NCAA Endorses Transformation Committee Reforms, Denies Postseason Waiver Requests

by Riley Overend 7

July 02nd, 2022 College, News

On Friday, the NCAA Division I Board of Directors endorsed in concept a general set of reforms recommended from the Division I Transformation Committee regarding transfers, enforcement, and student-athlete benefits. 

Proposed changes include creating a window of time to enter the transfer portal while remaining eligible for the following year, updating the infractions process based on “modernized” rules, and giving schools broader discretion as to how they financially support college athletes in academics, housing, and entertainment. 

The vague recommendations would require “additional accountability” for schools that receive transfer athletes, with the intention of stabilizing the transfer environment. On the enforcement front, they follow the NCAA’s recent trend of taking a step back by aiming to minimize impact on college athletes who were not directly involved in any rule-breaking. The full language of the proposed changes can be found here

The Transformation Committee has been working for about six months to overhaul NCAA policy and governance structure. It plans to do away with decades-old rules around cost containment and legislating competitive equity in the wake of antitrust legal concerns raised by the Supreme Court’s Alston ruling last summer. A few days ago, Sports Illustrated reported that committee leaders are also considering removing scholarship limitations that exist for many non-revenue sports.

The Board of Directors asked the Division I Council for feedback at its meeting this month ahead of their final vote in August.

“The board looks forward to hearing the Council’s position on the concepts,” said board chair Jere Morehead, president at the University of Georgia. “The board is committed to acting quickly to address the challenges in college sports, and we look forward to receiving additional Transformation Committee recommendations this fall.”

Also on Friday, the board reviewed and denied waiver requests for postseason access from schools transitioning from Division II to Division I. Current rules prohibit transitioning schools from competing at NCAA Championships until the four-year transition period is complete. The board and the Council agreed that “the timing of these requests is not appropriate given the ongoing review of membership requirements by the Transformation Committee.”

A-Sun commissioner Ted Gumbart sent an email to Transformation Committee co-chair and SEC commissioner Greg Sankey expressing his disappointment with the decision. 

“Based on the action — or rather, non-action — … this week related to the waiver requests submitted by Bellarmine and others to receive access to NCAA championship … I intend to work very hard on a public campaign to raise awareness of what I find to be a horrible rule,” Gumbart wrote. “I will be barking as loud as possible from every platform possible to encourage our NCAA Board of Directors to be bold enough to change a bad and discriminatory rule. … I intend to challenge every conference to take a public stance on the issue and defend it.”

Bellarmine men’s basketball captain Juston Betz echoed the sentiment in a letter to “NCAA leadership,” reflecting on his team’s exclusion after winning the A-Sun tournament.

“(Selection) Sunday was miserable,” Betz wrote. “It crushed us… That feeling was one that I never want another student-athlete to feel again.”

7
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

7 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
A parent of a swimmer
1 month ago

I feel at some point for programs that are making the transition from D2 to D1 there needs to be some parameters regarding post season access to NCAA’s-but a FOUR YEAR transition period really impacts the freshman class of swimmers that come in and never have an opportunity to swim at the NCAA championships-I can see one or two years but four seems punitive-there needs to be some equity in relation to swimmers and opportunity and access-

Swimpop
1 month ago

Yes, agree about the scholarships.

My question, and apologize, but what possible reason could there be to exclude a team moving up to the highest level of competition? They might be too good for D1? Some kind of hazing? WTH?

#AthleteLivesMatter
Reply to  Swimpop
1 month ago

I agree that when a team moves up a division they should not have to sit out. I can understand why they would want a team to sit out if they move down a division.

#AthleteLivesMatter

Big boy big 10
Reply to  Swimpop
1 month ago

They want to make sure schools could survive without TV money. That’s what really limits the 4 year rule.

Admin
Reply to  Swimpop
1 month ago

Different academic eligibility standards in different divisions, different scholarship counts, and as a general dissuasion from “Division hopping.”

JoOj
1 month ago

Removing scholarship limitations would likely result in some major problems for swimming programs, particularly on the men’s side.

Swim3057
Reply to  JoOj
1 month ago

One item not noted above but part of the Transformation Committee recommendations is the abolition of coaching staff limits. It would be up to institutions to determine staff sizes. It further separate those truly committed to the sport with others and could prompt some difficult institutional decisions.

About Riley Overend

Riley is an associate editor interested in the stories taking place outside of the pool just as much as the drama between the lane lines. A 2019 graduate of Boston College, he arrived at SwimSwam in April of 2022 after three years as a sports reporter and sports editor at newspapers …

Read More »