Drew Johansen has been the head diving coach at Indiana University since 2013 and only the 3rd head diving coach in program history. The other two, Hobie Billingsley and Jeff Huber, are legends of diving, and Johansen is chipping away at securing his own legacy in Bloomington.
Indiana as a diving program has consistently produced NCAA champions throughout its inception and sent at least one diver to the Olympics since 1964. As recently as 2023, the IU men swept the diving events at the Big Ten Championships. It is a program steeped in tradition and excellence, from its history to the present.
Just this year, they turned an old basketball arena into a top-of-the-line dryland facility and coach Johansen has taken full advantage of this novelty in their sport. With their new facility, IU divers can get more reps in a more forgiving environment than in the water, meaning when they do practice at the pool, their dives are already ahead of where they would be developmentally.
Johansen says his team is farther along than they ever have been before at this point in the season, a bright indicator for the goals Indiana Swim & Dive have for this post-season. Both Johansen and head swim coach Ray Looze have not shied away from the fact that they are chasing an NCAA team title in March. With many things on both teams heading in the right direction, this just may be the year the trophy heads back to Bloomington.
All it will take is for Texas to lose a championship by diving for them to open up the checkbook and correct that issue 😉
SwimSwam commenters seem to take IU Diving for granted, but IU doesn’t, and that’s why it’s so good.
I will go to my grave saying swimming and diving should be two different sports. It makes 0 sense that they are the joined into one just because they are both in water. Hockey and figure skating arent combined into one sport since they are both on ice.
It actually made perfect sense as to why they were originally combined: they used the same facilities, the same coaches, and the same athletes.
I guess my big question is: who benefits from the separation of the two? I’ve never gotten a (real-world) answer to that. I think everyone assumes that if you split diving from swimming, all of those diving resources would go into swimming, and I just don’t think that’s how that would play out.
The counterexample to hockey and figure skating is track & field, where they are combined into one sport because they use the same facilities.
The only benefit of the 2 sports separating would be to swimming. It would open up roster spits for swim coaches while diving would likely get cut everywhere except for some P4’s.
I doubt it would open roster spots. 30 spots for swimming and diving would be cut to 24 spots for swimming.
I strongly disagree that it would open up roster spots for swim coaches. I think swimming rosters would shrink in most cases to account for not having diving.
ADs aren’t going to just say “we’re splitting into two sports, and also we’re adding roster spots to our offering.” If they were going to do that, they wouldn’t need to split the sports to do so.
Okay, but it’s not as if all these conferences are saying, “You get 30 roster spots, but 6 have to be for diving.” Swim coaches are given the roster spots to do as they see fit, and dive coaches are going to pretty lucky to be given 6 spots.
But either way, my main point is that diving, unfortunately, would be very hard pressed to survive without being attached to swimming.
I guess the issue I have with swim and dive is that you are taking an inherently objective sport, timed to the 1/100th of a second to delineate placings and making a judged exhibition count for significant points towards a championship. Field events are objectively measured, highest, farthest, etc. and therefore have at least something in common with track, actual winners and placings.
I have no problem with diving itself, divers are generally fantastic acrobatic athletes. But the days of swimming/diving crossover are long gone. Hold the championships at the same facility, but separate them. Award a national diving championship.
THIS, subjective judged sports should not be combined with objectively scored things like swimming. If they could eliminate human error and judge with a robot or something than maybe it would make more sense.
I’m confused about ‘the same coaches’ part – was it common at one point for coaches to work with both sports? I experienced that a little through summer league and high school, but I have a tough time imagining it collegiately.
It was. Tom Robinson was Northwestern’s coach from 1909 to 1944, and they won 6 collegiate championships. He also led the team to 7 water polo championships, and was the school’s basketball coach in 1919.
Gotta remember that hyper-specialization of sport for both athletes and coaches is relatively new.
James Naismith brought basketball to Kansas in 1898…and like the good Canadian that he was, also brought lacrosse to the school.
Matthew Mann, who was probably the best American swim coach in the 1920s and 1930s, also coached several Olympic divers, like Richard Degener when he was at Michigan.
Remember that the events used to have a lot more overlap too. The “plunge for distance” incorporated elements of swimming and diving.… Read more »
Thanks for all this information!
My high school coach coached both. I imagine it’s more common at smaller high schools.
Would enjoy the conflicted posters that enjoy Texas losing but also refuse to accept the meaning of “Swimming AND Diving” but don’t correlate that same energy to ” Track AND Field”.
Texas wouldn’t have a team championship since 2017 if you omit diving points from pedophile Jordan Windle
Texas fans are delusional, but they’re in absolutely no position to complain about getting outscored on the boards
The joke
You
Enjoyed the diving content. Going to be super interesting to follow this season with how close NCAAs are.
They have 120+ points from Tyler, Henninger, and Weinrich
Glassberg and Sollenburger are also impressive and could each be double digit scorers
Could be a 150+ point showing on the boards. Just unfathomable and likely gets IU over the edge since their swimming is equally as good as diving for once
I enjoy this new, positive Andrew.
What’s positive about this it’s just the truth
I projected a record breaking boards performance last year and it looks like it will increase even more this NCs
Texas/Cal won’t be able to stay with IU. Texas may have a few more A finals in the pool, but it’s immediately offset by IU diving and IU’s B tier of swimmers is substantially better than Texas’s
*hugs Andrew*
Shhhhh. Don’t ruin it.
(I also agree with you on this.)
Serious question: Do you think Cal’s new additions can put them over IU/Texas?
Whether you agree with their methods or not, I feel like Cal is now a BIG player. They have a lot of A-Final potential with the most ‘Fringe’ athletes that, if they break through into scoring range, could make a big impact.
That being said, IU Swimming & Diving is obviously the most complete team and will be an absolute force. To me, at this point, Texas is out of the team race… but not by much.
Regardless, very excited for NCAA battle to come
Seems like Henveaux has been getting better and better each year. He seems like 35-40 point territory.
Tomac wasn’t anything crazy, but he’s never swam SCY before. He was also 149 SCM in December, so I would assume he will be top 5 in the 200 back, just not sure what how he’ll swim in other events. His 100 back seemed the best from the dual meet though.
I have IU, Texas, cal in that order
The gap between Texas and IU is bigger than Cal and Texas. Corbeau really shut the door tbh. Cal and Texas might be better on the top end than IU, but IU’s B tier of swimmers are better than both and that’s usually where the meet is decided. And 130-160 points from diving is hard to overcome
Spreadsheet in the works for team scoring simulations
This is what I would have predicted as well *before* Cal got Henveaux and Tomac.
I feel like they could cumulatively score anywhere between 40-80 points, which is obviously a huge X-factor.
I think prior, Texas had the better top end, but now that they seem more even, I’m looking at the B tier and Cal looks a lot stronger to me than Texas in that area.
I think (for now) it all comes down to who hits their taper the best and that is so exciting!
All that Breaststroke U stuff is cute, IU is actually Dive U. 150 points on the men’s side at NCAAs in just the diving events is a real possibility with Tyler/Henninger/Weinrich/Sollenberger. Not hyperbolic to say that Carson Tyler wins all 3 diving events in March.
Can you name another program (in any sport) with a more impressive coaching legacy than Billingsley/Huber/Johansen? E.Reese/Bowman, R.Reese/Troy/Nesty, and Thornton/Durden come to mind
Insane stuff from the Hoosiers, thank you for covering diving!
Jim Steen/Jess Book at Kenyon
What has Jess Book done to compare in any way to legacy of those listed above?
He does have 5 national titles (3 Men, 2 Women). As well as quite a few runner up finishes. If team titles are your measure of success then he has been incredibly successful.
Google is free. Give it a try.