SwimSwam Pulse is a recurring feature tracking and analyzing the results of our periodic A3 Performance Polls. You can cast your vote in our newest poll on the SwimSwam homepage, about halfway down the page on the right side, or you can find the poll embedded at the bottom of this post.
Our most recent poll asked SwimSwam readers to pick the optimal order for freestyle relays:
RESULTS
Question: What is the optimal free relay order?
- Anchor – fastest swimmer last – 60.4%
- Shotgun – fastest swimmer first – 39.6%
Almost two-thirds of SwimSwam voters said it’s better to put your fastest swimmer last on a relay, with just under 40% preferring the ‘shotgun’ approach.
The question itself speaks quite a bit to differences at the various levels of swimming around the world. At the elite levels, the ‘shotgun’ approach is extremely common – arguably the most established gameplan. When the margins between elite and super-elite swimmers are tenths of a second, getting out to a lead and taking advantage of clean water for your later relay legs can make all the difference. That’s why we see mixed free relays swim a man-man-woman-woman order without exception at the world level. The strategy is also supported by memories of Caeleb Dressel leading off a 200 free relay for Florida, and the lead he built securing a win despite the rest of the relay being made up mostly of IMers, not true 50 freestylers.
But at the high school and club levels, the margins between the top swimmers and the average swimmer are expanded. Few of us who have swum or coached at the high school level don’t have a memory (painful or exuberant) of some blue-chip swimmer running down an opposing relay on the anchor leg. When the anchor leg can be a bigger mismatch, putting your best swimmer in position to do something special can be a very viable strategy.
And, of course, these decisions are almost never made in a vacuum. In a high school format, you may have to work around event combinations – a 500 freestyler going back-to-back with the 200 free relay might be better off going third or fourth on the relay to maximize recovery time. (Check out our new poll to weigh in on high school event doubles).
Sometimes, your best swimmer has an amazing flat start – and a mediocre relay start. Dressel has pretty consistently proven that his flat start is so otherworldly-good that his relay start really isn’t that much faster. In that case, it makes sense for him to lead off and give someone else the advantage of a flying relay exchange.
Other times, an individual swimmer just feeds on the energy of a relay anchor. Call it the “clutch” element, call it lazer focus, call it a great finishing ability – some swimmers are just plain good at getting their hand on the wall first. Simone Manuel is a good example of an elite-level swimmer who just feels natural in that anchor role.
And, of course, the decision is easier if you have two star sprinters and can either bookend your relay with top talents or double-down on the shotgun approach with two dominant legs right off the bat.
Below, vote in our new A3 Performance Poll, which asks voters to pick the toughest of four relatively-common back-to-back event pairings in the high school event schedule:
ABOUT A3 PERFORMANCE
The A3 Performance Poll is courtesy of A3 Performance, a SwimSwam partner
in 200 FR the swimmer with the best flat start should go first. whether that’s the fastest or slowest.
I think you should always do vide case by case. You definitely want a good confident and experienced swimmer as an anchor, but you should play to your strengths. Using dressel as the anchor on a 400fr relay is a bad choice to me since it would mean giving up the advantage you have in his start.
Fred bouquet did a really nice explanation (imo) about this on the Brett hawke podcast.
It depends on the relay, the longer it is the more you can afford to not lead off your best. Florida won the 200fr at NCAAs a couple years ago because Dressel got them out in front of the wash
Actually, who’s to say that Dressel isn’t a good anchor swimmer? He drops insane 100 fly splits during medley relays, and his flat starts during free relays haven’t been his best too (except for 2017 WC and 2018 NCAA) Maybe he just hasn’t had the chance to shine as an anchor yet?
It’s definitely dependent on the swimmer. Adrian consistently drops almost a second as an anchor swimmer, whereas you cannot put dressel anywhere but first
Manuel is really not the best example of a clutch anchor, given the history with Cate Campbell.
I mean, the obvious example is surely Lezak…
Sometimes you have a clutch swimmer who isnt the fastest but rises up when theres a close race. Put the fastest swimmer first, get some clean water.
I agree, but when it goes wrong, like Magnussen in London 2012….EEK!
Anyone else think Manuel isn’t a natural anchor and might be better leading off?
Totally, Campbell has been the gun 100m anchor in the past few years (WC and PPacs)- the way she mowed down Manuel with a huge deficit in the mixed relay at the last Worlds was incredible.
However, Manuel had a fantastic opening leg in the 4x200m….
I’m no statistician but I just did a comparison of flat starts vs flying starts (only finals) at some major meets between 2017-2019 in a spreadsheet if anyone’s interested:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vSlXEJlTnh8QBGPxM6iwlUYY9A94tpOfDvQTzka8xhVzQUcj2G7mXFtHoZEeYb06VYDz7_TXQAu46iQ/pubhtml