USA Swimming Updates Worlds Selection Criteria to Include Stroke 50s In Priority One

by Sean Griffin 26

May 22nd, 2025 National, News

The 2025 U.S. National Championships are almost here, set to kick off in Indianapolis, Indiana, from June 3 through June 7. This meet will serve as the official qualifier for the World Aquatics Championships, scheduled to take place in Singapore this summer, from July 26 to August 3.

USA Swimming recently updated its selection criteria for Worlds following the IOC’s announcement that 50-meter stroke events (backstroke, breaststroke, and butterfly) will be added to the Olympic program. As a result, these events are now given the same qualification priority as all other individual events. This means the top two finishers in each final who meet the World Aquatics ‘A’ standard will likely be selected for the World Championships team, barring any extreme roster cap issues. The team will allow for up to 26 men and 26 women to be named.

This marks a significant shift from the previous policy, where only the swimmer who touched first was eligible for selection in the 50m stroke events.

While USA Swimming has not issued a formal announcement about the change, the updated selection document—pictured below—shows that the original Priority 3, which included non-Olympic events such as the 50m stroke races, has been removed. The stroke 50s are now being factored in with Priorities 1 and 2, having been elevated from their previous status as Priority 3. As a result, the original Priority 3 has been eliminated entirely, with the former Priorities 4 and 5 now renumbered as Priorities 3 and 4, respectively.

Updated 2025 Worlds Team Selection Priority Order:

  • Priority 1: The four best finishing available swimmers based on finish order in the 100 and 200 freestyle and the best finishing available swimmer based on finish order from the finals in each individual Olympic event other than the 100 and 200 freestyle.
  • Priority 2: The second-best finishing available swimmer based on finish order in the finals of each individual Olympic event other than the 100 and 200 freestyle
  • Priority 3: The fifth-best finishing available swimmer based on finish order from the finals in the 100 and 200 freestyle.
  • Priority 4: The sixth-best finishing available swimmer based on finish order from the finals in the 100 and 200 freestyle.

If a Priority 1-qualified swimmer declines to swim the 100 or 200 freestyle at Worlds before the team is finalized on June 7—but remains on the roster through another event—USA Swimming will not add an additional relay swimmer for that event. Instead, the next individual roster spot will be offered to the next fastest swimmer in line. However, this rule does not apply if a swimmer is removed entirely from the team.

This particular section of the selection criteria was first introduced ahead of the 2024 Olympics in response to past inconsistencies. When Katie Ledecky withdrew from the 200 freestyle at the 2013 World Championships, 7th-place finisher Karlee Bispo was called up to fill the relay slot. However, in 2022, when Ledecky again dropped the 200 free, 7th-place finisher Erin Gemmell was not added. Then in 2023, Anna Peplowski was selected under similar circumstances. This mistake prompted USA Swimming to issue a public apology to Gemmell.

The World Championship women’s and men’s rosters are constructed separately, except nations are limited to a combined total of 12 relay-only swimmers. If, after all the priorities are applied, there are more than 12 relay-only swimmers, the involved swimmers will be ranked within priority “according to their percentage of ‘A’ Stanford for the event for which they qualify.” Then, the swimmers with the highest percentage will be added to the team until the maximum number of relay swimmers is reached or the roster is full, whichever comes first. Any relay-only swimmers named to the team must compete at some point during the meet, or the relay they were selected for may face disqualification.

USA Swimming notes under its Discretionary Selection section that “all swimmers who are selected to the team shall be eligible for selection to any and all relays at the Championships provided that relay-only swimmers achieve the ‘B’ time standard for the event within the relay in which they are selected to compete.” The organization also notes that the National Team Managing Direction will be responsible for relay selection “with the advice and consent of the Head Coaches.”

The selection procedures also lay out how the organization would proceed if the top two swimmers at an event at U.S. Nationals don’t both swim under the ‘A’ cut. If the fastest finisher in a U.S. Nationals final only “has a “B” Time Standard, and the available swimmer with the second fastest time from the Finals has an “A” Time Standard, the fastest available swimmer at the [U.S. Nationals] will be selected to the team and will swim that event at [Worlds]. Then, “the second-fastest available swimmer would not be selected to the team for that event…even if they achieve the “A” Time Standard.”

USA Swimming has also explained what happens if the second-place finisher in an individual event at U.S. Nationals has not swum an ‘A’ cut during the qualifying period. In that case, the next best finisher from that event will be added to the team—if they’ve hit the ‘A’ cut during the qualifying period. USA Swimming states “this process will repeat until an available swimmer who has an “A” standard is selected to the team, provided that swimmer finishes in the finals in the event.” If no such swimmer exists, “then USA Swimming will only select one available swimmer to the team in that event.”

In This Story

26
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

26 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hshsbaowqbqb
43 minutes ago

will this change the selection process for junior worlds as well?

Admin
Reply to  Hshsbaowqbqb
33 minutes ago

Updated World Juniors here: https://websitedevsa.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/national-junior-teamdocuments/selection/2025-world-aquatics-junior-swimming-championships-selection-procedures.pdf

No changes to procedure, they just swapped “non-Olympic” for “stroke 50s”. World Juniors already had stroke 50s in their procedures.

RealCrocker5040
3 hours ago

Michael Andrew is jumping for joy so much rn that it’s going to rupture the San Andreas fault again

Walsh-Madden-Grimes-Weinstein
Reply to  RealCrocker5040
3 hours ago

The men’s 50 meter breaststroke, here I come. It’s the only event Michael Andrew will qualify for the 2025 World Aquatics Championships.

Walsh-Madden-Grimes-Weinstein
Reply to  RealCrocker5040
2 hours ago

Watch out!

Michael and his father Peter might just fall in.

Walsh-Madden-Grimes-Weinstein
3 hours ago

Peter Andrew lobbying the IOC saves his son’s international career (M 50 BR).

WaterAce
3 hours ago

Don’t think it makes much of a difference since the 50ers are gonna be the 100ers anyways. No swimmer is ONLY gonna do the 50 aside from Dressel and Andrew, if they even make it

Wow
Reply to  WaterAce
3 hours ago

It does make a difference for some- Skyler Smith (30.4) in women’s 50 breast is one additional example, Quintin McCarty (24.4) in men’s 50 back is another. Both are significantly better in the 50

WaterAce
Reply to  Wow
2 hours ago

But most cases it makes no difference, Huske and Walsh are gonna do the 50/100 fly, Smith/Berkoff will do the 50/100 back, etc

Walsh-Madden-Grimes-Weinstein
Reply to  Wow
2 hours ago

The female contingent of USA Swimming won’t have an issue with the roster limit:

Huske, T. – 100 FR, 50 FL, 100 FL
Walsh, G. – 100 FR, 50 FL, 100 FL
Weinstein, C. – 200 FR, 400 FR
Ledecky, K. – 200 FR, 400 FR, 800 FR, 1500 FR
Smith, R. – 50 BK, 100 BK, 200 BK, 200 FL
Berkoff, K. – 50 BK, 100 BK
King, L. – 50 BR, 100 BR
Douglass, K. – 100 FR, 200 BR, 200 IM
Walsh, A. – 200 BR, 200 IM

As a reminder, the top four in the 100 FR, 200 FR is deemed as Priority 1:

100 FR – K.… Read more »

owen
Reply to  WaterAce
3 hours ago

there are definitely some swimmers that have way better chances in 50s than 100s. justin ress, skyler smith come to mind. with so few roster spots it could definitely make a difference

swimslow
3 hours ago

Michael Andrew’s 2nd best day of his life

This Guy
Reply to  swimslow
2 hours ago

He probably makes the 50 breast but that might be it

Swimmer.thingz
Reply to  This Guy
46 minutes ago

And 50fly

Snowstorm
3 hours ago

Relay only swimmers have to swim, right?

Rafael
Reply to  Snowstorm
3 hours ago

Yes, since 2021 I think already

Truth
4 hours ago

So maybe they don’t take alternates which doesn’t bother me but I know I am in the minority on this issue!

Walsh-Madden-Grimes-Weinstein
4 hours ago

The male contingent of USA Swimming might not end up with any relay only swimmers (Priority 3 & 4).

Last edited 4 hours ago by Walsh-Madden-Grimes-Weinstein
Kevin
Reply to  Walsh-Madden-Grimes-Weinstein
1 hour ago

I’ve been trying to think about that and considering they’ve had to bump swimmers before adding 3 new priority 1 slots just ups the chances and by quit a bit.

Work was rough so my brain is fried so let’s walk through this. If there are no doubles at all meaning unique winners of each individual event and the 2nd -4th place finishers in the 100 or 200 don’t win an event or place 2nd – 4th in the other event they did qualify in you’d already have a roster of 23 (17 individual events + 6 more from the 100 and 200).

Doubles used to be you needed 6 to get all priority 2 swimmers. Before stroke 50’s you… Read more »

Last edited 1 hour ago by Kevin
Walsh-Madden-Grimes-Weinstein
Reply to  Kevin
50 minutes ago

The male contingent of USA Swimming was already at the roster limit upon conclusion of the 2024 USA Swimming Olympic Team Trials and that’s with Ryan Murphy doubling in backstroke (M 100 BK, M 200 BK), Caeleb Dressel doubling in the freestyle, butterfly (M 50 FR, M 100 FL).