The Case for an Olympic Women’s 1500

Last night Katie Ledecky completed her historic Olympics with an insane performance in the 800 freestyle, touching the wall almost 11 seconds before silver medalist Jazz Carlin finished. Ledecky is now the first Olympian since Debbie Meyer to win the 200, 400 and 800 races at one Olympics. Her unreal dominance in the women’s distance events raises the question about why the women’s 1500 is not an Olympic event. Surely she could put up a great, if not better performance in the 1500.

The Case for an Olympic Women’s 1500

The conversation surrounding the women’s 1500 freestyle as an Olympic event has been circulating for a while, however there are no plans to add it to the Olympic schedule in the near future.

The argument against adding the women’s 1500 has to do with popularity: the thought is that Olympic viewers are generally uninterested in the distance events, gravitating more towards exciting sprints and relays. While this argument holds some weight, it is flawed. If the 1500 is too boring to cover, why include it at all? Why should the men get to swim it and not the women?

Equality aside, this argument is inaccurate at its core– it shows a genuine misunderstanding of the sport of swimming. While it may not be as intense as the 50 freestyle or the 4×100 medley relay, the 1500 is a race that has potential to attract non-swimmer and swimmer viewers alike.

IT’S A BETTER RACE THAN THE 800– MORE CAN HAPPEN.

First and foremost, if you’re going to include a distance event in the Olympics – the 800 freestyle just doesn’t cut it. Any swimmer knows that the 800 is merely an extension of mid-distance events. No distance swimmer is training to swim the 800 when they taper; they are training to swim the mile.

Additionally, the 1500 is far more exciting and strategic than the 800– more can happen. Take the men’s 1650 at this year’s NCAA DI championships as an example. This race in particular exemplified just how much the 1500/1650 can come down to strategy.

Favorite Clark Smith took the race out incredibly fast; coming in at 4:20 at the 500 mark. Regrettably, this strategy did not work out and throughout the next 500 Smith’s technique and speed slowly dwindled as PJ Ransford took hold. Ransford led the race through the 1100, however similar to Smith his effort seemed to come too early, and South Carolina’s Akram Mahmoud began to catch up. Up until the last 50, it seemed like Mahmoud had the race in the bag. But outsider Chris Swanson came out of nowhere, blasting out the last 50 in 24.23, winning the race by only a tenth of a second.

If this race would have been merely a 1000, the outcome would have been completely different. The longer race allows strategy to become more apparent hence a more interesting/viewable race; a la “the Tortoise and the Hare”.

WOMEN CAN SWIM IT JUST AS WELL, IF NOT BETTER.

The notion that a women’s 1500 freestyle is somehow less interesting than a men’s 1500 is probably the biggest issue with the argument against including it in the Olympics.

Olympic team coach Bob Bowman noted that women can swim it just as well, if not better. In an interview with the New York Times, Bowman said “I actually think women are better suited, physiologically, for 1,500 meters than they are for the 800 because they’re more endurance-oriented.”.

Lastly, let’s not forget about Katie Ledecky. These Olympics have proven that she is without a doubt one of the best swimmers of all time. Her unreal performance in the 800 proves that she is more than capable of putting up a stellar performance in the 1500. She is also a fan favorite, somebody that viewers can relate to and love. Her large fan base would flock to watch her swim any race, whether it be the 50 or the 1500.

In This Story

31
Leave a Reply

15 Comment threads
16 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
27 Comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Swimmer Thieroff

So would the 1500 be a substitute for the 800, or would it be added on the women’s side and the 800 added on the men’s?

Mel

I’d hope they add the women’s 1500 and men’s 800. The Olympics take the place of world champs in Olympic years. I don’t care if NBC broadcasts it, but it should be swum. Both men and women distance swimmers get screwed in Olympic years because they only get to swim 1 of their events tapered.

Kordez

800 for men?

phelps swims 200 breast rio

Add 1500 for women, 800 for men, 4×50 free and 4×50 medley.

Swimmer0883

4x 50 relays would be so exciting to watch!

Siobhan

I think just the 4 x 50 medley to even out the relays and give the 50 meter specialists something to race. Ditto – I also agree in adding the 1500 for women and the 800 for men.

Roderick

No way the are going to add more events. There are already so many events compared tonother sports.

Years of Plain Suck

Roderick comment is harsh but true.

The IOC does NOT want more athletes in the Olympic Village.

I can see replacing the women’s 800 with the 1500.

swimswammer

More athletes, more medals, more money.

They won’t add. So the argument is to replace the 800 with the 1500. This is also tough because there is no longer any records or legacy in the event.

About Rachel Harvill

Rachel Harvill

Rachel has been swimming ever since she can remember. She grew up in the San Francisco Bay Area where she learned to love swimming with the Walnut Creek Aquabears. She took her passion for swimming to Willamette University in Salem, Oregon where she primarily competes in sprint freestyle events. In addition …

Read More »

Want to take your swimfandom to the next level?

Subscribe to SwimSwam Magazine!