Crooks, Liendo Climb The All-Time 50 Free Rankings, 19.0 Needed to A-Final at SECs

Braden Keith
by Braden Keith 22

February 15th, 2023 College, News, SEC

2023 SEC SWIMMING & DIVING CHAMPIONSHIPS

There was an eruption of speed at the 2023 SEC Swimming Championships on Wednesday morning in College Station.

Tennessee sophomore Jordan Crooks swam 18.25 to qualify first and climb to 2nd-place in the all-time rankings, while Florida freshman Josh Liendo took away Crooks’ title as the fastest frosh in history with an 18.35.

What’s more, there are three Florida Gators in the top four seeds, and it took 19.0-or-better to qualify for the A-Final at a conference championship meet.

Jordan Crooks #2 in History

After a breakout year as a freshman last season, that blossomed into a World Championship this season, Tennessee sophomore Jordan Crooks is on a tear this week.

On Tuesday evening, he became the first swimmer to ever split sub-19 seconds in the 50 fly on a 200 medley relay split (18.90). On Wednesday morning, he swam 18.25 in prelims, which breaks a tie with Cal’s Bjron Seeliger as the #2 performer in the history of the event.

All-Time Performers, Men’s 50 SCY Freestyle

  1. Caeleb Dressel, University of Florida – 17.63
  2. Jordan Crooks, University of Tennessee – 18.25
  3. Bjorn Seeliger, Cal – 18.27
  4. Ryan Hoffer, Cal – 18.33
  5. Josh Liendo,University of Florida – 18.35
  6. Cesar Cielo, Auburn – 18.47
  7. Matt Target, Auburn – 18.52
  8. (TIE) Brooks Curry, LSU/Ryan Held, NC State – 18.56
  9. (TIE) Matthew Brownstead, Virginia/Drew Kibler, Texas – 18.60

Crooks’ previous best was an 18.27 done mid-season on a 200 free relay leadoff leg at the Tennessee Invite in November. Before this season, his best was an 18.53 from last year’s SEC Championship meet.

To date, there hasn’t been anybody who looked poised to challenge Caeleb Dressel’s 17.63 record, but Crooks is getting closer-and-closer to opening up that conversation, especially if Tennessee head coach Matt Kredich’s early-season statement that the Volunteers are focused on NCAAs is true.

Dressel’s best time as a sophomore, for reference, was an 18.67 at the NCAA Championship meet.

Fastest Freshman Time

Speaking of Crooks’ time from last year, it was previously the fastest-ever time by an NCAA freshman (though he was a bit older than the average NCAA freshman – not by a lot).

Now, Josh Liendo of Florida has taken that torch.

All-Time Fastest NCAA Freshmen: 50-Yard Freestyle

  1. Josh Liendo, Florida, 2023 – 18.35 (20 years old)
  2. Jordan Crooks, Tennessee, 2022 – 18.53
  3. Caeleb Dressel, Florida, 2015 – 18.67
  4. Bjorn Seeliger, Cal, 2021 – 18.27 (21 years old)
  5. David Curtiss, NC State, 2022 – 18.74
  6. Adam Chaney, Florida, 2021 – 18.76
  7. Jimmy Feigen, Texas, 2009 – 18.84

Liendo is 20-years old, which like Crooks makes him slightly older than a traditional freshman. In fact, he’s only 3 months younger than the sophomore Crooks. But for the Canadian, it is his first year in collegiate swimming, so the swim does technically qualify for this list.

He came to Florida already with big credentials – in 2022, he was the World Championship bronze medalist in the 100 free and 100 fly.

Florida Continues to Push the 50 Free Forward

The University of Florida, renowned for its distance group and mega-volume tradition, has an incredible depth of success in the 50 yard free. That was highlighted on Wednesday with a 2-3-4 prelims finish from Liendo (18.35), Macguire McDuff (18.99), and Adam Chaney (19.04).

McDuff jumping under the 19 second barrier gives the Gators seven men who have been under 19.00 all-time in the event. That’s second only to Auburn, who have eight from the late-oughts, including the first man to ever do it, Fred Bousquet.

Colleges with the most Sub-19 Second 50 Freestylers

  • Auburn – 8 (Cielo, Targett, Brown, Bousquet, Apple, Andjkaer, Chierighini, Louw)
  • Florida – 7 (Dressel, Chaney, Liendo, deBorde, Friese, Will Davis, McDuff)
  • Texas – 6 (Kibler, Auchinachie, Schooling, Jackson, Feigen, Ringgold)
  • NC State – 6 (Held, Korstanje, Curtiss, Bilis, Henderson, Ress)
  • Cal – 5 (Seeliger, Hoffer, Sendy, Adrian, Stubbleifled)

Hat tip to tea rex for the research on these lists.

19.0 to Final….In a Conference Meet?

Even the famous Anders Holmvik line “I said 20-point and he didn’t even flinch” is starting to feel outdated. There is a growing list of swimmers who have been under 19 seconds in the 50 free, and it took 19.00 to qualify for the A-final of these SEC Championships.

Dillown Dowling was 8th in heats in 19.09, before it jumped to Alberto Mestre at 19.21 for 9th.

Seven men were sub-19 in the 50 free at mid-season meets, a new record. It took 18.94 to make the A-final in the 50 free at NCAAs last year.

This is part “the SEC sprinters are loaded this year,” and part “the 50 free is getting faster” – 19.09 would have finished 14th in prelims at NCAAs last year.

The times in the 50 free in the SEC have meandered lower over the last few years, but this year’s drop is a paradigm shift. The 19.43 that earned a spot in the A final last year would have tied for 14th this year.

SEC 19.0-or-better
SEC 8th place prelims time
2023 8 19.09
2022 2 19.43
2021 3 19.47
2020 0 19.45
2019 1 19.49
2018 0 19.73 No Dressel
2017 2 19.59
2016 1 19.65
2015 2 19.69

In This Story

22
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

22 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Octavio Gupta
1 year ago

Technically this is incorrect, 19.20 was needed to make A finals. 9th seed is 19.21.

Octavio Gupta
Reply to  Braden Keith
1 year ago

It depends on how you look at it. The 8th seed didn’t NEED to go 19.09 to make the A final, because anything faster than the 9th seed time (19.21) by the 8th seeded swimmer would in fact be fast enough to make the A final. The way its worded implies it wouldn’t.

Last edited 1 year ago by Octavio Gupta
Jfhhfd
Reply to  Octavio Gupta
1 year ago

L take

Octavio Gupta
Reply to  Jfhhfd
1 year ago

Okay cool. The fact is the 9th fastest time was 19.21 and as a result you NEEDED to be 19.20 or faster to make the A final. It’s simple logic. Not sure how else to explain it.

swimapologist
Reply to  Octavio Gupta
1 year ago

Imagine being Ocatvio Gupta and thinking you’re winning this debate.

Pro tip: even if you really believe you’re right, you’ve lost this debate. Because by the standard of pure logic, both answers are right, but by you trying so hard to make this a thing, you are, ultimately, wrong. Sorry bro.

Octavio Gupta
Reply to  swimapologist
1 year ago

There’s really only one correct answer. There were 8 swimmers faster than 19.21. However much faster than 19.21 is irrelevant. Period. 19.20 was the established threshold to finish better than 9th.

Again, keyword: they NEEDED to be faster than 19.21 to make top 8.

But to say you had to be 19.09 to make top 8 is a fallacy and here’s why: it incorrectly assumes there are more swims to come. There aren’t. Everyone has already completed racing the 50 free.

You could say 19.0 rounded off the top 8, no arguments there.

Octavian Gibberish
Reply to  Octavio Gupta
1 year ago

OMG dude… You said above that it depends how you look at it, which is fine, if you want to get into semantics…

But if you’re gonna push for ONE CORRECT ANSWER, then you should probably forget about that 9th seed. The 9th guy lost to the 8th guy, so to enter the final you have to be at least as fast as #8.

There were 8 swimmers faster than 19.10, so to enter the final you had to go 19.0.

Togger
1 year ago

Crazy how fast short course has got compared to long course in recent times.

For years Tom Jäger’s 19.05 seemed more untouchable than his 21.81 but now 19.05 is nowhere near as competitive as 21.81, despite a much smaller group swimming yards than long course.

Makes you wonder if there’ll be a time when we look at 17.63 as a time you need to qualify for the final at SECs.

A Casual Observer
1 year ago

Woooowwwwww

Andrew
1 year ago

Casuals forget how good those old auburn squads were…

VFL
1 year ago

Swimming is so nuts right now…

Grant Drukker
1 year ago

Never heard of Andjkaer before in the swimming history.

Mike
1 year ago

As a sophomore, Dressel went 18.2. I think that 18.67 was from his first year.

Crooks looks to be on the right trajectory

jeff
Reply to  Mike
1 year ago

Dressel was 18.23 twice at the same age that Crooks (and Liendo) is now, so they’re both basically on the same trajectory. But Dressel also went 18.20, 18.23, and 18.24 when he was a year younger than either of them are now

Last edited 1 year ago by jeff
green
1 year ago

Even the famous Anders Holmvik line “I said 20-point and he didn’t even flinch” is starting to feel outdated. 

Nah, it’s just on Kate, Maggie, and Gretchen now

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder/co-owner of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »