Tennis Star Sharapova Suspended for 2 Years; Jury Still Out on Efimova

Russian tennis star Maria Sharapova has been suspended for 2 years by the International Tennis Federation (ITF) and barred from competing in the 2016 Olympic Games, the governing body for the sport announced today. Sarapova has been the #1 ranked women’s tennis player in the world for a total of 21 weeks in her career and is one of only 10 women in history who has achieved a “career gland slam” by winning each of tennis’ four major tournaments at some point in her career.

Sharapova’s suspension came as the result of a positive test for the banned substance meldonium, which was officially outlawed on January 1, 2016. Sharapova’s test came on January 26th, while playing at the Australian Open, and she was charged a month later with an Anti-Doping Rule Viollation.

At a two-day hearing on 18-19 May 2016, the Independent Tribunal received evidence and heard legal arguments from both parties, and subsequently issued a reasoned decision on 8 June, which is available below. The Independent Tribunal determined that (1) Ms. Sharapova should serve a period of ineligibility of two years; (2) due to her prompt admission of her violation, that period of ineligibility should be back-dated under Article 10.10.3(b) of the Programme to commence from 26 January 2016 (the date of sample collection) and so should end at midnight on 25 January 2018; and (3) her results at the 2016 Australian Open should be disqualified, with resulting forfeiture of the ranking points and prize money that she won at that event.

While her positive test came during the January 2016 time period during which time the World Anti-Doping Agency has given a grace period, because of the uncertainty of whether athletes could have taken the substance before the ban was announced in October and still had it in their system in small concentrations in January, Sharapova admitted to taking Mildronate (meldonium) on 5 occasions in January, 2016 during the Australian Open. Sharapova and her support staff did not deny her taking it after the ban, but instead claimed that they didn’t know that Mildronate (a trade-name for meldonium) was a banned substance.

This makes the case of Sharapova, who was born in Russia but lived in the United States since the age of 7, unique from that of swimmer Yulia Efimova, whose Olympic fate is still in the air.

Efimova, a World Champion breaststroker, tested positive earlier this year for the same substance as Sharapova; however, Efimova is claiming that the presence of Meldonium in her system is a remnant from having taken it before it was outlawed.

Her former coach, Irina Vyatchanina (current coach of Viktoria Gunes, and mother of Arkady Vyatchanin) says that the amount in Efimova’s test was under the 1 microgram threshold that is being allowed by WADA, though no official data has been released to support the timing of the test or the concentration.

FINA had originally given Efimova a provisional suspension, in line with its policies, but after initially denying her request to lift that suspension, in late May they did so. That did not mean that they had cleared Efimova; rather, they determined that the case was set to go to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) anyway, and decided to allow her to compete and train with a coach until such time as it could be adjudicated.

Efimova was entered in, but wound up not racing at ,the Arena Pro Swim Series meet in Santa Clara over the weekend. Russia has not formally named her to their Olympic Team, but has left room in their selection procedures to send her if she is cleared to compete.

The CAS has not publicly announced a date for any hearings involving Efimova or FINA.

 

28
Leave a Reply

9 Comment threads
19 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
21 Comment authors
newest oldest most voted
ElevatorToTheEscalator

Hope this will set precedent for the punishment of ms. efimova.

50fr

I think she was a no show for all her events in Santa Clara

http://deadspin.com/maria-sharapova-who-was-on-so-many-pills-banned-two-y-1781292828

read the language of the tribunal and how they characterize Sharapova’s use of the drug. I hope Efimova had a better reason to take the drug than did Sharapova. Sharapova’s suspension will be appealed. The appellate opinion will be a fascinating read, regardless of the ultimate outcome.

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »

Don't want to miss anything?

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive our latest updates!