Swim of the Week is brought to you by arena, a SwimSwam partner.
Disclaimer: Swim of the Week is not meant to be a conclusive selection of the best overall swim of the week, but rather one Featured Swim to be explored in deeper detail. The Swim of the Week is an opportunity to take a closer look at the context of one of the many fast swims this week, perhaps a swim that slipped through the cracks as others grabbed the headlines, or a race we didn’t get to examine as closely in the flood of weekly meets.
If you’ve been following the first few days of action at the 2022 Australian Swimming Championships in Oaklands Park, you’re well aware the competition has been a standout one for up-and-coming phenom Mollie O’Callaghan.
The 18-year-old rising star has qualified to swim three individual events at the World Championships in as many days at the meet, which serves as a qualifier for next month’s Worlds in Budapest, but thus far the performance that stands out above the rest came in the women’s 100 freestyle.
Australia had the gold and bronze medalists in the event at last summer’s Olympic Games, but both Emma McKeon and Cate Campbell aren’t competing at this year’s trials, nor is veteran Bronte Campbell. Those absences meant that three out of the four members of the Australia’s gold medal-winning and world record-setting 400 free relay from the Tokyo Games wouldn’t be in the field in Oaklands Park, leaving an opening for the next generation to fill the void.
O’Callaghan did just that and then some, as she started out by becoming the first woman sub-53 in the 100 free this year in the prelims, clocking 52.83 for a new best time. She had previously been 53.08, done leading off Australia’s 400 free relay in the prelims at the Olympics last summer.
What stood out about that 52.83, beyond the impressive overall time, was O’Callaghan’s closing 50, as she came back in a scorching 26.73 (nearly even-splitting after opening in 26.10).
That briefly stood as the fastest textile back-half of all-time in the women’s 100 free, overtaking Bronte Campbell‘s 26.80 from the 2018 Commonwealth Games. It also ranked third overall, trailing two from Germany’s Britta Steffen at the 2009 World Championships.
In the final, O’Callaghan was faster on both 50s, getting out in 25.92 before coming home in a scorching 26.57, culminating in the victory and a final time of 52.49.
That swim further improved O’Callaghan’s world-leading time, and made her the eighth-fastest performer in history. Runner-up Shayna Jack (52.60) also moved to #2 in the world for the season, and Australia now occupies four of the top-five times globally this season.
2021-2022 LCM Women 100 Free
O'Callaghan
52.49
2 | Shayna Jack | AUS | 52.60 | 03/18 |
3 | Sarah Sjostrom | SWE | 52.80 | 06/23 |
4 | Torri Huske | USA | 52.92 | 06/23 |
5 | Emma McKeon | AUS | 52.94 | 08/02 |
But about that back half.
O’Callaghan’s 26.57 closing split ranks as the fastest in history, overtaking Steffen’s 26.61, which was done when she set the world record at 52.07 in Rome.
All-Time Closing 50s, Women’s 100 Freestyle (LCM)
Data courtesy of Daniel Takata. Follow his Swimming Stats page on Instagram here.
Athlete | Back-half split | Final time | Event |
Mollie O’Callaghan | 26.57 | 52.49 | 2022 AUS Nationals |
Britta Steffen | 26.61 | 52.07 | 2009 World Championships |
Britta Steffen | 26.62 | 52.22 | 2009 World Championships |
Mollie O’Callaghan | 26.73 | 52.83 | 2022 AUS Nationals |
Amanda Weir | 26.76 | 53.02 | 2009 World Championships |
Bronte Campbell | 26.80 | 52.27 | 2018 Commonwealth Games |
Ranomi Kromowidjojo | 26.83 | 52.75 | 2012 Eindhoven Swim Cup |
Sarah Sjostrom | 26.84 | 52.78 | 2015 World Championships |
Sarah Sjostrom | 26.86 | 52.73 | 2014 Stockholm Open |
Sarah Sjostrom | 26.88 | 51.71 | 2017 World Championships |
Emma McKeon | 26.88 | 51.96 | 2021 Olympics |
Sarah Sjostrom | 26.92 | 53.05 | 2011 NED Open |
Simone Manuel | 26.92 | 52.54 | 2018 USA Nationals |
Sarah Sjostrom | 26.93 | 52.93 | 2014 Stockholm Swim Cup |
Penny Oleksiak | 26.93 | 52.72 | 2016 Olympics |
Here’s a look at the top 10 performers in history and how they split their race:
Rank | Swimmer | Final Time | Opening 50 | Closing 50 | Meet |
1 | Sarah Sjostrom (SWE) | 51.71 | 24.83 | 26.88 |
2017 World Championships
|
2 | Emma McKeon (AUS) | 51.96 | 25.08 | 26.88 |
2021 Olympic Games
|
3 | Cate Campbell (AUS) | 52.03 | 25.09 | 26.94 |
2018 Pan Pacific Championships
|
4 | Simone Manuel (USA) | 52.04 | 24.81 | 27.23 |
2019 World Championships
|
5 | Britta Steffen (GER) | 52.07 | 25.46 | 26.61 |
2009 World Championships
|
T-6 | Bronte Campbell (AUS) | 52.27 | 25.47 | 26.80 |
2018 Commonwealth Games
|
T-6 | Siobhan Haughey (HKG) | 52.27 | 25.1 | 27.17 |
2021 Olympic Games
|
8 | Mollie O’Callaghan (AUS) | 52.49 | 25.92 | 26.57 |
2022 Australian Championships
|
T-9 | Mallory Comerford (USA) | 52.59 | 25.51 | 27.08 |
2017 World Championships
|
T-9 | Penny Oleksiak (CAN) | 52.59 | 25.42 | 27.17 |
2021 Olympic Games
|
O’Callaghan’s closing ability was on full display once again on Friday in the final of the women’s 200 free, as she came home faster than winner Ariarne Titmus to place second in a personal best time of 1:54.94.
Titmus swam the third-fastest time in history in 1:53.31, closing in 28.79, while O’Callaghan’s final 50 split was 28.54. This resulted in O’Callaghan placing second by over nine-tenths of a second after turning sixth at the 100m wall and fourth at the final turn.
Less than an hour later, O’Callaghan was back in the water taking on another Olympic champion, Kaylee McKeown, as she split 29.14/29.98 to place second to McKeown (58.49) in the 100 back (59.12).
Next month in Budapest it’s no secret that O’Callaghan will be a force to be reckoned with. And if we’ve learned anything from the way she swims her races, no one lead is safe.
Follow arena USA on Instagram here.
arena has revolutionized the world of aquatic sport through insightful collaboration with world class athletes and the development of cutting edge competitive swimwear since 1973. Today, this spirit of collaboration and innovation lives on through a continuous evolution of advanced materials and Italian design that improves the performance, style and expression of all those who chose arena. From leading the lanes to living in style, arena is dedicated to providing all swimmers with the tools they need to express themselves, feel confident, win and achieve more. Because in arena, you can.
does this include relay splits? Since I assume the back half would be relatively unaffected by relay starts
Relay splits don’t count as there are other aspects that influence the back half.
26.57×2=53.14
26.57 is insane for a female!
its just insane
If she brought it back any faster she would’ve been splitting the water molecules
So you’re telling me no one has ever tried going out in a 30 and coming home in a 25 or a 26 flat?
It’s possible, but not that we’re aware of.
Kinda surprised no Cat Campbell on the list.
C1 almost always dies in the last 20 metres of her individual 100 free races (just rewatch the 100 free at olympics last year)
and 2016 lmao
So you are the sort of person who laughs at other’s misfortune? I feel sorry for any of your friends/family/workmates.
I had the same thought – at her peak, she really set herself apart from around 60-80m, and she’s so strong at the end of her monster relay splits, thought she’d at least be in the top 10.
Especially when kromowidjojo is on the list, and I always thought her best swims were based off her first 50 top end speed and ability to hang on.
Campbell almost has the WR in the 100, and most certainly some of the fastest opening 75s ever, but definitely not among the fastest second 50s. Her final 25 is usually lackluster.
Wow!!