ITA Finds Bella Sims Had “No Fault Or Negligence” For Positive Drug Test After Investigation

U.S. Olympian Bella Sims, 19, accepted a “no fault or negligence” finding from the International Testing Agency (ITA) after testing positive for the banned substance Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) last fall, the agency reported on Monday, Mar. 31.

As the investigation returned a finding of “no fault or negligence”, the ITA did not impose any sanctions on Sims.

The ITA reported that a sample collected from Sims during an unannounced out-of-competition doping test on September 29, 2024, returned an adverse analytical finding for HCTZ. The drug is a diuretic that’s considered a specified substance under class S5 Diuretics and Masking Agents on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) Prohibited List.

While diuretics are commonly prescribed to treat hypertension and cardiovascular disorders, the United States National Institute of Health (NIH) states that they can cause rapid weight loss and act as a masking agent for other prohibited substances which is why they are banned in sports. 

The ITA stated “during the results management proceedings, the athlete was able to establish that the presence of HCTZ in her sample was caused by the intake of an anti-inflammatory prescription medication, which was confirmed to be contaminated with the banned diuretic. This permitted medication did not list HCTZ on its label…however, laboratory analyses subsequently conducted on the medication tablets confirmed the HCTZ contamination.” 

The Aquatics Integrity Unit (AQIU) noted in its statement on the decision that Sims declared the use of this medication on the doping control form during the unannounced drug test. 

The “no fault or negligence” decision means the athlete was able to establish they “did not know or suspect, and could not reasonably have known or suspected even with the exercise of utmost caution, that [they] had used or been administered the Prohibited Substance.” Unless the athlete proves mitigation factors, including “no fault or negligence” the default period of ineligibility for a case like this is two years. 

The sample wasn’t collected during the competition, so none of Sims’ results were disqualified.

Sims posted on her Instagram about the decision. 

“It was announced today by World Aquatics that I have been cleared of any wrongdoing after a full investigation determined I was not at fault for the presence of a banned substance called Hydrochlorothiazide detected in my urine sample collected on September 29, 2024. World Aquatics’ investigation found that the banned substance was in a contaminated medicine I was prescribed after being diagnosed with a torn labrum in my hip. Until this happened to me, I never understood that prescription medicine could be contaminated with substances not listed on the label. This has been a very stressful time for me, but I am grateful to my family, the University of Florida, and World Aquatics for supporting me and standing by me.” 

The NCAA is not a WADA signatory, so Sims was still eligible to compete at NCAA events during the 2024-25 season. Most recently, Sims competed at the 2025 Women’s NCAA Division I Championships, placing second in the 100 and 200 backstroke. Her 34 points were the most by a Gator swimmer at the meet, helping Florida to a 6th place overall finish. 

While the ITA and World Aquatics now consider the case closed, the parties with a right of appeal—for example, WADA or the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA)—may challenge the decision in the Court of Arbitration of Sport (CAS) if they choose. 

Sims is a Tokyo Olympian. As one of the youngest members of that U.S. roster, she won a silver medal as part of the women’s 4×200 freestyle relay team. She’s won two Worlds medals as part of that relay, including gold at the 2022 World Championships. In 2023, she won silver as part of the mixed 4×100 freestyle relay as well.

In This Story

155
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of


155 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Seth
2 days ago

I know the ISL is disbanded, but would this still disbar Sims from the ISL or any other organization that has a “one and done” policy?

Joel
2 days ago

I’m actually glad she doesn’t get punished but I’m still disenchanted with the inconsistencies with different athletes.
Are the American swimmers not meant to declare any medication BEFORE they start taking it? I think in Australia they have to declare it first.

Last edited 2 days ago by Joel
The unoriginal Tim
Reply to  Joel
2 days ago

It says she declared it on paperwork. Are you expecting people to tweet out every medication they are prescribed?

Joel
Reply to  The unoriginal Tim
2 days ago

No. I mean they have to send the paperwork ( which would be online now) in to the authorities. (Whoever that is)

Last edited 2 days ago by Joel
The unoriginal Tim
Reply to  Joel
2 days ago

Okay but why should somebody at a federation decide if it is okay for you to take a medicine a doctor is prescribing especially when you aren’t competing internationally (didn’t make the team).

Troyy
Reply to  Joel
2 days ago

Do you mean a TUE? She wasn’t prescribed a banned substance so no TUE is required. Non-banned medications still need to be declared but only on the doping control form when a sample is collected.

chickenlamp
Reply to  Joel
2 days ago

I don’t think it would have changed anything in this case. The medication she was prescribed is not prohibited, the problem was that it was contaminated with something that is. As far as I know USADA strongly encourages athletes to check the DRO database or confirm with WADA that a substance is ok to take before starting anything new, but they don’t have to fill out paperwork for it unless they need a TUE or are actively getting tested. But having to fill out a form every time someone takes a dose of ibuprofen seems unnecessary

Applesandoranges
Reply to  chickenlamp
1 day ago

Meds made in China?

The unoriginal Tim
2 days ago

Why is she even being tested?

aquajosh
2 days ago

It seems a pretty cut and dry case to me.

  1. She had a torn labrum and was taking a prescription anti-inflammatory that was not listed to contain any banned ingredients, including HCTZ.
  2. She listed the medication on her paperwork.
  3. She produced the medication that resulted in the positive test.
  4. The lot number of the medication she had was tested against the control of the lot at the manufacturer, and it was found the control lot at the manufacturing facility was tainted.

The athlete did not knowingly ingest any banned substance; the substance was not a typical component of the medication, and the medication was declared. No fault is on the athlete or the pharmacist… Read more »

GOATKeown
Reply to  aquajosh
2 days ago

Is that actually what happened? Is there a source for the decision that outlines the steps you say happened?

The reported ITA announcement certainly makes no mention of any of what you’re talking about

Last edited 2 days ago by GOATKeown
Thomas The Tank Engine
Reply to  GOATKeown
1 day ago

Aqua Josh is Florida #1 fan and defender

Wirotomo
2 days ago

I hope USADA challenge this decision, to show that they’re not just targeted non-US athletes.
Or WADA use this occasion to challenge this, and in the same time slam USADA for their silence.
And in the end this case goes to CAS, and we will get the detail.
I like that….

Greg Tucker
2 days ago

Tell me exactly how she contaminated the tablet? I’m a pharmacist. I’ll hang up and listen.

Masters swammer
Reply to  Greg Tucker
2 days ago

I suppose it’s a fundamental problem with the Internet, but I actually don’t know how to interpret your comment 🙃

Greg
Reply to  Masters swammer
2 days ago

Many are saying she contaminated the anti-inflammatory. How?

Craig
Reply to  Greg Tucker
2 days ago

Yup… how did she break into the manufacturing facility (as per aquajosh point 4 above) and contaminate the manufacturers control.

Connor
3 days ago

Isn’t the swimming community online so fun, opinionated and toxic ❤️😭😂

barelyaswammer
3 days ago

Triple quad mass spectrometer performance has gotten insanely good. I was wondering what the lowest reported LOD was for a published analytical method and found that it is typically 0.5-1 ng/mL in plasma these days. I wasn’t finding as many published ranges for urine, but would guess based on the plasma limits it’s fairly trivial to hit 5-10 ng/mL on modern instruments.

Funny enough, one of the first articles I encountered was about contamination of a urine sample from an over-the-counter NSAID pill: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27611956/. This appears to be a surprisingly common pharmaceutical contaminant. I am not an expert on sports doping and didn’t see anywhere what matrix was tested and what the reported level… Read more »

About Sophie Kaufman

Sophie Kaufman

Sophie grew up in Boston, Massachusetts, which means yes, she does root for the Bruins, but try not to hold that against her. At 9, she joined her local club team because her best friend convinced her it would be fun. Shoulder surgery ended her competitive swimming days long ago, …

Read More »