2014 M. NCAA Championships 5 Big Things #4: Not a Single ‘Last Chance’ Qualifier Scores at NCAA’s

  25 Braden Keith | April 13th, 2014 | Big 12, College, Featured, News

NCAA swimming has a system of meets in place that are colloquially known as “Last Chance Meets,” but in official NCAA jargon are referred to as “Approved Championship Qualification Meets.”

These meets are held after the completion of Conference Championship meets, and when submitted and approved prior to the beginning of the season, are a special exception allowed after conference meets to achieve NCAA qualifying times.

There are several administrative rules surrounding these meets, but ultimately, they give swimmers what often seems to be a limitless number of attempts at making qualifying times for the NCAA Championship meet, and are commonly used as college coaches as a ‘mulligan’ for when athletes don’t hit the standards needed to feel safe for an NCAA invite.

In the 2014 season, there were 5 approved men’s last chance meets:

  • Pac-12 (King County Aquatic Center)
  • Georgia Tech
  • Texas (American Short Course Championships)
  • Georgia (M&W)
  • Tennessee (M&W)

Among those 5 meets, there were 10 swimmers that we found whose only invited swim was a swim done at a Last Chance meet.

Kyle Troskot – 50 free – 19.32 – American SC Championships
Cory Bolleter – 50 Free – 19.38 – American SC Championships
Pedro Coutinho – 100 fly – 46.58 – SE Championship Qualification (Needed this time AND a couple of scratches)
Garrett Trebilcock – 100 back – 45.92 – Yellow Jacket Championships
Imri Ganiel – 100 breast – 53.23 – American Short Course Championships
Renato Prono – 100 breast – 53.03 – SE Championship Qualification
Nick Munoz – 1650 Free – 15:02.04 – American Short Course Championships
Patrick Myers – 200 Back – 1:42.32 – Yellow Jacket Championships
Steven Zimmerman – 200 Back – 1:41.66 – Yellow Jacket Championships
Nico van Duijn – 200 Fly – 1:43.00 – Yellow Jacket Championships
Note: Texas’ John Murray swam an invited time in the 50 free, but his 100 free time from mid-season was also under the ‘Invited’ Line. Texas’ Will Licon improved his qualifying status with a last-chance swim, but his Big 12’s swim ultimately would have been good enough in the 200 breast.

Of those 10, not a single swimmer wound up scoring at the NCAA Championships.

Texas freshman Will Licon, who picked up 22 points for the Longhorns, was sort of a last-chance qualifier, but would have been in even without that meet, so we don’t count his 22 points either. That included a 5th-place finish in the 400 IM, though that 400 IM wasn’t the event in which he was invited to NCAA’s.

Update: one of our readers pointed out that Licon’s previous season-best in the 200 breaststroke would have qualified anyway, so strike him from ‘last chance qualifier.’

So, after running 5 meets, investing many resources in hosting those meets and undergoing much stress and uncertainty and handwringing, the swimmers qualifying at last chance meets had zero effect on the final team placements or scores.

Of course, from an individual level, it’s a different story. There are 10 swimmers whose lives were significantly impacted by these last chance meets. There are 10 swimmers from 7 teams who seized their opportunity to jump into the NCAA Championships, and specifically Licon, who seized the opportunity to earn three All-American honors (one first-team, two honorable-mention). In fairness, were there not a last chance meet, Licon probably was the most likely of the 10 swimmers to qualify anyway.

But based on the current NCAA qualification rules, where there’s a cap on the number of swimmers who can go to nationals rather than a time, there’s 10 swimmers who lost a spot due to these last chance meets as well.

When you speak to coaches around the country, the responses that I’ve heard about this meet are fairly consistent. Most coaches, though not all coaches, would prefer to see the last chance meets go away, but while they’re still in the rules, those coaches fully intend to take advantage of them, and would never fault another coach for doing the same.

I’ll admit that this pretty well matches my personal perspective on the matter. I don’t particularly like that swimmers get a ‘do over’ when they miss their taper at their conference meet, or when they underestimated just how fast of a swim it would take to qualify for NCAA’s. I think that last chance meets take a lot of the excitement and intensity out of conference championship meets. I’m not particularly a fan of time trials to qualify for NCAA’s either.

Of course, there’s an obvious other side to that coin. The fact that different conference meets are different weekends means that while Pac-12 swimmers know what their targets are well before their conference meet means that they have a better idea of just how much rest they might need to qualify for NCAA’s.

There are also teams like Texas who are in conferences that regardless of how hard they push for qualifying times won’t have the same intensity as a meet like SEC’s or Pac-12’s. Those teams are naturally at a disadvantage, and the way that those conferences are laid out have little to do with swimming. It’s no coincidence that Texas got three guys in through last chance meets. Eddie Reese is smart, and he knows that there’s little emotion that can be captured at Big 12’s, so he might as well take advantage of the other advantage and host a last chance meet every year.

Last Chance meets have both pros and cons. Every year, the number of athletes who benefit from them will equal the number of athletes who are hurt by them.

But if, at the end of the day, they are not affecting the outcome of the team score, and ultimately the swimmers who sneak in through these last chance meets are not swimming very well once they get to NCAA’s, the question becomes are they worth the expense? Are they worth tying up a pool for a weekend, and worth teams travelling for multiple days, even with small squads? No coach would ever tell the swimmer right on the cusp that ‘no, you’re not worth the money,’ even if they really weren’t.

If the rules were changed, it’s likely that some of these 10 would have qualified at their conference meets and that those 7 coaches would have planned their seasons a little differently as well, so there’s an adjustment that would undoubtedly take place.

Perhaps it’s time for the last dance for last chance.

In This Story

Leave a Reply

25 Comments on "2014 M. NCAA Championships 5 Big Things #4: Not a Single ‘Last Chance’ Qualifier Scores at NCAA’s"


Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Whoohoo237
2 years 5 months ago

Congrats Will Licon! Although there is one major fault in this article. Ryan Murphy, junior at Cal, qualified through a last chance meet and ended up winning the 200 back on the final day of competition. He had just enough in him to edge out the super star French, Eric Ress, from Indiana university, which is no small feat. If there were no last chance meets, Ryan Murphy would not have qualified for the NCAAchampionships this season and would have made a real dent in Cal’s final score in the team standings. Goes to show how important those meets really are.

Mistakes
2 years 5 months ago

Um… Ryan Murphy is a Freshmen and not a junior. Ryan Murphy easily go into NCAA, and just like Braden Keith said, his Pac 12 times got him in with ease.

Reid
2 years 5 months ago

I think Licon’s time from Big XIIs would have made it anyway, no?

weirdo
2 years 5 months ago

I agree that last chance meets should be banned. They hurt and help a team equally…get some in and get some knocked out. If they can’t do it under pressure when it counts at conference then they probably aren’t going to do it at NCAA’s.

mattrwahl
2 years 5 months ago

“Perhaps it’s time for the last dance for last chance.”

Beautiful wordsmithing, Braden. Beautiful.

Chris Knight
2 years 5 months ago

Braden, obviously D3 is less interesting to most of the readers, but I imagine that the impact of last chance meets on the scoring is much higher there, given how much closer the cut line is to the top 16?

Nathan Smith
2 years 5 months ago

Are there the same number of athletes qualifying for last chance meets in D3 though? As mentioned by Swim3057, the 19 week rule means that any team looking to attend a last chance meet has to take 18 weeks to prepare for their conference championships to compete the week after.

This puts most coaches in a bad position. If you have a NCAA Championship hopeful, you want to give them the best shot at qualifying and should be giving them the most chances to get there, so you plan your season around a last chance meet. But then you have to sacrifice a week of training for what should be your focus, your conference championships. It’s already tough getting a team prepped in 19 weeks, let alone 18 weeks. You end up dragging the rest of your team into the plan for your NCAA qualifier.

Denison and Kenyon take advantage of it, but you don’t see too many other schools using last chance meets. It’s hard to justify it if you don’t have too many NCAA level swimmers.

2 years 5 months ago

The sad thing is that, in general, last chance meets replace guys who have rested less and have greater chance of performing well at NCAA’s with guys who have rested more and have less chance of performing well at NCAA’s.

2 years 5 months ago

Ban the last-chance meets. And ban all time trials while you’re at it. Make your times in real competition.

swimmer
2 years 5 months ago

Yes, that really sucks for those not able to swim because someone bumps them out of the meet at a last chance meet.. But what about the swimmers who get sick during their big meet and don’t perform as highly was they’re capable of? Or if you’re conference meet is in greensboro and you have bad asthma and can’t breathe all weekend, then how is it fair to them? Keep the last chance meets, the best swimmers will be at the big show that way.

Matt
2 years 5 months ago

Although this is great research, is any of it really that surprising? I could have come up with the same results on just a hunch. My guess is that swimmers that achieved their NCAA invitation by only a few hundredths of second did not score much, if at all, either. I’ll also wager that most swimmers that barely met the Olympic Trials selection times didn’t make the Olympic team either.

I think these meets are a great idea. NCAA’s, as with every other big meet, has more dynamics at play than just the team score or individual champions. I don’t care how it is molded to fit into NCAA, high school, or whatever USA Swimming is trying to come up with, swimming is an individual sport. For some people at the pointy end of things, NCAA’s is all about making finals, or scoring, or if they are lucky, winning an event. Congratulations. For others, it may be about gaining All-American status. For others, though, simply making the meet is a goal. I think the goal to simply qualify for a prestigious meet can be applied to all sorts of events…High School State Championships, Olympic Trials, or even the Olympics themselves.

These meets are not about getting more scoring swimmers to NCAA’s, they are about letting those on the fringe accomplish something that could define their swimming career. What are the issues with this? Cost? The NCAA has very little to do with these meets, and if the meets lose money, that is an issue for their hosts. How much could it be for one or two days of time trials? The NCAA does not invite more swimmers to NCAA Championships, as the number is essentially capped. Is it that this is technically “out of season” and a swimmer gets nearly unlimited shots to make their times? Well then apply that same thought process to all non-NCAA meets. Make swimmers qualify only at conference meets or duel meets. What if teams have more duel meets? What about small schools that don’t get invites to the big Texas and Florida invitationals?

I doubt any swimmers outside of Texas, Florida, Cal, or Michigan gave a second thought to the team scores while at NCAA’s this year. Heck, I bet some swimmers on those top teams didn’t even care. To cap off your season by qualifying and competing at NCAA’s is a tremendous honor. Whether you do that by duel meet, conference meet, invitational meet, or last chance meet is irrelevant.

Tim
2 years 5 months ago

What about swimmers who don’t make conference teams? Every so often at a deep school like Cal, Georgia, etc someone who just missed the conference team ends up having a great last chance meet and makes NCAAs.

Swimmers ear
2 years 5 months ago

Lindsey Gendron got her 200 fly NCAA cut at the last chance meet in Knoxville. And she placed 3rd in the 200 fly at NCAA’s, about one-tenth out of 2nd place. With the 100 fly leg on the 400 MR up for grabs late in the season, she split 51.7 at SEC’s and decided to try the 200 fly at the last chance meet. Just an FYI

John Dussliere
2 years 5 months ago

The deadline is the deadline so no one actually “loses their spot”. They qualified. The 10 swimmers that qualified in the last chance opportunity gained valuable experience at the meet. Now they know they can get in the meet or others at this level (internationally) and continue to progress toward the top. How many first time “last chancers” ever went on to do something bigger? in swimming? in life? I’m guessing 100%. Swimming is a set up for life after swimming. Trust me, every chance to qualify for something is legitimate.

mikeh
2 years 5 months ago

What John Murray did for UT was truly remarkable. I think he went 19.72 in the 50 yard free at Conference. The next weekend at Short Course Champs he went a 19.40. Then at NCAA’s a 19.07, plus an 18.3 relay split. The 100 was similarly dramatic – best time of his life going in was 42.9 – at NCAA’s he went a 41.7. I’d say he just needed more rest! Really incredible.

wpDiscuz

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

The most common question asked about Braden Keith is "when does he sleep?" That's because Braden has, in two years in the game, become one of the most prolific writers in swimming at a level that has earned him the nickname "the machine" in some circles. He first got his feet …

Read More »