Post-NCAA Championships Big Question #2: Who Was the Swimmer of the Men’s Meet?

This is our second in a series of bigger questions about this year’s college season that we asked briefly on social media last weekend, but will dig through more deeply over the next few weeks.

Question #1: Is Michigan the Greatest Program Ever?

Just as with the first question, this is meant to be a civil discourse, informed opinion, and intelligent discussion. Just because you swim with someone who doesn’t get our vote, or swam with them in high school, or go to the same college as them, or think they have the best haircut, doesn’t mean that anybody else is an “idiot,” “hater,” or “biased,” so go ahead and leave those comments in your brains. We had some great opinions and discussion on the last post, so let’s shoot for that again.

Question 2: Who Was the Swimmer of the Men’s Meet, and How Do You Define This Award?

As with any MVP award, everyone is going to have a different definition for how to qualify the top swimmer at the 2013 Men’s NCAA Championship meet. Is it the swimmer whose team would’ve been hurt the most in the points standings without them? Is it the swimmer who scored the most individually? Is it the swimmer who had the most crucial relay impact? Is it the swimmer who had the best one or two swims and broke the most records? Does how well the team places matter? Does age matter? Does leadership matter?

For the context of this discussion, we’ll focus on 5 guys who we thought were really the standouts and stars of this meet (in alphabetical order). I’m not sure there’d be a whole lot of debate on whether or not these were the guys. If you were to make an all-star team, this would be it:

  • Kevin Cordes, Arizona, Soph.
  • Connor Jaeger, Michigan, Jr.
  • David Nolan, Stanford, Soph.
  • Tom Shields, Cal, Sr.
  • Vlad Morozov, USC, Jr.

Now, if this were a USA Swimming meet, Cordes would run away with the award. The CSCAA sent it his way in its official honor. His record-breaking swims, even in the face of three of these guys breaking NCAA Records, took things to a new level (Shields and Morozov did so as well). The 49.5 breaststroke split on a relay, the 1:48.6 on the 200 breaststroke. Those are unbelievable times.

Unlike a USA Swimming meet, or an Olympic Trials meet, though, NCAA’s are not swum in the vaccuum of solidarity. It’s not just about swimming for yourself, it’s also about swimming for your team. That’s where things start to even out on Cordes.

The young breaststroker swam only four events (the two breaststroke individuals plus the two medley relays), and as such was outscored by Nolan, Shields, and Morozov, each of whom maxed out at 7 total events.

David Nolan and Tom Shields were the two highest individual scorers of the meet. Each took two solo event victories (Nolan in the 100 back and 200 IM; Shields in the 100 and 200 butterflys). They each also added to that a runner-up finish (Nolan in the 200 back, Shields in the 100 back).

Neither of those two, though, ended up with the highest relay placing out of the group. In one of the more unusual relay outcomes we’ve seen, 5 different teams won the 5 different relays for the first time in history; Shields’ Golden Bears weren’t one of those 5 winners (and his 400 free relay didn’t make the A-Final), while two of Nolan’s relays got DQ’ed (both medleys, though neither was his fault).

Nolan won their only head-to-head race (the 100 back). Counter that, though, with the fact that Shields won the 200 fly in a 1:39.65 that tied Michael Phelps as the fastest 200 yard fly swim in history and crushed the old NCAA Record.

Then there’s Big Bad Vlad. Vlad the Impaler. The Tsar. The Czar. The Zhar (Russian for “heat,” appropriate, no?). The Slavic Slayer. The uncontainable Firebird. (References to Russian mythology? Anybody?)

He was the first swimmer under 18 seconds on a relay split in the 50 free, which really set the tone on the first day of this meet. He then broke a legendary Cesar Cielo record in the flat-start 100 free with a 40.76. He added a third A-Final in the 100 breaststroke, though he was still three points behind Nolan and Shields individually.

  • Shields: 57 individual points
  • Nolan: 57 individual points
  • Morozov: 54 individual points
  • Jaeger: 51 individual points
  • Cordes: 40 individual points

Morozov and Cordes were the only two swimmers to swim on winning relays. If you factor in Morgan Priestley’s terms of “value,” though, Arizona would’ve still been very good in the medley relays had they used Carl Mickelson or Kevin Steel on that leg instead of Cordes (they made A-finals in both relays without Cordes swimming in the morning).

USC, however, would’ve been sunk without Morozov. They closed the meet with the victory in the 400 free relay, but without Morozov it’s likely they wouldn’t have even been in the A-Final.

Connor Jaeger earns his way into this conversation both on the strength of his two event wins in the 500 and 1650, as well as a third A-Final in the individual 200 freestyle. Beyond that, Jaeger doesn’t land on top of this list in most statistical categories; he didn’t score as many points as Morozov, Shields or Nolan. He didn’t break as many records as Morozov and Cordes and Shields. He didn’t win as many relays as Morozov or Cordes, either, nor swim as many relays as Shields, Morozov, and Nolan.

He does, however, have one big tally in his column that none of the others can claim. He won two events for the Michigan Wolverines: the 2013 NCAA team champions. The team aspect is what makes this the best meet in the world, and nobody’s team was better than Jaeger’s was.

Which of those factors is most important in deciding a swimmer of the meet? All of them in some form matter, though everyone will have their own weighting to each. To me, it comes down to Cordes and Morozov for the honor. In a team meet, my edge has to go to Vlad. His individual scoring output and relay contributions outweighed those of Cordes, and that’s trumps in my book. Here’s how I’d put the top 5:

  1. Vlad Morozov, USC
  2. Kevin Cordes, Arizona
  3. Tom Shields, Cal
  4. Connor Jaeger, Michigan
  5. David Nolan, Stanford

Next year’s meet should be even better…of those five, only Tom Shields will be graduated.

In This Story

38
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of
38 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Peter
8 years ago

None of the above. I vote for Dax Hill. Defending champion in an event, coming off a tough senior year and a disappointing Olympic trials. Puts it all at risk to start swimming breaststroke on the relays so Texas has some chance at making finals. Gutsy, gutsy move to take one for the team like that!

FREEBEE
8 years ago

I’m a big Dax Hill fan and I think he went a life time best in the 100. However, he can’t make my top 8. I think it is really is a no brainer. KEVIN CORDES –swimmer of the meet!!!

Philip Johnson
8 years ago

Cordes, broke barriers by miles.

Mead
Reply to  Philip Johnson
8 years ago

Cordes did break huge barriers, but some of the fastest breastrokers in history (Kitijima, van der Burgh…) never competed NCAA or took yards seriously. However, some of the world’s top sprinters (Cielo, Adrian, Bousquet a while ago…) were very serious in yards, and Vlad out swam all of them (even when Adrian had “the suit”).

Cordes did beat some fast records, but he only swam 2 relay finals and 2 prelim/final events for 6 swims total. Vlad had 6 individual swims and 8 total relay performance for 14 swims in all. That’s not comparable, and maybe if Vlad only had 6 swims he could’ve broken more records (18.47, sub 40 split). Vlad is way more versatile and had to do… Read more »

Reply to  Mead
8 years ago

Mead.. gotta remember one thing

Cielo and Adrian never had to “catch up” anyone on the relay.. if they had.. they could have broken 18 also..

Philtonf
Reply to  Rafael Teixeira
8 years ago

It’s a 50 free. Nathan and Cesar layed it on the line and wanted to break that barrier. Vlad rides higher then maybe any 50 guy in history of sport. 5’11 maybe and to succeed at those events is amazing. Gives short guys hope. Those swims definitely have greater lasting impact on sport. Not hard to succeed when you are 6’6 like Cordes or Nathan. Short guys can rule.

Reply to  Philtonf
8 years ago

There are plenty of 6’6” guys that don’t succeed at those events. Success like Vlad’s, Adrian’s, or Cielo’s is extraordinary no matter the height.

Mead
Reply to  Rafael Teixeira
8 years ago

Actually…Adrian anchored the 200 medley relay in 2009 with an 18.23 going in .28 behind Auburn and lost the relay by .14. It was against a very good sprinter (Gideon Louw) but .28 is a reasonable comeback. That proves your argument wrong.

Jeah
8 years ago

Shields should have won it by far. He broke records, helped out relays, had a fastest relay split in history (which wasn’t mentioned above), tied Michael Phelps’ American record in 2 fly, and helped his team to a second place finish.

Travis
8 years ago

All factors considered, I’d say Shields was the swimmer of the meet. He tied for highest individual points, tied Phelps’ American record in the 2 fly, and had the fastest all time 100 fly split in the 400 medley relay.

SwimSam
8 years ago

A quick clarification on the article above… the award mentioned above is presented by the College Swimming Coaches Association of America (CSCAA) and is not actually an official part of the NCAA Championships. The NCAA does not recognize Swimmers/Divers/Coaches of the year/meet at the D1 championships.

While it might not have been noticed by many folks, the NCAA requires that the final Team Trophy presentation be announced and champions celebration to be essentially complete before the NCAA provides the CSCAA an opportunity to announce their award winners. Also, the award winners are selected as part of an on-site vote by the coaches in attendance.

That being said, all five of the guys mentioned above were worthy of strong consideration… Read more »

Scott
8 years ago

Though I find Cordes record amazing, it seems those voting for him are really placing a lot more emphasis on it then I think is fair for this award seeing that he only swam 4 events. Shields record setting/tying performance came in his 6th event, on the final night – the night after winning the 100 fly and taking second to Nolan in back. Had he only swum 4 events like Cordes he may have shattered Phelps’ record. Just saying I think it is hard to compare how much a record is beaten by when some of those athletes were swimming a lot more for their team than others.

rjcid
8 years ago

I was there and I think it should have been co-winners. Cordes and Morozov should have shared the honors.

Cordes and Morozov showed us all that its possible to go even faster. They both deserved it equally. Shields came close behind simply because his 400 free relay was not in top 8.

The mental impact both those swimmers have on their respective events will ripple through the sport for years to come. Just as the 19 was the benchmark of greatness, both these guys set that bar pretty high for elite swimmers.

Nolan and Jaeger could both have been winners any other year.

Jeah
Reply to  rjcid
8 years ago

You said Shields came close behind because his 400 free relay was not in the top 8… Cordes wasn’t even on the 200, 400, or 800 free relays. So how does that put Shields behind Cordes?

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder/co-owner of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »