The men’s and women’s relays at the 2016 Olympic Games will be one of the most competitive we’ve seen in recent history. As evidenced at the FINA World Championships last year, smaller nations are gaining depth and stepping up big time, while the usual powerhouses of USA and Australia aren’t as clear of favorites as they may have been in years past.
In Kazan, we saw Great Britain’s 4x200m freestyle relay take the gold in the men’s race and secure another win, along with a World Record, in the non-Olympic mixed 4x100m medley relay. Meanwhile, the men of both the United States and Australia failed to even final in the 4x100m freestyle race.
Yes, we’re entering ‘Trials Season’ with the athletes Japan, Great Britain, Australia and Canada among others all gearing up to throw down qualifying times at their country’s respective Trials meets. Most likely we haven’t seen the fastest combinations of athletes that will enter the pool sequentially once gold medals are on the line in Brazil. But, what if the Olympics were tomorrow? Let’s take a look at the countries which would be on the Rio roster qualification list for the men’s relays if the cut-off stood at today.
First, as a refresher, here are the FINA qualification rules concerning relays:
- There shall be a maximum of sixteen (16) qualified teams in each relay event, for a total of 96 relay teams.
- Each NOC may enter only one (1) team in each relay event.
- The first 12 placed teams in each relay event at the 16th FINA World Championships in Kazan (RUS) in 2015 shall automatically qualify for the relay events at the 2016 Olympic Games.
- The remaining four (4) teams per relay event will be the teams with the fastest times in the FINA World Rankings as of 31 May 2016 achieved during the qualification period, in the qualifying events approved by FINA, from 1 March 2015 to 31 May 2016.
- All swimmers entered in individual events can be used in relays, even if they have not achieved the OST / “B” Time for the corresponding stroke and distance of the relay in which they are entered.
- RELAY ONLY SWIMMERS:
- Each NOC may enter additional swimmers for relays only (Relay-Only Swimmers), provided that they have achieved at least the OST / “B” Time for the corresponding stroke and distance of the relay in which they are entered.
- If an NOC enters relay-only swimmers for a specific event, these swimmers must swim either in the heat or final of that relay event. Should a relay-only swimmer not compete, this will lead to the disqualification of the respective team in the final.
One final note: even when we see the list of top 16 teams as of May 31st, there are no guarantees we won’t see a last-minute scratch in Rio. It has happened, as Japan, for instance, scratched the men’s 400 freestyle relay prior to the start of the 2012 London Games.
Men’s 4x100m Freestyle Relay
*Automatically Qualified | |
1. France 3:10.74* | 9. Belgium 3:15.50* |
2. Russia 3:11.19* | 10. Great Britain 3:15.70* |
3. Italy 3:12.53* | 11. Germany 3:16.01* |
4. Brazil 3:13.22* | 11. USA 3:16.01* |
5. Poland 3:14.12* | 13. Australia 3:16.34 |
6. Japan 3:15.04* | 14. Spain 3:16.77 |
7. China 3:15.41* | 15. Greece 3:16.83 |
8. Canada 3:15.94* | 16. Argentina 3:17.41 |
With the first 12 teams being set from Kazan, the only real shake-up in terms of who would ultimately qualify will potentially occur within the bottom 4 teams. Notice USA barely made it to the top 12, sitting just .33 of a second ahead of Australia, who needs to maintain at least a 16th-best time in the world as of May 31st to qualify.
However, with sprinter James Magnussen back in competition, having had to sit out Kazan due to shoulder surgery, and young gun Kyle Chalmers proving he’s the real deal, the Aussies should be more than safe to land a spot to contend for a lane in Rio finals.
Men’s 4x200m Freestyle Relay
*Automatically Qualified | |
1. Great Britain 7:04.33* | 9. Brazil 7:10.20 |
2. USA 7:04.75* | 10. Spain 7:11.39* |
3. Australia 7:05.34* | 11. Japan 7:11.59* |
4. Russia 7:06.89* | 12. France 7:12.68* |
5. Germany 7:09.01* | 13. Denmark 7:13.72* |
6. Belgium 7:09.64* | 14. Italy 7:13.77 |
7. Netherlands 7:09.75* | 15. China 7:16.67 |
8. Poland 7:10.34* | 16. Canada 7:17.33 |
The United States earned the runner-up spot by just .42 of a second in Kazan, but it was enough to establish Great Britain as a true gold medal contender come the Rio Olympic Games. The only question is if GBR can replicate their outstanding performance, highlighted by World Champion James Guy‘s insanely-fast anchor split of 1:44.74.
Also, with Australia less than a second away from USA, the stars and stripes will need their best line-up primed and ready to take the lane in Rio. The foursome in Kazan was a kind of mixed bag, not entirely representative of who would most likely make the final 4 or even 6 in the men’s 200m freestyle at U.S. Olympic Trials, the method by which U.S. relay slots are earned.
Ryan Lochte and Conor Dwyer look good to finish top 6 in the individual 200 to win a relay spot, but look to the young stars of Maxime Rooney and Townley Haas to make their mark at Trials and possibly add their names to the 800m freestyle relay roster.
Men’s 4x100m Medley Relay
*Automatically Qualified | |
1. USA 3:29.93* | 9. Poland 3:34.34* |
2. Australia 3:30.08* | 10. Canada 3:40.40 |
3. France 3:30.50* | 11. Italy 3:34.59* |
4. Great Britain 3:30.67* | 11. China 3:35.21* |
5. Russia 3:30.90* | 13. Lithuania 3:35.30* |
6. Japan 3:31.10* | 14. Greece 3:37.86 |
7. Germany 3:32.16* | 15. Belarus 3:38.23 |
8. Brazil 3:32.68* | 16. Singapore 3:38.25 |
Additionally, GBR’s sprinter Ben Proud has been on a tear as of late, clocking a personal best 100m freestyle (48.52) and scoring a new GBR National Record in the 50m freestyle (21.73) already in 2016, so his anchor could be just the push the squad would need to get them over the edge and possibly on the podium in Rio.Although still a stellar time, Great Britain’s effort isn’t reflective of its fastest possible scenario, as World Record Holder Adam Peaty was absent from the relay squad in Kazan. GBR teammate Ross Murdoch threw down a very respectable split of 59.20, but seeing how Peaty owns the individual 100m breaststroke world record at 57.92, he’s almost guaranteed to drop that leg by at least a second, edging GBR up in the rankings.
If you swim in the prelims, but not the final, do you still get a medal?
America can lose both the men,s 4×100 medley and 4×200 free. The only relay where the US has no team close to them at the moment is the women,s 4×200 free relay although things can change once we see the Swedish trials.
In the men,s medley relay Britain could be a problem. The backstroke and breaststroke is already taken care of with Chris Walker hebborn and Adam peaty respectively. The unknown at the moment is the butterfly and freestyle but James guy who is not supposed to be a butterfly we swam a pb in the 200 fly? this year, a 1:57. Come on man, the dude is not a flyer. He also split a 51 in the relay in… Read more »
I’m especially hopeful for Duncan Scott!
Interesting Carlo…..based on times….the Aussie women just swam faster than the US in 200m Free…….
Which male swimmer do you think has the highest chance of breaking a lcm WR in Rio?
I feel like 100ba, 200br, 200im most likely to go down.
Most likely is tough… Kind of agree with your picks but would add the 100 back to that list (I don’t see why Murphy can’t be even better in LCM). Least likely would be 400IM and 200 free in my opinion. Would love to see that stupid suit time of 1:42.0 go down but that seems unrealistic. Don’t see anyone touching the legendary 4:03 either just because 2008 phelps was a special thing
Depending on what kind of form Dressel and Manadou are in, the 50 record might be in trouble. But I still don’t think that’s highly likely
Dressel?
Lol. Asking a lot of the kid aren’t you, putting him in Manaudou’s bracket?
Get out of France much, Dee?
Manadou probably still the favorite but not by nearly as much you may suppose.
Dressel moved Cielo (WR LCM) from the top of the SCY listing to #7 in just about 6 weeks. And by a goodly margin, Cielo was :18.47 in a rubber suit whereas Caeleb progressed to :18,20 in textile. Caeleb is making quick advance in LCM as well, dropping from :22.22 as a 16 year old at the JR. Worlds in 2013 to :21.53 in winning US Nats in summer 2015.(2014 was not a good year.)
So he improved from :18.67 (winning NCAA as Freshman) to :18.20 as Sophomore, a .47 sec advance. Then summer of 2015 he was… Read more »
SCM doesn’t mean anything when it comes to LCM OLYMPICS. I think mens 100 fr will be in for a nudge with McEvoy
Does anyone have doubts if the pool itself in Rio will be as fast as Beijing or London? It takes some technical precision to build an ultra fast pool. I have doubts the construction teams in Rio have the expertise for this.
There is a lot of speculation about low times but I wonder if times will be more normal and still quite slower than 2008- 2009 or even 2012. Phelps winning 100fly time from London was like a 50 mid or high wasn’t it? Maybe a 21.4 or 21.5 50free or a 47.5 100free or a 50.5 100fly will be enough for Gold.
Curious, what causes you to have doubts about the construction teams in Rio?
McEvoy just swam 47 for 100m …..big concerns for the US.
No way the U.S. will lose the medley or the 4×200 free relay for the medley I predict. Murphy 52.01 lead off 57 high to 58 mid for miller 50.10 for phelps and 46.68 for Adrian. 200 free 1:45:20 for Dwyer, 1:45:38 for haas 1:46:01 for Rooney 1:43.88 anchor lochte
1:43.88 Lochte?
Haha.
Like my comrade Bobo often said, you Americans are funny.
Jacques — Lochte was flat start 1:44.4 in a textile suit winning world championship in the event in 2011 Shanghai. Your laughter is based on what?
You’re assuming Miller doesn’t get the relay DQ’d
that’s why I’m pulling for Licon (or anybody else!)
Gee, move away to Singapore and you become forgotten (even the fact you are the one who normally gets relays dq’d.
Very generous on those times……can’t wait to see this monumental improvement you claim from Adrian …hmmmm
How about that. All these years and I never knew there were so many crazy rules.
First and second question. All relay only swimmers must swim. So if they pick 4 relay only all 4 must swim one round. For medley there is no such a rule of number 2 being used unless the swimmer is a relay only.
For third I am not sure but there must be an expection clause
Thanks, Rafael!
Can somebody please answer a couple of questions for me?
1. Is there a max number of swimmers that can be assigned for a freestyle relay?
example: If Phelps doesn’t swim the 100 free at US OT and 6 athletes are assigned to the 4×100 (2 swimming the 100 free individually and 4 relay only athletes), as long as all 4 of the relay only athletes swim in the heats, can Phelps swim in the finals?
2. Are all the athletes entered in the individual 100 races (back, breast, fly and free) automatically entered for the 4×100 medley? If so, that means that, no matter how badly they swim in their individual races, the US needs to have… Read more »
I can answer that one. A team can nominate as many swimmers as they wish for their various relay squads; even if they have not qualified for individual swims in that particular stroke. However the “relay only swimmers” (those selected purely for relay duty, not individual swims) MUST be used in either heats or finals for whatever relay they have been nominated.
This is not really going to majorly impact the selection strategies of most nations who may have only limited depth to call on/no alternates but is potentially a key issue for the USA and maybe in some cases AUS & 1/2 Euro nations. These nations will look to minimise their relay only selections and where possible will… Read more »
Thanks! So it sounds like the only problem would be if a relay only athlete was really in bad form for some reason. If the US takes 4 relay only swimmers for each of its freestyle relays, they better swim well in the prelims or the team might miss making the final, as happened in Kazan.