USA Swimming Publishes Guidelines for Virtual Meets

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the aquatic community, USA Swimming is pushing a different model of competition for events sanctioned by the governing body for swimming in the United States – USA Swimming Virtual Meets.

The idea is not new, and was used for years under the guise of “postal meets,” but with the need to socially distance and limit the size of crowds, these meets are coming back into focus. Postal meets are still held in some places, including for some US Masters Swimming National Championship events, but are not as common as they once were.

Virtual meets allow club teams to swim locally, but to compete against other teams within their own Local Swimming Committee (LSC).

The guidelines also include instructions for how to set up virtual meets in the Meet Manager software that is used to run most swim meets in the United States.

Although these meets will be held “virtually,” they must meet some requirements.

While these meets can extend through various sessions, they must all be held as a single event. Different swim teams can partake in the meet while essentially swimming as intrasquad meets with results being combined to score meets, similar to the old postal meet system (though, more commonly now this won’t be done through the actual postal service).

USA Swimming has suggested that a host team be determined, with responsibilities extending from developing meet announcements, establishing an order of events, or merging the results from different intrasquad or smaller site meets for scoring purposes.

The new project would also allow for different LSCs to virtually swim against each other. A team would still host the event and be responsible for duties such as results management.

We reported that after it extended its moratorium on sanctioned events through April 30 last month, USA Swimming is now saying it will not sanction any events until at least May 31 and revoke any existing sanctions through that date in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.

While USA Swimming has limited powers to forbid meets from happening, they can refuse to approve, sanction, or accept the times from such meets.

The new trial, if proven to be successful, could change the landscape of both high school and collegiate swimming for this forthcoming 2020-2021 season.

According to the website worldometers.info, the United States stands first in the world in terms of total cases associated with COVID-19 as they have reported a total of 987,100 infections and 55,412 deaths. Another 118,779 have reportedly recovered from the virus.

15
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Irish Ringer
4 months ago

Good to see them attempting to move forward.

Coach Chris
4 months ago

One of the biggest issues in any meet situation is the amount of people in close proximity on the deck and/or in the facility. While you can reduce the need for timers by having the swimmer in the next heat time, has there been any discussion as to reducing the number of officials required for the meet to be recognized as having “official” times?

digitaltim
Reply to  Coach Chris
9 days ago

The minimum number of official positions for a meet is four (4) which can be filled by three (3) people if the starter rotates from starting to stroke & turn. I do not advocate hosting a meet with that little coverage, but it can be done and still considered legit according to current rules.

Last edited 9 days ago by digitaltim
digitaltim
Reply to  digitaltim
9 days ago

PS – I meant wet-side officials.

Momthatcooks
4 months ago

I dont have any answers but going forward with these virtual swim meets will be very unfair as some smaller teams facilities are just not optimal for racing. Sure some facilities are state of the art – great blocks…deep… “fast pools”. Some are 6 lane tiny no window dungeons. Some teams won’t have a shot in any real cuts. 😞

GA Boy
Reply to  Momthatcooks
4 months ago

Racing is racing, I’d swim in a wave pool just to get back in the water and compete again.

SwimFan49
Reply to  Momthatcooks
4 months ago

Not fair!? Well, I guess you could just not swim at all and then you still wouldn’t have to worry about any real cuts.

Alex Doerwaldt
Reply to  SwimFan49
3 months ago

I agree that pools can be faster than others due to size and available funding, but I think that the sport has taken a more communal turn while we are all apart from each other, so cuts don’t really stand out during the pandemic as much as the actual competition:)