as freshmen, but our top 10 women were basically all major contributors right away.

Reply to  Jared Anderson
7 years ago

Yes, I would think guys might be even harder to project based simply on high school times as they can be much different stages of physical maturity. I have heard coaches talk about technique, versatility and racing attitude with boys as an attraction.

Would be interesting to think about Conor Dwyer as a perfect example of a late bloomer.

Michigan doesn’t seem to get the kids with the very best times out of high school but certainly produces big time drops during the career of the kids they get. Some of that is their coaching but perhaps they have a superior eye for potential.

Reply to  SwimFan
7 years ago

If we really drill down upon it, what I think Bottom and his staff do really, really well is identify swimmers who will excel in their program, specifically. Though it’s hard to say 100% of the time anybody sticks to anything, I don’t often look at Michigan signees and think “that’s a head scratcher.” I more often at other top-tier programs see swimmers going from a big volume to low volume program, or vice-versa, or race-paced versus threshold based, or even Geographically misplaced – they have a lot of guys from places where they’re used to the climate and such, lots of guys from New Jersey, and Michigan, and Oregon, and Illinois, and Indiana, and Ohio.

Michigan always seems to… Read more »

Reply to  Braden Keith
7 years ago

Interesting observation. However, don’t tell Paul Powers, Alex Katz and Tristan Sanders about that geography theory.

Reply to  Braden Keith
7 years ago

Michigan likes to pick up people with the right attitude… and that is about it. They take great high school swimmers and turn them into the best college swimmers because Bottom is able to recognize their potential. One of the reasons I really like Michigan.

Reply to  SwimFan
5 years ago

This list is unreal. It’s amazing to see the times on here that have changed significantly since the late 90’s and early ’00’s. Swimmers have gotten stronger and the techniques keep getting better. I don’t know if the suit technology has changed, but that would have something to do with it as well. These kids will be studs at the next level.

7 years ago

I’ve never seen Seliskar’s SCY times laid out like that, the versatility is unreal and Phelpsian, and I believe that at least some of these times are faster than the GOAT at this stage.* (*Admittedly Seliskar has considerable catching up to do in LCM, and Phelps was always a better/more prolific LCM than SCY swimmer).

John Hartel
7 years ago

I have seen Seliskar swim short course (yards and meters) a number of times. He has incredible acceleration off his turns which really suits him in short course. But for someone so small, the guy is a beast in the water and will do well in long course also.

7 years ago

Pretty sure Seliskar took down Phelps’s 15-16 200 IM NAG.

Also, his best times in the 200 breast, 200 IM, and 400 IM would have earned him 4th, 7th, and 6th in the NCAA’s this year. Not half bad…

About Tony Carroll

Tony Carroll

The writer formerly known as "Troy Gennaro", better known as Tony Carroll, has been working with SwimSwam since April of 2013. Tony grew up in northern Indiana and started swimming in 2003 when his dad forced him to join the local swim team. Reluctantly, he joined on the condition that …

Read More »