4 WR-Holders Dive into a Pool – Walk Away with Another (Women’s Medley Relay Analysis)

2024 PARIS SUMMER OLYMPIC GAMES

WOMEN’S 4×100 MEDLEY RELAY – Finals

  • World Record: 3:50.40 – USA (2019)
  • Olympic Record: 3:51.60 – AUS (2021)
  • 2021 Winning Time: 3:51.60 – AUS
  • 2021 Time to Win Bronze: 3:52.60

Podium

  1. USA (Regan Smith, Lilly King, Gretchen Walsh, Torri Huske) – 3:49.63 ***NEW WORLD RECORD***
  2. Australia (Kaylee McKeown, Jenna Strauch, Emma McKeown, Mollie O’Callaghan)- 3:53.11
  3. China (Wan Letian, Tang Qianting, Zhang Yufei, Yang Junxuan)- 3:53.23
  4. Canada (Kylie Masse, Sophie Angus, Maggie MacNeil, Summer McIntosh) – 3:53.91
  5. Japan (Rio Shirai, Satomi Suzuki, Mizuki Hirai, Rikako Ikee)- 3:56.17
  6. France (Emma Terebo, Charlotte Bonnet, Marie Wattel, Beryl Gastaldello)- 3:56.29
  7. Sweden (Hanna Rosvall, Sophie Hansson, Louise Hansson, Sarah Sjostrom) – 3:56.92
  8. Netherlands (Maaike de Waard, Tes Schouten, Tess Giele, Marrit Steenbergen) – 3:59.52

Backstroke Leg

Rank Swimmer Country Time (Place)
1 Regan Smith USA 57.28 OR
2 Kaylee McKeown Australia 57.72
3 Kylie Masse Canada 58.29
4 Emma Terebo France 59.00
5 Wan Letian China 59.81
6 Maaike de Waard Netherlands 59.91
7 Hanna Rosvall Sweden 1:00.38
8 Rio Shirai Japan 1:01.24

Kaylee McKeown got the better of Regan Smith in the individual 100 and 200 back, again, but put three teammates behind her, and Regan Smith turns into a different swimmer and, more often than not, has beaten the Aussie in relay lead-offs.  Out in 27.84, the only sub-28 split in the field, Smith put the Americans in the lead in just a few quick strokes, and they never looked back.

Coming home in 29.44, Smith touched in 57.28, and while it may be a little bittersweet, that time would have given Smith her first individual gold medal. Yet Smith, much like in 2019, when she led off that medley relay, exited the pool this evening with an individual record. The Olympic record this time, as opposed to the WR in 2019, as her 57.28 tonight surpassed McKeown’s days-o;d record of 57.33.

The Aussie backstroker didn’t have that poor of a swim themselves as she clocked a time of 57.72, ahead of Kylie Masse‘s 58.29.

Breaststroke Leg

Rank Swimmer Country Time (Place)
1 Lilly King USA 1:04.90 (1)
2 Satomi Suzuki Japan 1:05.08 (6)
3 Tang Qianting China 1:05.79 (4)
4 Sophie Hansson Sweden 1:06.24 (7)
5 Sophie Angus Canada 1:06.54 (2)
6 Charlotte Bonnet France 1:06.85 (5)
7 Jenna Strauch Australia 1:07.31 (3)
8 Tes Schouten Netherlands 1:08.55 (8)

Lilly King turned a lead of .44 over the Australians to 2.65 over the Canadians. King may not be happy with her individual performances, as this was the first international meet since before the 2016 Rio Games in which she did not medal in an individual event, but like Smith, King feeds on the relay atmosphere.

Her fastest individual performance of the meet was her tie for 4th place in the 100 breast (1:05.60), so her split of 1:04.90 was mightily impressive, especially considering it was just .09 slower than her split from the 2019 World record-setting relay.

King wasn’t the only swimmer who used this relay as an opportunity to prove that they still have it as 33-year-old Satomi Suzuki, a three-time Olympic medalist from 2012, recorded the second fastest split in the field of 1:05.08. Not only was this time light years ahead of the 1:06.90 she swam in the 100 breast semis (12th), but it was also nearly a full second faster than the 1:05.86 she split in 2012 to win the Olympic bronze in this event.

Tang Quanting was slower than her silver medal-winning performance, but had started to cut into the lead of the Australians and Canadians after having started over a second behind both teams (two, in fact, behind the Aussies)

Butterfly Leg

Rank Swimmer Country Time (Place)
1 Gretchen Walsh USA 55.03 (1)
2 Zhang Yufei China 55.52 (3)
3 Maggie MacNeil Canada 55.79 (2)
4 Emma McKeon Australia 56.25 (4)
5 Mizuki Hirai Japan 56.27 (5)
6 Louise Hansson Sweeden 56.95(7)
7 Marie Wattel France 57.29(6)
8 Tessa Giele Netherlands 57.51 (8)

Over two seconds ahead of the field, Gretchen Walsh dove into the water with a .2-second lead over the dread World Record line. Walsh, the World record holder in this individual event and the silver medalist, took it out fast (fast might not be the correct word) as her opening 50 of 25.09 was faster than half the opening 50s for the freestyle legs (seriously).

Employing great underwater, Walsh surged down the back half and touched in 55.03, equalling with the great Sarah Sjostrom as the fastest 100 fly split ever and opening up an insurmountable lead of 3.41 seconds on the Canadians, who remained in 2nd place after a strong showing by Maggie MacNeil who split 55.79 with a legal reaction time of -.02,

China’s Zhang Yufei pulled the Chinese past the Australian with her 55.52 split, bringing them to within half a second of the Canadians.

Freestyle Leg

Rank Swimmer Country Time (Place)
1 Mollie O’Callaghan Australia 51.83 (3)
2 Yang Junxuan China 52.11 (3)
3 Torri Huske USA 52.42 (1)
4 Beryl Gastaldello France 53.15 (6)
5 Summer McIntosh Canada 53.29 (4)
Sarah Sjostrom Sweden 53.35 (7)
7 Marrit Steenbergen Netherlands 53.55 (8)
8 Rikako Ikee Japan 53.58 (5)

Torri Huske‘s 52.42 split, when compared to her 52.06 from earlier in the week or the mixed medley sub-52 performance (51.88) is rather lackluster, but when compared to the 52.93 she qualified for the team for, the 52.42 would make anyone happy and when out in front of the field by over three seconds its hard to gauge one’s speed, but with a lead of 1.33 over the World record line, Huske did her part and helped the US knock .77 off the record.

Trailing the Chinese by .16 and the Canadians by .66, Australia’s Mollie O’Callaghen posted the fastest first 50 of 24.82 and the fastest second 50 of 27.01 to surge past both of the teams. She hit the wall in 51.83, her second-fastest split ever and gave the Australians the silver medal.

Yang Junxuan did her best to hold off the 200 free gold medal winner, but was unable to replicate her 51.96 from the mixed medley and finished .12 behind with her split of 52.11.

In This Story

24
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

24 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Yikes
17 minutes ago

So were the podiums for every relay except the men’s medley some order of AUS USA China?

Zach
Reply to  Yikes
40 seconds ago

100/200 Free Relay

John Pilterine
24 minutes ago

The other thing about Huske’s split was that she (correctly) had a *very* safe start. I’m sure that, in a tighter race, she’s a few tenths faster with a riskier start.

SJS
26 minutes ago

Epic.

James
1 hour ago

I haven’t read much of the discourse in the comments. But I suspected Kate Douglass to be more of a force on the relays. I think she may have been a good breaststroke candidate.

I miss the ISL (go dawgs)
Reply to  James
1 hour ago

No point bringing it up when King went the fastest split in the field

Yikes
Reply to  James
19 minutes ago

Not at all, her PB is almost 2 seconds slower than what King did here. Not sure why we are still having this conversation. Douglass seemed to have gone all in on 200s in her preparation and didn’t focus as much on her 100s

KSW
1 hour ago

Has there ever been a medley relay made up of all individual 100 world record holders? The US here has 3/4 of the world record holders but is missing the freestyle

Tracy Kosinski
1 hour ago

Summer was so tired from her 11 other races that they should have kept Penny on as anchor for Canada. Not sure why they didn’t. She was faster than Summer in prelims and most likely would have produced a faster finals split to hold off the Chinese and Aussies.

AQWAMN
Reply to  Tracy Kosinski
1 hour ago

Tracy, I understand your frustration with the Summer anchor. Coach decision and it may not have worked out. However, you may or maybe not understand my comparison but nobody is going to pinch hit for Joe Dimaggio.. Summer will be an iconic athlete if her progression continues. I see your point though.

ScovaNotiaSwimmer
Reply to  AQWAMN
1 hour ago

Except Summer and Penny have different skill sets. Not a direct comparison. The US doesn’t put Ledecky on the anchor of the 4×1 MR.

Bill G
Reply to  ScovaNotiaSwimmer
33 minutes ago

The 4×100 free relay splits on night one: penny was slower than both McIntosh and Ruck. (All 53.2 ish). Summer had the 400m that session as well.

Penny’s 52.90 in prelims for the medley relay was good … the coaches may have figured that Summer could replicate or better that with no 400m free earlier.

Penny never made the A-standard for the 100m free at Trials or her subsequent attempts.

Penny didn’t do enough to make her a no-brainer decision to swim the relay.

Surswim
Reply to  Bill G
24 minutes ago

She simply put the best time of the available options before the relay line up was decide. Maybe not a no brainer, but yes to the being the logical choice. Still the gap was to big for 3rd place, about 0.70, she would have had to swim a 52.5…

Surswim
Reply to  Tracy Kosinski
28 minutes ago

Agreed, many of us thought the same.

Hmm
1 hour ago

Game. Set. Match

#EnjoyTheNextFourYearsCate….

I miss the ISL (Go dawgs)
1 hour ago

This relay was a pure beauty to watch from start to finish!