2017 U.S. NATIONALS/WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS TRIALS
- Tuesday, June 27th-Saturday, July 1st
- 50-Meter Course
- Indianapolis, Indiana
- Meet Info
- Prelims timelines
- Broadcast schedule
- Event-by-event previews
- Psych Sheets
- Live Results
- Live Stream (U.S. viewers)
- Live Stream (International viewers)
Athens Bulldogs Swim Club’s Olivia Smoliga, who swam at her last NCAA Championships this March, had time trial redemption in the 50 back this afternoon. During prelims, she finished with a dismal 29.25– certainly not what she was capable of. That result was due to a slip on the start, as she had to pick up from no momentum and swim the 50 back, costing her time and energy. She finished prelims way back in 32nd.
Determined to set the record straight, Smoliga prepped for another 50 back, racing in a time trial between prelims and finals sessions. With a strong start, Smoliga was able to take over a full second off of that time, posting a 28.08.
That time is a best– her first PR in the race since 2013, when she went a 28.34 as a high school senior. It also would’ve been third in prelims, behind only Club Wolverine’s Ali Deloof (27.82) and Missouri’s Hannah Stevens (27.94), and just ahead of Kathleen Baker (28.09).
Smoliga checks in as the 8th-best performer in U.S. history in the 50 LCM back.
U.S. TOP PERFORMERS — WOMEN’S 50 LCM BACK
- Natalie Coughlin – 27.51 – 2015
- Rachel Bootsma – 27.68 – 2013
- Hayley McGregory – 27.80 – 2008
- Ali Deloof – 27.82 – 2017
- Jenny Hanselmann – 27.92 – 2011
- Hannah Stevens – 27.94 – 2017
- Missy Franklin – 27.98 – 2013
- Olivia Smoliga – 28.08 – 2017
- Kathleen Baker – 28.09 – 2017
All times in red were done today in Indianapolis
Even though Smoliga won’t be in the finals of this event, she could still swim this in Budapest.
Per USA Swimming’s selection procedures, there are two spots (but really one new spot) for the 50s of stroke. Spot 1 goes to the 100 back winner, if they want it. Spot 2 goes to the 50 back winner PROVIDED they have qualified for Worlds on priority 1. Priority 1 means you have either won an Olympic event in Indy, or you were top 4 in the 100 or 200 free.
Then, if all eligible swimmers were to decline to swim the race in Budapest, the next best swimmer ON THE TEAM (no priorities listed, so anyone already on the team could be selected) would get to swim it. If there are enough roster spots, the 2nd-best swimmer on the team will also get to swim it.
So, though Smoliga hasn’t made the team on priority one, she’ll almost definitely be on the 4×100 free relay in Budapest, thus being on the team. She can’t win the 50 back tonight, but if she wins the 100 back tomorrow, she’ll get to do the 50 back, and if tonight’s 50 back winner doesn’t want to swim it in Budapest, she could get selected if those who go faster than 28.08 tonight don’t get selected on the team.
I thought that priority #3 did not require priority #1 qualifications to make the team, have I misunderstood that?
Practically, no. Technically, yes. Off the top of my head, I think there are 30 spots between priorities 1 and 2, and only 26 roster spots. So, no stroke 50 winners will officially be added to the team until they’re sure all 2nd place finisher in Olympic events make it.
That is the way I was thinking it was, was just a little confused by reading some of the comments.
Anyone know if you need a subscription to watch tonight’s finals on NBC Sports?
Isn’t the wedge supposed to prevent slipping. I wonder how it happened. Anyone know anything specific?
Oméga wedges can be a little slick the grip they use isn’t amazing
Keep the size of the team to a minimum. Fat cats at USA swimming need to keep expenses to a minimum to keep salaries at a maximum. They LOVE Ledecky. She eats up a bunch of roster spots that otherwise would cost money to take to the meet.
Facts
Oh and Smogs gonna Smogs
you have no idea what you are talking about.
Not sure Demerae Christiansen ever went that time… sounds crazy to me
Yeah, she must’ve been 29.79 rather than 27.79 at WUGs back in 2005. Fixed.
The 50 selection process seems kind of stupid, why don’t they just do top 2 in the event?
I really won’t pretend like I understand it. They do need to prioritize qualification in Olympic events, though, since the roster is capped at 26 per gender, so it makes sense that they’d want to take nobody (or just 1 new roster member) for the 50.
17 individual events x 2 people per event (assuming no repeats) is 34, plus you have relay considerations for 100s and 200s. Could theoretically bring 40 women and 40 men, well over the cap of 26.
Cap was established for all sorts of reasons, not the least of which are financial based. Think about what an extra 20 athletes per country would mean for logistics at these international events.
I think it saves them a person. Suppose the top two in both the 50 and 100 are all different people. They would be paying for four separate people verses three to cover the 50 and 100 event. ? I guess if the person that wins the 100 was third or forth in the 50…Oh well. ? Suppose the second place 100 finisher has the faster 50 time? It could happen. This makes no sense.
The silver lining may be that she will be very focused on her start on the 100 back.
If she wins the 100 back, then she gets to swim the 50 anyway.
If it’s her and Baker in the 100 back, even with Baker winning, there will probably be enough roster spots for her to do 50 back, too. I think.
She looks good, but with Stevens, Smith, Deloof in there, it’s going to be really close. Like the men’s 100 breast but with a lot less int’l experience.