Swimming Isn’t Normal

by SwimSwam 27

August 13th, 2015 Club, Opinion

Courtesy of Bridger Bell

Swimming Will Put You To Sleep

Watching a swim practice will lull you to sleep unless you create interest in it. If you watch passively, the rhythmic stroke cycles and sloshing of water is like the ambient sound generators people use to fall asleep. There’s no talking. Just rhythmic sloshing, splashing and the white noise of consistent kicks. Swimmers even train in hypnotic counterclockwise loops. You have to be a strange breed to be mentally engaged by such a soporific display. You have to create interest in it, make it a puzzle, a problem-solving challenge: how do we get these athletes to get across the pool faster? You must constantly take intellectual initiative, actively wrestling with that challenge.

Our Coaches Are Nerds

Swimming coaches are nerds. And for much of competitive swimming history, most swimmers didn’t really look all that athletic and thus had a reputation for being nerdy themselves. Coaches had all sorts of pseudo-scientific rationalizations about why muscle mass and weightlifting were detrimental to swimming performance. Swim coaches can rationalize anything. They see one swimmer break a record performing a stroke in a certain way, and almost immediately they can give you myriad explanations about why that works so well and should be emulated, as if they’d always known, as if it’s fact…until someone new comes along and breaks that record with different technique and the cycle repeats. Now that Hulk-ish swimmers like Nathan Adrian and Ryan Lochte have shown us that muscle power generates speed, we’ve gotten faster. Fancy that! A sport based on power and speed can be advanced with greater muscular strength! How did it take a century for coaches to figure that out? Sure, swim teams have long done various strength and conditioning programs, but conventional wisdom used to warn against “too much” muscle, “too much” strength training. And the rationalizing power of the intellectualizing coach kept the sport as a whole from discovering what now looks like common sense.

Our Coaches Don’t Have A Clue

We all know somebody who can argue any point, who can take something absurd and rationalize it until it sounds reasonable. This is how coaches clung for decades to arguments against muscle mass in swimming, lauding the ’S’ pull, or justifying gliding off the wall and not “kicking too soon.” This is how they can give you the most professorial, erudite stroke-mechanics explanations that make some particular technique sound like a Newtonian universal law and then turn around a few years later and explain how the old way was so misguided. This is why more experienced coaches are often heard preaching that we don’t have a clue. We just try stuff and see if it works. Most so-called “scientific” studies of swimming performance are anything but scientific: a sample size of 15 swimmers all on the same team does not generate scientific knowledge; it’s an anecdote. But we have to try. Pseudo-science or anecdotes that generate discussion and elicit new ideas are better than nothing.

It’s true. We don’t have a clue. That’s why swimming is so exciting: it’s still in its infancy. Other sports have plateaued. Swimming is just getting started. Every meet, we can boldly go where no one has gone before.

Swimming – The Final Frontier

In terms of the athletic performance of the human body, swimming truly is the final frontier. Think about it: with just our bodies, what is the most unexplored territory we are physically capable of exploring? The water. We can’t explore space without living in a fully enclosed capsule. We’ve already explored all the land on Earth. Our normal means of getting from one place to another with our bodies is walking or running. But swimming isn’t normal. Our bodies aren’t built to swim. Much of the world’s population has never or will never swim. Even fewer ever swim a great distance, and fewer still swim fast. [Being a competitive swimmer puts you in the top 0.1% of the world’s population in terms of swimming skill. That’s a rarified, elite group–far from normal.] In order to improve, we have to invent new movements–novel uses of the human body–to propel ourselves through the water, and we haven’t even come close to inventing the fastest way.

Swimmers Are Naked

Swimming uses the entire body for propulsion, not just the arms or legs, and nothing but the body. Other sports require equipment: sticks, mallets, bats, clubs, balls, helmets, pads, cleats, etc. Other than tiny plastic bubbles over our eyes and a tiny thin cloth for decency, we use no equipment to compete.

Swimmers Push Their Bodies Further Than Any Other Athletes

We can train, compete and push our bodies beyond the level of any other athletes because there’s no high-impact collision of our bodies with the ground or other bodies or flying objects. And because the water continually lowers our body temperature, we don’t overheat. If other athletes pushed their bodies as much as swimmers, they’d experience impact injuries or overheating and related exhaustion; that keeps their performance at a lower level than ours.

We Swim In A Vacuum

In other sports, athletes get pumped up by the excitement of the cheering crowd, the intensity of verbal exchanges, the vocal engagement of the coaches with the action and the constant outside stimulus of other athletes and objects interacting with you during the competition. Swimmers compete alone, nearly blind and in silence. Our competitors–even if we can see them a lane or two over–are separated from us by a silent, blurry gulf. Swimmers must generate their own excitement during the race or carry the excitement from the pool deck with them into the water and mentally nurture it through the race, because when you’re racing, you’re in a vacuum, cut off from the excitement of the arena.

We Still Have Feudal Apprenticeships and Still Value Excellence

For most of the world, the lengthy apprenticeships of the past have been replaced by brief internships: shortcuts and advancement are unfortunately often valued over true excellence. But many young swimming coaches benefit from the ancient practice of following a master of his or her craft over many years. Most coaches love to share their secrets, because we embrace the true excellence of beating the competition when the competition is at its best. In swimming, we care more about excellence than about winning. Beating one of the best swimmers in the world isn’t excellence if that swimmer was having an off race. Beating your competition isn’t personal excellence if it wasn’t a best time. We strive for world records and personal records, not just victory. Coaches want to share secrets, because elevating the competition sets the bar higher for everyone. This spirit fosters open exchange of wisdom, collegiality and mentoring. One of my coaching mentors has shared his own mentor with me, so we now have three generations of coach continuing the tradition.

Swimming Is A Family…On The Verge of Tragedy

The more you have, the more you have to lose. We in swimming have it all. Swimming is the most salubrious [i.e. “health-promoting”…see what I mean about coaches being nerds?] sport in the world and the one with greater and more frequent pinnacles of human excellence than any other sport.

Yet, our sport is on the verge of becoming a classical tragedy. We have the best things going for us, and yet we are set to repeat the same mistakes we made in the past. History and mythology are replete with examples of heroes and civilizations that recovered from a first mistake but paid the ultimate price when the mistake was repeated.

Our excitement about new technology has always put humanity in precarious positions. Prometheus’ pride about his own clever trickery caused him trouble the first time around, but condemned him to an eternal punishment the second time. Daedalus and his innovations alternately got him through and then into trouble, until he paid the ultimate price losing his son. Moses and his people recovered from many mistakes, but when he struck the stone a second time, he was denied entry into the Promised Land.

If we continue on the path to forgetting and repeating the tech suit fiasco, we may not be able to recover again. Our sport will be lost. The purity of our pursuit of excellence in human athleticism will be corrupted and lost to a technological arms race.

If we forget the criminal negligence that led to the loss of Fran Crippen’s life and fail to protect our athletes in open water–e.g. the failure to cancel or postpone the Coeur d’Alene Iron Man this year and the ongoing threat of contaminated water in Rio–the sublime beauty of open water racing may be lost.

And if we continue to allow athletes to dope, then sit out from competition while continuing training that maintains the benefits acquired through doping, then return to competition, our sport may be lost to the tragic question of “what is he on?” “what is she on?” rather than the pure joy of celebrating excellence.

Tackling the challenges facing our sport is part of tackling the pursuit of excellence, which we swimmers and coaches are practiced at. Like the exceptional personalities of past heroes, the exceptional character of swimming means we may have the most to lose. But we don’t have to follow the normal course of a tragedy. Swimming isn’t normal. There is ample opportunity to avoid further relapses that could be devastating to our swimming family and our sport. Properly nurtured and course-corrected, swimming has the brightest future.

Swimming Is Winning

Our sport isn’t like other sports. It’s not normal. It’s better. If you’ve chosen the sport of swimming, you’ve already won the sport-selection game. You’re on the path to pursuing a level of excellence far beyond normal, far greater.

The title of this article is riff on the title of the book Winning Isn’t Normal™ by Dr. Keith Bell. The idea that being abnormal can be a positive good follows from the content of the book Winning Isn’t Normal™. Winning Isn’t Normal™ is a registered trademark of Dr. Keith Bell.

Tshirt

Books

Posters

About Bridger Bell

Bridger BellBridger Bell is the Head Coach of Donner Swim Club and Columbus North High School in Columbus, Indiana. He was previously an assistant at Johns Hopkins University while head-coaching the St. Paul’s Schools in Brooklandville, Maryland. Prior to that, he coached with Pete Higgins at The Westminster Schools in Atlanta when the boys and girls teams each won Georgia High School State Championships. Bell served for six years as the National Director of Collegiate Club Swimming for the American Swimming Association while also representing collegiate club swimming to the CSCAA. A competitive swimmer all his life, Bell was a USMS National Champion and All-American in the 2-mile cable swim. He was featured as a coach in the July ’14, August ’14 and June ’15 issues of Swimming World Magazine and has written articles for SwimSwam, Swimming World Magazine and Swimming Science.

27
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

27 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bridger Bell
8 years ago

Steve-O, your Berens video is an great illustration of dolphin kick technique. He’s clearly not worried about speed there. But the narrator says “do this as good as our demonstrator”…

Charlotte
8 years ago

Thanks for update on swim suits. It seems swimming also allows changes in technique like underwater swimming and backstroke flip turns. Breaststroke is unrecognizable from 30 years ago. Freestyle is the only stroke you can compare times from 20 to 30 years ago to present. In cycling there’s been lots of technical innovation. Tri-bars changed time trialing. Track is fairly un touched by technology. The big unknown is how far doping is ahead of testing in each of these sports. Swimming seems cleaner because less money involved- – and that’s good.

Bridger Bell
8 years ago

Steve-0, what you’ll see in “Swimming Faster” and other studies that have graphed measured velocity is that the deceleration immediately after push-off happens less rapidly, i.e. the swimmer maintains more speed, when he or she kicks. The idea of the kick breaking the streamline – and that being more harmful to forward velocity than the propulsive force of the kick is beneficial – just doesn’t happen; the propulsion from the kick outweighs any drag/resistance from the kick.

Steve-O Nolan
Reply to  Bridger Bell
8 years ago

Hm. I suppose I can buy that, though I only recently started picking up on the “gliding longer” thing and observationally I do like it. Wonder where the hell I read it, though.

Is this the book? (It’s not the most SEO-friendly title, hahah.)

Bridger Bell
Reply to  Steve-O Nolan
8 years ago

Superlative, yes; that’s it.

Sprintdude9000
Reply to  Bridger Bell
8 years ago

Actually it does happen. If, for example, a swimmer pushes off the wall (or submerges after a dive) travelling at 4m/s and the maximum speed that they can achieve whilst underwater kicking is 2.5m/s then there would be no point in starting kicking until that swimmer has slowed to 2.5m/s because all that would happen is that the drag forces would increase. What you’re suggesting would only be true if a swimmer is capable of generating more speed by kicking than by pushing off the wall (which may occur in some swimmers with particularly bad push offs and great uw kick). I’m not contending that this deceleration (ie. post dive speed being reduced to max kick speed) would be rapid… Read more »

Bridger Bell
Reply to  Sprintdude9000
8 years ago

there is no practical maximum speed you can achieve while kicking underwater if you are starting with velocity. if you dive out of an airplane into the ocean and enter the water at 56m/s and then immediately start dolphin kicking, you’re not going to instantaneously slow to 2.5m/s.

there is a point to kicking before you slow to 2.5m/s in your scenario. if you kick before you slow to 2.5m/s, you’ll slow (decelerate) later/less quickly, i.e. you’ll be going faster longer. 2.5m/s might be the fastest speed a swimmer is generating from dolphin kicking alone, but if you start out with an initial velocity greater than that, then adding a dolphin kick isn’t going to instantaneously slow you to… Read more »

Allen
Reply to  Bridger Bell
8 years ago

It’s interesting how this veers into a topic on when to start kicking. Here’s a nice article on it: http://www.swimmingscience.net/2011/03/kicking-on-starts.html.

Charlotte
8 years ago

As a triathlete who came from a swimming background, you could write a similar article for cycling and track as well as triathlon. What’s hard to tell is does the author have some recommendations to make it better? If so they’re somewhat buried in the text. The section on repeating the tech suit fiasco in particular: is there some pending technology about to change swimming? Swimmings is a great sport and the expansion of open water swimming, post collegiate swimming and the increasingly international profile of the sport are advancements over the past 20+ years. Plus triathlon!

Bridger Bell
Reply to  Charlotte
8 years ago

it’s not pending technology. it’s current technology. the suit manufacturers have adapted to the new rules and created performance-enhancing suits within the rules. this is probably one reason why women are breaking more records than men, because their new suits cover more of their bodies and thus they get more benefit. tech suits are being used now within the rules that were created to ban tech suits; it’s just that the new generation of tech suits fall within the 2009-present rules.

Bridger Bell
8 years ago

Steve-O, when to kick off the wall can be studied scientifically because it’s a matter of measuring velocity: if you’re not applying a force opposite your direction of motion, then you’re slowing down from water resistance. This has been measured. Once you push off the wall, you immediately slow down (~.01 seconds). Kicking immediately can reduce your rate of deceleration. One place to check this out is the book “Swimming Fastest.”

Parent, “nerd” isn’t meant in a derogatory sense and certainly wasn’t meant to imply that we coaches don’t do anything else; it’s meant to suggest we have a unique ability to find interest in and embrace the challenges of this bizarre and wonderful sport. It’s exciting not to… Read more »

Steve-O Nolan
Reply to  Bridger Bell
8 years ago

But the act of kicking itself, moving your legs out of line with your body, will increase that water resistance and also slow you down. (Especially if you flutter kick instead of dolphin kicking.) So it’s sort of a balancing act – you don’t want to start kicking too soon b/c you’re just putting out effort for no reason, but you also don’t want to wait too long b/c like you said, you’ll start slowing down.

A number of elites are really lengthening their glides off the wall, I think if you watch Grevers from WC he basically doesn’t kick until his feet pass under the flags. I might’ve remembered seeing Lochte doing it, too.

Steve-O Nolan
Reply to  Steve-O Nolan
8 years ago

Already thought of something else – for me, I’m much better at pushing off the wall than I am at dolphin kicking. I’ve got fairly inflexible ankles and am a bit of a spaz, but I can squat a million pounds. So I am MOVING when I leave the wall; I’ll only slow myself down more quickly if I break my body line to start kicking. I won’t be able to match the (ever diminishing) speed I generated leaving the wall through kicking for a solid 5 yards or so. Someone that’s on the other end of the spectrum, who’s better at kicking versus pushing off? Sure, they should start kicking sooner. But! I think those kinds of people are… Read more »

Bridger Bell
Reply to  Steve-O Nolan
8 years ago

Agreed that given where you are on the day of the race you work with what you have at your disposal. I was speaking to the conventional wisdom that was taught describing the ideal of gliding and not kicking too soon. Whereas the ideal really is to kick immediately because the ideal we are training toward is having a great kick.

Steve-O Nolan
Reply to  Bridger Bell
8 years ago

What was the rationale behind the old conventional wisdom about not kicking too soon? Assuming it’s not the same stuff I’m harping on, but I dunno.

While that might be the ideal, I don’t think it’s likely or maybe, possible to have a kick that’s that good. It boils down to how fast you are jumping off a solid surface vs how fast you are kicking against something that’s moving. I’m betting someone’s always gonna be faster pushing against that wall. Ricky Berens was a hell of an underwater kicker and I really like what he’s doing at this part of this video. (There’s a whole series of those, but that’s the only one that’s… Read more »

Coach Dave
8 years ago

Nailed it, Bridger. Wish I had said (all) that.

parent
8 years ago

Not all swim coaches are nerds. In my opinion, coaches that have other interests in their lives and don’t spend 24/7 at the pool, reading swimming articles, and watching results have more to help develop our young athletes as PEOPLE, not just swimmers. Our coaches spend far more time in our older athletes’ lives than we as parents do. I sure do not want my son and daughter coached by someone that is only passionate about swimming and has nothing else in their life. I want that coach to be an excellent mother/father to their kids, to show that you can work and balance family life. They need to have another passion in life, whether that’s faith, family, traveling, cooking,… Read more »

Tim
Reply to  parent
8 years ago

Agreed.

I am clearly biased, as I’m a part time swim coach with a day job and a new side business (both non-swimming related) I’m slaving over on nights and weekends. I balance the day and night jobs with coaching both age groupers and masters swimmers in the morning and evening, and I think it makes me a more well rounded coach in the grand scheme of things.

That being said, I’m also totally a swim nerd! During meets like Worlds, Pan Pacs, the Olympics, I’m glued to SwimSwam and other swimming media outlets as work permits, and also spend a lot of time reading articles about all things swimming.

I try to be the best coach I can for… Read more »

Willis
8 years ago

This is the most powerful and needed article that I have read on SwimSwam to date. Much needed write up Bridger – way to go

RL
Reply to  Willis
8 years ago

I agree, and we also have to take a look at how we recognize and train kids with sprint talent. I shook my head when I saw the Amanda Weir video and she said she trains for the 400. She is a very talented woman. Perhaps with different training, she’d be giving the Aussies and the Swedish women a run for the money!

Steve-O Nolan
Reply to  RL
8 years ago

Right!? I was gonna say the same thing on that Weir video.

Is she just starting back up after a break? I could see wanting to ease in training a bit after a while off, but there ain’t no way that’s ideal.