The NCAA has updated the Questions and Answers document they released in October regarding the settlements in the House case, and the Hubbard and Carter cases.
The document contains an additional 24 questions and answers on top of the 11 from a few months ago. Similar to last time, most of the document was clarifications of previously available information. There was particular focus to the opt-in/opt-out option for the settlement and its associated regulations.
We also received clarification on topics like roster limits and a few different things related to the “Pool” and its associated limitations
Important Notes:
- The opt-in/opt-out process can be changed on a year-to-year basis. Schools must inform the NCAA of their decision by March 1st of each year if they are opting in for the next year. This starts on March 1 of 2025 for the 2025-2026 academic year.
- Schools must be fully compliant with settlement terms in order to opt back in.
- Scholarship limits will not apply to any school regardless of their opt in status because they are being eliminated as part of the settlement.
- NCAA Championship participation will not be affected by a school’s status.
- Roster-limits do not take effect at the start of the school year. The deadline changes depending on the sport. Swimming, which is a winter sport, must be compliant with limits by “the first contest that counts for championships selection in the relevant sport”. For most schools, this will be the first meet of the season.
- The “Pool”, or maximum amount of money allocated to each school, will be determined based on all the revenue acquired from the five defendant conferences (power-fives) and Notre Dame, and dividing by the total number of schools then using 22% of that number.
- The “pool” will be reallocated every three years using the above method. On the ‘off-years’ the pool will increase by 4% from the previous year
- Finally, All NIL deals completed after the settlement’s approval in April will be subject to “fair-market value” review to be completed by Deloitte.
Important Notes from last time:
- Under the proposed settlement, each Division I institution does not have to agree to the terms—schools can simply opt out and not take part. Each school is able to decide whether and how much of any benefit it provides to its student-athletes, up to the “Pool” limitations.
- Each D1 conference can set rules or guidelines for its members on the provisions of the benefits to student-athletes, provided those are done independently and not in agreement with another conference.
- Once a school pays one student-athlete, they are subject to the settlement terms.
- Institutions can not opt into the settlement on a team-by-team basis. This means that if a school opts into the agreement, the terms apply to all athletics programs at the school.
- All student-athletes, even those at schools that opt out of the revenue-sharing agreement, will need to report their name, image and likeness (NIL) deals that are $600 or more, either to their school or the designated reporting entity.
- All D1 scholarships will be equivalency awards and schools can provide any portion of a scholarship to student-athletes (full scholarships not required in any sport).
- The D1 Council will adopt legislation that establishes roster limits for each sport consistent with those reported to the Court as part of the settlement.
NEXT STEPS IN SETTLEMENT
- January 31, 2025 (105 days after Notice Date) – Exclusion and Objection Deadline
- January 31, 2025 (105 days after Notice Date) – Claims Period Closes
- March 3, 2025 (135 days after Notice Date) – Motion for Final Approval and Response to Objections
- April 7, 2025 (10 a.m., to be held remotely and in person) – Final Approval Hearing
Yahoo Sports reporter Ross Dellenger posted the full document on X
The NCAA today sent to members a second Q&A related to the House settlement. The 8-page document is intended to be a starting document. More information will be made available at a later date. pic.twitter.com/CSRW3eI8Uu
— Ross Dellenger (@RossDellenger) December 9, 2024
You can also read the full document here.
The NCAA and Power Conferences agreed to the 10-year settlement in May, which will pay athletes $2.7 billion in back-pay damages. The revenue-sharing agreement will allow schools to share $20-23 million annually in revenue to athletes.
The case was originally filed in 2020 with former Arizona State swimmer Grant House serving as the lead plaintiff, and was granted preliminary approval in October.
Are payments to athletes taxable income? Scholarships were not but it seems that moving forward any payment received is taxable. Is this correct ?
They are.
House and these other athletes have been played for fools by the attorneys. They will get pennies in comparison to what the attorneys will get. So sad that their parents and people around them would not advise them better and allowed this to happen. These athletes will literally be hated by the sport that they love for the rest of their lives.
I have a question and also need some intelligence to verify what I’ve heard. Does this new document imply that all D1 men’s swim program must be at the 30 roster cap? We are hearing from coaches and swimmers that most of the Power 5 conferences are aligning with the settlement number of 30. I think that’s low since it includes diving but it’s workable and good for the sport longer term. The SEC is the outlier – they established their own cap of 22 with no rhyme or reason. Maybe because that is how many athletes can go to an SEC champ. It has the added benefit of being an easy way out to comply with Title IX. Some… Read more »
I would love clarification on this as well.
@SwimSwam does anyone know if it has been reported what Grant House gets as his part of the settlement?
Court filings last week show that House and the other named plaintiffs will receive $125,000.
He’s asking for $125,000. It hasn’t been approved yet, but likely will (that’s not an unreasonable request for a named plaintiff in a case of this scale).
“La commedia e finita!” These are the words of Canio in the opera Pagliacci after he kills his wife Nedda and her lover Silvio on stage as a “fake” murder which, of course, was a real and vengeful act! NCAA seems to have done in swimming and “lesser” sports across the board. Ugh! When does the nightmare end?
Grant House put his selfish personal interests in front of a greater good. Student athletes, who recognize that their current place in life is temporary, will be the loser (along with institutions that agree).
Chuck Knox, who coached the Pittsburg Steelers when I was a kid, reminded players that their time on the team was a delay until they needed to join the rest of the working world.
Grant, what’s your plan in life? You appear to be a legal stereotype.
The NCAA was doing something blatantly illegal. The full and sole blame lies at its feet.
The Steelers were coach by Chuck Knoll.
quote:
“Gentlemen, welcome to the NFL, you are now being paid to play, football is your profession. But I can tell you it is not your life. You can’t let it be. Part of my job is to help you find your life’s work.’
Men’s swimming and diving and Olympic sports are taking the hit.