Americans Show Incredible Improvement From Kazan To Budapest

The U.S. team had a relatively disastrous showing at the 2015 World Championships in Kazan.

Yes, they finished atop the medal standings for the 7th consecutive time, but the addition of two new events (mixed relays added in 2015) was all that saved them from their lowest medal total since the stroke 50s were introduced in 2001.

The Australians were just one shy of their gold medal tally, which, at 8, was their lowest total since 1994 when the Chinese team reigned supreme amid a doping controversy.

Doubts heading into the 2016 Olympics were quickly silenced in Rio, as the Americans steamrolled their way to 16 gold and 33 total medals. Both numbers were head and shoulders above their 2015 World Championship totals, including doubling their gold count, with ten fewer events on the schedule.

The Olympic performance made the dominant American showing last week in Budapest no surprise, but looking at the difference between their 2015 and 2017 performances is quite remarkable.

The Americans set a new record with 38 total medals, surpassing their 1978 and 2007 marks of 36 (though the three can be considered equal with no mixed relays in ’78 and ’07). Their 18 gold medals ranks 3rd all-time, trailing their 20 from ’78 and ’07.

In 2015, they edged the Australians by just one gold and seven total medals, while 2017 saw them a staggering 14 gold medals ahead of Great Britain (4). In terms of total medals, their 38 trounced the next three highest teams who managed ten.

Where exactly were the improvements made from two years ago? In terms of gold medals, relays played a major role.

After three gold and six total medals in Kazan, they won seven of the eight in Budapest. Failing to final in the men’s 400 free and being 1.5 seconds outside of a medal in the women’s 400 medley just two years prior, they answered with golds medals in both, including an emphatic world record in the latter.

Individually, they went from a total of eleven medalists up to seventeen, but the biggest improvement came in terms of swimmers who won multiple individual medals.

Just four did so in 2015, led by Katie Ledecky‘s sweep of the 200 through 1500 freestyles, and Matt GreversKevin Cordes and Missy Franklin all chipped in with two apiece.

In Budapest that number increased to ten, with 23 of their 30 individual medals coming from that group. Ledecky once again led the charge with four, while Caeleb Dressel had three golds and Grevers led a group of eight with two.

In terms of the specific strokes, they saw the biggest improvement in freestyle, with the emergence of Simone ManuelLeah Smith and Dressel catapulting them from seven to twelve medals. Lilly King and Katie Meili led the charge for the breaststrokers as their total doubled to six, and the duo of Grevers and Ryan Murphy, along with Kathleen Baker and Jacob Pebley, improved the backstroke total by four medals up to seven.

Butterfly continues to be their weakest stroke in terms of medals (sounds weird, I know), going from just one in 2015 to two in 2017. However, Dressel’s gold in the men’s 100 was emphatic, and he’ll be a medal favorite in the sprints for a long time. Kelsi Worrell will also be a major player in the women’s sprint fly events for the foreseeable future, just getting things started with her bronze in the 100. The women’s 200 is still in a state of flux, as Hali Flickinger grows into the role previously assumed by Cammile Adams (who took silver in Kazan). The men’s 200 will work itself out soon enough, with many right on the cusp of medalling.

Chase Kalisz showed us the men’s IM events were in good hands despite the retirement of Michael Phelps and the absence of Ryan Lochte, while Madisyn Cox snagged a medal in the competitive women’s medley scene where Katinka Hosszu reigns supreme.

There are really two reasons why the U.S. team saw such a big turnaround from Kazan to Budapest. Number one, the qualification criteria.

The fact swimmers qualified for the 2015 World Championships in the summer of 2014 definitely played a role in their debacle, as it seemed to be a combination of not having the fastest available swimmers that year (many were faster at Nationals in San Antonio), and those competing perhaps being lulled into a bit of a false sense of security with no Trials meet to keep them on their toes. With the 2017 Trials taking place less than a month out from the Championships, all swimmers were forced to perform-or-die in Indianapolis in order to get to Budapest.

Another major reason is that it simply seems many of the swimmers on this 2017 team are just coming into their prime. The likes of Dressel, King, Manuel and Kalisz were all impressive last summer (heck, King and Manuel won individual golds), but really came into their own in Budapest and made some very big time improvements.

Though the qualification process will be the same for the 2019 Championships, don’t expect a repeat of Kazan. All swimmers and their coaches who qualify to swim in Gwangju next summer are well aware of what happened in 2015, and you’d expect they’ll be sure that they/their swimmers are ready when the time comes. Plus, this young, supremely talented core of the team doesn’t appear to be slowing down anytime soon. Full steam ahead to 2020.

In This Story

Leave a Reply

16 Comments on "Americans Show Incredible Improvement From Kazan To Budapest"

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted

Wait… so the qualification for the 2019 US Worlds team will take place in the summer of 2018?
I just puked all over the floor at the thought of this.

75M FREE – this has been the case for at least the last two quads!

Bummer! So much can change in 12 months, especially for a country that keeps looking for opportunities for the youth to rise to the occasion. Those rockstar teens are a year younger at the Trials…

lilaswimmer

do they explain why they do this? its so bizarre. do other countries do the same?

National Team Directors have explained this many times. #1- Avoiding the double taper a year out from the Olympics provides a bigger base for when Olympians do have to double taper for Trials/ Olympics. #2- Giving as many swimmers as possible international experience the 3rd year of the quad. Between Worlds, WUGs, and Pan Ams, lots of Americans get an international meet. Some Pan Am swimmers from 2015- Kelsi Worrell, Katie Meili, Olivia Smoliga, Jimmy Feigen, Allison Schmitt, Amanda Weir, Gunnar Bentz, etc. Resting for just one meet in 2015, even though it wasn’t Worlds, seemed to pay off with all of those swimmers who came back from Rio with medals. Seems to be working for the US, who prioritizes… Read more »
tolaforlife

Some of the swimmers you mentioned (Worrell and Smoliga at least) swam NCAA Championships in both 2015 and 2016. Would it be safe to assume they were tapered for those meets as well?

With that in mind, Manuel, Dressel, King, Baker, Worrell, Kalisz, etc. were all hugely successful in their 2nd double taper in two years plus swimming NCAA.

I am no expert, but it seems like swimmers with less international experience might benefit from experiencing a double taper in the year leading up to OT and the main event.

You will always find exceptions to everything. I would argue that the system in place better prepares American swimmers than any other country.

As for the swimmers you mentioned performing better at Worlds this year- Across the board, swimmers swam better at Worlds, not just the Americans. In some events, the gold medal time from last year would not have made the podium at Budapest. I personally think that has more to do with a better venue, better facilities (no sewage running down dormitory walls, food better than McDonalds, warm up pools that were not green, etc), and swimmers racing finals at 6:00 PM rather than 1:00 AM.

tolaforlife
I fully agree this was a better meet than at the Olympics, but that was not my point. Relative to their peers, the swimmers mentioned performed at an incredibly high level despite having had two years of double tapers in a row (plus NCAA both years for many of them). I don’t doubt that there are some swimmers who benefit from tapering only once, but why take away from those with the hot hand in the pre-Olympic year in order to cater for those few. Using Phelps as an example, he probably benefitted from only tapering once in 2015 but maybe he also benefitted from taking a year off from Worlds and swimming fast out of the spotlight. Let each… Read more »

Equally puke inducing is the fact that semis and finals sessions will likely be at 3 am !!!!

Greg Brance

So why no mention of the fact the 2015 Men’s team was deliberately handicapped by the exclusion of the GOAT because of his DUI?

He deserved to miss out on that team

He wasn’t on the 2017 team. Didn’t seem to hamper them then.

I understand the reasoning, but I think it is sad not to give young swimmers the chance to have a breakout year and qualify for Worlds, like Dakota Luther, Regan Smith, and Justin Ress did this year.

wpDiscuz

About James Sutherland

James Sutherland

James is currently a university swimmer for the Laurentian Voyageurs, where he is studying economics. Along with swimming, he also loves hockey. He's in his 11th season as a competitive swimmer.

Read More »