Brown University Investigating Men’s Swim & Dive For Hazing, Vandalism

Brown University is launching an investigation into hazing allegations regarding the school’s men’s swimming & diving team, the campus newspaper reports.

The investigation began on Nov 29, according to the Brown Daily Herald. The allegations focus on the night of October 7, an evening in which the newspaper reports new team members “vandalized University property, were instructed to perform a skit and vomited after excessive drinking.”

A new member of the team passed along screenshots of conversations to the Herald, requesting anonymity out of fear of retaliation from teammates. The newspaper reports that it saw a photo of “seven individuals stripped down to their bathing suits or underwear standing in front of the Van Wickle Gates,” as well as a photo of two people smashing bottles of Smirnoff Ice against a campus statue of Marcus Aurelius.

The newspaper also says it was provided an audio recording of a Nov 14 team meeting in which a team captain talked about a team tradition of “smashing the ‘Ices’ against the statues.”

The Herald report goes on to reference a photo of a new team member with the word “Oedipus” and a drawing of a penis on his bare back and a script for a skit performed by the freshmen at an off-campus house for upperclassmen. The NCAA does officially categorize “stunt or skit nights, with degrading, crude or humiliating acts” as hazing.

The Herald reports that on Nov. 29, upperclassmen collected new team members from their rooms and gave them bottles of Tabasco sauce and vodka to drink. Audio recordings referenced two new team members who vomited due to drinking that night, and a member of the women’s team said she was told by the men’s team that Emergency Medical Services had been called for one male team member who had drunk too much.

Worse still, the recording of a team meeting provided to the Herald features a team captain telling new team members to categorically deny any hazing allegations. “There’s things that are out there that could be damaging, it’s just about how we spin it right now,” the captain said, according to the Herald.

The school paper also reports that the Brown women’s team is under investigation for events that took place on the same night – October 7 – though the school says that investigation is into “unrelated conduct,” and the paper says that investigation regards “possible underage drinking.”

We reached out to Brown for comment and were directed to the school’s official statement, posted at the bottom of this report.

The Herald reports that it has reached out to the swimming & diving coaching staff with no reply, and that the men’s team captains “set up multiple meetings with The Herald but failed to appear and have denied multiple requests to comment.”

This is the third potentially team-wide disciplinary incident to crop up within the Ivy League in the past year or so. Princeton suspended its entire men’s swimming & diving team for all of last season after offensive content was found in a team listserv. Dartmouth cancelled three meets, the team’s winter training trip and put the women’s swim team on probation over the summer over a “sexualized PowerPoint” that first-year team members were told to create.

Outside of the Ivy League, hazing has caused myriad problems for a number of swim and dive programs. Five former Virginia swimmers were subject to a lawsuit in 2014 for alleged hazing, Drury’s head coach was forced to step back from his coaching role in early 2017, and Western Kentucky suspended its entire men’s and women’s programs for five years beginning in 2015.

 

Here is Brown’s official statement on the investigation:

On Tuesday, Nov. 14, 2017, Brown University’s Department of Athletics learned through a news media inquiry of an alleged hazing incident involving the men’s varsity swimming and diving team. At that time, few details were shared with Athletics regarding the circumstances that prompted the media inquiry, and no student had expressed concerns directly to the University. However, Brown considers any allegation of hazing with the utmost seriousness, and Athletics immediately shared information with Brown’s Office of Student Conduct and Community Standards. The two departments began conversations to gather information and on Nov. 29, the conduct office notified members of the team that it had launched an investigation into the allegations.

Since then, additional information regarding the alleged incident has emerged, both through the student conduct office investigation and through new details shared on Nov. 29 by the news media organization, which brought forward additional allegations from its unnamed sources. While it remains the case that no student has expressed concerns directly to Brown to date, the University remains deeply troubled by the allegations and continues to actively investigate. Any activity proven to constitute hazing is a violation of both Brown’s Code of Student Conduct and Rhode Island state law.

(The University is not currently investigating the women’s swimming and diving team in relation to the allegations involving the men’s team. While Student Conduct has started a preliminary investigation of unrelated conduct on the women’s team, that effort is focused on possible underage alcohol violations and at this time is distinct from investigation into the alleged hazing incident involving the men’s team.)

Brown’s policies regarding matters of student conduct and discipline protect the privacy of students records, and federal law limits when details related to student conduct investigations may be disclosed. However, the University wants to make it clear unequivocally that students found responsible for code violations are subject to sanctions. Should any student(s) be found responsible, the University will ensure that responsible parties are held accountable, whether through individual and/or collective disciplinary action. The Code of Student Conduct website outlines the various sanctionsfor violations of the conduct code. In addition, Brown student athletes always are subject to conduct policies for athletes, as well as sanctions relating to any violations of Ivy League or NCAA regulations.

The University educates all students regarding the policy on hazing through its Code of Student Conduct. In particular, as a requirement for athletic participation, every student athlete must review Brown’s hazing policy and attest in writing that they understand and commit to adhering to the policy. Separately, all student athletes must attend an NCAA compliance meeting with their team. And Athletics administrators meet with team leaders to discuss policies, including hazing, and their roles as team leaders. Other training programs include discussions on responsible use of social media and the dangers of hazing.

Early this fall, in response to national attention to issues of hazing, a working group of Brown administrators began work on a proactive review and discussion of Brown’s resources and practices related to hazing. These efforts continue.

55
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

55 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Athletic Supporter
6 years ago

This season is over – no Ivy’s. Next season is also suspended – the team can practice but cannot compete. This punishes the the freshmen “victims” as well as any incoming recruits. Unbelieveable

Narc
Reply to  Athletic Supporter
6 years ago

Going to recommend that you delete this. Let those kids have some time away from all of the drama.

TheJudga
7 years ago

I think when it comes down to it, rules preventing hazing are obviously there for a even more obvious reason – to protect both the athletes’ and school’s health and reputation. Forcing someone to do anything that they either don’t want to do or if it will hurt them should not be accepted by other athletes or the school.

That being said you then need to analyze the level of harm being done; is it worth the kicking out or suspending an entire team for what most of them have already been doing since high school**? It depends on details we probably don’t have.
– Were they forced to drink?
– Was it just encouraged?
– Was… Read more »

Duswim
7 years ago

I totally understand why they all needed to blow off some steam.

They have to swim against Dean Farris.

Vladislav22
7 years ago

Can someone explain to me what a sexualized powerpoint is?

Nellie
Reply to  Vladislav22
7 years ago

Silly reporter jargon. The actual power point was a silly girls team traditional that had nothing to do with sex. A witch hunt by the administration to make the Dartmouth’s girls swim team an example. As you know the scariest group on Dartmouth’s campus is of course the girls swim team.

JustMyOpinion
7 years ago

Several people are commenting on the fact that this is not a big deal….for the most part I agree, but I do think that the principle behind the poor decisions is a big deal when others are “forced” to participate to fit in. The primary issue that I see needs attention here is if anyone was truly coerced to drink when they were underage (and apparently in at least one case to the point of requiring emergency care) and then told to lie or “spin” about what actually happened. This kind of thing happens in all schools and underage drinking is not anything new so I’m not singling out ivies. No matter what school these kids are from, actions that… Read more »

Neil
7 years ago

Although I have not been a frequenter of SwimSwam for a long period of time under this pseudonym, I have made it loud and clear for my support and acclaim that I hand to the Ivy League institutions and the students that attend these eight aforementioned schools. However, out of the very few things that I despise about both the elitist prep school/Ivy culture, instances like this are far and alone the most egregious snag. Zero tolerance should be expressed towards the perpetrators, and I believe that they should be expelled from Brown, assuming these allegations are true. And I’m not trying to come off as harsh and say to ‘ruin these kids lives for one silly little mistake’. These… Read more »

iLikePsych
Reply to  Neil
7 years ago

And with your way in 20 years people will get expelled for walking on the grass, no second chances. As many other commenters have made clear, this behavior, while unacceptable, is not unique to this team, school, or athletes in general. Almost every student who ventures outside of their dorm will encounter situations like this, and thus it’s a matter of figuring how to improve college culture without ham-stringing a group of individuals who got caught with a common denomination amongst them as an example.

Jay ryan
Reply to  Neil
7 years ago

Sorry, Neil but I have absolute intolerance for intolerance of all kinds, including yours.

Neil
Reply to  Jay ryan
7 years ago

Intolerance of what??? Destructive, unhealthy behavior??? If you can’t outright condemn something this despicable, then you are condoning it!

ct swim fan
7 years ago

I saw the headline and said out loud, “what is wrong with these people” Enough already.

Dudeman
Reply to  ct swim fan
7 years ago

college brah

About Jared Anderson

Jared Anderson

Jared Anderson swam for nearly twenty years. Then, Jared Anderson stopped swimming and started writing about swimming. He's not sick of swimming yet. Swimming might be sick of him, though. Jared was a YMCA and high school swimmer in northern Minnesota, and spent his college years swimming breaststroke and occasionally pretending …

Read More »