USA Mixed Medley Relay: A Closer Look at the Options

by Robert Gibbs 13

August 04th, 2015 International, News

Tomorrow will mark the halfway point of swimming portion of the 2015 FINA World Aquatics Championships, and in the middle of the toughest major meet for Team USA in years, its coaches get to make some interesting decisions.  Namely, day four of this meet will be the first time the USA has contested a mixed medley relay in a major (long course) international championship.  There are going to be a number of factors that the USA coaches will have to keep in mind as they decide who will be swimming, including:

1.  Men will swim back/breast, women will swim fly/free.  This isn’t a rule, but is an optimization strategy that recognizes the fact that, because the first legs are slower, the gap between men and women is larger than between fly and free.

2.  Event schedules for swimmers.  A number of swimmers who will be under consideration will be slated to swim other events tomorrow.  Several more will be swimming events the following day, as the Day 5 schedule features the heats and prelims of the women’s 100 frees and the 200s of the men’s back and breast.  The coaches might have to strike a balance between picking the fastest lineup and saving swimmers with heavier schedules for their best individual events.

3.  Tryouts.  The mixed medley relay offers coaches a chance to evaluate a few swimmers who didn’t earn individual spots, but whose times could be faster than those who did, and see if they might help out the medley relays for each gender.

4.  Fairness.  It’s long been an unwritten rule that medley relay spots should go to those who qualified individually, and that the second-fastest individuals in each event would get a chance to earn a medal via swimming in the preliminaries.  This has been prompted, in part, because usually the USA has been able to get away with swimming its “B team” in relays and still qualifying for finals.  Of course, that strategy took a bit of a blow this week when the men failed to qualify for the finals of the 4×100 free relay.

5.  Winning medals.  I have a feeling that given the paucity of medals for the USA this week, the idea of “sharing the wealth” might take a back seat to “securing the wealth.”  This means we may very well see the USA go with more of an “A” team on this relay that they might otherwise do.

Backstroke

Matt Grevers and David Plummer contested the 100 backstroke for the US this week and lead the considerations for relay spots.  Plummer was apparently feeling ill during preliminaries, but somewhat rebounded in the semifinals.  He finished 9th with a time of 53.54, which would have made finals in 2013.  Grevers has been looking better as the week goes on, ending up with a 52.66 that only earned bronze, but was his best time since the 2012 Olympics.

Meanwhile, there has been a lot of speculation for months that Ryan Murphy, who’s been lighting up the NCAA for the past two seasons, but just missed out qualifying for the individual 100 back here, could get a chance to show what he can throw down right now in the 100 back.   If he gets that chance, a strong time could earn a swim leading off the men’s medley relay. Murphy was 53.64 less than a month ago at the LA invite, so he should be able to go faster than Plummer did.  If he does get that chance tomorrow and show that he can, or if he impresses in the 200 back later this week, the coaches could definitely justify putting him in preliminaries, which would let Grevers save his energy for the finals.

Breaststroke

Kevin Cordes actually had the fastest 100 breast time among US swimmers last year, but that 59.70 came in the preliminaries of the Pan Pacific championships.  He DQ’d in the A-final there, with the result that he missed out on qualifying for Worlds in that event.  However, despite concerns about his penchant for jumping early on relays, the coaches selected him to swim in the medley relay and he split a 58.64, which is unofficially the second-fastest split for an American swimmer ever.  He looks primed so far at this meet, having just broken the American Record in the 50 breast while qualifying third in the semifinals of that event.  There are indications from the USA coaching staff that Cordes is very much in contention for a spot on the men’s medley relay, which makes sense.

Meanwhile, the two swimmers who beat out Cordes to swim here, Cody Miller and Nic Fink, were off their best times in the semi finals of the 100 breast, and both missed the final.  If the coaches feel that Miller’s time is good enough to ensure the USA makes the final in this relay, he may swim prelims so that they can go with what should be their fastest lineup in the final.  The 50 breast final is also tomorrow night, and while Cordes should have plenty of time between two events, the coaches could decide to have him swim preliminaries for the relay and avoid the double, if he’s on this relay at all.

Fly

On the first day of this meet, Claire Donahue finished 20th in the preliminaries with a time of 58.77.   Kendyl Stewart made it to the semis, but finished in 10th with a time of 58.14, just slower than her preliminary swim.  Katie McLaughlin is on the team for the 200 fly, but has been steadily improving her 100 fly over the past year.  She swam a 57.87 at the Fran Crippen Memorial meet in June, a time that’s faster than either of the aforementioned teammates have gone here.

The fly leg may currently be the weakest for the USA women as they look to the women’s medley relay, and it would be great to get McLaughlin a “tryout” on this relay.  However, this relay comes after the women’s 200 fly in both sessions tomorrow, so it’s not clear that putting McLaughlin on this relay would be a great indication of where she’s at in the 100.  The coaches might instead decide to stick with Donahue and Stewart, and use McLaughlin’s individual 200 to gauge whether or not she’d be an upgrade as the USA women battle for a medal at the end of the week.

Free

On one hand, this selection process is a little less complicated, as there is no need for a “tryout” on this leg.  However, both of the USA women’s top freestylers, Simone Manuel and Missy Franklin, have busy schedules this week.  I don’t expect to see Franklin on this relay at all.  Manuel has the 100 free the next day, but will probably anchor the evening relay, assuming that the preliminary team can make it to finals without her.

If the coaches leave off Manuel in the morning, then that freestyle leg will probably go to Margo Geer or Lia Neal.  Geer had the fastest time on the USA squad in the prelims of the 4×100 free, with a 53.37, but faded to a 54.14 in the finals.  Neal was a little more consistent, splitting a 53.93 in the morning and a 53.70 for finals.

Conclusion

I’m glad I’m not Dave Durden or Dave Salo right now, as I wouldn’t be getting much sleep.  However, if it was up to me, no matter how much I may feel like the mixed relays are exhibitions, I would think the US team could use a little shot in the arm, and a victory here could help give the team some momentum for the rest of the week.  I’d go with:

Preliminary: Murphy, Cordes, Stewart, Neal
Final: Grevers, Miller/Cordes, Stewart/McLaughlin, Manuel — decisions on the middle two legs would depend on how the morning session goes.

 

 

In This Story

13
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

13 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ferb
9 years ago

The Cordes and Murphy cases are completely different. Cordes is obviously the USA’s fastest breaststroker over any distance. It’s a fluke that he’s not swimming the 100 individually, because of the goggle problem and resulting DQ. Not only did he have the fastest time in the USA last year, but he also swam a huge 58.6 relay split. And the AR in the 50 proves he’s in great form right now.

Murphy, on the other hand, has never been faster than 53.2, a time that Plummer has bettered on numerous occasions. Murphy is a great talent, and undoubtedly the future of USA backstroking, but there is no basis to assume that he would be faster than Plummer in the relays… Read more »

SwimGeek
Reply to  Ferb
9 years ago

Ferb – There’s no basis to assume Murphy would be faster? I respectfully disagree.

Plummer is apparently battling a stomach bug and maxed out at 53.54 in two opportunities. Murphy went 53.6 unshaved a month ago and went 53.2 a full year ago — followed by significant time drops in his NCAA season. Thus, there’s absolutely a basis to *assume* Murphy will be faster than Plummer’s 53.5.

If your real point is that it’s never right to make an assumption, fair enough. But if we’re looking at assumptions, the reasonable assumption is that Murphy is faster at this meet.

Ferb
Reply to  SwimGeek
9 years ago

Murphy has maxed out at 53.2 lifetime. Swimming 53.6 in-season is no proof that he can go faster than 53.2, and neither are his monster SCY swims from NCAA’s. I could just as easily argue that Plummer’s 53.5 when he was getting over a stomach bug means that with a couple days’ extra rest, he ought to be able to beat Murphy’s lifetime best of 53.2. I could also point out that Plummer has beaten Murphy head-to-head every time it has really mattered.

I’m not trying to knock Murphy. I think he is a great guy and a huge talent. I just don’t like the lack of respect for Plummer, who has been getting the job done at the highest… Read more »

SwimGeek
Reply to  Ferb
9 years ago

52.18. Enough said.

statman
9 years ago

The one event I wanna see happen is a 4×200 medly relay!!!!!!

Ferb
Reply to  statman
9 years ago

I totally agree. That makes a lot more sense than these goofy mixed-gender relays.

calswimfan
9 years ago

Can the same gender swim consecutively?
I really hope Ryan Murphy, Kevin Cordes, and Katie McLaughlin gets a shot at the 100m of their strokes. Whether it’s through this relay or the medley.

Admin
Reply to  calswimfan
9 years ago

calswimfan – as long as it’s 2 and 2, countries can put whichever legs they want in whatever spots that they want. Traditional logic typically puts guys on back and breast and women on fly and free, though it does vary based on the specific situation of each nation (and is over a relatively small sample size).

EH
9 years ago

These relays are silly. What’s next? One woman, one man, one coach, and one parent?

ct swim fan
Reply to  EH
9 years ago

I agree, there are already enough events without these gadget events.

commonwombat
Reply to  ct swim fan
9 years ago

Do tend to agree. At the very minimum, they should not have been introduced to LC Worlds the year before Olympics when that is the prime focus for leading swimmers & teams. If you are going to trial these events, do so at the Worlds the year after.

Given how the meet has been panning out, it will be curious as to who lines up for the US ….. and other leading teams. Noticeably AUS

Swim idea
Reply to  EH
9 years ago

Add a Cannonball event! This new event will garner massive media interest and bring in new swim fans.

ole 99
9 years ago

Here’s the rough delta between the men and women by stroke. It would seem the only given is Simone Manuel as the anchor…

Men Women Delta
52.60 59.40 6.80
59.80 66.70 6.90
51.30 58.10 6.80
48.00 53.30 5.30

About Robert Gibbs