It's only December 15th, but the Texas men are already projected over the NCAA roster cap with 21 likely qualifiers based on last year's invite times. Archive photo via Jack Spitser/Spitser Photography
It’s only December 15th, but the Texas men are already projected over the NCAA roster cap with 21 likely qualifiers.
That’s based on times swum this season that are under the times it took to earn an NCAA invite last year.
The Texas men had 24 swimmers earn times that would have qualified them for NCAAs last year. But the NCAA roster cap of 18 forced the Longhorns to leave a number of those guys off the roster to fit in four likely scoring divers and get under the cap. It looks like they’ll have a very similar conundrum this year, with 21 swimmers already hitting the 2020 invite time in swims so far this fall.
NCAA Qualifying Process
The NCAA selection process is a bit complex. The most-simplified version is that athletes who hit “A” cuts are automatically qualified for the meet. They can also add second and third events where they have “B” cuts.
The remaining “B” cuts are slowly added to the NCAA invite list based on national ranks as of March. Last year, the top 29 men and top 37 women were invited in each event, and the cut lines usually hover in those general areas. We also track “invite times” each year – those are the times of the last swimmer in each event to earn an NCAA invite.
Invite times tend to get gradually faster each year, though they’ll occasionally get a tick slower in a given event. Comparing this year’s national ranks to last year’s invite times gives us a rough idea of which swimmers are in decent shape to earn NCAA invites even if they don’t better their current season-bests.
Note: last year’s NCAA invites were already locked in before the coronavirus pandemic started canceling meets and disrupting practices. So the listed invite times were not affected in any way by the pandemic.
Women Under 2020 NCAA Invite Time
Note: these are all according to the current NCAA event rank database. If there’s a time missing (or a time from a non-collegiate athlete included), make a note in the comment section and we’ll work to verify it.
2020 Invite Time
50 Free
22.21
Name
Team
Time
Douglass, Kate
Virginia
21.42
Thompson, Sarah
Missouri
21.76
Keil, Megan
Missouri
21.83
Alons, Kylee
NC State
21.90
Fa’Amausili, Gabi
Georgia
22.08
Grinter, Bailey
Tennessee
22.11
Bray, Olivia
Texas
22.13
Gantriis, Emily
California
22.14
2020 Invite Time
100 Free
48.51
Name
Team
Time
Douglass, Kate
Virginia
46.86
Stepanek, Chloe
Texas A&M
47.84
Ivey, Isabel
California
48.01
Scott, Morgan
Alabama
48.15
Pash, Kelly
Texas
48.29
Alons, Kylee
NC State
48.42
Gaines, Riley
Kentucky
48.46
Thompson, Sarah
Missouri
48.50
2020 Invite Time
200 Free
1:45.23
Name
Team
Time
Madden, Paige
Virginia
1:42.39
Pash, Kelly
Texas
1:43.61
Gaines, Riley
Kentucky
1:43.68
Pfeifer, Evie
Texas
1:43.77
Stepanek, Chloe
Texas A&M
1:44.40
Scott, Morgan
Alabama
1:45.20
Harnish, Courtney
Georgia
1:45.22
2020 Invite Time
500 Free
4:41.20
Name
Team
Time
Madden, Paige
Virginia
4:33.09
Pfeifer, Evie
Texas
4:35.73
Harnish, Courtney
Georgia
4:36.86
Moore, Kate
NC State
4:37.94
Braswell, Leah
Florida
4:38.69
Forde, Brooke
Stanford
4:39.58
McMahon, Kensey
Alabama
4:39.84
McNeese, Beth
Kentucky
4:40.69
Weyant, Emma
Virginia
4:40.92*
Palsha, Peyton
Arkansas
4:40.95
Schmidt, Sierra
Michigan
4:41.13
*Weyant appears in the NCAA database for the moment, though we’ve previously reported that she’s expected to defer her enrollment and not compete for UVA this season.
*Weyant appears in the NCAA database for the moment, though we’ve previously reported that she’s expected to defer her enrollment and not compete for UVA this season.
NC State: 9
Alons, Moore, Hierath, Berkoff, Muzzy, Podmanikova, Calegan, Arens, Poole
The Virginia women are gearing up for a run at their first-ever NCAA swimming & diving title. They look to have the arsenal to do it, with a dozen swimmers projected to earn invites at this point.
It’s worth noting, of course, that these rankings are heavily skewed towards the ACC and SEC, where meets have been more common in this pandemic-adjusted season. The Big Ten and Pac-12 have competed only sparingly, and should really re-shuffle these ranks as they return to a more full competition schedule.
For the Texas men, the situation is remarkably similar to last year. The raw qualifier numbers are incredible – it’s only somewhat rare to see a team over the 18-person cap, but to be as far over as Texas is at this point is extremely rare.
On the other hand, the issue for the Longhorns last year was that they had too many single-event scorers projected, where Cal’s smaller group were ultimately seeded to outscore Texas because more Cal swimmers were projected to score in multiple events. Texas also has a lot of guys just barely under the invite times, but well behind the times it typically takes to score at the NCAA meet.
And just as we noted with the women, these ranks really favor the SEC, ACC, and Big 12 right now, because those conferences have competed more. The Big Ten and Pac-12 have slightly stricter rules on practice and competition during the pandemic, so we’d expect those conferences to add a lot more qualifiers closer to the NCAA meet.
I look at this list and am hoping and praying for a swift return to normal for all of our swimming and diving teams. I can’t begin to imagine how difficult it is to keep teams going with different local, state, and federal mandates impacting the training and competition schedules. All I want for Christmas is regular conference meets in February and some great NCAA action in March.
bula
3 years ago
Michigan and Stanford women… wut
JolynnSwimmer
3 years ago
Not many Stanford women on lost yet due to super few meets, no invite. They only had 2 meets so far. Covid restrictions are very very strict in Santa Clara County. 14 day quarantine after they return from the winter break.
Go Horns
3 years ago
Hook ’em!
OLDBALDIMER
3 years ago
and the TX list does not include Katz, Bowman or Willenbring, all should have cut times after conference. So quite a few guys will be left again ….good problem to have! Go Horns!
I say let UT bring anyone who qualifies! If the darn NCAA is concerned about total number of participants just have swimmers from the bottom feeder “teams” that have one, two or three swimmers qualified stay at home and wish they had chosen a great team!!! Or better yet get rid of diving so me swimmers can compete…Go TEXAS!
Wow – I am not a fan of Texas??? Actually I truly appreciate the amazing things Coach Eddie has accomplished and am a fan of many of his swimmers. Coach Capitani is a class act and I always pull for her team. For you to categorize me as “dumb” is contrary to a reasonable statement since you know not my IQ, intellectual capacity or educational level. I am humored by your aspersion and simply choose to again write…GO TEXAS!!!
Snarky
3 years ago
Gonna be some teary eyes again in Texas when a half dozen guys stay home and have to be happy with a two team “conference” meet.
IMO Cincy and SMU should join as affiliates now that ECU and UConn are gone from AAC. I don’t know what that process entails, but they could do it just for men’s swim/dive.
1) pretty sure those guys knew what they were signing up for when they picked texas
2) ever consider the possibility that the intense, high-level competition in Austin under the tutelage of the GOAT is what pushed them to get that Q time? And maybe that if they had gone to Tennessee or TCU that they wouldn’t have pushed themselves as much?
Jared Anderson swam for nearly twenty years. Then, Jared Anderson stopped swimming and started writing about swimming. He's not sick of swimming yet. Swimming might be sick of him, though.
Jared was a YMCA and high school swimmer in northern Minnesota, and spent his college years swimming breaststroke and occasionally pretending …
I look at this list and am hoping and praying for a swift return to normal for all of our swimming and diving teams. I can’t begin to imagine how difficult it is to keep teams going with different local, state, and federal mandates impacting the training and competition schedules. All I want for Christmas is regular conference meets in February and some great NCAA action in March.
Michigan and Stanford women… wut
Not many Stanford women on lost yet due to super few meets, no invite. They only had 2 meets so far. Covid restrictions are very very strict in Santa Clara County. 14 day quarantine after they return from the winter break.
Hook ’em!
and the TX list does not include Katz, Bowman or Willenbring, all should have cut times after conference. So quite a few guys will be left again ….good problem to have! Go Horns!
Braden Vines as well.
Except we don’t know why they are missing and if they will be competing this season. Well maybe you know, but most of us don’t. 🙂
I say let UT bring anyone who qualifies! If the darn NCAA is concerned about total number of participants just have swimmers from the bottom feeder “teams” that have one, two or three swimmers qualified stay at home and wish they had chosen a great team!!! Or better yet get rid of diving so me swimmers can compete…Go TEXAS!
SwimFani is not a Texas fan. Nobody in Texas says “Go Texas” and nobody is this dumb [among swim fans, that is].
Wow – I am not a fan of Texas??? Actually I truly appreciate the amazing things Coach Eddie has accomplished and am a fan of many of his swimmers. Coach Capitani is a class act and I always pull for her team. For you to categorize me as “dumb” is contrary to a reasonable statement since you know not my IQ, intellectual capacity or educational level. I am humored by your aspersion and simply choose to again write…GO TEXAS!!!
Gonna be some teary eyes again in Texas when a half dozen guys stay home and have to be happy with a two team “conference” meet.
Three team*
IMO Cincy and SMU should join as affiliates now that ECU and UConn are gone from AAC. I don’t know what that process entails, but they could do it just for men’s swim/dive.
I have heard this bandied about at a level where ‘it matters,’ and it’s basically been put on hold because of COVID.
Most people I spoke with indicated that the two schools would likely affiliate to different conferences because of geography.
1) pretty sure those guys knew what they were signing up for when they picked texas
2) ever consider the possibility that the intense, high-level competition in Austin under the tutelage of the GOAT is what pushed them to get that Q time? And maybe that if they had gone to Tennessee or TCU that they wouldn’t have pushed themselves as much?
3) if they were unhappy, wouldn’t they leave ?
When will swimswam understand weyant isn’t at UVA
I thought Emma Weyant was taking a gap year?
Emma Weyant is not at UVA yet (unless there’s been a change of plans and she’s coming for 2nd semester??)