Arizona Gets 2-Year Probation, Loses Scholarship Over NCAA Infraction

Originally published on January 30.

The University of Arizona swimming & diving program has been put on a two-year probation and docked a women’s scholarship over NCAA violations committed by former diving coach Omar Ojeda.

The infractions occurred between January and September of 2017, under former head coach Rick DeMontPer the NCAA’s report, the violations center on an international women’s diving prospect. Ojeda had known the prospect and her family for “many years and had previously coached the prospect in her home country.” The diver didn’t yet meet academic requirements to join the Arizona diving team, but moved to Tucscon, Arizona in January 2017 with plans to study English and improve her test scores ahead of her enrollment at the University of Arizona that fall.

The report says Ojeda arranged for the diver to live with Arizona boosters for eight months, and that the boosters didn’t require her to pay rent. Ojeda and the boosters also provided transportation for her to train with Ojeda in diving. The NCAA found that Ojeda conducted “approximately 192 impermissable tryouts of the prospect over the course of 120 days.”

DeMont, the head coach of swimming & diving at the time, said he wasn’t aware that the diver was living with boosters or training with Ojeda, but was still responsible for the violations. DeMont retired in July of 2017 and Ojeda was not retained as the school’s diving coach.

The NCAA sanctioned Arizona with the following:

  • A two-year probation from January 2019 to January 2021
  • A loss of one women’s swimming & diving scholarship for the 2020-2021 academic year

The school also sanctioned the program itself before the NCAA’s ban was handed down. The report says Arizona suspended off-campus recruiting and unofficial visits for three weeks, beginning on December 10, 2018. The school also reduced the program’s official visits by five for the 2018-2019 academic year, a reduction of 10.8% from the average number of visits in previous years. Finally, the school self-imposed a $5,000 fine.

DeMont and Ojeda are no longer with the Arizona program. Augie Busch took over the program in July of 2017. The Wildcats had some turmoil in hiring a diving coach after parting ways with Ojeda, hiring John Appleman, then rescinding their offer when he was temporarily suspended by USA Diving, then hiring Dwight Dumais even though Appleman’s suspension was lifted.

Probation

During a period of probation, the teams are still allowed to compete, but have to meet a certain heightened set of compliance standards to demonstrate their commitment to the rules. Any further violations during the probationary period could result in an extension of the probationary period or additional, more severe penalties.

During the period of probation, Arizona shall:

a. Continue to develop and implement a comprehensive compliance and educational program on NCAA legislation to instruct coaches, the faculty athletics representative, all athletics department personnel and all institutional staff members with responsibility for NCAA recruiting and certification legislation;

b. Submit a preliminary report to the Office of the Committees on Infractions (OCOI) by March 15, 2019, setting forth a schedule for establishing this compliance and educational program;

c. File with the OCOI annual compliance reports indicating the progress made with this program by December 15 during each year of probation. Particular emphasis shall be placed on Arizona’s rules education related to Bylaw 13 recruiting inducement and tryout legislation;

d. Inform swimming and diving prospects in writing that Arizona is on probation for two years and detail the violations committed. If a prospect takes an official paid visit, the information regarding violations, penalties and terms of probation must be provided in advance of the visit. Otherwise, the information must be provided before a prospect signs an NLI; and

e. Publicize specific and understandable information concerning the nature of the violations by providing, at a minimum, a statement to include the types of violations and the affected sports program and a direct, conspicuous link to the public infractions decision located on the athletic department’s main webpage “landing page” and in the media guides for the affected sports program. Arizona’s statement must: (i) clearly describe the violations; (ii) include the length of the probationary period associated with the case; and (iii) give members of the general public a clear indication of what happened in the case to allow the public (particularly prospects and their families) to make informed, knowledgeable decisions. A statement that refers only to the probationary period with nothing more is not sufficient.

Update (1/31):

The NCAA says that probation applies to the entire athletics department. They would not comment on whether the self-imposed recruiting restrictions applied to the men’s and women’s program, or just the women’s program, but deferred to Arizona because they were self-imposed. Arizona declined to give any further transparency to the self-imposed sanctions besides what was in the report.

44
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

44 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Meeeeee
5 years ago

Uuugh! i hate these NCAA decisions. Why take away a scholarship?! That simply punishes someone who is now in high school and hoping for a scholarship to swim at Arizona. I simply don’t think the NCAA cares about athletes.

Ol' Longhorn
5 years ago

Not a good look for Rocket: “The head coach admitted that he was more focused on the swimming side of things and on his impending retirement from the university.”

The Wolf of Raleigh
5 years ago

Lol Arizona isn’t even a hard school to get into. Usually if you get admitted if you have a pulse

Blake A
Reply to  The Wolf of Raleigh
5 years ago

That’d be Asu

ScottishDragon
5 years ago

So essentially there is no real consequence for such a large violation. It’s also surprising that this happens a single time in the Diving world and it makes headlines, yet in the Swimming world it is consistent theme and nobody cares.

FreeSwimmer
Reply to  ScottishDragon
5 years ago

The penalty seems fitting to me for a violation regarding one athlete and not systematic.

What are these major violations and consequences within the swimming world that you refer to?

Truth Tortoise
5 years ago

Good call NCAA. No one should live rent free

oldazfan
5 years ago

Hate to say this but the AZ program needs a complete “reboot”. Just like they did with the pool. Shut it down, take some time to re-group, then re-build it from scratch. When Busch was hired at AZ there were a lot of “haters” on the threads. After seeing him in action, the haters were right. And if you look back no one from UVA seemed sorry to see him go. The Demont environment was bad, this one is bad too, and the program is poor.

Justin Wright
Reply to  oldazfan
5 years ago

Did I miss something? I recall the haters, but I’m not sure I can tell what they were right about. I already saw a complete reboot, what exactly makes another one necessary after an only one and a half year period of the current staff in action?

Less backstroke
Reply to  oldazfan
5 years ago

The violations happened prior to the current coach’s arrival, why try to blame him for it?

running start to touch backstroke flags
5 years ago

Sanctioning programs for potential athletes trying to survive in a new country that may be very expensive. It’s bad enough to be a NCAA diver with about zero financial future but this is just absurd given the loads of money these schools pull in with their football pimping of unpaid players. How much does NCAA clearing house make?

Diver tried to live rent free with help from some good folks = problem
Coaches and AD’s making millions a year from slave labor athletes = ok

And the punishment…. to hurt another poor athlete who might need assistance in the future via a scholarship. This is all so wrong, morally.

Swimfan

In isolation it seems harmless, but these rules exist for good reason, and they have to be enforced fairly.

JimSwim22
Reply to  Swimfan
5 years ago

What’s the good reason for not allowingsomeone top live rent free?

LOOZING CONTROL
5 years ago

Wow, if this is the consequence for those actions Indiana definitely should be investigated upon. Especially because Zach Apple transferred and was training with them well before the summer classes started last year.

Admin
Reply to  LOOZING CONTROL
5 years ago

Loozing Control – the situation that you’ve described is not even close to what happened at Arizona. I can’t speak to the details of what Apple’s arrangement with Indiana was, but 1) it wouldn’t be a violation if he weren’t living rent-free with people defined as boosters, and 2) if someone is a legal resident within 50 miles of the local sports club, the coach is allowed to coach them (except in basketball). Nothing you’ve described is a violation.

Swimmer
Reply to  Braden Keith
5 years ago

Hi Braden, could you explain that 50 mile radius thing a bit more? Sorta confused by what you mean

Ol' Longhorn
Reply to  Swimmer
5 years ago

I sucked at geometry, too. Something to do with the distance from the center of a circle.

About Jared Anderson

Jared Anderson

Jared Anderson swam for nearly twenty years. Then, Jared Anderson stopped swimming and started writing about swimming. He's not sick of swimming yet. Swimming might be sick of him, though. Jared was a YMCA and high school swimmer in northern Minnesota, and spent his college years swimming breaststroke and occasionally pretending …

Read More »