2018 WOMEN’S NCAA CHAMPIONSHIPS
- Wednesday, March 14th – Saturday, March 17th
- McCorkle Aquatic Pavillion — Columbus, OH
- Prelims 9AM/Finals 5PM (Eastern Time)
- Defending Champion: Stanford (results)
- Live stream: Wednesday/Thursday Prelims & Finals, Friday/Saturday Prelims / Friday/Saturday finals on ESPNU
- Championship Central
- Event-by-Event Previews
- Psych Sheet
- Live Results
We’ve taken a pretty deep dive back into years-old recruiting ranks over the past two days, and we have one more piece of that puzzle to reanalyze. Luckily, the ranking we’ll revisit today is much more recent: how did our top 20 recruits in the class of 2017 perform as freshmen?
Further reading:
- Top 20 recruits from 2014 after four NCAA seasons
- Top 12 recruiting classes from 2014 after four NCAA seasons
Naturally, this analysis has a far smaller sample size than our reports from the past two days, so it’s much more difficult to read too much into these numbers. Still, it’s useful to look at which first-year NCAA swimmers had the best performances relative to their recruiting ranks.
The ranks are from our top 20 story from July of 2016. Bear that in mind – a lot of these ranks would have changed if we had ranked them in July of 2017, after their senior years. In fact, there almost certainly would have been a different #1. Our recruiting ranks also only include domestic athletes, as international students are often hard to group into a specific recruiting class, and are generally shrouded in mystery as to when they’ll join an NCAA team, if they do at all.
Rank | Name | College Team | 2018 NCAA Points |
1 | Courtney Harnish | Georgia | 7 |
2 | Sierra Schmidt | Michigan | 9 |
3 | Margaret Aroesty | USC | 9 |
4 | Brooke Forde | Stanford | 21 |
5 | Nikol Popov | Tennessee | no invite |
6 | Lauren Pitzer | Stanford | 1 |
7 | Ashlyn Schoof | Louisville | 0 |
8 | Hannah Kukurugya | Stanford | 0 |
9 | Taylor Pike | Texas A&M | 5 |
10 | Grace Zhao | Stanford | 5 |
11 | Victoria Edwards | Texas | no invite |
12 | Ashley Volpenhein | Stanford | no invite |
13 | Marta Ciesla | USC | 0 |
14 | Caitlin Tycz | USC | 0 |
15 | Alexis Margett | Michigan | no invite |
16 | Anna Belousova | Texas A&M | 27 |
17 | Taylor Ault | Florida | 0 |
18 | Paige Madden | Virginia | 0 |
19 | Joy Field | Texas A&M | no invite |
20 | Regan Barney | Princeton | no invite |
- This year’s freshman class had a disproportionately small impact on NCAAs point-wise, scoring less than a third of what any other class scored. Some of that was due to a huge number of returning NCAA champs, and it shrinks our already-tiny sample size even further. It won’t be wise to close the book on this class until they get an opportunity in a less-loaded NCAA crowd.
- Texas A&M’s Anna Belousova had the best point haul. She’s technically listed as a sophomore, but joined the Aggies with this recruiting class. When we ranked her in July 2016, she was 1:00.5 in the 100 breast and 2:10.1 in the 200. This year, she went 58.9 and 2:07.2 at NCAAs to make the A final in both races.
- Stanford’s Brooke Forde scored 21 points in her team’s dominating NCAA effort. It became clear to us over the course of this class’s senior year of high school that Forde was probably the new #1 recruit in the class, especially when she dropped her 400 IM from 4:07 to 4:02, her 200 IM from 1:57 to 1:55 and her 200 free from 1:46 to 1:44 before even setting foot on campus as a freshman.
- Six of our top 20 didn’t even get an NCAA invite. That’s a big change from last year when all 20 of our top prospects made the big show. All six of those swimmers regressed fairly significantly from their best times – always a possibility in the tough transition from high school to college.
And of course, we’ll include everyone’s favorite part: which unranked recruits scored NCAA points as freshmen. There aren’t many, and 6 of the 9 are internationals, denoted with an asterisk (*):
Name | College Team | Total NCAA Points |
Evie Pfeifer | Texas | 23.5 |
Robin Neumann* | Cal | 16 |
Bailey Bonnett | Kentucky | 14 |
Sarah Darcel* | Cal | 12 |
Mariia Astashkina* | Louisville | 12 |
Tamila Holub* | NC State | 11 |
Kristen Romano | Ohio State | 7 |
Mackenzie Padington* | Minnesota | 5 |
Sonnele Oeztuer* | Auburn | 3 |
These don’t include diving or relay contributions.
Did you write an article like this after last year’s NCAAs?
sort of? https://swimswam.com/swimswams-top-20-hs-recruits-16-make-ncaas-frosh/
Jared,
Seems to me given the difficulty in addition to the lack of points perhaps a measurement of recruits should focus on consistency. Given only 5% of college women swimmer even make an NCAA cut in any given year. Why not show the number of top recruits in a bigger sample size (maybe top 50) that have made NCAA every year?
What you are writing about is the smallest sample size of an already small sample size (listing only swimmers that have top 16 times at NCAAs). Your chart above shows the 30% of the top 20 recruits didn’t even make the NCAA cut. Show me the list of top recruits that qualified for ALL FOUR YEARS of… Read more »
CollegeSwimDad – if it’s four-year results you’re looking for, you’ll find them in the two stories linked at the top of the page.
As to your other point, with respect to the difficulty of just making NCAAs (and coming from someone who knows that difficulty firsthand!), when we cover sports at the highest level, participation isn’t a very meaningful stat. Meets are scored on points – participation at NCAAs has no effect on team scores unless you place in the top 16. (It’s similar to why we analyze football players in terms of touchdowns more often than we do in terms of games started or snaps played – the former statistic proves much more meaningful than the latter). In terms… Read more »
Courtney Harnish, ouch!! #1 recruit may have been a bit overstated!
I wouldn’t jump to conclusions. She had a great year and college and especially NCAA’s is a big adjustment. We’ll see
I’d add Abby Richter from UVA as a name to look out for. Just barely missed finals at NCAAs (I believe she was 1st alternate in the 200IM if I remember correctly), and she did a phenomenal job at ACCs, dropping time for the first time since her Junior year of high school.
romano & pfefier improved massively during their senior year of HS, bu even more during college. another name to look out for – ali harrison, cal. she was a 1:01.4 in the 100 breast and 2:14.4 in the 200 breast when she committed, and dropped down to a 59 & 2:10.
And they say Cal can’t coach breastrokers
A&M is “Breast Stroke U”. Look at the A final in 200 breast. Nuff said! Gig em?
My guess is there are some sleepers in this cohort. Seeing a trend towards swimmers, even girls, peaking a bit later than before. Some of these women might explode in the points over the next 3 years.
Great job by Carol and Roric in Texas. If sickness hadn’t hit at the wrong time, they would have had two swimmers in the A final of the 500 free. Congrats to Evie.
Maybe. Or even a healthy Evans could have missed the 500 finals completely just like Commerford. No guarantees anywhere.
Agreed.
Bonnett….the one to watch!