2020-2021 NCAA Men’s Swimming & Diving Power Ranks: February Edition

Braden Keith, Robert Gibbs, and Karl Ortegon contributed to this report.

As in previous years, SwimSwam’s Power Rankings are somewhere between the CSCAA-style dual meet rankings and a pure prediction of NCAA finish order.  SwimSwam’s rankings take into account how a team looks at the moment, while keeping the end of the season in mind through things like a team’s previous trajectory and NCAA scoring potential.  These rankings are by nature subjective, and a jumping-off point for discussion.  If you disagree with any team’s ranking, feel free to make your case in our comments section.

It’s our last round of power rankings before conference meet season – and we’ve got a theme of this month’s ranks: One big question for each team heading into conference championships.

Of course, there’s one big question that every team has in common with the specter of the coronavirus pandemic still looming large. In lieu of asking that same question 25 times below, we’ll lead with it up top:

One big question for every team: Less than a year removed from a canceled NCAA Championships, will teams approach conference meets differently?

Some teams may opt to really gear up for conference meets rather than risking two consecutive years of saving a taper only to lose the payoff meet. Other might be forced into a more full conference meet taper, with limited regular-season competitions to lock in early NCAA invite times. Plenty of teams will feel the relay heat, needing even their stars at full strength to make sure all five relays are NCAA-eligible.

Others might go old-school, seeing a year of missed training and less time to build that all-important aerobic base that swim coaches are so in love with. That might lead to more training-through for conference meets – at least for teams and individuals who can still make the NCAA meet.

Previous Ranks:

Without further ado, here are our men’s NCAA power rankings, with changes from our previous ranks noted in red or green. Unranked teams joining the top 25 are listed with just a plus sign.

Honorable mention: Wisconsin, UNC, Pitt, Miami (OH)

#25: Northwestern Wildcats (+)

Between breaststroker Kevin Houseman and flyer Federico BurdissoNorthwestern has some pieces of a good medley relay – can they find the back and free legs to push towards the top 8 nationally?

#24: Florida State Seminoles (-1)

They’ve been missing parts of their roster for lots of meets this season. We’ll have to see if the band is all back together by ACCs.

#23: Miami Hurricanes (-2)

Honestly, the biggest question for Miami isn’t about Miami. With only divers Miami’s points are a little capped. But will Texas/Cal eat up enough combined points to thin out scoring opportunities for depth teams and allow Miami to sneak into the top 20?

#22: Notre Dame Fighting Irish (-)

Coming off his banner freshman season, can Jack Hoagland break Zach Yeadon’s school record in the 500 free (4:10.39)? He’s already been faster than he was in-season last year.

#21: Minnesota Golden Gophers (-1)

Will we see Max McHugh become just the second swimmer in history under 50 and 1:50 in the breaststrokes? A better question: how fast will he have to split to get the medley relays into scoring range, and can he have a Lilly King-like impact in elevating those relay teams?

#20: LSU Tigers (-1)

Will Brooks Curry have another SEC explosion in the 100/200 frees? He was 43.1/1:36.0 going into SECs last year. He’s been 42.0/1:33.7 already this season.

#19: Arizona Wildcats (+6)

Does Ogi Maric trend more toward backstroke or freestyle? Backstroke might be his best bet individually. But Arizona will need him in freestyle form to help buoy the relays.

#18: Tennessee Volunteers (-1)

Freshman Harrison Lierz is an outstanding 200 backstroker – but can he quickly develop enough speed to be the missing link on the Volunteer medley relays?

#17: Virginia Tech H2Okies (+1)

Can a deep butterfly group produce enough NCAA-scoring worthy times to bump them up in our next round? They currently have five men under 47 in the 100 fly, which is quite solid, but no one is quite yet under the 45.64 it took to score at 2019 NCAAs. They’ve got a few guys close, led by freshman Youssef Ramadan’s 45.68. Pair Ramadan with possible 200 fly scorer Antani Ivanov and Blake Manoff in the 200 fly, and the Hokies could produce quite a few more point in the butterfly events alone than they scored at 2019 NCAAs.

#16: Alabama Crimson Tide (-2)

How do you quantify the impact of internal turmoil and coaching transitions? Alabama’s sprinters have swum pretty well this year, but also transitioned from Coley Stickels to Ozzie Quevedo, with another shift to Margo Geer coming after the season. Sometimes we see a boost in confidence under a new regime – but transition can also be difficult in the short term. SECs will tell us a lot about where ‘Bama is at.

#15: Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets (+1)

How many points can a strong Georgia Tech roster score in the relays? It’s probably  not realistic to stick with their swimulator projection of 120 – that’s the 4th-most of any team in the NCAA. But they’ve got a really balanced roster with a top backstroker (Kyle Barone), breaststroker (Caio Pumputis) and butterfly (Christian Ferraro), and that should keep the medleys in the mix.

#14: USC Trojans (+1)

What kind of impact will the Trojans get from Junior College standout Billy Cruz? He’s a 19-low sprinter, but he’s been no faster than 20.5/44.3 in the early stages of USC’s season.

#13: Missouri Tigers (-)

Can Mizzou hold up its incredible relay ranks of 4th (400 medley relay), 5th (400 free relay), 6th (200 medley relay) and 8th (200 free relay), or will they fall back to the pack some during conference season? Also, just how good is versatile sophomore Ben Patton going to be, and what events will he swim?

#12: Virginia Cavaliers (-)

Who will swim on the free relays? There’s a few locks, like Matt Brownstead and August Lamb on the 200/400 free relays, but there’s a lot of question marks after that. The Cavaliers have about eight other guys who have split 19-mid on the 200 free relay, and it seems like they should be able to get another two out of that group to approach 19-low splits and put this team in contention for a NCAA A-final.

#11: Ohio State Buckeyes (-2)

Without Ruslan Gaziev, do we see a hit to the Buckeye relays? Getting newcomers like Justin Fleagle and Hunter Armstrong up to speed will be key.

#10: Stanford Cardinal (-)

Did the freshman class, which Stanford is heavily reliant on this season, have enough time to prepare for big-time college meets with only one official competition between November 21 and the Pac-12 Championships?

#9: Michigan Wolverines (+1)

How will the two week ‘pause’ to training three weeks out of the Big Ten Championships impact the Wolverines?

#8: Indiana Hoosiers  (-3)

How badly will IU miss Bruno Blaskovic? Losing your kingpin sprinter can dismantle relays. Jack Franzman has become a pretty good sprinter, but he’ll really have to step up to cover for Blaskovic.

#7: Louisville Cardinals (+1)

Can a few more guys step up with NCAA scoring times? Nicolas Albiero, Evgenii Somov, and Mitchell Whyte could all make two A-finals in March. If a few next-tier guys could throw down even NCAA B-final times, it could give the Cardinals a strong argument to be bumped up another spot or two.

#6: NC State Wolfpack (+1)

NC State has crazy upward energy right now, but are missing a few foreign swimmers who stayed home to train amid the pandemic. Can that upward energy smooth over the rough spots left by the absences of guys like Nyls Korstanje? The last two recruiting classes have been very good, but they’ll need to step up early.

#5: Texas A&M Aggies (+1)

What can the supporting cast – guys like Tanner Olson, Koko Bratanov, and Andres Puente – do to add to the brilliance of Shaine Casas and A&M’s more established national threats?

#4: Florida Gators (-)

Two years ago, the Florida men’s team was home to the best 100 freestyler in NCAA history. This year, so far, they’ve had to use 200/500 guy Trey Freeman as their 400 medley relay anchor. Is freshman Adam Chaney ready to step up and take that spot?

#3: Georgia Bulldogs (-)

Which Georgia butterflier, among a pair having spectacular years, will come out on top: the freshman Luca Urlando or the senior Camden Murphy? More specifically: who gets the spot as part of the best sprint relay lineup Georgia has had in a while, if not ever?

#2: Cal Golden Bears (-)

Will it be Destin Lasco or Daniel Carr on the backstroke legs of the medleys? And will Hugo Gonzalez finally get his NCAA redemption three years after his disappointing freshman performance?

#1: Texas Longhorns (-)

The obvious question is who earns an NCAA spot via conference performances, and who gets left at home. But we’ll go with a less-common question: does Drew Kibler swim the 500 free or the 50 free? And if he swims the 500, does that rule out a 200 free relay leg? (That combination has been extremely rare throughout NCAA history, but Texas might need Kibler pretty badly in both races)

In This Story

57
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of
57 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Yup
7 months ago

What exactly is ‘crazy upward energy’?

Snarky
Reply to  Yup
7 months ago

You gotta know the Pack to know.

Whoa
Reply to  Snarky
7 months ago

As in ‘stuck in fourth place’?

Guy lewis
Reply to  Whoa
7 months ago

So u mean better than 99% of schools

Ohio swim observer
7 months ago

I don’t think Federico Burdisso has swam for NW yet this year – can/will he swim at Big10 or NCAAs?

Last edited 7 months ago by Ohio swim observer
Mommabear
Reply to  Ohio swim observer
7 months ago

Interesting.. FB wasn’t even listed on their team roster on the website when NW swam during duel season. Now he is there. What are the rules??

JP input is too short
Reply to  Mommabear
7 months ago

I doubt the rules address whether someone is listed on an athletics department website roster. Only gotta do one meet to count.

D who
Reply to  JP input is too short
7 months ago

Needs to have a meet before conference and I believe there is a minimum number of meets before ncaas (again I think).

Editor
Reply to  D who
7 months ago

D who – I’m not sure about that. Back in 2017, Zhang Quah only swam at the Pac-12 Invite, after the Pac-12 Championships, and qualified, and swam at NCAAs. Not sure if the Big Ten has different rules than the Pac-12 does/did, though.

Admin
Reply to  Robert Gibbs
7 months ago

There is no NCAA rule about meets required for an individual athlete – other than that you have to swim one to get your cut times.

Ohio swim observer
Reply to  Braden Keith
7 months ago

Do conferences require swimmers to swim in a meet before championships?

JP input is too short
Reply to  Ohio swim observer
7 months ago

Not generally.

Admin
Reply to  Ohio swim observer
7 months ago

It may vary by Conference, but nothing in the Big Ten handbook seems to require it. We know the pac-12 doesn’t because of the Hugo Gonzalez saga where they were down to the wire trying to get him eligible.

I reached out to a couple of Big Ten coaches to see what they know, but as far as I can tell, their first meet can be Big Tens.

Admin
Reply to  Braden Keith
7 months ago

Update: confirmed that a swimmer can make their season debut at Big Tens.

Mommabear
Reply to  Braden Keith
7 months ago

Thanks for checking. Interesting rule.

Perdue swimming
Reply to  Braden Keith
7 months ago

I have downvoted all your comments.

Questionable
Reply to  Mommabear
7 months ago

Ask Louisville. They do something similar with bringing European athletes in at the turn of the new year pretty often.

Not sure if its the same situation but sounds similar.

HoosierDaddy
7 months ago

IU will win NCAAs. No need to comment about other teams SwimSwam fans, IU can not be stopped. See you next year!

Candycorn
Reply to  HoosierDaddy
7 months ago

What are you smoking? No way IU beats Texas, sorry!

Admin
Reply to  Candycorn
7 months ago

So there’s this guy in the comments named Guerra (probably not his real name, though he made a real Facebook page with his fake name), who just lushes over Indiana. Like most of Guerra’s postings, nobody takes them all that seriously.

Now HoosierDaddy is rolling in to be a meta meme, and I’m pretty sure he’s just trying to one-up Guerra to prove how ridiculous Guerra is.

So, when you see those usernames, just don’t take it seriously.

Guerra
Reply to  Braden Keith
7 months ago

The Swimming Gods are a curious sort. Like Mother Nature this week, she promised us a bunch of snow, gave us sleet for a ways, and then, in her benevolence, blanketed us anyways. Despite all our knowledge of this beautiful planet and no matter what these polls say, God is always capable of sending a few wondrous surprises and I believe that the Indiana Hoosiers will be National Champions!

Horninco
Reply to  HoosierDaddy
7 months ago

comment image

Guerra
Reply to  HoosierDaddy
7 months ago

HoosierDaddy speaks the truth. I’m devastated by some of the hate and slander spoken on this thread today. I’m suffering from Covid for God sakes!

HoosierDaddy
Reply to  Guerra
7 months ago

I pray you have a speedy recovery my dear friend!

Guerra
Reply to  HoosierDaddy
7 months ago

https

Last edited 7 months ago by Guerra
HoosierSon
Reply to  HoosierDaddy
7 months ago

Yes Daddy

aggie
7 months ago

Where is Mark Theall for A&M? NCAA A-cut and 3rd in the NCAA this season for the 500 doesn’t cut it for the Swimswam article?

Admin
Reply to  aggie
7 months ago

Our goal is not to write an entire team-wide recap for every team.

That would amount to 17,000 words that nobody would read.

swimswamswum
Reply to  Braden Keith
7 months ago

*most people wouldn’t read
If there’s the 17K version out there, I would definitely be interested 🙂

Swimmer
Reply to  aggie
7 months ago

“And A&M’s more established national threats”

Austinpoolboy
Reply to  aggie
7 months ago

To be fair, this article left off about a dozen to two dozen names off the blurb about Texas. A&M got a lot more names mentioned. Four to ONE. So chill, bro. We know Theall is stud, it goes without saying!

Last edited 7 months ago by Austinpoolboy
Swimfan
Reply to  aggie
7 months ago

Strange reaction. Obviously the team write ups are just one Tiny angle on things… not in any way meant to be a highlight or an MVP award per team… notice Kieran Smith is not mentioned under Florida…. gasp!

Texas A&M Swim Fan
7 months ago

Y’all had better watch out for those A&M relay teams as well😳. They can drop “atomic bombs” on ya real quick & you won’t even see them comin👍👍

Last edited 7 months ago by Texas A&M Swim Fan
JP input is too short
Reply to  Texas A&M Swim Fan
7 months ago

I think at this point we all see A&M coming. A couple years ago, before Casas, Theall, et al blew up, you could say that. Now they are pretty established. They really do need one of their second tier back or fly guys to step up to make those medleys really dangerous though.

Cardsfan
7 months ago

Yes, you will see more men stepping up to score for Louisville
Thanks for asking

Say’s Phoebe
Reply to  Cardsfan
7 months ago

Sameh, Paulson, Dely, Sibirtsev, and Curley are all possibilities for B finals, as is Somov in the 200 IM.
Albiero is likely for thee A finals.
And I see Dalton Lowe as ready for a big breakthrough.
Relays are very strong; they had four A’s and a B in 2019, this could be the year they get five A’s (minimum 110 points).

SwimminIsGood
7 months ago

Always an interesting read…thx for the synopsis, Jared.

Some thoughts on your questions, imho: Kibler – leaning towards the 500, as he might have an “easier” time winning or placing top two vs. the 50? More questionable to place top 2 in the 50 than 500 due to slimmer margin of error? Then again, Texas could score more points with other guys in the 500, leaving the 50 a better choice. I do think Kibler could do the 500 and also 200 F.R….tough, but I say he does that. Certainly an interesting dilemma for Eddie (but he’s rather good at figuring out best options for his swimmers/team)

As for Cal’s medley relays, I’d say Carr on the 200 and… Read more »

Willswim
Reply to  SwimminIsGood
7 months ago

For some reason I thought Sean Grieshop had a decent 200 free in his bag and would be a contender for an 800 free relay spot. Am I remembering wrong? In the 400 free relay I think a lot of people are rooting for Nate Biondi for sentimental reasons, but he still needs to make a big step forward to get there. Is there any word on how Matthew Jensen has dealt with the transition to college swimming? Before the season started I thought, because his brother had a strong freshman year, maybe he’d be a possibility to make the 400 free relay.

Admin
Reply to  Willswim
7 months ago

Grieshop’s PB in the 200 free is 1:35.43 done at the 2019 Minnesota Invite. A good swim by mortal standards, but probably not good enough to make a Cal “A” relay.

swimmerTX
Reply to  SwimminIsGood
7 months ago

Great points you bring up. As a Cal fan, I am excited to watch how both the Longhorns and the Bears perform. Both teams are great, and I have nothing but respect for the entire Horns’ team.

Some of my thoughts regarding the Bears… the 200 free relay is my biggest concern. Hoffer and Seeliger are locks, but the two other spots are up for grabs. Based on Cal vs USC results from a couple weeks ago, Carr and Nate Biondi may take the other two spots, which frees up Destin Lasco for the other relays. Last year, Carr was on the 400 and 800 FR, with the 200 and 400 MR. Bryce Mefford and Lasco are options for the… Read more »

Editor
Reply to  SwimminIsGood
7 months ago

I think Texas’ 800 F-R will almost certainly be Carson Foster, Katz, Sannem, and Kibler. I don’t think Kibler ends up on the 200 F-R, although I could see him swimming fly in the 400 M-R prelims, just like he did in 2019. That’d probably help Jiang a bit, especially if he’s swimming the 200 F-R and the 50 free that day.

Like you said, Cal has a lot of options. I wonder if we finally see Whitley on a free relay…

Last edited 7 months ago by Robert Gibbs
PsychoDad
Reply to  SwimminIsGood
7 months ago

Will we see a “John Murray swimming relay breaststroke” level of surprise from Eddie this year? That was beautiful.

Wethorn
Reply to  PsychoDad
7 months ago

One can hope not.

swimfan210_
Reply to  SwimminIsGood
7 months ago

Cal’s top 100 freestylers this season: Hoffer (42.12, PB 41.23) Mefford (44.34, PB 43.36) N Biondi (44.46, PB 43.34) Gonzalez (44.56, PB) Carr (44.83, PB 43.76). Seeliger didn’t swim the 100 yet but should factor on the relay.
200: Julian (1:33.91, PB 1:33.17) Lasco (1:34.66, PB) Michael Petrides (1:35.40, PB 1:34.66, not mentioned yet) Rose (1:35.53, PB) C. Mefford (1:35.90, PB 1:35.02), B Mefford (1:36.05, PB 1:32.84).

Max McHuge
7 months ago

Minnesota will need the fastest splits in history from McHugh to make their medleys at all competitive. Not to mention their intense lack of sprint freestylers (McHugh is their fastest 100 free split this year). It’s not looking good for the gophers aside from their standout unfortunately 🙁

About Jared Anderson

Jared Anderson

Jared Anderson swam for nearly twenty years. Then, Jared Anderson stopped swimming and started writing about swimming. He's not sick of swimming yet. Swimming might be sick of him, though. Jared was a YMCA and high school swimmer in northern Minnesota, and spent his college years swimming breaststroke and occasionally pretending …

Read More »