Courtesy: Dominique Hérailh
Looking at single-race performances, who were the most dominant Olympic champions in Paris? How do we answer this question objectively?
In breaking down which performances were most dominant, we’ve opted to use the World Aquatics Point Scoring system.
The two key determining factors in whether or not a performance was “dominant” are:
- A high score in FINA/World Aquatics points
- Large margin of victory over the runner-up
The scoring format: A swimmer’s total FINA points + the gap in points between them and the silver medalist.
Example: Katie Ledecky scored 962 FINA points in the women’s 800 free. The runner-up, Ariarne Titmus, scored 955. The total of the points retained is 962 + (962 – 955) =969
WOMEN’S RANKINGS
#5. Katie Ledecky, 1500 Freestyle – 1002
Swimmer | Time | FINA Points | Total Score | |
Winner | Katie Ledecky | 15:30.02 | 970 | 1002 |
Runner-up | Anastasiia Kirpichnikova | 15:40.35 | 938 | |
Gap: | 32 |
Although her time was 10 seconds slower than her world record, Katie Ledecky scored 970 points in the 1500 free, and earned an extra 32 after beating Anastasiia Kirpichnikova by another 10 seconds.
Number 4
4. Mollie O’Callaghan, 200 Freestyle – 1003
Swimmer | Time | FINA Points | Total Score | |
Winner | Mollie O’Callaghan | 1:53.27 | 989 | 1003 |
Runner-up | Ariarne Titmus | 1:53.81 | 975 | |
Gap: | 14 |
In a must-see battle between the world record holders in the 200 and 400 free, we saw a razor-thin finish between Mollie O’Callaghan and Ariarne Titmus, and although they were only separated by 14 points on the FINA table, O’Callaghan’s win still ranks so highly due to her 1:53.27 time scoring 989.
3. Kaylee McKeown, 100 backstroke – 1018
Swimmer | Time | FINA Points | Total Score | |
Winner | Kaylee McKeown | 57.33 | 1000 | 1018 |
Runner-up | Regan Smith | 57.66 | 982 | |
Gap: | 18 |
The world record holder and the reigning Olympic champion proved once again that she’s the best backstroker in the world. Kaylee McKeown’s time (57.33) matched the old world record she set in October 2023, hence the 1000 points awarded. Regan Smith finished 2nd, 33 one-hundredths back, with 982 points.
2. Sarah Sjostrom, 50 freestyle – 1019
Swimmer | Time | FINA Points | Total Score | |
Winner | Sarah Sjostrom | 23.71 | 987 | 1019 |
Runner-up | Meg Harris | 23.97 | 955 | |
Gap: | 32 |
With a time of 23.71, the 31-year-old Sarah Sjostrom was just one-tenth shy of her world record in the Olympic fianl. Leading from the early stages, she flew down the final 25 meters to open up a gap of 0.26 over Meg Harris.
1. Summer McIntosh, 400 IM – 1039
Swimmer | Time | FINA Points | Total Score | |
Winner | Summer McIntosh | 4:27.71 | 979 | 1039 |
Runner-up | Katie Grimes | 4:33.40 | 919 | |
Gap: | 60 |
Summer McIntosh doesn’t necessarily claim the #1 spot because of her time, which was three seconds behind her world record. It was the massive gap she had over runner-up Katie Grimes, who was nearly six seconds back.
In the following graph, we can see that McIntosh is the only one to be found in Quadrant 1 (High Performance + Large Gap).
Most of the other competitors are in Quadrant 4 (High Performance + small gap) with the exception of Ledecky (1500) and Sjostrom (50), who are at the edge of Quadrant 1.
See the full rankings below:
MEN’S RANKINGS
5. Leon Marchand, 200 breast – 1013
Swimmer | Time | FINA Points | Total Score | |
Winner | Leon Marchand | 2:05.85 | 991 | 1013 |
Runner-up | Zac Stubblety-Cook | 2:06.79 | 969 | |
Gap: | 22 |
An Olympic record and a lead of almost one second over Zac Stubblety-Cook allowed Leon Marchand‘s 200 breast performance to rank 5th with 1013 points.
4. Bobby Finke, 1500 free – 1014
Swimmer | Time | FINA Points | Total Score | |
Winner | Bobby Finke | 14:30.67 | 1001 | 1014 |
Runner-up | Gregorio Paltrinieri | 14:34.55 | 988 | |
Gap: | 13 |
A world record and leading the race from start to finish showed the dominance Bobby Finke had over the rest of the field in the men’s 1500 free.
3. Leon Marchand, 200 IM – 1030
Swimmer | Time | FINA Points | Total Score | |
Winner | Leon Marchand | 1:54.06 | 998 | 1030 |
Runner-up | Duncan Scott | 1:55.31 | 966 | |
Gap: | 32 |
Coming within six one-hundredths of a second of Ryan Lochte’s historic world record, Marchand set a new Olympic record and scored 998 points in the 200 IM. The 1.25 second gap with Duncan Scott gives him an extra 32 points.
2. Leon Marchand, 400 IM – 1060
Swimmer | Time | FINA Points | Total Score | |
Winner | Leon Marchand | 4:02.95 | 994 | 1060 |
Runner-up | Tomoyuki Matsushita | 4:08.62 | 928 | |
Gap: | 66 |
With the second-fastest performance of all-time, Marchand dominated the 400 IM from start to finish. Tomoyuki Matsushita was the runner-up, almost six seconds behind the leader for a gap of 66 points.
1. Pan Zhanle, 100 freestyle – 1099
Swimmer | Time | FINA Points | Total Score | |
Winner | Pan Zhanle | 46.4 | 1030 | 1099 |
Runner-up | Kyle Chalmers | 47.48 | 961 | |
Gap: | 69 |
In one of the most anticipated events of these Olympic Games, Pan’s race was a real feat. Not only did his time of 46.40 break the previous world record by 46 one-hundredths, but his dominance over the field was impressive.
He deserves, without a doubt, the top ranking.
The following graph highlights the two exceptional performances of Pan and Marchand, which are the only two to appear in Quadrant 1 (High performance + Large Gap). Compared to the women’s graph, there is a greater dispersion among men.
See the full rankings below:
On another note, Kaylee just withdrew from World Champs. Still doing world cups
Hmm, wonder why.
it’s pretty clear if you read her ig post
I guess not everyone has Instagram. Lol
And if I don’t waste my life on Instagram?
Then you are missing out on important swim news.
Theres a lot of room between “wasting your life on instagram” and “having an instagram” lol
Great article except the 200 free wasn’t a battle between the world record holders in the 200 and 400- Titmus has both records
For Pan to produce that performance in that event in that pool against that opposition on that stage under that scrutiny. It’s the swim of the century. 🦄
The same odds that Aurora Borealis will show up at this time of year at this time of day at this part of the country localized entirely within your kitchen.
May I see it?
No.
There’s a real elegance to this formula!
some standout past performances off the top of my head
2016 Olympics men’s 100 breast: Peaty had a total score of 1123
2016 Olympics women’s 800 free: Ledecky had a total score of 1085
2007 Worlds men’s 200 fly: Phelps had a score of 1127
1991 Euros women’s 200 back: Egerszegi had a score of 1158
Ledecky also has a 1084 from her 2016 400 free, Sjostrom has a couple of like 1065s from her best 50 free and 50 fly at Worlds, Egerszegi has a 1060 flat from 1996 Olympics
Where are you able to get the scores from past events?
just from doing the calculations, FINA score is (wr time/swim time)^3 * 1000 where the world record time is from the end of the previous year
Do Mary T Meagher in 200 fly at 1984 Olympics next!!
that one’s at a 1058 – huge margin of win, but the base score wasn’t as high because she already set the WR so fast in 1981
If she had never broken the WR before (so it stood 2:09.87 by Caulkins) and then swam that 2:06.90, it would’ve been a score of 1160
Nah, The two 400IMs are the winners in my book.
More evidence for Pan Zhanle’s 100 free being the swim of the year 🧐
How is anyone even questioning it? Amazing some people.
finke’s nationality explains it
Yes it’s funny for some the nationality can mean so much that they are blinded, I so wish Mckeown to be swimmer of the meet, but how do you compete with Summer.
Likewise, Timmus what a swimmer in the 400 free, but where will Summer be in 1 or 2 seasons, its’ scary, she’s only 17 years old. She could be WR holder in the 200IM, 400IM, 200FLy, 400Free & 800Free by next Olympics. Even the 200Free not beyond her.
Yes. Aren’t they just?
Why is McKeown’s former World Record used for FINA points in the 100 Back when Regan had already lowered it prior to the Olympic Games?
The base times for calculating FINA points are only updated at the end of each year.
And the article said she is the actual World Record holder instead of former record holder.