TritonWear Analysis: 2017 Women’s NCAA Championships 100 Free

by SwimSwam Partner Content 9

March 19th, 2017 News

TritonWear and Swim Swam are bringing you the best in swimming race analysis. With the power of TritonWear, you can have an in-depth analysis of your practice every day with zero effort. Stay up-to-date with this live NCAA race analysis by following TritonWear after visiting their full race analysis page through the link at the bottom.

The freestyle events at the NCAA D1 Women’s Championships have been especially exciting this year with some of the fastest swimming ever seen.

The 100 free was no exception, and once again, it was very much a 3-woman race coming out of prelims between Simone Manuel, Olivia Smoliga, and Mallory Comerford who all clocked sub-47’s in their morning swims.

Manuel, the current NCAA record holder of 46.09, had the top seed heading into finals by over half a second with a 46.30 and she was looking for a big win tonight after being overtaken in the final lap of the 200 Free yesterday to claim third.

The final was a packed heat filled with 7 Olympians and promised to be a race for the history books as the swimmers lined up behind the blocks.

Off the blocks, Smoliga had a blistering first 25 to take the early lead with powerful, long underwaters where she stayed under almost 5 seconds to break out ahead of the field combined with a strong stroke rate of 1.11 seconds/cycle. However, Manuel was close behind and managed to overtake the Bulldog’s sprinter with her unmatched turns – see in the analysis below how her turns are faster than the other top Women at 0.75 seconds.

By the 50, Manuel split a 21.90 – well ahead of record pace – and had a commanding lead at almost half a body length ahead of Smoliga, Comerford, and the rest of the field. At this point, Comerford was neck and neck with Smoliga.

At the 75, Manuel held an uncatchable lead and it’s a battle for second and third. Smoliga looked to be ahead after the breakout, but the only non-Olympian in the field, Comerford, pushed hard to the wall with her powerful stroke and fast rate of 1.13 seconds/cycle. It would unfortunately not be enough and she would touch in third, only five one-hundredths behind Smoliga. Stanford’s Lia Neal put in a strong back 50 with the fastest stroke rate in the field to touch in fourth and also break the 47 barrier at 46.76 for a new PB.

However, it was Simone Manuel who stole the show with her NCAA and American Record breaking swim of 45.56, the first woman ever under 46 and breaking the record by over half a second.

Swim analysis courtesy of TritonWear, a SwimSwam partner. 

In This Story

9
Leave a Reply

Subscribe
Notify of

9 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
StuartC
7 years ago

Am I missing something for stroke rate (sec/stroke). If you take Simon’s stroke number (11) for first 25 and multiple by stroke rate you get 12.43 seconds for first 25 but her total first 25 was 10. 55! Is stroke rate time then for a complete arm cycle? if so then stroke rate should really be called stroke cycle (sec/cycle) or time in seconds should be divided by 2 to achieve “time/stroke” data.

StuartC
Reply to  StuartC
7 years ago

multiple should be multiply

bobo gigi
7 years ago
AvidSwimFan
Reply to  bobo gigi
7 years ago

Thanks for this gift. I can’t stop re-watching. Every time I do, I still find it just as jaw dropping as the first time.

Swimclh
7 years ago

Love to see this!!! Very interesting… I think statistical analysis of swimming is the future of coaching.

Just Wondering....
7 years ago

Technically speaking, in this race turn times were really the difference. Simone’s total turn time is 2.29 sec. Olivia’s total turn time is 2.93. Difference is 0.64. If we subtract the 0.64 from Olivia’s time, she goes 45.66.

AvidSwimFan
Reply to  Just Wondering....
7 years ago

Part of what gives you the turn time is your speed into the wall and your form.

Just Wondering....
Reply to  AvidSwimFan
7 years ago

Actually, that’s not really correct either if you use the data provided. As an example finishing in 7th place was Chantal Van Landegham. Her total turn time was 2.21 verses Simone’s 2.29. She went 47.7 quite a bit slower than Simone’s 45.56, but with a faster over all turn time.

CBswims
7 years ago

Interesting to see. thanks.