Chinese, U.S., and Russian Teams for SC Worlds Have Seen Highest Testing Over Last 12 Months

World Aquatics has unveiled testing statistics for athletes participating in the World Short Course Swimming Championships beginning next week in Budapest.

The Aquatics Integrity Unit, the disciplinary and anti-doping arm of World Aquatics, has become significantly-more transparent in publishing testing data since the case of the 23 Chinese swimmers who quietly tested positive before the Tokyo Olympic Games came to light. They published similar testing data before the Paris Olympics, though that data didn’t always match up perfectly with data published by National Anti-Doping Organizations.

Chinese swimmers lead the way, according to AQUA data, with 9.4 average tests per participating athlete, followed by the United States (8.2) and Neutral Athletes with Russian nationality (7.5).

Digging deeper into the data reveals that the averages are, in some cases, buoyed by a handful of leaders. Qin Haiyang, who was among the 23 who tested positive before Tokyo, was tested 28 times. 17 were conducted by World Aquatics and 15 by other authorities.

China’s Tang Qianting, who wasn’t on the list, was tested the most times of any participating athlete – 36.

For top American, athletes, meanwhile, proportionately-more tests were conducted by non-World Aquatics bodies, including USADA. Regan Smith, for example, was tested 18 times: five of those by World Aquatics and 13 by other bodies. That’s the same ratio for her in terms of out-of-competition versus in-competition testing. Kate Douglass has had 6 World Aquatics and 9 non-World Aquatics tests, while Gretchen Walsh has had 3 World Aquatics tests and 11 non-World Aquatics tests.

333 of the athletes in the report of participants have no reported anti-doping tests over the last year, which likely points more to the completeness of the data than an actual gap in the testing program – that represents about one-third of participants.

While the official press release says that “all neutral athletes have been tested at least four times in the last 12 months,” that doesn’t appear align with the full report – which shows neutral athlete Miranda Grana Perez from Mexico with no tests.

It is true for those neutral athletes from Russia and Belarus, however, and all athletes from those countries have been tested at least once by World Aquatics – though most of them have been tested primarily by other groups. With limited participation in World Aquatics events in the relevant time period, they do have lower counts of in-competition testing than some of the other nations in question.

The testing programme, designed and implemented by the International Testing Agency (ITA), encompasses a wide range of tests conducted both in and out-of-competition. In total, 3,054 anti-doping tests have been conducted on athletes participating in the World Aquatics Swimming Championships (25m) – Budapest 2024 since 1 January 2024, resulting in an average of three tests per athlete.

The AQIU expects 290 in-competition samples to be collected during six days of competition at the World Championships, which run from December 10-15 at the Duna Arena in Budapest.

Testing Averages from the 10 largest Participating Teams

Teams Average number of tests per athlete
People’s Republic of China 9.4
United States of America 8.2
Neutral Athletes (Russian nationality) 7.5
Canada 6.4
Italy 6.2
Hungary 5.2
Germany 5
Australia 4.2
Japan 3
New Zealand 2.1

In This Story

13
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

13 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
peter
1 month ago

Swimmers dont get tested 34 times for no reason. And guess who under performed at the Olympics.

I miss the ISL (Go dawgs)
1 month ago

Well at least we can say it seems somewhat fair for the countries that keep quabbling about it (China and the US)?

cow from china
1 month ago

If i am correctly recall, Tang Qianting wasnt among the tested positive with those 23 swimmers

arrow
Reply to  cow from china
1 month ago

She was not

JSB
1 month ago

I have been testes 2 times this year but I’m listed at 0, (non NCAA athlete as well) so I’m guessing a lot more of the 330 athletes listed with 0 are the same..

Paul
1 month ago

Australia only 4.2? How many Titmus, O’Callaghan, McKeown, McEvoy?

Joel
Reply to  Paul
1 month ago

See comment above. Often tests are not listed.

Last edited 1 month ago by Joel
KeithM
Reply to  Paul
1 month ago

The overall number of tests for the athletes you mention is likely going to be lower due to fewer (or zero) in-competition tests. For many athletes that are less active following the Olympics, most if not all of their tests will be out of comp resulting in a lower total number.

Goated Mcintosh
1 month ago

“… both among the 23 who tested positive before Tokyo…”

, Tang didn’t test positive for any substance. She wasn’t on that list.

SCCOACH
1 month ago

How many times was Sun Yang tested?

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder/co-owner of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »