What Does Team USA’s International Future Look Like Based On Their Fastest 2025 Times?

by Sean Griffin 23

September 01st, 2025 National, News

U.S. swim fans have been on edge over the past month following the World Championships, questioning the future of Team USA heading into a home Olympics in about three years’ time.

Commenter “ArtVanDeLegh” was one of several commenters over the past few weeks to raise the question: How well would Team USA have performed in Singapore had they been able to replicate their times from Nationals?

Does this information mean anything in the grand scheme of the meet? Absolutely not. But it can provide some outlook into the future as to how things could look over the next few years. This assumes setting aside the illness as well as the double taper issues the team has experienced at the past three major international meets—something Team USA historically excelled at prior to 2022.

This same analysis can be run for any country, as teams such as Great Britain, Australia, and Canada experienced some level of sickness in Singapore. But we’re focusing specifically on the Team USA angle, though we may run through the scenarios for some of these other countries in the coming months.

This is all hypothetical. It’s essentially impossible for every swimmer to replicate their best swims from Trials to Worlds. But given their capabilities, it does provide hard facts as to where Team USA stands at their best, especially given the widespread criticism of the team, specifically the men.

When running the data, the women’s team could have won two additional individual gold medals (50 & 100 free) and a total of seven extra medals. On the men’s side, where most of the fan criticism lies, they would have won only three additional individual medals (400 IM, 200 fly, & 200 back), none of which were gold.

The relays are where the USA team heading into Los Angeles has the best opportunity to target topping the medal table. Their season bests on paper should have easily won them three extra relay gold medals (women’s 4×100 free, men’s 4×100 free, & men’s 4×200 free), with the latter two on track to set new world records.

The biggest problem stems not only from sickness or double taper issues, but from the depth of the Americans in these events that requires them to go “all-in” on a taper for Trials.

Australia has faced this same challenge with their women over previous seasons for both the 4×100 and 4×200. They had to go all-in at their Trials but then handled the transition to major international meets very well. It’s an issue that is very manageable for the Americans over the next few years, especially with an experienced coach like Greg Meehan now at the helm of the U.S. National Team.

Taking into account both individual and relays on paper, the Americans could have walked away with four additional golds and 11 total medals. Things never go perfectly, and if there had been no sickness or any other issues, it’s almost impossible that this outcome would have unfolded anyway, but people have been asking for the data as a point of analysis over the next three years.

See the raw data below.

Women

  • 200 Butterfly
  • 50 Backstroke
    • 1. Katharine Berkoff (United States) — 27.08
      • She went an even faster 26.97 to win U.S. Nationals
    • 2. Regan Smith (United States) — 27.25
      • She went an even faster 27.20 for runner-up at U.S. Nationals
    • 3. Wan Letian (China) — 27.30
  • 100 Backstroke
  • 200 Backstroke
  • 50 Breaststroke
  • 100 Breaststroke
  • 200 Breaststroke
  • 200 IM
  • 400 IM
  • 4×100 Freestyle Relay
    • 1. Australia — 3:30.60
      • Fastest U.S. times in 2025 add up to 3:29.33
    • 2. United States — 3:31.04
    • 3. Netherlands — 3:33.89
  • 4×200 Freestyle Relay
    • 1. Australia — 7:39.35
    • 2. United States — 7:40.01
      • Fastest U.S. times in 2025 (-1.5) add up to 7:39.61
    • 3. China — 7:42.99
  • 4×100 Medley Relay
    • 1. United States — 3:49.34
      • Fastest U.S. times in 2025 (-1.5) add up to 3:48.15 WR
    • 2. Australia — 3:52.67
    • 3. China — 3:54.77

Men

In This Story

23
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

23 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Avast
9 months ago

The lack of American men across fly, back, and breast is startling

not in my hot tub
Reply to  Avast
9 months ago

400, 800, 1500 free as well

Bobthebuilderrocks
Reply to  not in my hot tub
9 months ago

800 and 1500, yeah. Can’t say 400. Maurer- 3:43.3 and Mijatovic 3:45 and are at the younger side of things

Molly
9 months ago

I appreciate that you have a lot of disclaimers at the beginning of the article, but…perhaps it would be more informative looking to 2028 if you used every athlete’a best times this year, not just for the US? I know there’s the swim data section of the website but it’s not limited to the top 2 per country to simulate a world meet.

not in my hot tub
9 months ago

I just want to see two US swimmers final in the 400, 800, 1500 free that would be a good start…

Swimmingly Dory
Reply to  not in my hot tub
9 months ago

You mean “two US *male* swimmers”

Sherry Smit
9 months ago

Got the 4×200 free relay for women has so much potential. I wish they could have Weinstein, Gemmell, Sims, and Ledecky all peak at the right time. Gemmell and Sims go 1:54.2-1:54.7, Weinstein a 1:54.6, and Ledecky 1:53.6, that’s a world title right there

Troyy
Reply to  Sherry Smit
9 months ago

Would’ve been enough for a world title this year but might not be enough at next worlds if Titmus returns to anywhere near her best.

Swimmingly Dory
Reply to  Sherry Smit
9 months ago

“I wish they could have Weinstein, Gemmell, Sims, and Ledecky all peak at the right time”

It’s meaningless if Pallister + Titmus + MOC + Perkins peak at the right time.

jpm49
Reply to  Sherry Smit
9 months ago

Very soon Rylee Erisman will swim under 1:54, certainly for the 2028 Olympics.

FST
9 months ago

That’s always assuming that whoever got the medals instead wouldn’t have had an answer and gone even faster.

Admin
Reply to  FST
9 months ago

For sure. There’s endless hypotheticals. This is just one specific one that people asked about, so we obliged.

The intention is to try and sniff out the roots of USA Swimming’s performance problem (especially on the men’s side). If it turns out that their best times from Trials would make a significant medals impact at Worlds, then maybe the issues is either with 1) timing of Trials or 2) those final preparations for Trials.

jess
9 months ago

Women’s 4x 200 feels a little misleading because if you just throw gemmel or huske’s flat start pb in there, that relay would have been 7:38

GOATKeown
Reply to  jess
9 months ago

That’s still slower than Australia’s would be if you use the same formula

Swimmingly Dory
Reply to  jess
9 months ago

That’s still slower than Australia add up.

Khachaturian
9 months ago

i think the mens relay side is honestly was has stirred up the most disappointment in the comments. Two add ups for a wr time only to get bronze and off the podium blindsided quite a few people.

Walsh-Madden-Grimes-Weinstein
Reply to  Khachaturian
9 months ago

Taking account the medal tally, the boys at the 2025 World Aquatics Junior Swimming Championships were even worse than the men at the 2025 World Aquatics Championships:

Boys: 0 G, 0 S, 4 B
Men: 1 G, 3 S, 4 B

K g
9 months ago

Edit: Never mind, irrelevant for future meets

Last edited 9 months ago by K g