Race Analysis: Men’s 100m Freestyle 2012 London Olympic Games

by SwimSwam Staff 24

April 13th, 2020 News, Training

TritonWear  and Swim Swam are bringing you the best in swimming race analysis. With the power of TritonWear, you can have an in-depth analysis of your practice every day with zero effort. Today we are having a closer look of one of the fiercest duels of 2012 London Olympic Games.

It was predicted the men’s 100 freestyle final in 2012 could be the race of the Olympics. Australia had high hopes for James Magnussen, who was seemingly unbeatable heading into London. He’d dominated at World Championships the year prior and set the fastest time ever in a textile suit at the Australian trials with a 47.10.

But doubts were raised after Nathan Adrian of the United States beat Magnusson head-to-head on the opening leg of the 4 x 100 freestyle relay early in the competition. While the Aussie qualified first for the 100m freestyle individual final, Adrian’s potential threatened an upset. Other big contenders in the final included Yannick Agnel, who had come from behind on the anchor leg of the relay to propel France to the top of the podium, and César Cielo of Brazil, who already had a number of international titles under his belt.

The final was hyped to be an epic showdown between multiple competitors, but most of all the Australian favorite and the American underdog. When the beep sounded, the swimmers exploded off the blocks and charged down the pool with high stroke rates and powerful kicks. Adrian’s rate was faster at 1.14 seconds per stroke while Magnusson held 1.25 s/str, giving the American a slight edge.


While the field was nearly dead even for most of the first length, some swimmers began to surge ahead coming into the wall. Known for his front-end speed, Cesar Cielo of Brazil was the first to flip in a time of 22.60. He was followed closely by Brent Hayden of Canada and Nathan Adrian in third position. Adrian flipped faster than anyone else at the front of the pack with a turn time of 0.79, launching him into a strong second length.

Magnusson was two-tenths of a second behind the leaders at the first wall, which was still within striking distance; he blasted ahead with a speed of 2.02 m/s to fight Adrian for the win. The last fifteen meters turned into a dogfight, with no clear leader even as they powered into the wall. Magnusson had the advantage in efficiency, but Adrian held a slightly higher stroke rate that made the difference.

It was Adrian who got his head down at the finish and touched in 47.52, managing to secure the victory by the narrowest of margins: 0.01 seconds. In upsetting “the Missile”, he shattered the hopes of the Aussies and became the first American to win the 100 freestyle since 1988. Touching for bronze was the wildcard Hayden, who also made history in becoming the first Canadian male ever to claim a medal in the 100 freestyle at the Olympics.

TritonWear is revolutionizing training with data-driven coaching. Check out how coaches in Texas are putting down their stopwatches and focussing solely on stroke mechanics.

With TritonWear, you can explore your practice with an in-depth analysis every day with zero effort and track your progress throughout the season. Train smarter with TritonWear.

 

Swimming analysis is courtesy of TritonWear, a SwimSwam partner.

AB

In This Story

24
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

24 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Charge
4 years ago
Joel
Reply to  Charge
4 years ago

Thank you . Love the Aussie commentators as usual. Well informed .

Colt Simonelli
4 years ago

Wow, 6 swimmers under 48, I believe only 4 in the Rio finals. I see all 8 going under in Tokyo.

Sun Yangs Hammer
Reply to  Colt Simonelli
4 years ago

Even at US trials there could be 8 who go under 48. Dressel Adrian Farris Jackson Pieroni Apple Held Rooney

Colt Simonelli
Reply to  Sun Yangs Hammer
4 years ago

True, but it’s very unlikely those 8 will all go under at once.

ERVINFORTHEWIN
Reply to  Colt Simonelli
4 years ago

at least 5 of them

iLikePsych
4 years ago

I always like looking at these, but if I could give feedback to TritonWear it would be to make all of the swimmers scroll to the right with 1 click instead each one scrolling individually. I can get the desire to have individual control, but I usually want to just see and compare each swimmer’s stats across the board, and that means I have to do 8x as much clicking

Curious Swimma
4 years ago

Can we please talk about hanser! He nearly even split a 48.0… with the technic of an age grouper with a 2-3beat kick. Like that is just mind boggling

Togger
Reply to  Curious Swimma
4 years ago

I still believe the best hybrid 100 free in history has Garcia swimming 70m of it (Dressel does the start and Ken To does the turn).

Joe
Reply to  Togger
4 years ago

Surely MP does the turn? According to Swimswam, his turn in the Rio 4×100 relay was the GOAT turn.

https://swimswam.com/does-caeleb-dressel-accelerate-a-statistical-video-based-look/

Charge
Reply to  Joe
4 years ago

I never analyzed a Kenneth To turn. Anyone have a good example?

ERVINFORTHEWIN
Reply to  Joe
4 years ago

one of the best MP turns for sure ……the underwater speed after the flip was Monstruous .

CACrushers
Reply to  Curious Swimma
4 years ago
Luigi
Reply to  Curious Swimma
4 years ago

The best of the field in terms of natural talent. Started out late, swam in unheated pools, had no start or underwaters, yet still managed a 48 flat

M Palota
Reply to  Luigi
4 years ago

Where is he? What happened to him?

ERVINFORTHEWIN
Reply to  M Palota
4 years ago

desapeared ….

Togger
4 years ago

Great race. Magnussen takes a lot stick for being a choker on here, but I’m not sure losing by a hundredth to a guy of Adrian’s caliber, whilst going faster than either of his own World Champs winning times, should really get you that kind of rep.

He led some unbelievably douchey behaviour in 2012 and was rightly castigated, but in the pool he was just unlucky on the day.

iLikePsych
Reply to  Togger
4 years ago

Hindsight’s 20/20, but remember that Magnussen was a 47.10 going into the games, while Adrian’s best was a 48.00 in 2009 presumably with the super suit. I would think losing to a guy who was seeded nearly a full second behind you was a choke.

Additionally – this could just be perception – but it seemed like Magnussen took the lead on the second 50, but then took his foot off the gas to coast into the wall, which allowed Adrian to snatch the win

Entgegen
Reply to  iLikePsych
4 years ago

I don’t know about taking his foot off the gas, it looked more like he ran out of gas in his legs 10m in. You can see his wake from his kick start to dwindle then and become almost non-existent 3m out from the wall where Adrian snuck in.

Togger
Reply to  iLikePsych
4 years ago

True, but Adrian dropped that seed time by half a second. If Adrian swam his seed, Magnussen wins.

It just seems to be levelled at him when other swims don’t get the same treatment.

Manadou underperformed seed (21.19 to 21.41) by a similar proportion in Rio and got pipped by Ervin, but no one suggests he choked. He put up a very good time, but got beaten by a guy having a lifetime swim.

If underperforming your PB in the final is choking, Peaty chokes quite regularly, as he has put up a few WRs in semis.

Pvdh
Reply to  Togger
4 years ago

Flo is forgiven in the eyes of fans bc he was already a gold medalist from the last Olympics

Mr Piano
Reply to  Togger
4 years ago

A big difference is clean water. In 2011 Magnussen was 47.6, and in 2012 at the Olympics 47.5. He’s a comeback swimmer, so back halving it to a 47.1 is easier when you’re out in 1st at the 50. Popov went 21.64 in clean water with a brief in 2000, then doesn’t win gold in Sydney, or even break 22.

Greg
Reply to  Mr Piano
4 years ago

that’s just wrong – drafting is faster than clean water

Eouai
4 years ago

Awww the video is showing as blocked for me.

But fun to look at these splits. I didn’t remember that Adrian had gone out in 22.6.