It has been a long road for Michael Andrew, the youngest swimmer to turn pro at the tender age of 14. Peter Andrew, his coach and father, said:
“I think this (2018 U.S. Nationals) is the beginning of his career…because there is no more age group (swimming)… He’s got to step up.”
Michael did step up at the 2018 U.S. National Championships winning four national titles. At only 19 years old, it was a timely breakthrough performance netting him a position on Team USA through the 2019 FINA World Championships.
Michael’s often maligned training method, USRPT (ultra short race pace training), has taken hold in parts of the global swimming community, and it is gaining ground, but many critics stand firm that it does not work, or rather, it only works for the 50 sprints. I have opinions about USRPT coming from the 1980s era of grinding distance, but it’s hard to argue against Michael’s closing speed to win the 100m breast at U.S. Nationals.
1ST QUESTION: What do you think about USRPT now, after witnessing Michael’s incremental success over the last 5 years?
2nd QUESTION: Has Michael’s decision to go pro so young turned out as you expected?
3rd QUESTION – PREDICTIONS FOR PAN PACS: Based on the Pan Pac psych sheet, Michael’s swimming 100m breast, back, butterfly, and the 50m freestyle.
100m back and fly – PBs mark a success under the pressure of being on his first USA National A-Team.
100m breast – Getting on the podium is a success against the Japanese block of breaststroke talent.
50m free – Michael nets silver, 21.3. Caeleb Dressel wins in 21.2. HOWEVER, I’m shaky on this, nervous about my prediction. Here’s my conflict: I was on deck at NCAAs to witness Dressel’s 17.6 50y free, and I’ve watched Michael’s back half speed in the 50m free race video at Nationals in Irvine over and over again. Michael is swimming great right now. Dressel’s taper appears to be in question after nationals. I think the extra time/rest will benefit Dressel more in Tokyo.
But who cares what I think… What do you think?
Follow Michael Andrew on Instagram here.
RECENT EPISODES
This is a Gold Medal Media production presented by SwimOutlet.com. Host Gold Medal Mel Stewart is a 3-time Olympic medalist and the co-founder of SwimSwam.com, a Swimming News website.
wpDiscuz
USRPT clearly works for the sprints, unclear how useful it can be for mid-distance yet.
Be interesting to get Michael and his dad’s view on how far USRPT has affected his freestyle stroke (which breathing seems to screw up, presumably less of an issue if he’d been grinding heavy yards with mid/distance technique over winter).
Think he gets silver in the 50 free and 100 breast. Unless Troy’s had him on 14 km a day this week.
….we have another interview with Peter/dad/coach saying he’s encouraging Michael to train for the 100s (notably free), and he (Peter) feels his 200 IM will be among his strongest events. Peter’s actually been saying that for some time a/2-IM. Makes sense. 2-IM is a sprint, and Michael’s proving he can hold his stroke.
As MA says, “It’s a work in progress” Kudos to his dad for not pushing his wants onto his son. My prediction is that as MA gains more success in the 100’s as he did at Nationals in the 100 breast, fly and even a PB in the 100 free, that he will have more confidence in the 100’s and 200 IM and will “explode” in those events in time.
I believe he could throw down a massive 200 IM in the next few years if he builds up his endurance on each of the strokes equally
Those that come to mind as having world class 50s of every stroke are Morozov and Manadou, but they haven’t swum tapered stroke 100s with any regularity and certainly not 200 IM.
Lochte probably the most likely best combined time on 100s of every stroke? Difficult as Phelps never really swam 100 breast, even at PSS.
I think MA will be able to learn a lot if Dressel takes 2IM seriously long course. World class 200 IMers in recent times (Phelps, Lochte, Cseh, Kalisz, Hagino, Hosszu, Ye etc.) have usually been training for 200s of a stroke and/or the 4IM. Dressel’s unlikely to swim a 200 stroke or the 400 IM, so he should prove a good litmus for… Read more »
He faded badly in the freestyle legs of the 200IM last summer, when he said that event was ‘the focus’ all spring/summer long…
“200 IM is a sprint”.
200 IM might be a “sprint”, but it’s still “aerobic” in physiological nature. Given you’re tapping into that system almost exclusively about 30-35 seconds into action, and given his improvement in the 100Br and 100Fly, he’s probably not doing absolutely strict USRPT stuff (at least by its very definition) and hasn’t been doing that for a while.
Thanks, it will be interesting to see how USRPT translates, for an elite swimmer, to the longer distances.
Disagree. We don’t know if usrpt works for sprints because we are dealing with a sample size of one. What we do know is that it works for Michael, and we don’t if another type of more traditional training would work better for him.
My opinion is that Michael would be successful with many different styles of training because he works hard and is an exceptional talent.
MA uses USRPT for sprint training. It is possible to use USRPT for distance training but that’s not what he does.
20×100 at your per-100 pace for your 800 would prepare you well for a distance event but not for sprinting. Likewise 20×25 on :25 at per-25 pace of your 100 would prepare you well for a 100 but not for an 800.
Someone who wanted to only use USRPT but swim a range of distances could probably do so if they wanted.
But MA trains for sprints. Why do people expect him to do otherwise? And why is his personal focus on sprinting an indictment on USRPT as a whole for distance or middle distance?
I’m curious if you have any examples of mid distance or distance swimmers at an elite level who use usrpt? 30×100 at 1500 pace is a great set as shown by Perkins decades ago…but it was part of 80k+ weeks. Race pace sets and usrpt are very different things, and I have my doubts that usrpt can work for anything over 100 and maybe a 200 IM.
I came from a program that was heavily focused on quality over quantity, but we still had somewhat of a base that we would pull from. 50s at race pace, 1:00min to represent 200s and 2:00 min to represent 100s were weekly sets building up to 28 or so total 50s throughout a training cycle. But we still mixed in a lot of kick sets and heavy fin work. Still rarely went over 6k a practice. Certainly a far cry from USRPT but nowhere near these 10k and 12k practices I would hear friends of mine talk about from other teams. We certainly had some national and Olympic trials qualifiers in a variety of distances in this training program. I… Read more »
Top Dog
Kieran Perkins dominated the 1500m doing RPT, and half the training distance of his American counterparts. His bread and butter set was a broken 1500—15×100 on 1:05 holding under 1:00. His workouts were rarely over 10k.
Half the training? Perkins averaged 8k a practice and generally swam 80k+ per week. He also did almost half of his workouts at a relatively slow pace and was doing things like stationary biking 5 days a week. Yeah, he used rpt, but arguably there was more in common with “traditional training” than there was with anything resembling usrpt.
https://coachsci.sdsu.edu/swim/bullets/trainh35.htm
Coach Troy just presses the stop watch and records times. He doesn’t give MA swim sets. At least not yet.
I know from personal experience that RPT works for 200s and I suspect it works for any distance. It’s a matter of breaking the distance into smaller, proportional pieces. For 200s, I do sets of 4×50 on short rest, with recovery between rounds. The goal time for each 50 is my 200 split, which in training requires an all-out effort, especially on #4. People think USRPT is easy. If done right, it is the most unpleasant, painful and mentally demanding way to train. I’m not saying longer distance sets aren’t painful and demanding, but it’s a different kind of effort. One of the most important aspects of USRPT is repetition. You do the same exact thing over and over. The… Read more »
Great swimmer, no doubt. To me, he has not lived up to the hype. At this point in his career, I thought he would not quite be Phelpsian, but the next closest thing. He has a good half second drop in all of his 50 strokes to compete with the best. He is able to perform at his peak for multiple meets, but I think his endurance suffers from his training. I think he also benefitted because not everyone was at their best for Pan Pacs. Regardless, tremendous swimmer, and I wish him the best.
No doubt, nationals was soft….but when Nats is slower, new talent gets a big shot of confidence. It does a lot for your brain when you win… It was great to see Andrew Seliskar (2-free) and Justin Wright (2-fly) earn wins. (Also, US Nationals was so deep and dense. 4 tenths separated 16th place from 8th in 200m races. And we saw so many young swimmers 17th-30th cracking great swims.) Overall, I think 2019 and 2020 got a lot more interesting based on Nats in Irvine.
Years ago, I was at nationals and asked Tom Jager why he didn’t swim the 100 backstroke. (I think he held the American Record at the time). His answer: I haven’t worked on backstroke. That answer blew my mind wide open. Even the best have to work on every event specifically. Until then, I thought everything came naturally to great swimmers. So, MA is training all 4 strokes, which takes a lot of time and energy. He can’t train for every stroke at every distance. He has to choose and narrow it down. Right now, it’s 50s. Later, he may focus on the IMs. Over his career, he’ll shift his focus and keep things interesting.
Isn´t it easier to build an Aerobic base now and go down to Shorter events as you get older? It might be difficult for him to go to longer events as he gets older.
I think the USRPT premise is that ‘aerobic base’ isn’t necessary for a 2 minute race. It’s necessary for the way people traditionally train for a 2 minute race (with 150 minute workouts), but USRPT, in theory, wouldn’t ever hit “aerobic” levels. But, I’m sure there’s someone more well-versed on the physiology that can correct my notions if I’m wrong.
I have not heard Michael say this, but I “think” he’d be happy being the fastest man on earth in one event, 50 free. He wants to be the fastest, period, in all 4 50-strokes. That’s a great goal, an extremely tough goal, and within range. I “think” his dad/coach wants to see how far his talent can take him….as many of us do. Irvine was a milestone. He has more to cross, and some time to get there.
Thing is, I just don’t see him being a peak Dressel in either 50 free or 50 fly in the years to come. And Peaty is the king for 50 breast right now. Not saying Andrew can’t get to that level, but beating Dressel and Peaty would be an enormous task.
Govorov 50 fly WR seems a lot out of anyone reach by now too.. even Dressel..
Can´t see Andrew becoming the fastest in any,even less at all 50 strokes.. Peaty, Kolesnikov, Govorov and Dressel/Proud seem to have more speed on their main event than Andrew trying to get all 4 at the same time
Agreed and I still feel like it’s hard to compare what Phelps did at age 18-19 and what MA had done at 19, mainly because I do feel like the competition is tighter. For example, in 2003, Niel Walker won the men’s 50 Free in 22.37 at age 26. The fastest 18 year old was 23.55 and the world record was 21.64. The 100 Free A final was won in 49.43 by Scott Tucker and the 8th place finisher was 50.99 (and only 1 person in the B final beat that 8th place time). Blake peroni won the men’s 100 Free in 48.08 and 8th place was 48.65. And a number of people considered this somewhat lackluster given that nobody… Read more »
You can’t just base Phelpsian performances off times now, but also by margins they beat the competitors by. Phelps beat everyone else in the 200 fly by 3 seconds at 2007 worlds, 2.7 seconds in the 200 free, won the 400 im by 3 seconds, etc. Swimmers will get faster as time progresses.
And we have to measure how is he against the competition.. No need to have a Phelps like results, but pick what Milak is doing..
I think Michael Andrew is a talented athlete and his training has done well for him. However, other than the 100 Breast which is most likely his best stroke, he really cannot swim 100 Meters well. At nationals he began to fall off in all other stokes. He did not make the top 2 in the 100 fly or 100 back. He fell short in the 100 free. USRPT is good for 50s but not for 100s which to me separate the top swimmers from the others. Plus I do not see him getting a world record anytime soon but I could be wrong.
He didn’t swim the 100 back at Nationals.
oops I meant the 50 back
The problem with his 100 free is A) his breathing and B) his stroke is short vs what the 100 LC requires. His 100 fly was still top 3 and I truly believe his 100 back will be the surprise of his Pan Pac meet. Let’s not forget in yards the kid goes 18 high and in the low 3:40s in the 4IM. It takes time to swim LC well, heck Dean Farris and Tate Jackson just put together good 100 frees this summer. He’s doing fine and I’m excited to see him continue to develop. Just because somethings different from the traditional norm doesn’t mean we should condemn it. His 50s are world class and the 100s should be… Read more »
Dean Farris is a great point… He’s cracking great yards swims, and this summer was solid step forward. LC Meters is brutal. Takes time to get it right.
I think does some small drops except his 50free he got a bit ahead of his improvement curve so I would say 21.54 there with all three swims under 21.60
Correction only two swims at pan pacs
He will pull a Blume on the 100 free prelims… so 3 50!!
The US swimming community has always surprised me in the way we generally react to anyone with an idea outside of the mainstream. Instead of pulling daggers out on Mr. Andrew and company, maybe we should be collectively study his training methods (objectively) and see what points that we can all take from it. Call the nationals performance whatever you want, but I don’t think anyone can honestly say you can’t sit up and take notice of what he achieved. Does race pace training 100% if the time work for everyone? Of course not. However to summarily dismiss the philosophy is somewhat ignorant. We still have too many coaches that train based upon principles that are decades old simply because… Read more »
I kinda get the pushback, but not at the level MAndrew experienced since he was 14…. I see MAndrew as a gift to the swim-family…. We all get to witness Michael Andrew as a test case for USRPT. We’re all going to learn from this, experiment, and get faster.
To be fair to the critics, it’s definitely not his methods that drew the most criticism. There was a tremendous amount of hype when he was 14-16…tons of interviews about him and his dad and his methods. It was very over-the-top. That didn’t even happen with Michael Phelps when he got his first world record (not junior world record. world record.), when he was what 15? So I think the criticism has been understandable with going pro, all of the 2016 Olympic predictions, Phelps comparisons and so forth but I am very happy to see that he is seeming to be back at the top of his game. Wishing him success!
Olympic Champions in their 20s didn’t get as much coverage in 2001 as your average college swimmer now. That’s a total red-herring comparison. AOL was still the leading internet service when Michael Phelps was 15.
Sounds like you think swimming was better when nobody paid attention to it, when there was no SwimSwam to help us spread the sport. Guess some people prefer to whine about growing than to grow.
Why should anybody be fair to the critics? The critics have never been fair to MA. “It’s definitely not his methods that drew the most criticism…” – wanna bet? If there’s real money on the line, I’ll go and prove that the most common criticisms were:
1) His training methods… Read more »
100%
Lol not referring to swimswam. More along the lines of self promotion.
I have been a fan all along for many reasons. The incremental increases, the path that differs from others, etc. In the last few years, his interviews have been fun to watch as he comes into his own. It might sound odd, but how an athlete interviews is the piece that makes me a big fan. Best of luck MA. Forward motion.
A great storyline of one who walks to a different tune. So happy for Michael and wish him continued success!
When I first started following the “Michael Andrew story,” I was very critical of USRPT, his lcm results, and he and his father’s belief in an unproven system of training. As he has aged, specifically within the past year as they have shared some of their training habits, I have come to respect their choices more. For example, Dr. Rushall calls for no sort of dryland/weight training program, but I know Michael has mentioned trying some things out and in his videos he uses those rings over his pool. I like that he has really trusted this system, yet he is also not afraid to stray a little bit and experiment with what will help him succeed. As for his… Read more »