In the SwimSwam Podcast dive deeper into the sport you love with insider conversations about swimming. Hosted by Coleman Hodges and Gold Medal Mel Stewart, SwimSwam welcomes both the biggest names in swimming that you already know, and rising stars that you need to get to know, as we break down the past, present, and future of aquatic sports.
We sat down with Torrey Hart, former SwimSwam writer and now full-time sports journalist at Front Office Sports. Torrey wrote a massive piece breaking down the business side of ISL at the conclusion of Season 2, and if you haven’t read it yet, DO SO NOW! Then we can really have a conversation.
We break down how the ISL ran things in their first 2 seasons, including their inability to pay all of their debts right away. We talk through both sides of the coin as well as moving forward, what the league can do to turn a profit and really start to turn swimming into a legitimate professional sport. Because let’s be honest: as swim fans, that’s all we really want.
- Click here to listen and subscribe on Spotify
- Click here to listen and subscribe on Apple Podcasts
- Click here to listen and subscribe on Podbean
- Click here to listen and subscribe on Google
- Click here to listen and subscribe on YouTube
- Click here to listen and subscribe on Listen Notes
- Click here to listen and subscribe on Stitcher
- Click here to listen and subscribe on iHeartRadio
- Click here to listen and subscribe on Amazon
- Click here to listen and subscribe on Pandora
Music: Otis McDonald
www.otismacmusic.com
RECENT EPISODES
Opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of the interviewed guests do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs, and viewpoints of the hosts, SwimSwam Partners, LLC and/or SwimSwam advertising partners.
wpDiscuz
No
It could… But it feels like there’s still a longer way to make swimming popular enough for the broad public
Yeah people would have to magically care about and understand swimming aside from Michael Phelps
I think ISL can be, re: total digital reach. Over 2019, reach was 40 million and change. It’s larger this years. Once you’re nearly 100 million reach, you have a business. True, it’ll take time, 2-3 more years, but you can reach break-even. HOWEVER, if the gamification (gambling) of swim is a part of the biz model, then you’re in the black and profitable in 12-18 min.
Yes
Not at all, it’s swimming. XFL failed twice now and football is infinitely times more popular. The AAF also failed.
Both those leagues had existing competition though. It’s EXTREMELY hard to produce a better product than the NFL when all the elite talent is there. The ISL has all the elite swim talent, the challenge for them is reaching new potential fans. I wholeheartedly agree with Mel’s comment above saying that adding a gambling aspect could do wonders.
ISL really needs strong marketing and sponsors otherwise, it will fail. This season was amazing to watch on tv , the content is great, that’s the big point.
Not in the way it is currently designed. To attract audience, the following must be changed:
SC is more spectator friendly and we also get to see far more records.
1 – I actually like the pro teams (their BRANDS) made up of talent from allover the world (and when they start a DRAFT, which “I think” they will–that’ll bring excitement and buy-in from fans)
2 – scm is way more exciting (and I actually like that it’s different from the Olympic distance)
3 – sponsors will came when “total digital reach” is sold, and their digital reach is solid (re: the swimmers participating love this and leverage nonstop while competing)
4 – I’m all for paying swimmers more? I think that’s covered, and it’ll evolve as the league does.
Most countries of the swimming world understand short course times and records.
I think he’s an American (I’m an American and many here don’t understand SCM. We’re constantly switching between SCM/SCY/LCM it’s nuts)
I have always hated yards. I wish all US meets were SCM and LCM, re: we could then have WRs at NCAAs and world rankings for all age groups.
Yeah, but you already have the vast majority of pools established in the country as 25 yards in length so kindof hard to make that switch at this point.
Yes most pools are 25 yards, but there was a time when a ton of available pools were 20 yards (enough so that records were kept for 20 yard pools at a variety of levels). We didn’t stick with that model then, and we don’t need to stick yards now. Most elite colleges and larger teams have bulkheads and could easily make the transition, especially for meets. When NCAA has done scm, it’s awesome because you get to see fast swimming, team competition, and world records
Yes. Then times would be comparable to other universities across the world. We could also compare age group swimmers in SCM. If club swimming was SCM, it would be easier to recruit internationally because you could get world age rankings for events.
SwimSwam should run a paid fantasy league around the ISL and give a portion of profit to them. It might be enough to cover the salary of one lane-filler on the DC Trident, but it will be fun for all 10 of us that play.
I’m not sure we want to register as an internet casino, which is what would be required to do that…
I mean we would, but that’s super expensive so I think the profit would have to be much higher than a few dozen swim nerds spending 10 bucks each.
As a swimmer who has done it both years, it’s a hard no. Too many directions from management, no streamline view between all the heads within the organization either. Even as a swim nerd, I don’t even necessarily like sitting down and WATCHING swimming. There are plenty other more exciting sports that have struggled to take off. I think it would be an incredible hurdle from even the best of organizations, it’s only magnified by the fact the organization has internal issues and debts to be paid.
“There are plenty other more exciting sports that have struggled to take off.”
But there are also so many less exciting sports that are thriving…I mean, poker is literally watching people sit around a table.
The internal issues hurdle is really the lynchpin it seems
It seems like all these comments are very American-centric in whether the league survives or not. While that makes sense because of the demographic of this site, I think it’s important to recognize that the ISL can become financially solvent without the US being a main contributor. It’s clear there are some major internal issues that will have to be dealt with, but American viewership numbers are not necessarily an indication.
Cricket, Badminton, and Rugby are examples of sports which are thriving and have enormous viewership in other countries and are pretty exciting, while Poker and Fishing (literally people sitting and/or standing around) have huge viewership in the US. All of that to say that Mel’s point about total digital… Read more »
That’s sort of true, but if you exclude America from your commercial plan, your audience has to be a lot bigger. In terms of advertising dollars, you need a much higher number of Chinese fans or Indian fans or even Japanese fans to make the same money as American fans.
That, and, this isn’t a business, it’s a vanity project for its owner.
He WANTS to be in America. He WANTS to prove that he can make swimming big in the toughest sports market on earth to break into.
I’m not a psychologist but maybe it has something to do with the fact that he’s not allowed in the country?
Can’t it be both? He wouldn’t be the first business person to start an endeavor in an effort to prove something…
Sure, I recognize it will still need America in the plan, I’m just commenting on the fact that there are a whole bunch of paths in which America is a piece of the puzzle versus THE piece of the puzzle. Honestly, if they get the promotion figured out for the age group teams (not really that difficult), they’ll have a large and constantly growing American fanbase. I just don’t think the American part of it is as difficult as a lot of folks have been suggesting.
Agree that the sponsors will come when the value and exposure are realized. Some bit of tribalism is needed though to create loyal fans. Regionality is helpful for this and the current areas represented by the teams leaves a lot of holes at least from a US perspective. People in Texas don’t have much of a preference for a NY, DC, or a California team. Yet Texas is a big swimming state that is more similar to middle America. The regions have to have some similarities or a common culture to create loyalties.
I don’t believe that teams need to hoard athletes from their region. A team with a loyal fan base does not need to have players from… Read more »
In your opinion, does that chaos need to come at the individual race level, or the team battle level?
I don’t know. I think it can come from either. There just need to be a hook that draws people in for something unexpected. When I watch football on the weekend there are so many variables that could make my subpar team (LSU guy-rough one after last year) come out with a victory. I hate losing to A&M or Bama and will hold out hope till the last second runs off the clock.
I wish I was imaginative enough to know the answer here. I really want swimming to have it’s place in the world of professional sports. I just need the intrigue. I need to be able to have a 100-message text group with my friends to second guess… Read more »
After records, rivalries are the most talked about thing in our sport. Whether it is Efimova/King, Phelps/Le Clos, or Horton/Yang. Those are intriguing. You pick a side, and you want to see the other side lose. With the exception of the first mentioned, I don’t know of any rivalries like that in ISL. They should be marketed though if they exist. Swimming is not really a sport of loud mouths and obnoxious athletes, but maybe we need some if your goal is viewship.