Cal Men Lead Swimulator Rankings

With mid season invites in the bag, pretty much every team in the country has had a meet that they’ve taken seriously. This means that we can finally start to get some useful information by comparing team’s times so far. The easiest way to do this is with our Swimulator. The Swimulator takes everyone’s top times so far this season and scores out a national meet respecting individual event limits and reasonable event choices (swimmers can’t do two events in a row). No diving is included.

For the men, this puts Cal on top over Texas by a score of 517.5 to 442.5. Despite the advantage to Cal, this is actually a good result for Texas. At this point last year, Cal had a 112.5 point advantage over Texas. Cal went on to outscore Texas at nationals by 69.5 points in the swimming events at nationals, but Texas won the meet with on the back of their 81 diving points. None of Texas’s divers graduated. This year Cal are ahead by only 75 points. Both teams have significantly more points in the Swimulator rankings than they did at this point last year.

Cal project to 188 relay points, they have a top 2 ranking in every relay and the top ranking in 3 relays. Texas project to 154 relay points. They have a top 3 time in 4 of the 5 relays including a #1 ranking in the 800 free relay. Their main failing is the 200 medley relay where they currently rank 10th.

Cal have 13 individual swimmers projected to score, including 6 swimmers with 25 or more points. Texas have 16 swimmers ranked in scoring range with 5 projected to score 25 or more.

Texas and Cal’s improved totals may be a bad sign for Indiana and NC State, last year’s 3rd and 4th place teams. Indiana are only 34.5 points ahead of where they were at this point last year (this year: 189, last year: 154.5) when they went on to score 324 swimming points at nationals. Cal are 45 points ahead of last year, Texas are 82.5 points better.

NC State are behind their pace from last year at this point (this year: 265, last year 304). The gap to the top teams is still closeable, especially for Indiana with their diving strength, but the hill NC State and Indiana need to climb is bigger than last year.

One team that jumps off the page is Missouri at #7. Missouri are unranked in our current power rankings, so 7th is impressive. Last year at this point they had 104 points in the Swimulator rankings and ended up with only 29 at nationals, so some drop off again this year wouldn’t come as a big surprise. Still, with 185 points they have a significant head start on where they were last year.

The most dramatic drop off came from Arizona State who sit at only 72 points vs the 150 they had at this point last year. ASU lost some talent to transfers and their top returning swimmer Cameron Craig has yet to race this season.

If you are interested to see the full event by event projections check out the full Swimulator page here. The event projections are below the points. Just scroll down. Below the event projections are individual swimmer point totals sorted by team.

I’ll be doing write ups on the women’s rankings and some of the conference rankings in the coming days, but if you want to see those rankings before those articles are written, feel free to run the simulation you are interested in yourself.

One final thought: this type of ranking isn’t intended as an exact prediction of what will happen at the end of the season. It’s intended as a starting point when thinking about what will happen at the end of the year. This is a baseline. If your expectation is that a team will do better or worse, look at their swimmers current rankings and think about which swimmers are likely to move up or down between now and the end of the season.

Swimulator Projected Points

Swimulator projections do not include diving

Team Swimulator Points Swimulator Points At this Point Last Season Swimming Points at Nationals Last Year Diving Points at Nationals Last Year
1 California 517.5 472.5 437.5 0
2 Texas 442.5 360 368 81
3 NC State 265 304 385 0
4 Michigan 242 220 168.5 0
5 Stanford 190 223.5 205 0
6 Indiana 189 154.5 324 98
7 Missouri 185 104 29 0
8 Texas A&M 144 113 34 41
9 Tennessee 138 131.5 67 56
10 Arizona 136 96 64 0
11 Southern Cali 135.5 154 240 13
12 Alabama 135 190.5 95 0
13 Florida 128.5 177 347 0
14 Georgia Tech 113 21 0 0
15 Georgia 79 65 129 0
16 Arizona St 72 150 45 0
17 Florida St 67 52 42 0
18 Notre Dame 61 25 26 3
19 Grand Canyon 57 73 7 0
20 Utah 54 28 10 0
21 Louisville 50 61.5 156 0
22 Harvard 32 15 58 0
23 Virginia 23 9 19 0
24 Minnesota 21 18.5 53 14
25 Brigham Young 15 0 0 0
26 Missouri St. (M) 14 17.5 0 0
26 UCSB 14 21 0 0
26 Denver 14 78 31 0
29 Pittsburgh 9 0 0 0
30 Kentucky 8 22 0 0
31 Duke 4 0 0 9
31 East Carolina 4 0 0 0
33 Hawaii 3 0 6 0
34 West Virginia 2 0 2.5 0
34 Wisconsin 2 0 0 0

Leave a Reply

Notify of
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
2 Cents
2 years ago

hmm… interesting. Obviously not a pure indicator of NCAAs, but fun and might be the best we can do at this point of the year. With that said, you know who I don’t see?? unc, auburn, Penn state, usc-e, Virgina Tech, clemson or maryland (yes those last 2 were a joke). Some of those have to be surprising, right? Sergio’s team not there, but old one is… Comfort’s team probably where they belong, Auburn national champs in the last decade, and usc-e after Bernardino moves on is not listed either….. Penn state might make sense since Shane Ryan finally graduated… or did he?

Coach MM
2 years ago

No Auburn?

Reply to  Coach MM
2 years ago

It’s crazy to see, but the cupboard was pretty bare after Apple and Gonzalez left with the new staff incoming. Taylor vs. DeSorbo comparisons seem really obvious to make, but I think Taylor is going to need a little more time to restock.

Reply to  Braden Keith
2 years ago

Once Sergio left you could see the end coming.

Reply to  swimlife
2 years ago

Not sure what you are implicating? The cupboard was left bare. I don’t know if it would be any different if Sergio was still there?!?

Reply to  Braden Keith
2 years ago

Definitely restocking for the next year or two but he’s already got a great jump on the recruiting with some fast distance to middle distance guys. Not the sprint school it use to be, obvious why Apple wanted a change.

i love steak
Reply to  Braden Keith
2 years ago

Pretty sure Auburn beat ECU by a very large margin at the Georgia Tech Invite, not even rested very much

Reply to  i love steak
2 years ago

If Auburn is going to start using ‘beating East Carolina’ as their measuring stick, that kind of proves the point, doesn’t it?

2 years ago

If Indiana is +35 from last year and if they carried that over and added that to last year they would win. How does their diving look? Cal vs Texas is about what I expected…’s diving that will decide it unless Cal’s second tier of swimmers go nuts and start sneaking into A finals. ASU really seems down but I thought ARizona had a pretty good meet.

Reply to  Taa
2 years ago

Great information and article! The biggest difference between CAL and Texas at this point is that Texas’ top returning performers are FAR under what they will score at NC’s while Cal’s top performers are swimming relatively MUCH faster. For example Seliskar has 60 projected points while Haas, Shebat and Katz have a combined projection of 52 points! Anyone out there think that’s close to their scoring potential at NCs? Also, Texas swam relays with at least 1 swimmer missing from each relay who is significantly faster. And Krueger (big relay contributor and potential scorer) is not in the mix due to missing the texas invite. I predict Texas will win all 5 relays.

Reply to  Longhorn
2 years ago

Good luck winning the 4×100 medley with with your flyer nearly 2 seconds slower than every other A finalist flyer. Good luck winning the 4×50 when Cal has two 18 second flat swimmers and two 19 low swimmers, Also NC state LOL. Typical Texas fan out of his mind.

The Ready Room
Reply to  jmanswimfan
2 years ago

Not a Texas fan in particular, but for the sake of discussion, I think Tate will split 44 at NC’s. Texas also has Tate, Townley, Kibler, and Krueger for the 2FRR. Cal might still have the edge, but Texas has very reasonable chances in those relays, and it will surely be competitive and a lot of fun to watch.

Reply to  The Ready Room
2 years ago

Shebat split an 18.7 in the 2 free relay last year. Texas has choices there.

Reply to  jmanswimfan
2 years ago

Are you confused? What flyer are you referring to? Tate’s best time right now is 45.78. Lol

Reply to  Longhorn
2 years ago

Texas did even come close to winning any relays last year, didn’t even final in one relay. Winning one would be a huge turnaround after last year’s disaster. Divers will again save the day.