Member of USA Swimming Age Group Committee Appeals for Tech Suit Votes

On Saturday, the USA Swimming House of Delegates will vote on a number of regulations, including a proposal to limit tech suits for 12 * under swimmers. Breandan Gibbons, a member of the USA Swimming Age Group Development Committee, which led a study into the matter and ultimately favored a ban of some sort, has made a last-minute appeal for voting members of the House of Delegates to vote in favor of the ban.

The regulation as written would outlaw technical suits except for meets in USA Swimming’s Championship Series (Sectionals, Futures, Jr Nationals, Pro Swim Series, US Open, Nationals, Olympic Trials) or YMCA Nationals.

The working definition would count suits as technical suits if they have:

  1. bonded or taped seams regardless of its fabric or silhouette, or
  2. any male or female suit with “woven fabric extending to the knee or mid-thigh” regardless of the type of seams.

Breandan Gibbons is a lifelong swimmer, starting at age 7 with the Star Swim Team in St. Paul, MN, who is on the age group development committee of USA Swimming. He is currently a freshman on the swim team at Fordham University in New York City. 

The following represents the opinion of its author Breandan Gibbons and does not necessarily reflect the views of SwimSwam.

I am one of the Athlete members of USA Swimming’s Age Group Development Committee and here’s why I want to ban tech suits for 12 & under swimmers:

Youth sports are too damn expensive and everyone knows it. Swimming is no exception. But with a concerted effort from those in all levels of the sport, it can be the exception. Change can happen starting this week at USA Swimming’s annual convention if the House of Delegates restricts the use of tech suits for 12 & under competition.

Many other pieces of legislation are required to solidify the change, but next week the House of Delegates can send a message to parents, athletes, coaches, and all involved in swimming that the sport is not open for business for those trying to make the most money possible.

My goal is to make swimming as easy for anyone to swim as possible. This is the first step.

Further, restricting high level tech suits removes alleviates pressure from kids who have barely started middle school to succeed at a high level. As a study from Amanda Visik and George Washington University shows, winning and competing is not fun for kids in youth sports. Removing some of that pressure can help refocus the sport on other parts of athletics kids find more fun like “trying their best,” “working as a team,” and other far more valuable characteristics that go beyond a fast 50 freestyle time.

Swimming is just the means to an end for most athletes involved in the sport and the level of financial commitment should reflect that. Only the top six athletes in each event make the National Team and only two athletes from each event make the Olympic team every four years. That compared to the 354,627 year round athletes registered with USA Swimming show that the priority should be placed on making the sport as positive and as accessible for those 354,627 athletes as possible.

USA Swimming needs to give families flexibility that other youth sports organizations do not afford to their members. Financial strangling from youth sports brought about by lack of regulation created the “Income Disparity” Linda Flanagan wrote about in her article for The Atlantic.

If USA Swimming can create space for those who cannot afford any other youth sports options, it will be a boon for membership and a triumph for the sport. A triumph that no other sports organization accomplished.

Of course there is not currently a rule requiring athletes to wear high level suits, but in the current climate of the sport, it seems that swimmers need to have tech suits to compete with others. It is basic group psychology, if a child sees that their friend has something, they want it. This became clear to me when surveying 12 & under athletes. I gave one survey to one athlete on one team and although these surveys looked like math homework, everyone on that team saw their friend had a survey and wanted one.

Similar mentality comes to play with technical suits. Dr. Stacy Nelson of VitalSmarts has an example in his book Influencers of a shipping company that struggled with their efficiency because employees would not fill their shipping containers. The solution was not to incentivize filling the boxes, it was simply putting a “Fill Line” on the boxes.

Tech suits are that “Fill Line” for age group swimmers. They see their competition decked out and that influences every age group swimmer to want one of those suits.

I spent the summer surveying athletes and parents about the proposed legislation and there is a majority in both demographics that support the legislation. In addition to showing support for the legislation, they also showed how USA Swimming has failed its membership in providing an affordable sporting opportunity where athletes can learn values that apply outside the 25 yards or 50 meters of a swimming pool.

Many parents complained that the suits were just one part of the overall cost of youth sports in America. These anecdotes are corroborated by Mark Hyman in his book Most Expensive Game in Town: The Rising Cost of Youth Sports in America. Hyman finds example after example of corporations pushing kids and parents closer and closer to the edge until they fall over and leave the sport.

Delegates have a choice: make a change to address what is clearly a problem or leave USA Swimming in a scenario in which it cannot win.

Corporations are the only ones who in the current scenario. Athletes don’t win, parents don’t win, USA Swimming doesn’t win.

39
Leave a Reply

14 Comment threads
25 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
28 Comment authors
newest oldest most voted
John Prokos

Why not just restrict them to championship meets for younger swimmers instead of creating an age limit. Regionals/State/Zones. The truth is at the younger ages they really don’t make a difference in speed that better technique can’t compensate for anyway. So there is really no advantage and no reason to “level the playing field”.

Gde

How much does it cost to get “better technique”? When you are talking about kids who are looking at making the BB->A or A->AA progression, it can be very small adjustments that don’t typically get noticed in club practice. Is $50-100 for an hour 1:1 clinic. How about the difference in the cost of swimming for an elite club where they use underwater camera and give top swimmers the attention to get them to zones and beyond, vs. a community based club that costs 1/2 as much to join, and is super thrilled if someone makes an A cut, and focuses on mostly on getting the little kids to finish 4 legal strokes. There is always an uneven playing field… Read more »

Adam

1 – “Youth sports are too damn expensive and everyone knows it.” Not stating my stance on the suit issue, I really do not care, but using fowl language and the “everyone knows it” statement is one of the worse ways to present a position. 2 – USA does a great job providing opportunities and flexibility for all athletes to swim and does an exceptional job making it affordable. 3 – When corporations win, corporations create more jobs and those corporations are able to sponsor teams, coaches, and professional athletes. Our team is able to help support several of our families and it is largely due to partnerships made from those corporations. 4 – Comparison is the thievery of joy.… Read more »

coachmdl

“To me, it seems like there are much bigger issues in swimming to work on. The 12 under suit issue just needs to be something coaches continue to work at their team level.” Yes.

Mustangswimdad

I have changed my mind when it comes to buying a tech suit for my child. Yes, initially I believed that it should be the parents’ decision to buy the tech suit for their child. However, this just means that virtually everyone at TAGS is swimming with a tech suit. This just makes it “mandatory” for parents to buy a tech suit rather than making it a choice for parents to buy it or not. If it is not a choice, then I’d rather than USA Swimming ban tech suits to create an even level playing field for everyone.

Ferb

So, you’re only okay with tech suits if some parents choose not to buy them, thereby giving your kid an advantage?

Adam

Teaching a 12 and under how to have fun, supporting them when they fail, and the importance of effort are what we are teaching our 12 and unders. Some wear fast suits and the “big meets” some don’t.

We don’t push “winning” until they are older and understand that failing is part of life.

Yabo

Corporations don’t care about you, they don’t care about your team, and they most certainly don’t care about the swimmers. All corporations care about is what will make there shareholders happy, and if that happens to maybe benefit a team it was a happy accident. If they made more money by not sponsoring teams they absolutely wouldnt

Swammer

Is “damn” too offensive of a word for you?

Swimmlmstl

I think he was saying it’s not the mature way to state an argument ?

Swimmer

It’s our damn money! It is our decision!

Yabo

It’s not about ur money, it’s about develop athletes in the best way possible

Jojo

There are many families who can’t afford these suits and should not be put at a disadvantage due to their financial situation. Breaking records whether they be WR, NAG or even personal records can be cherished more when you know you did the work and not a suit. I personally don’t want a 10 year old biedermann record.

Buy what you want and hand-time your kid in their tech suit.

Hswimmer

Why would you want to spend that much money on a swimsuit anyway lol

JojoNV

I don’t spend that much money. I spend a pittance compared to others but I don’t condemn them for it. Rather, I teach my kid that tech suit or not, you still have to show up on race day. Best feeling ever? Wearing a Dolfin Ugly and smokin’ the tech suits in the lanes next to you. That’s a real life lesson that kids will remember.

Angela Kramer

Ok. Your money and your decision, so long as the rest of us and our children do not have feelings! So it is fine therefore, for the rest of us “trashy folk” without million $ incomes and homes to not have swimming as an option? I guess option means having the money and all the perks to go with those selfish and isolationist views too? Oh. I know! We poor folk can participate as long as our children do not delude themselves into thinking they might be able to compete at the USA or State level Without those SPECIAL SUITS! We all know that without a compression suit they haven’t got a prayer! I know, we poor folk do not… Read more »

About Braden Keith

Braden Keith

Braden Keith is the Editor-in-Chief and a co-founder of SwimSwam.com. He first got his feet wet by building The Swimmers' Circle beginning in January 2010, and now comes to SwimSwam to use that experience and help build a new leader in the sport of swimming. Aside from his life on the InterWet, …

Read More »

Want to take your swimfandom to the next level?

Subscribe to SwimSwam Magazine!