Shouts From the Stands: Best Male Freestyle Sprinter Ever

by SwimSwam 58

April 22nd, 2018 Opinion

SwimSwam welcomes reader submissions about all topics aquatic, and if it’s well-written and well-thought, we might just post it under our “Shouts from the Stands” series. We don’t necessarily endorse the content of the Shouts from the Stands posts, and the opinions remain those of their authors. If you have thoughts to share, please send them to [email protected].

This “Shouts from the Stands” submission comes from D. Michael Connellan:

In March at the D1 NCAAs, Caeleb Dressel became the first man to go under 40 seconds in the 100 Free, clocking a sensational 39.90 in the finals. Being the first to break that barrier brought him universal acclaim as ‘the best ever’ – but is he?

Steve Clark swam for Santa Clara Swim Club and Yale in the early 1960s, and was a member of both the 1960 Olympic team as a high schooler and the 1964 team for which he captured three gold medals and tied the world record in the 100 meter Free. But it was at the 1965 national championships held at Yale in the Payne Whiney gym’s Kiphuth Pool that he swam what many consider his greatest race. In that event he went 45.6 seconds to become the first man to ever go under 46! He was also the first to go under 48, 47 and 21 in the 50. After graduation Clark, who’s in the ISHOF, retired and went on to Harvard Law with his 9 world records unbroken. Today Steve is retired fom the law and helping coach at Marin Co.’s Redwood High.

Clark & Moriarty

So what, you say! 45.6 is a long way from 39.9! But is it? There have been a great many major changes in the sport in the intervening 53 years, and they’ve consistently resulted in faster times. Let’s take a look at seven of these changes:

  • Clark was required in 1965 to hand touch every wall on turns, resulting in much slower turns than Dressel;
  • Modern goggles were not in use until the late 1960s. Clark trained and raced without goggles so his training and underwater vision for turns was quite limited;
  • Underwater swimming wasn’t practiced in Clark’s era meaning he came up much sooner than Dressel on the start and turns, encountering more turbulence and stroking further on the surface, all of which slowed him compared to Dressel.

Kiphuth Pool

Built in 1932, Kiphuth pool was superb for 1965 but hardly state of the art compared to the Freeman Aquatic Center in Minneapolis, with flat walls at both ends and lacking modern non-turbulent lane lines in 1965;

  • Yale’s starting blocks were flat and old-fashioned in 1965, resulting in a slower start for Clark than Dressel;
  • Clark wore a baggy nylon race suit with far more drag than modern suits;
  • Yale had an outstanding coach – Phil Moriarty – and facility for the time, but weight-training, plyometrics and swimming as a science were in their infancy for Clark compared to Dressel’s training.

So if Steve Clark had competed in 2018, or Caleb Dressel in 1965, who would win the mythical title of ‘the best male freestyle sprinter ever’? Do the seven changes add up to 5.7 seconds?  We’ll never know, but it’s worth remembering that swimmers’ times from the decades past may be slower due to rules changes and other advances but it doesn’t necessarily mean that on a level playing field the great swimmers of the past wouldn’t have been just as good.

In This Story

58
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

58 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stephen Clark--not Stephen Chris
6 years ago

Stephen Clark not Stephen Chris

Stephen Chris
6 years ago

I was lucky enough to see Caeleb’ s swims at Minneapolis NCAA’s, and was amazed. I’d agree with the opinion that his 17.63 50 free projects to a low/mid 39 in the 100. His 39.9 was at the end of the meet and he had to be tired. No way I can see myself being anywhere near him, despite the changes in swimming over 50 years. My only claim to fame currently is that I think I could still make the NCAA 100 finals today 50 years later– in the women’s event. I think one factor missing in comparing swimming eras is the psychological difference– a good 12 year old age grouper looks way past a 45.6 if he aims… Read more »

Old Retired Guy
Reply to  Stephen Chris
6 years ago

Thank you, Mr. Clark, for your appearance and comment. You and all of the other elite 1960s swimmers added greatly to my childhood enjoyment of and love for competitive swimming.

LawDog
6 years ago

Boy, this article seems like it was written by a lawyer…

Old Retired Guy
6 years ago

Verification and/or citation, on the claimed 1965 requirement for an open turn, would be appreciated. I found one questionable reference that indicated that 1965 was the first year that flip-turns were universally legalized in competition. I was a club-swimming middle-and-high schooler in the mid-late 1960s, and I idolized some of you 1960s swimming collegians whose names I see on the SwimSwam staff. Can you guys/women, or anyone else, remember?: Did Clark *really* have to do open turns on his 45.6 swim? Good article, BTW. From the stands…….

Years of Plain Suck
Reply to  Old Retired Guy
6 years ago

My (fuzzy) memory is that 1964 was the last year a “hand touch on the wall” was required in international (and AAU) competition. I believe it had been eliminated a bit earlier in high school and NCAA (yards) competition.

Donna
6 years ago

Yards

Means nothing outside of US. Needs to compete internationally, and LC. Simple as that.

ooo
6 years ago

The Duke and Tarzan come to mind. Between themselves the world record was their from 1912 till 1934.

Aquajosh
6 years ago

You could start the debate by spelling his name right. It’s CAELEB.

Years of Plain Suck
6 years ago

Steve Clark was an inspiration for me growing up. As a youngster, I watched him (shaved head and all) go 46.8 — first man under both 48 and 47 in the same race — on CBS Sports TV in 1961.

Unfortunately for Steve, he didn’t qualify for the individual 100 free for the 1964 Tokyo Olympics but did make the 4X100 free relay. In Tokyo, he led off the relay in a world record-tying 52.9. Don Schollander won the individual 100 free in 53.4. US Men’s Head Coach Doc Councilman picked Clark to anchor the US 4X100 medley relay (over Schollander). Many years later, George Haines (who was an assistant Olympic coach in 1964), told me this was a… Read more »

JJJ
Reply to  Years of Plain Suck
6 years ago

52.9 > 53.4
Seems like a fairly rational decision to me.

Years of Plain Suck
Reply to  JJJ
6 years ago

There’s a huge difference between a “fly and die” lead-off effort (Clark), and one where the competitor has to go through prelims, semis, and then swim a more tactical finals race to actually win the event (which Schollander did by 0.1 seconds). George Haines coached both of these young men — that was his opinion. Unfortunately, there were no prelims gold medals awarded back then; had there been, perhaps Clark could have swum in the medley relay prelims.