2021 Big Ten Women: Northwestern & Indiana Set To Duke It Out For 3rd Place

2021 BIG TEN WOMEN’S CHAMPIONSHIPS

  • When: Tuesday, February 23rd to Saturday, February 27th | Prelims 11am | Finals 6:30pm (5pm Tuesday) CT
  • Where: Minneapolis, MN (Central Time Zone) / Diving @ Purdue University
  • Defending Champion: Ohio State (1x) (results)
  • Live Results
  • Streaming: Big Ten Network
  • Championship Central

For those unfamiliar with swimming terminology, the concept of “Ups” and “Downs” is a good way to track which teams performed best at prelims. In prelims, swimmers qualify for one of three finals heats: the top 8 finishers make the A final, places 9 through 16 the B final and places 17 through 24 the C final. In finals, swimmers are locked into their respective final, meaning a swimmer in the B heat (spots 9-16) can only place as high as 9th or as low as 16th, even if they put up the fastest or slowest time of any heat in the final.

With that in mind, we’ll be tracking “Ups,” “Mids” and “Downs” after each prelims session. “Up” refers to swimmers in the A final, “Mid” to swimmers in the B final and “Down” to swimmers in the C final.

CURRENT SCORES

  1. Ohio State, 1139.5
  2. Michigan, 940.5
  3. Indiana, 705
  4. Northwestern, 694.5
  5. Wisconsin, 511
  6. Minnesota, 427
  7. Nebraska, 382
  8. Iowa, 354.5
  9. Penn State/Purdue, 309
  10. Michigan State, 181
  11. Illinois, 145
  12. Rutgers, 60

The Ohio State Buckeyes are hours away from defending their Big Ten team title here in Minnesota. Tonight, the Buckeyes will have 17 scoring swims, earning 6 up and 7 up swims from this morning. The Buckeyes are projected to earn roughly 80 points in both the 200 back and 200 breast. Senior Kristen Romano already won the 200/400 IM, a sweep worth 64 points, and is seeded second in the 200 back. Sophomore Hannah Bach, more known for her sprint side, qualified 8th into the 100 breast A-final. Last year, Bach’s C-final win earned 11 points for the Buckeyes. Just placing 8th tonight would be worth 22 points, double from what she earned last year. Meanwhile in the 100 free, Ohio State could earn 103.5 points with the help of their 3 A-finalists, led by #3 seed Taylor Petrak. The Ohio State Buckeyes also have two swimmers seeded in B-final scoring position (11-20 points) in the 1650 free.

Northwestern had another big morning, racking in 6 up swims and 1 mid swim. In the 1650 free seeds, Lola Mull is the #3 seed along with #6 seed Ilektra Lebl, which is a potential 51 points. The Wildcats are looking to pick up 88 points in the 200 breast as well as 83 points in the mile, projecting to hit 245 points across all individual pool events tonight. The Wildcats will also have 2020 runner-up Emma Lepisova in the 200 back A-final and on-fire senior Maddie Smith plus Selen Ozbilen in the 100 free championship final.

Indiana turned on the right gears this morning to fend off Northwestern for 3rd place, earning 5 up swims and 4 mid swims this morning. In the 200 breast, the Hoosiers went 1-2-3 in prelims thanks to Emily WeissNoelle Peplowski, and Mac Looze. Looze’s swim was her first time under 2:10 to tie for second this morning. If achieved in finals, that sweep is worth 87 points. In the 200 back, Bailey Kovac sliced 2 seconds off her lifetime best to place 6th into the A-final. If she stayed near her previous best, that would have only managed a B-final spot.

While picking up 4 up swims this morning, Michigan will project to earn 213 points. In the 1650 free seeds, senior Sierra Schmidt is the top seed, along with sophomore teammate Kaitlynn Sims seeded in 8th. The Wolverines will also have two A-finalists each in the 200 back and 100 free. The Wolverines could finish 1-2 in the 100 free with top two seeds Daria Pyshnenko and Big Ten record-holder Maggie MacNeil. Again, no Michigan Wolverines will score in the 200 breast.

Wisconsin will have freshman stand-out Phoebe Bacon contest as the 200 back top seed, aiming to sweep the backstrokes. Meanwhile, Minnesota freshman Indy Jongman qualified 8th into the back final after scratching the 100 free.

DAY 5 UPS/MIDS/DOWNS

Credit to Andrew Mering for running the numbers.

All 100 Free 200 Back 200 Breast
1650 Free (seed)
Ohio State 6/9/2 3/2/0 1/3/1 2/2/0 0/2/1
Northwestern 8/3/0 2/0/0 1/0/0 3/1/0 2/2/0
Indiana 5/5/3 1/2/1 1/1/0 3/1/1 0/1/1
Michigan 6/2/4 2/0/1 2/2/3 0/0/0 2/0/0
Wisconsin 3/7/2 0/2/1 2/1/1 0/2/0 1/2/0
Minnesota 1/1/6 0/1/2 1/0/0 0/0/3 0/0/1
Penn State 0/4/3 0/1/1 0/1/0 0/1/0 0/1/2
Nebraska 1/2/4 0/1/1 0/0/1 0/1/0 1/0/2
Purdue 1/0/4 0/0/0 0/0/1 0/0/2 1/0/1
Iowa 1/0/2 0/0/0 0/0/1 0/0/1 1/0/0
Michigan State 0/0/1 0/0/0 0/0/0 0/0/1 0/0/0

DAY 5 SCORING BREAKDOWN

Ohio State Indiana Northwestern Michigan Wisconsin Minnesota Penn State Nebraska Purdue Iowa Michigan State
100 Free 103.5 55 49 66 33 20.5 17 18 0 0 0
200 Back 78 36 25 93 87 22 13 5 1 2 0
200 Breast 81.5 108.5 88 0 30 9 11 12 16 4 2
1650 Free (seed) 26 20 83 54 59 2 23 35 32 28 0

SCORED PRELIMS (Including 1650 FR seeds)

  1. Ohio State, 289
  2. Northwestern, 245
  3. Indiana, 219.5
  4. Michigan, 213
  5. Wisconsin, 209
  6. Nebraska, 70
  7. Penn State, 64
  8. Minnesota, 53.5
  9. Purdue, 49
  10. Iowa, 34
  11. Michigan State, 2
  12. Illinois/Rutgers, 0

On paper, Ohio State is projected to be in team title-winning position by over 300 points. While Michigan picked up the 4th-most morning points, they are still projected to comfortably take second place in the team standings. If things go as planned, Northwestern could set themselves up to jump Indiana for 3rd place by 15 points, before 1-meter diving and the 400 free relay. Penn State could also break their tie from Purdue for 9th place while Michigan State remains ahead of Illinois for 11th.

CURRENT SCORES + SCORED PRELIMS/1650 FR Seeds

*before 1-meter diving and 400 free relay

  1. Ohio State, 1428.5
  2. Michigan, 1153.5
  3. Northwestern, 939.5
  4. Indiana, 924.5
  5. Wisconsin, 720
  6. Minnesota, 480.5
  7. Nebraska, 452
  8. Iowa, 388.5
  9. Penn State, 373
  10. Purdue, 358
  11. Michigan State, 183
  12. Illinois, 145
  13. Rutgers, 60

In This Story

19
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Swimmer
6 months ago

Lets go Cats!!!

Guerra
Reply to  Swimmer
6 months ago

This will be fun! Go IU! But I hope both squads have a great meet tonight!

Coach Joho (the lawyer)
6 months ago

Indiana has better divers…Unfortunately without Sheridan Calypso it will be tough for the Cats this year to claim 3rd place. It’s a pity that Miriam Guevara got DQ for her “poor effort” in the 100 back final. It’s absurd in my opinion because what if she swam a life time best and right after added 10+ seconds in the 200 fly because of exhaustion? Would she be DQ also?
Good Luck to the Cats!!

H20PoloFan2
6 months ago

Good luck to all and nice to see more depth in BIG. Guevara DQ is BS like all the non NCSt DQs at ACCs. That hurt 20 points and IU 200 Medley 52 points gone in 1st race for Backstroke toes. Judges try their best and are volunteers but maybe pre meet conferences with team coaches and captains about points of emphasis so all know what they are getting into. Co frats to all for making it thru worst training year with Covid rules. Better years ahead!

SAMUEL HUNTINGTON
Reply to  H20PoloFan2
6 months ago

I agree with all the DQs I’ve seen this week. Guevara obviously sandbagged and should be penalized. The ISL you actually lose points and nobody seemed upset with that. And the multiple dolphin kicks needs to get under control.

yaboi
6 months ago

Looks like Coach Katie Robinson has handled the transition to head coach beautifully! Nothing but success, team records, and moving up in the Big Ten.

Guerra
Reply to  yaboi
6 months ago

I watched her grow up as an age group and high school swimmer in Indiana. It couldn’t happen to a classier, nicer and more genuine and exceptional person. The sport is so lucky that she chose coaching as a profession!

yaboi
6 months ago

I’m also surprised at the DQ on Northwestern last night, partially because I’ve seen many swimmers do the exact same strategy to maximize points in the past. Also, if you’re going to DQ people for not giving enough effort, what about when someone cruises prelims to save up for finals and place better? It just doesn’t seem like a rule that can be enforced fairly or uniformly across competitions.

Admin
Reply to  yaboi
6 months ago

Swimmers have obviously sandbagged races before.

But 10 seconds in a 100 in an A final? I can’t think of many times I’ve seen that.

We found one other example of this being called. Check in tomorrow morning to read about it…

swimswamswum
Reply to  Braden Keith
6 months ago

As someone who has pulled tough doubles in conference meets, I’m not really mad about the DQ. I get the strategy behind the choice but did she save that much energy between going a 1:02 versus a 55/56? I would guess, no. If I was the 9th/17th/25th place swimmer I would be frustrated to watch this. There’s a clear visual difference between someone sandbagging and someone who is hurting in a race.

Ferb
Reply to  swimswamswum
6 months ago

I don’t buy the argument that it’s unfair to the 9th/17th/25th place swimmer (you didn’t exactly say unfair, but other people have). She legitimately earned the spot in the A-final, and they didn’t. Everyone knows that for swimmers on the bubble, prelims are sometimes more important than finals, and making the A-final, or B-final or whatever is sometimes more important than how they swim in said final.

swimswamswum
Reply to  Ferb
6 months ago

Never said it was unfair for 9th/17th/25th! Just said it was frustrating, especially when it’s in the rule book. At the end of the day I’m not sure if there’s a “right” answer here, clearly a grey area – just a swim fan like you sharing my thoughts anonymously.

Binky
Reply to  swimswamswum
6 months ago

Then 9/17/25 should have swam faster in prelims. Prelims is for times, finals is for places.

Admin
Reply to  Binky
6 months ago

You keep saying this over and over again, but the difference is your “prelims is for times, finals is for places” rule is not in the rule book, but the “honest effort” rule is in the rule book.

Also…the other 7 swimmers in the final all swam better times in the final than in the prelims. So that doesn’t really jive with your idea that swimmers are going after times in prelims but not in finals.

Stewie
Reply to  Braden Keith
6 months ago

If the team scores matters to the team (which in most cases it does), then a fast swim in prelims gets you into position to score max points at night. Once in finals, what matters is relative place compared to other teams. YMMV. Honest effort? That’s subjective. She had two finals, so she put in an “honest effort”. She didn’t do corkscrew…

Reply to  Stewie
6 months ago

Stewie/Binky – please adhere to SwimSwam commenting rules and stick to one username in a thread. Thanks!

Ferb
6 months ago

My first instinct was that Guevara’s DQ was unreasonable, but the problem is she acted like it was a big joke, which was pushing the bounds of sportsmanship a little too far. If she had cruised a 58, and kept a low profile about it, I don’t think she would have been DQ’d. She probably didn’t even know there was a rule — I didn’t — and it’s unfortunate for her and the team that she had to be the example everyone will learn from.

Dark Horse
Reply to  Ferb
6 months ago

It’s the water splashing and laughing for me.

A!ana
6 months ago

Penn State SHOULD be better
Sad to see this program not reaching their potential

About Nick Pecoraro

Nick Pecoraro

Nick Pecoraro started swimming at age 11, instantly becoming drawn to the sport. He was a breaststroker and IMer when competing. After joining SwimSwam, the site has become an outlet for him to research and learn about competitive swimming and experience the sport through a new lenses. He graduated in …

Read More »