SwimSwam Breakdown: Sink or Swim of Every Major Meet Last Week

On this week’s SwimSwam Breakdown, we play Sink or Swim with every major meet that happened last weekend, and a few non-major meets that just had some freakin fast swimming. Here’s the full list of meets – let us know in the comments which was your favorite and which ones you Sink or Swim.

  • Canadian Trials
  • French Trials
  • British Trials
  • South African Trials
  • Italian TRials
  • Stockholm Open
  • Brazilian Trials
  • Texas Men Time Trials
  • UVA Time Trials
  • Queensland Meet (SA High Performance Invite)

47
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

47 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gulliver’s Swimming Travels
2 years ago

Guys… the South African swimmers’ names aren’t so hard to pronounce.

“Coetzee” is most closely approximated as “Kut-seer.” “Schoenmaker” is “skoo-en-macher.”

Also, the South African government doesn’t support its swimmers in any non-Olympic meets, which is why you don’t see them participating in things like ISL, Short Course Worlds, etc. Zane Waddell also highlighted this fact when he announced his decision to retire.

swimapologist
Reply to  Gulliver’s Swimming Travels
2 years ago

I don’t think any countries’ governments support them in the ISL, right?

Tatjana doesn’t go to the ISL because her coach doesn’t want to give up control. It’s not really a secret.

Swammer
2 years ago

7:41.4 for Martens
New German national record, beating Wellbrock‘s mark set in Tokyo

Wellbrock looking pretty smooth as well with a 7:43.1 at what seems to be an untapered meet for him since he’s already pre-qualified

Calvin
Reply to  Swammer
2 years ago

How crazy is that 7:32

Ghost
Reply to  Calvin
2 years ago

That and W 2fly are crazy WRs

Jackman
Reply to  Swammer
2 years ago

Best time and NR for Felix as well, 7:45

Sherry Smit
2 years ago

World Trials Precitions
50 Free

  1. Claire Curzan
  2. Abbey Weitzeil

100 Free

  1. Abbey Weitzeil
  2. Erika Brown
  3. Torri Huske
  4. Natalie Hinds
  5. Claire Curzan
  6. Olivia Smoliga

200 Free

  1. Katie Ledecky
  2. Paige Madden
  3. Erin Gemmell
  4. Katie McLaughlin
  5. Bella Sims
  6. Claire Weinstein

400 Free

  1. Katie Ledecky
  2. Leah Smith

800 Free

  1. Katie Ledecky
  2. Katie Grimes

1500 Free

  1. Katie Ledecky
  2. Katie Grimes

50 Back

  1. Katharine Berkoff
  2. Gretchen Walsh

100 Back

  1. Katharine Berkoff
  2. Regan Smith

200 Back

  1. Regan Smith
  2. Claire Curzan

50 Breast

  1. Lilly King
  2. Kaitlyn Dobler

100 Breast

  1. Lilly King
  2. Kaitlyn Dobler

200 Breast

  1. Annie Lazor
  2. Lilly King

50 Fly… Read more »

Samuel Huntington
Reply to  Sherry Smit
2 years ago

Jacoby??

Awsi Dooger
Reply to  Samuel Huntington
2 years ago

I’ve seen more than one poster here not pick Jacoby. I don’t necessarily agree with it but I certainly understand it. She’s got one top event and uses a late losing style in that one event. That is really bucking margin for error. Early speed owns all the best of it, the higher up the ladder. I think Jacoby on talent level alone will rally late to get second behind King. Those not picking her are probably looking at distractions like her Instagram account which is loaded with references to fashion.

Calvin
Reply to  Sherry Smit
2 years ago

What are you on

Not-so-Silent Observer
Reply to  Sherry Smit
2 years ago

No late Douglas in the 100 free relay positions? I could see her out placing smoliga or torri. The rest feel like locks

Breezeway
2 years ago

Hey Braden chill, NC State folk are not checking for you

snarky
Reply to  Breezeway
2 years ago

Braden wishes he was an NC State grad… Wolf envy!

Wahoooowa.
Reply to  Breezeway
2 years ago

Lol says an NC State folk literally checking for him.

I saw on an Instagram post once that the NC State swimmers were crying about “I bet Braden Keith made this meme.”

They are definitely checking for him.

John26
2 years ago

Is Popovici’s times not super foreboding? He is miles ahead of where he was at this point last season (1s faster in the 100, 2+ Faster in the 200).

To not extrapolate clear PB’s for him this season you have to assume either his training cycle has changed a lot or his drop from April to July last year is completely due to a freak growth spurt.

Mark
2 years ago

British trials were the best!!!

Swimmerfromjapananduk
Reply to  Mark
2 years ago

Could’ve been a lot better obviously. Generally it was one of the best, but nothing that made your eye pop. In that sense, I felt the South African champs did just that with niekerk and coetze

Scotty
Reply to  Swimmerfromjapananduk
2 years ago

Yh their swims were phenomenal

Swammer
2 years ago

Question:
Which swim was more impressive? McIntosh‘s 4:29 earlier this year or Martens 3:41?

Somewhat out of Nowhere? Both
Closer to the WR? Martens
Higher up in the All-time-Performer-ranking? McIntosh
Miles ahead of all other swims in the past years? Both

Scotty
Reply to  Swammer
2 years ago

4:29 was impressive she is just 15 and she is also a medal contender in other events…Martens is a medal contender in his specialized events also but only his 200,400 and maybe his 800 is impressive…..Summer is impressive in all of her specialized
Lukas is 21 ……they peaked at different times in their career

AnEn
Reply to  Scotty
2 years ago

His 1500 free isn’t impressive? He is now 11th all-time, 1 second faster and he would have been 7th all-time. His time was only 0.63 seconds slower than the winning time at the olympics.

Scotty
Reply to  Swammer
2 years ago

They are both impressive

Scotty
Reply to  Swammer
2 years ago

Cool

Scott
Reply to  Swammer
2 years ago

Magnifique

HJones
2 years ago

I really disagree, for the most part, on “swimming” the UVA time trials. G. Walsh has shown to not be the most absurd taper-drop swimmer ever, and 56.0 in the 100 FR pretty much 2 weeks out from WC trials isn’t exactly promising–especially since she’s already 24.7 in the 50. Nor is that 1:01.8 in the 100 BK. Weyant also didn’t have that great times. Douglass and A. Walsh looked fine, though that 1:00.7 in the 100 FL might be a bit concerning (+4s off PB).

But, I have no idea under what circumstances these races were swum, like how much they’d done in the previous practice or how much rest was given between events.

Last edited 2 years ago by HJones
Sherry Smit
Reply to  HJones
2 years ago

I feel like Gretchen's SC times are a lot better at the moment. She seems to have a lot more raw speed than endurance, and I personally don't think shes gonna break 54.5 in the LC 100 at trials. I see Gretchen making it in the 50 Back possibly, or maybe the 50 Free. Weyant seems to have a better chance in the 400 Free than the 400 IM at the moment. I see her going around 4:36, but she would have to go past Katie Grimes (who I predict is going to have a smash 400 IM this season), and Hali Flickinger. Alex Walsh also seems really on in the 400 IM as well. Personally, if they
… Read more »

Samuel Huntington
Reply to  Sherry Smit
2 years ago

Ledecky and Smith are looking too good right now. No way Weyant makes it in the 400 free.

Hswimmer
Reply to  Samuel Huntington
2 years ago

You are forgetting Paige Madden (she hasn’t done the 400 this season I don’t believe though).

Samuel Huntington
Reply to  Hswimmer
2 years ago

Madden seems to be focusing more on 100/200 this season. And Smith would beat her in the 400 anyway.

Hswimmer
Reply to  Samuel Huntington
2 years ago

She beat smith at trials and is improving every summer, so not sure about that. She does seem to be trending to sprints more now though. Looking for another relay medal.

Yikes
Reply to  Hswimmer
2 years ago

Leah had an off trials meet. She looks good lately though. Don’t see her not making it in 400 FR and/or IM

About Coleman Hodges

Coleman Hodges

Coleman started his journey in the water at age 1, and although he actually has no memory of that, something must have stuck. A Missouri native, he joined the Columbia Swim Club at age 9, where he is still remembered for his stylish dragon swim trunks. After giving up on …

Read More »