British Trials Post-Mortem: How They Killed Their Own Momentum

Coming into 2016, Britain was the hottest country in world swimming. They won an impressive nine medals at the 2015 World Championships in Kazan and were buoyed by a strong mix of older and younger swimmers. While there were a few standout swims from this past weeks British trials, the results overall were a near disaster. The realistic medal chances for Britain based on this trials meet come down to two swimmers: Adam Peaty and James Guy. Of those two, Peaty is a one event swimmer at the Olympics, and Guy will likely face much harsher competition than he did last summer.

Fading Chances

The rest of the Kazan medalists look weak. Jazmin Carlin, who won bronze in the 800 free, swam nearly ten seconds slower in that event this past weekend. Only a last ditch effort in the 400 free saved her qualification, but she will need to swim significantly faster to medal in Rio.

Meanwhile, Siobhan Marie O’Connor looked like a swimmer with plenty of upside and Olympic experience from 2012 to help calm her nerves. But the swims from this past weekend were full of tension. She was a second slower than she needed to take bronze in Kazan. Although that time ranks her second in the world, chances are O’Connor will need to reverse the trend if she wants to medal in Rio.

Even the World Champion men’s 4×200 relay took a hit. Daniel Wallace, who started that relay, was way off the entire competition, struggling from the first day’s 400 freestyle. He will not return for Rio. Robbie Renwick, despite putting everything into his 200 free effort, managed just 1:47.23 after a 1:45.9 split in Kazan. With the 4th place team from Kazan just 2.5 seconds back, there is no room for slippage from the Brits in this race.

Failed Potential

Although Russia has consistently dominated at the European Junior level, Britain has had some good Juniors through as well. Last summer’s European Games in Baku looked especially promising, with a total of 23 medals won through the competition. Simply put, those good Junior results did not progress as they should have in 2016.

The most glaring example is Luke Greenbank, who set a World Junior Record in the 200 backstroke in Baku (1:56.82). With the qualifying time set at 1:55.13 (and the 2% standard at 1:55.9) Greenbank needed to improve significantly to make the Olympic team. Instead, Greenbank went in the opposite direction and won in 1:57.79.

Abbie Wood was another gold medalist from Baku that back slid and was well outside of Rio contention. After going 4:41.9 last summer, she managed just 4:43 in the final at British Trials.

Paradoxically, Duncan Scott, who won both the 200 and 100 freestyle in Baku and improved massively in the last nine months, needs to be subjectively selected onto the 4×200 freestyle relay in order to swim in Rio.

Standards Too High

While so much of the talk in this Olympic season has been on tough national standards for Rio, Britain stands out. Whereas France was somewhat defensible in where they set their Rio marks, Britain may have seriously overestimated. In many events, the automatic Rio standard was so far from reach that it became demoralizing for the athletes.

When a swimmer like Chloe Tutton breaks the national record by 1.5 seconds in the 200 breaststroke, while recording a time that would have won silver in Kazan, and still has to sweat out a subjective selection, something is wrong. While many of the problems in British swimming several Olympiads ago can be attributed to poor standards, the pendulum has swung too far in the other direction.

Not Over Yet

One of the few advantages of setting your Trials competition in April versus late June like the United States is that you have time to adjust. If the leadership of British swimming, most importantly Olympic Head Coach Bill Furniss, can make the right adjustments between now and Rio they can still be successful. There is little point at the moment in lingering on what went wrong this past week, and Britain still has a once in a generation talent like Guy to build their Olympic hopes around.

In This Story

27
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of
27 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Swimmer A
5 years ago

It’s like every country wanted to one-up each other’s qualifying standards. Whatever… France, England, Japan, and Canada all got a big reality dose these past few weeks. They’ll have to learn what works for them. Luckily the US have the good ol’fashion capitalism approach to olympic trials.

Mcgillbeb
Reply to  Swimmer A
5 years ago

France England and Japan all got reality checks however canadians only had to go the fina A time which is very reasonable. California alone has twice as many competitors than Canada so of course americans will have more people posting faster times

ASwimCoach
Reply to  Mcgillbeb
5 years ago

Canada’s problem isn’t lack of populace size. Swimming Canada push & funding has been directed at age group swimmers. Simple look at past history shows that Olympic podium swimmers tend to be older. It’s lousy optics. Too many talented swimmers burn out and quit before reaching full potential.

Scottishswimmer
Reply to  Swimmer A
5 years ago

Excuse me but it is not just England, the Gb team consists of scottish and Welsh athletes too! The trails were held in Scotland!

Tim Wheyster
5 years ago

There are other factors in play for one or two of the main squads failing last week, and you’d be foolish to write off some of the medal winners from last year, but your summary is in the main accurate.

A case of pushing too hard, creating a really negative atmosphere and shooting oneself in both feet !

Swim Fan
Reply to  Tim Wheyster
5 years ago

How much of the current selection strategies (I almost said insanity) is being influenced by the funding agencies that swimming in each country must depend on?

The task at The Olympics is finishing first – the gold medal isn’t awarded on the basis of making a standard – it’s a race and the winner wins.

The countries listed in the article have all sought to “motivate” their athletes with additional selection requirements… the approach has largely failed over the years in Canada, so of course we tried it again. Swimming administrators and National Head Coaches might want to think about the current situation when they consider the best ways to “raise the bar” for their athletes.

Perhaps the… Read more »

Raymond likestosplash
Reply to  Swim Fan
5 years ago

Fell asleep reading that, what’s your point..?

Eric Lahmy
Reply to  Raymond likestosplash
5 years ago

Me too, good title and no substance! I take this one to go to sleep tonight!!

Sean O'Connor
5 years ago

The usual case of adequate knowledge being inversely proportionate to strong opinion.
Thanks for writing her off though, I assume they’re still handing out the main medals in the Summer like they’ve done for the last two seasons ?!
Keep up the good work…

Sean O'Connor
Reply to  Chris DeSantis
5 years ago

Thanks Chris for taking the trouble to reply.

Siobhan was ill just before her taper which undermined an otherwise great block of work in Australia.

She was disappointed, but isn’t one to make excuses or shy away from the challenge (or bottle it)

I just wanted to put the record straight on her behalf.

It only matters when it matters, and I appreciate the feedback.

ATB.

Sean

thomaslurzfan
5 years ago

Russia and Germany have rather soft standards, lets see how their trials will go. German swimmers have to swim the 20th fastest time from Kazan 2015 prelims in the prelims of the german championships and the 12th fastest time from Kazan 2015 prelims in the final of the german championships. Those times are pretty fair in my opinion:
Mens/Womens:
50 free: 22.27/24.94
100 free: 48.81/54.41
200 free: 1:47.17/1:58.27
400 free: 3:47.49/4:09.08
1500/800 free: 15:02.37/8:33.33
100 back: 53.91/1:00.25
200 back: 1:58.02/2:10.39
100 breast: 1:00.01/1:07.32
200 breast: 2:10.43/2:24.88
100 fly: 58.35/51.94
200 fly: 1:56.33/2:09.16
200 IM: 1:59.64/2:12.91
400 IM: 4:16.37/4:38.96

Its true that talents like Greenbank didnt progress… Read more »

WagWan
Reply to  thomaslurzfan
5 years ago

Kurle had a lucky swim and isn’t physically built to swim at the Olympics. He has the body shape and structure of a 14 year old boy.

Baylissrr
Reply to  WagWan
5 years ago

Hey wag man you really don’t know your stuff do you
Have a look back over the past year then comment
Wow but body of a 14 year old just think what he can do when he fills out
Unfortunately people like you show no respect how big do you think Hagino is?
Nice to be so lucky though ????

Swimfan
Reply to  WagWan
5 years ago

Nice to be lucky on a regular basis
Good luck in your chosen field ????

Lokermotion
5 years ago

Given that Calaeb Dressel was almost lost to the sport due to Internet commentary and critique, is it wise, or fair, to refer to young athletes as ‘failed potential’?

James
Reply to  Chris DeSantis
5 years ago

I understand the desire to avoid overly harsh criticism of our athletes in swimming, but that’s what comes with the territory of elite level sports. At least within the commentary sections of most swim message boards, the comments are actually more about time/talent/form and not just personal attacks on the swimmer. Certainly not the case when society starts to discuss elite athletes in the NBA/NFL/etc.

Diane Halsall
5 years ago

Wouldn’t worry about it Sean O’Connor people have been writing Fran off for years but she has still won 32 international medals ,she is also written off by many for an Olympic medal . Just relax and smile at their remarks , they are entitled to an opinion and that’s all it is. Siobhan will be amazing and we are lucky to have her on the GB swim team.

Sean O'Connor
Reply to  Diane Halsall
5 years ago

Thanks Diane, I agree that when they’re in doubt they often make it up.

Fingers crossed for the whole team in the Summer, it’s a tough enough sport without the negativity.

See you over there.

Lokermotion
5 years ago

I agree that adults in professional sports should come to expect some level of public comment on, or critique of their performance. Abbie Wood and Luke Greenbank however are not adults. They are high school aged athletes and to describe them as failed potential is unduly harsh in my opinion.

thomaslurzfan
Reply to  Lokermotion
5 years ago

I think you might have misunderstood the “failed potential” part. I think it doesnt describe those athletes as failed potential but the fact that they couldve been faster this year with different standards. No one doubts that Greenbank, Wood or Rudin can still win international medals in the future, its just that those standards didnt allow (some) young talents to unfold their full potential this year.
Its doesnt really have much/anything to do with those special athletes, its no kind of critique towards those young swimmers, but towards the policy of british swimming.
(Not my opinion, but thats just how i understood the text)

Caroline Peaty
5 years ago

The time to comment is after the olympics! Bill Furness has had an enormous impact on British swimming and in the change of attitude. All an athlete can do is give 110% and what right do you have to criticise? Could anyone of u do any better? I think not.
Let’s wait and see what Great Britain can do, I have every faith in our swimmers ????????

About Chris DeSantis

Chris DeSantis

Chris DeSantis is a swim coach, writer and swimming enthusiast. Chris does private consulting and coaching with teams and individuals. You can find him at www.facebook.com/cdswimcoach. Chris is a 2009 Graduate from the Masters of Applied Positive Psychology program at the University of Pennsylvania. He was the first professional athletic coach …

Read More »