NCAA Men’s Diving Preview: How Zone Scores Project To Impact The Team Race

2024 MEN’S NCAA SWIMMING AND DIVING CHAMPIONSHIPS

The Men’s NCAA Championships kick off on Wednesday in Indianapolis, and the question that always comes up pre-meet will try to be determined in this article: How will diving impact the team race?

When we score out the psych sheets, we know things aren’t going to go exactly as projected for a myriad of factors, with things such as taper, nerves, event schedules and everything else playing into how swimmers perform on the big stage.

In diving, there’s a different set of variables at play, as the NCAA qualifiers competed at five different Zone meets earlier this month, meaning there were five different sets of judges. Therefore, comparing scores across multiple meets is far from being an exact, definitive ranking, but it does give us some indication of who the favorites are heading into NCAAs.

Below, find the top 16 scores in each of the three men’s diving events across the five Zone meets (using finals results only), and how they would stack up against one another in an NCAA scoring format.

MEN’S 1-METER

Rank Diver Zone Score Points
1 Dylan Reed, Pitt A 774.95 20
2 Nicholas Harris, Texas D 768.75 17
3 Jack Ryan, Stanford E 765.50 16
4 Victor Povzner, Texas A&M D 757.30 15
5 Carson Tyler, Indiana C 756.35 14
6 Noah Duperre, Texas D 755.80 13
7 Yutong Wang, Minnesota D 734.10 12
8 Shangfei Wang, USC E 733.45 11
9 Daniel Knapp, Notre Dame C 733.10 9
10 Clayton Chaplin, Ohio State C 729.25 7
11 Lyle Yost, Ohio State C 727.05 6
12 Aidan Wang, Princeton A 726.30 5
13 Cameron Cash, Pitt A 713.65 4
14 Takuto Endo, Texas A&M D 710.70 3
15 Quinn Henninger, Indiana C 710.50 2
16 Collier Dyer, Mizzou D 705.30 1

MEN’S 3-METER

Rank Diver Zone Score Points
1 Carson Tyler, Indiana C 910.65 20
2 Jack Ryan, Stanford E 878.20 17
3 Quinn Henninger, Indiana C 869.35 16
4 Holden Higbie, Purdue C 839.20 15
5 Carson Paul, LSU D 813.90 14
6 Clayton Chaplin, Ohio State C 811.05 13
7 Yutong Wang, Minnesota D 808.10 12
8 Tanner Braunton, Texas D 806.00 11
9 Max Fowler, Georgia Tech B 805.80 9
10 Mohamed Farouk, Miami (FL) B 803.90 7
11 Noah Duperre, Texas D 802.35 6
12 Nicholas Harris, Texas D 791.35 5
13 Cameron Cash, Pitt A 781.30 4
14 Manuel Borowski, Texas D 780.50 3
15 Dylan Reed, Pitt A 776.70 2
16 Sebastian Otero, IUPUI C 774.25 1

MEN’S PLATFORM

Rank Diver Zone Score Points
1 Carson Tyler, Indiana C 854.55 20
2 Bryden Hattie, Tennessee B 852.40 17
3 Maxwell Weinrich, Indiana C 801.30 16
4 Mohamed Farouk, Miami (FL) B 779.45 15
5 Laurent Gosselin-Paradis, USC E 779.25 14
6 Geoffrey Vavitsas, Cal E 775.10 13
7 Andrew Bennett, Minnesota D 771.50 12
8 Rhett Hensley, Texas A&M D 767.00 11
9 Holden Higbie, Purdue C 738.00 9
10 Mario Del Valle Jr, CBU E 733.05 7
11 Anton Svirskyi, Florida B 731.90 6
12 Alec Hubbard, TCU D 728.25 5
13 Nicholas Stone, Tennessee B 725.60 4
14 George Callanan, Princeton A 717.15 3
15 Robert Gref, USC E 709.30 2
16 Jesco Helling, FSU B 707.05 1

Looking back at last year’s projections and how things ultimately panned out, the Zone scores did a fairly decent job in determining where the points would come from in the diving events, though far from the accuracy we see from psych sheet points in swimming due to the various factors at play in diving.

Indiana junior Carson Tyler, the defending NCAA champion on platform, was the top Zone scorer in both the 3-meter and platform events, while his Hoosier teammates Quinn Henninger and Maxwell Weinrich are also positioned to score big. Henninger was 3rd on both 3-meter and platform last season.

Stanford’s Jack Ryan was another top Zone scorer with some pedigree behind his name, having placed 3rd on 1-meter in 2023, while Pitt fifth-year Dylan Reed leads the 1-meter standings.

Reed was 16th in the 1-meter event last season, but notably saw a stark improvement at the Zone A Championships from 2023 (628.80) to 2024 (774.95) in the event.

In the team Zone scores below, Indiana leads by a wide margin with 88 points, while Texas is a clear 2nd and Minnesota, Stanford and Pitt all project to crack 30.

SCORING THE ZONE RESULTS – TEAM STANDINGS

Rank Team 1M 3M PLATFORM TOTAL
1 Indiana 16 36 36 88
2 Texas 30 25 0 55
3 Minnesota 12 12 12 36
4 Stanford 16 17 0 33
5 Pitt 24 6 0 30
6 Texas A&M 18 0 11 29
7 USC 11 0 16 27
8 Ohio State 13 13 0 26
9 Purdue 0 15 9 24
10 Miami (FL) 0 7 15 22
11 Tennessee 0 0 21 21
12 LSU 0 14 0 14
13 Cal 0 0 13 13
14 Notre Dame 9 0 0 9
14 Georgia Tech 0 9 0 9
16 Princeton 5 0 3 8
17 CBU 0 0 7 7
18 Florida 0 0 6 6
19 TCU 0 0 5 5
20 Mizzou 1 0 0 1
20 IUPUI 0 1 0 1
20 FSU 0 0 1 1

If we add in the projected diving scores with the psych sheet scores from the swimming events, here are the key takeaways:

  • Two teams moved up two places inside the top 10: Indiana and Stanford. The Hoosiers jumped up from 6th into 4th, while the Cardinal moved from 9th to 7th.
  • Texas’ diving used to propel into the title conversation. This season, it boosts them from 11th on the swimming psych sheets into the top 10, sitting 8th thanks to 55 projected diving points.
  • Texas A&M, Ohio State and USC all move up three spots in the mid-tier range, with the Aggies now 14th, the Buckeyes 16th and the Trojans 19th.
  • As the third-highest projected diving scoring team, Minnesota jumps four spots into 20th.
  • Pitt and Purdue both go from having no psych sheet points to cracking the top 25 thanks to diving, while Miami (FL) and LSU sit 27th and 28th, respectively, solely due to their projected points from the boards.

PROJECTED SCORES: PSYCH SHEETS + ZONE RESULTS

Rank School Total Individual Relays Diving
1 Arizona St 538 345.5 192 0
2 Florida 449 267 176 6
3 California 311 158 140 13
4 Indiana 281.5 97.5 96 88
5 NC State 275 135 140 0
6 Tennessee 245.5 102.5 122 21
7 Stanford 198.5 89.5 76 33
8 Texas 187.5 82.5 50 55
9 Virginia Tech 176 78 98 0
10 Georgia 173 115 58 0
11 Notre Dame 151 66 76 9
12 Auburn 116.5 48.5 68 0
13 Michigan 103 49 54 0
14 Texas A&M 87 54 4 29
15 Virginia 78.5 36.5 42 0
16 Ohio St 73 37 10 26
17 Alabama 67.5 31.5 36 0
18 Louisville 62 28 34 0
19 USC 55 28 0 27
20 Minnesota 53 17 0 36
21 Wisconsin 51 25 26 0
22 Penn St 36 24 12 0
23 FSU 31 16 14 1
24 Pitt 30 0 0 30
25 Purdue 24 0 0 24
25 Arizona 24 0 24 0
27 Miami (FL) 22 0 0 22
28 LSU 18 2 2 14
29 Brigham Young 17 17 0 0
29 Penn 17 17 0 0
31 Georgia Tech 16 7 0 9
32 SMU 15 15 0 0
33 Mizzou 11 10 0 1
34 Princeton 8 0 0 8
35 CBU 7 0 0 7
36 Brown 6 6 0 0
36 Kentucky 6 6 0 0
38 TCU 5 0 0 5
39 Towson 2.5 2.5 0 0
40 Utah 1 1 0 0
40 IUPUI 1 0 0 1

13
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

13 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JeahBrah
1 month ago

Texas’s top 2 platform divers shut it down in the Zones final and switched to easy dives garnering lower scores. Tanner Braunton has a good shot to A final at NCAAs, and Duperre B finaled last year

Erik
Reply to  JeahBrah
1 month ago

Wild.. TIL that divers will shut it down/coast like a swimmer into finals.

IU Swammer
Reply to  Erik
1 month ago

Yep, divers often put their highest DD dives in the last two slots. If they’re running away with it, it’s relatively easy for them to slot in a lower DD dive.

Jimbo
Reply to  JeahBrah
1 month ago

Also Carson Paul cut his DD in half for finals. Battle of Carsons for tower title most likely

Supafly23
1 month ago

Is there any possible way to get those IU pants (other than being on the team)?

Nevermind. Found them. $120

Last edited 1 month ago by Supafly23
IU Swammer
Reply to  Supafly23
1 month ago

Yep. You can buy them from the Hoosier team store.

MarshFAN
1 month ago

Very revealing article – If the readers want diving to GO AWAY vote DOWN, if the readers want diving to STAY vote UP.

Jimbo
Reply to  MarshFAN
1 month ago

So, show me on the stuffed cal bear, where did the diver hurt you?

KingDevil
Reply to  MarshFAN
1 month ago

We should also add in points from Water Polo and Synchronized Swimming while we are at it. Those sports have as much to do with competitive swimming as Diving does.

Wethorn
Reply to  KingDevil
1 month ago

Do we have to debate this every year? It is what it is, and every coach knows the rules and can allocate scholarships however they want to maximize.

So you think Indiana and Texas would have better swim teams if they allocated diving scholarships to swimming?

I for one enjoy diving.

IU Swammer
Reply to  MarshFAN
1 month ago

I’m curious how many diving NCAA Championships titles IU, Texas, Miami, and Purdue would have if they were separated. Not quite curious enough to go back and figure it out for myself, but I’m hopeful that someone is.

Andrew
1 month ago

Diving should count as half points. Divers count as half a person for crying out loud

Swim Alchemist
Reply to  Andrew
1 month ago

Eh, if they swim on a relay, they’re a full person. Since they have no “team” diving event, I think it’s fine.

About James Sutherland

James Sutherland

James swam five years at Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ontario, specializing in the 200 free, back and IM. He finished up his collegiate swimming career in 2018, graduating with a bachelor's degree in economics. In 2019 he completed his graduate degree in sports journalism. Prior to going to Laurentian, James swam …

Read More »